Abstract
The application of three-dimensional (3D) printing is growing explosively in the medical field, and is especially widespread in the clinical use of fabricating upper limb orthosis and prosthesis. Advantages of 3D-printed orthosis compared to conventional ones include its lower cost, easier modification, and faster fabrication. Hands are the most common body parts involved with burn victims and one of the main complications of hand burns are finger joint contractures. Applying orthotic devices such as finger splints are a well-established essential element of burn care. In spite of the rapid evolution of the clinical use of 3D printing, to our knowledge, its application to hand burn patients has not yet been reported. In this study, the authors present a series of patients with hand burn injuries whose orthotic needs were fulfilled with the application of 3D-printed finger splints.
-
Keywords: Three-dimensional printing, Burns, Orthotic devices
INTRODUCTION
Hands are the most common body part injured when burns occur, although they comprise only 3%–5% of body surface area [
1]. Post-burn patients suffer from various complications such as joint contracture, hypertrophic scars, and peripheral nerve injury. In particular, finger joints are the most common site of joint motion disorder [
2]. Post-burn deformities of the hand are functionally limiting and serve as a visual stigma to the patient [
3]. Comprehensive interventions including early excision and grafting, early joint mobilization, scar care, and splinting are necessary to help prevent joint contracture. Orthosis application is an important practice that should be maintained throughout the entire process of burn care. One domestic survey revealed finger splints were the most common prescription for burn patients after injury (44.2%), and finger extension splints were the most prevalent type of finger splints (29.3%), followed by thumb web spacers [
4].
Post-burn patients often require serial splinting to prevent grafted skin breakdown or a hypertrophic scar, and the majority of the orthosis should be fabricated individually to meet the special conditions of burn patients [
4]. Although conventional orthoses made with thermoplastic techniques are most widely used, their complexity and higher cost can be a burden to burn patients. Patients’ orthotic and prosthetic needs may be better met with simpler solutions. Along with the developments in computer aided design (CAD) programs, online open-source file sharing, and increasing availability of three-dimensional (3D) printers, there has been an increase in interest of the low-cost custom 3D printed orthotic devices. The authors report three cases of patients with deep hand burns whose post-burn joint contractures were successfully managed with the use of 3D-printed finger splints.
CASE REPORTS
CAD programs and 3D printers (
Fig. 1) were used to fabricate the finger splints. Using the free open-source hand design, Thingiverse (MakerBot Industries, Brooklyn, NY, USA), all designs were modified individually with Rhinoceros 5.0 (Robert McNeel & Associates, Seattle, WA, USA) or Simplify3D (Simplify3D, Cincinnati, OH, USA). Since the finger splint designs used in this study did not require total contact with the affected finger, we measured each patient’s finger length with the small joints and modified the design with the above mentioned CAD programs instead of using a 3D scanner. The designed splint was printed with FlashForge Creator Pro (Flash-Forge, City of industry, CA, USA) using the fused deposition modeling (FDM), which involved stacking up melted flexible thermoplastic elastomer filaments layer by layer [
5]. The plastic monofilaments used were either thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) for the soft material splint or polylactic acid (PLA) for the hard material splint, which are the same thermoplastic materials used in manufacturing conventional orthosis. For post-processing, the rough surface of the 3D printed finger splints was smoothed by chisel and sandpaper.
A 21-year-old female visited the ER due to bare skin defect on face, trunk, genitalia, and both upper and lower extremities. Deep second- and third-degree burns covering 47% of the whole body surface was diagnosed. Multiple surgeries including an escharectomy and allograft, and split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) were performed. When referred to the rehabilitation department, she showed left hand, shoulder, and right knee joint contractures. On physical exam, she showed distal interphalangeal joint (DIP), proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion, extension limitation, and angulation deformity in all digits of the left hand (
Fig. 2). Active range of motion (ROM) of the left metacarpophalangeal (MP), PIP, and DIP joints was fixed to 0°. To prevent flexion contracture of finger joints and angulation deformity due to hypertrophic scaring, a 3D-printed hard material finger extension splint with PLA monofilaments was applied to her 2nd and 5th fingers. She was advised to keep the splints on for 24 hours a day, and other rehabilitation management included stretching of all contracted joints, wearing a compression garment, applying moisturizing treatments, followed by laser therapy for hypertrophic scar tissue. On the last follow-up evaluation after 18 months, her finger motion was sustained to avoid further reconstruction surgery for the hand deformity. Although she was not able to perform pinch and opposition with left fingers, the 3rd to the 5th digit MP, PIP, DIP ROM was improved to 30°–40° of flexion with full active finger extensions, and she could make a weak grasp. Total modified Barthel index (MBI) score was changed from 84 to 91 with the subsequent improvement of personal hygiene and in the bathing, feeding, and dressing domains.
A 39-year-old female was referred to the rehabilitation outpatient clinic due to left 3rd to 5th finger contractures. Her left hand was crushed under a hot press machine, and she received early escharectomy, debridement and STSG for the bare skin defect on the left hand dorsum and 3rd to 5th fingers 3 months ago. On surgical exploration, her extensor tendon injury was extensive with 3rd to 4th PIP joint dislocations. She presented claw hand deformity with the 3rd, 4th, and 5th fingers MP extension and PIP flexion contracture (
Fig. 3A,
3B). On initial ROM evaluation the 3rd, 4rth, and 5th MP flexion was limited to 70°, 40°, 55°, and PIP was fixed to 65°, 60°, 0° of flexion, respectively. Electrodiagnostic evaluation revealed reduced amplitude of dorsal ulnar cutaneous nerve and abnormal spontaneous activities as well as reduced recruitment at dorsal interossei muscles, which suggests an ulnar nerve lesion at or around the burn site level. Since reconstruction surgery was not possible due to severe soft tissue defects, we applied a hard-material correction finger extension splint 3D printed with PLA monofilaments to her 3rd and 4th fingers to prevent flexion contracture (
Fig. 3C,
3D). At examination 18 months later, ROM was slightly improved to 3rd to 5th MP flexion 85°, 75°, 65°; PIP flexion 80°, 70°, 0°; and PIP extension -50°, -65°, 0°, respectively. She was able to make a fist, perform all pinch motions and oppositions with all five fingers. Total MBI score remained constant with 95 requiring minimal assistance for bathing, feeding, and dressing domains.
A 37-year-old male burned both of his hands while touching the peeled sheath of a cable. He was diagnosed with deep second- to third-degree electrical burns involving both of his hands, and received multiple surgeries including debridement and peroneal artery perforator free flap on the right 2nd finger, and debridement and STSG of the right 3rd and 4th, and left 2nd fingers. Operative findings revealed necrotic change on the right 2nd extensor tendon, which was removed. When he was referred to the rehabilitation department, he presented a mallet finger deformity of the right 2nd finger (
Fig. 4A). On ROM evaluation, the right 2nd finger DIP joint was fixed to 45°. At first, we applied a static molded plastic splint for the mallet finger (
Fig. 4B). However, he showed poor compliance due to an irritation of the flapped dorsal skin underneath the splint. We changed the splint to the 3D-printed soft material finger extension splint with TPU monofilaments to minimize the skin irritation (
Fig. 4C,
4D). Due to good adherence to the new splint, his digit maintained a neutral position. Twelve months after the initial injury, he received flap debulking and local flap surgery to repair the extensor tendon gap of the right 2nd finger.
DISCUSSION
Along with the rapid evolution of CAD, 3D scanning, and capabilities of the 3D printer, the 3D printer’s application to rehabilitation field bears tremendous potential. The availability of 3D printing offers the ability to fabricate low-cost, light-weight, durable, and easily replaceable hand and finger orthotic devices compared to preparing a conventional orthosis [
6]. The greatest advantage to post-burn patients is its easy adjustability to fit the changing needs or underlying hand conditions using the stored 3D image files.
Compliance in using an orthosis has a very important role in improving the function of a patient. Although no systematic survey has been conducted on the adherence to the orthosis among the post-burn patients, noncompliance due to pain, edema, or skin problems are well-known precautions preventing use [
4]. Cost is another obstacle for the post-burn patients who often require serial changes of orthotic devices. In our three case investigations, one patient showed poor compliance to the conventional finger splint, and one patient hesitated to use the conventional orthosis due to the high cost. It took about 1 hour and less than US$1 (considering only the cost of plastic monofilaments materials) to fabricate each finger splint. And all patients were satisfied with the use of 3D printed splints.
In this study, we applied finger extension splints to three patients made with CAD and a 3D printer. This is only an introductory report on the use of 3D printed splints in post-burn patients and it lacks a direct comparison between the conventionally applied splints. Another limitation of this study is that objective measures of patient satisfaction or functional outcome were not used. Further research should establish the feasibility of this technology as it might be a greater alternative to the conventional orthosis for post-burn patients.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (No. HI15C1486).
Fig. 1.(A) Three-dimensional (3D) printer (Creator Pro; FlashForge, City of industry, CA, USA). (B) Anatomy of the 3D printer.
Fig. 2.Post burn hand deformity of Case 1. (A) All digits of the left hand and (B) both hands.
Fig. 3.(A, B) Post burn claw hand deformity caused by ulnar nerve injury. (C, D) Three-dimensional printed hard material finger extension splint design in Case 2.
Fig. 4.(A) Post burn mallet finger deformity caused by extensor tendon injury. (B) Conventional plastic static splint. (C, D) Threedimensional printed soft material finger extension splint design in Case 3.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sorkin M, Cholok D, Levi B. Scar Management of the Burned Hand. Hand Clin 2017;33:305-15.
- 2. Choi JS, Mun JH, Lee JY, Jeon JH, Jung YJ, Seo CH, et al. Effects of modified dynamic metacarpophalangeal joint flexion orthoses after hand burn. Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35:880-6.
- 3. Brown M, Chung KC. Postburn contractures of the hand. Hand Clin 2017;33:317-31.
- 4. Jang KU, Seo CH, Kim MK, Moon CH, Yang JI, Kim JW, et al. The distribution analysis of orthotics in burn rehabilitation. J Korean Burn Soc 2004;7:98-103.
- 5. Lee KH, Kim SJ, Cha YH, Kim JL, Kim DK, Kim SJ. Three-dimensional printed prosthesis demonstrates functional improvement in a patient with an amputated thumb: a technical note. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018;42:107-11.
- 6. Burn MB, Ta A, Gogola GR. Three-dimensional printing of prosthetic hands for children. J Hand Surg Am 2016;41:e103. -9.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Comparison of low temperature thermoplastic and 3D printed (TPU and PLA) CMC joint stabilization orthoses in healthy participants
Enver Güven, Ali Koray Özgün, Serap Alsancak
Scientific Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef - Motion-Mimicking Robotic Finger Prosthesis for Burn-induced Partial Hand Amputee: A Case Report
So Young Joo, Yoon Soo Cho, Jisu Seo, Yurim Seo, Sangho Yi, Cheong Hoon Seo
Journal of Burn Care & Research.2025; 46(1): 230. CrossRef - A national survey of conservative mallet finger injury care and the potential for 3D printing to impact current practice
Una M. Cronin, Dr. Niamh M. Cummins, Dr. Aidan O’ Sullivan, Prof. Damien Ryan, Prof. Leonard O'Sullivan
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine.2025; 17: 100184. CrossRef - Response to Letter to the Editor “Motion-Mimicking Robotic Finger Prosthesis for Burn-Induced Partial Hand Amputee: A Case Report—Correspondence”
So Young Joo,, Yoon Soo Cho,, Sangho Yi,, Cheong Hoon Seo,
Journal of Burn Care & Research.2025; 46(3): 679. CrossRef - 3D-printed orthoses vs. traditional plaster cast: a comparative clinical study
Ciprian Glazer, Mihaela Oravitan, Corina Pantea, Alexandra Mihaela Stanila, Nicolae-Adrian Jurjiu, Andreea Totok, Mihai Petru Marghitas, Claudiu Avram
Balneo and PRM Research Journal.2025; 16(Vol 16 No.): 785. CrossRef - Finger Orthoses for Rehabilitation―Part I: Biomedical Insights and Additive Manufacturing Innovations
Alireza Nouri, Lijing Wang, Hamed Bakhtiari, Yuncang Li, Cuie Wen
Prosthesis.2025; 7(3): 62. CrossRef - Hand orthoses–related factors affecting patient satisfaction and adherence: A scoping review and checklist design
Maryam Farzad, Joy C. MacDermid, Marjan Saeedi, Steven Cuypers
Prosthetics & Orthotics International.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Additive Manufacturing and Upper-Limb Orthoses: A Scoping Review
Amy Gehner, Dianna Lunsford
JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics.2024; 36(1): e25. CrossRef - An adjustable and customised finger splint to improve mallet finger treatment compliance and outcomes
Shi Lei Teng, Yoke Rung Wong, Peggy Poh Hoon Lim, Duncan Angus McGrouther
Annals of 3D Printed Medicine.2024; 13: 100142. CrossRef - Minimizing post-operative burn contracture through customized inter-phalangeal static stent: Analysis of digital vs conventional workflows - Case Report
Shubham Sharma, Ritty Jeba E., Parag Dua, Saurav Kumar
Journal of Indian Dental Association.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - A Review on 3D Scanners Studies for Producing Customized Orthoses
Rui Silva, Bruna Silva, Cristiana Fernandes, Pedro Morouço, Nuno Alves, António Veloso
Sensors.2024; 24(5): 1373. CrossRef - 3D printed personalized assistive devices: A material, technique, and medical condition perspective
Srija Vennam, Vijayasankar KN, Falguni Pati
Applied Materials Today.2024; 40: 102403. CrossRef - Effectiveness of hand reconstruction techniques for the treatment of postburn contractures of the hand: A systematic review
Christos Vosinakis, Simona Ippoliti, Efthimios Samoladas, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Irene E. Gamatsi, Lee Smith, Chryssa Pourzitaki
Burns.2024; 50(9): 107281. CrossRef - Utilization of 3D printed orthoses for musculoskeletal conditions of the upper extremity: A systematic review
Deborah A. Schwartz, Katherine A. Schofield
Journal of Hand Therapy.2023; 36(1): 166. CrossRef - Rehabilitation interventions after hand burn injury in adults: A systematic review
Zoë Edger-Lacoursière, Erika Deziel, Bernadette Nedelec
Burns.2023; 49(3): 516. CrossRef - Application of a 3D-Printed Writing–Typing Assistive Device in Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Ji Hwan Kim, Hee Seung Yang, Seung Hyun Han, Byung Min Lee, Youn Kyung Lee, Woo Sob Sim, Gwan Su Park, Seul Bin Na Lee, Min Jo
Applied Sciences.2022; 12(18): 9037. CrossRef - Application of 3D Printing Technology in the Medical Field
Bingwei Gao, Hongjian Zhao, Hongtao Yu, Yihan Lin, Jun Liu, Jiawei Wang
Recent Advances in Electrical & Electronic Engineering (Formerly Recent Patents on Electrical & Electronic Engineering).2022; 15(8): 621. CrossRef - Manufacture and clinical application of the forearm pronation’s assistant tableware in the severely burned
Jia-Jia Shi, Ying Sun, Shan-Shan Pan, Ting-Ting Xu, Jia-Jia Hua
Burns.2021; 47(3): 684. CrossRef - In-hospital professional production of patient-specific 3D-printed devices for hand and wrist rehabilitation
M. Keller, A. Guebeli, Florian Thieringer, Philipp Honigmann
Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation.2021; 40(2): 126. CrossRef - Direct 3D Printing of a hand splint using Reverse Engineering
J Kechagias, K Kitsakis, A Zacharias, K Theocharis, K-E Aslani, M Petousis, N A Fountas, N M Vaxevadnidis
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.2021; 1037(1): 012019. CrossRef - Three-dimensional Printed Customized Adjustable Mallet Finger Splint: A Cheap, Effective, and Comfortable Alternative
Theodora Papavasiliou, Rushabh K. Shah, Stelios Chatzimichail, Lauren Uppal, Jeffrey C.Y. Chan
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open.2021; 9(3): e3500. CrossRef - Overview of In‐Hospital 3D Printing and Practical Applications in Hand Surgery
Marco Keller, Alissa Guebeli, Florian Thieringer, Philipp Honigmann, Xiaojun Duan
BioMed Research International.2021;[Epub] CrossRef - Clinical Utility of an Exoskeleton Robot Using Three-Dimensional Scanner Modeling in Burn Patient: A Case Report
So Young Joo, Seung Yeol Lee, Yoon Soo Cho, Sangho Yi, Cheong Hoon Seo
Journal of Burn Care & Research.2021; 42(5): 1030. CrossRef - Customized Power Wheelchair Joysticks Made by Three-Dimensional Printing Technology: A Pilot Study on the Environmental Adaptation Effects for Severe Quadriplegia
Hee Dong Shin, Da Hyun Ahn, Hyun Ah Lee, Yun Kyung Lee, Hee Seung Yang, Min Jo, Seul Bin Na Lee, Gwan Su Park, Yun Sub Hwang, Woo Sob Sim, Sung-Jun Park
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(14): 7464. CrossRef - Effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions: A scoping review
T. A. M. Oud, E. Lazzari, H. J. H. Gijsbers, M. Gobbo, F. Nollet, M. A. Brehm, David Benjamin Lumenta
PLOS ONE.2021; 16(11): e0260271. CrossRef - Trends in 3D Printing Processes for Biomedical Field: Opportunities and Challenges
Alina Ghilan, Aurica P. Chiriac, Loredana E. Nita, Alina G. Rusu, Iordana Neamtu, Vlad Mihai Chiriac
Journal of Polymers and the Environment.2020; 28(5): 1345. CrossRef - The functional effect of 3D-printing individualized orthosis for patients with peripheral nerve injuries
Dong-Sik Chae, Da-Ham Kim, Kyung-Yil Kang, Doo-Young Kim, Si-Woon Park, Sung-Jun Park, Jae-Hyung Kim
Medicine.2020; 99(16): e19791. CrossRef - 3D printing technologies in the treatment of patients with injuries and diseases of the forearm and hand
V V Khominets, S A Peleshok, D A Volov, M V Titova, M I Eliseeva, S V Kushnarev, A V Shirshin, V N Adamenko, Ya I Nebylitsa
Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy.2020; 22(1): 113. CrossRef - 3D printing in hand surgery
V. Matter-Parrat, P. Liverneaux
Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation.2019; 38(6): 338. CrossRef
, Cheong Hoon Seo, MD2
