Ann Rehabil Med Search

CLOSE


Ann Rehabil Med > Volume 41(6); 2017 > Article
Pyo, Kim, Park, Hong, and Kim: Effects of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Stroke Patients' Health Related Quality of Life and Their Performance Scale

Abstract

Objective

To identify the effects of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in stroke patients since OAB symptoms are common in such patients, but their effects on stroke rehabilitation over time are unclear.

Methods

This study included 30 post-acute stroke patients who had been admitted for rehabilitation treatments. All participants completed a questionnaire evaluating urinary symptoms, including the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) and general HRQOL with a Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health survey. We assessed their performance in terms of the Function Ambulation Category, Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Modified Barthel Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). All assessments were carried out twice at baseline and at 3 months. We divided patients into an OAB and non-OAB group with OABSS. A correlation analysis and multivariate regression were then performed.

Results

All performance scales showed an improvement over 3 months in the non-OAB group (n=18; p<0.02), but, MRS and MMSE scores did not improve significantly in the OAB group (n=12) (p=0.15 and p=0.20, respectively). In the OAB group, the vitality and mental health scores significantly decreased over 3 months (p=0.011 and p=0,041, respectively), and the mental component summary (MCS) score showed a marginal decrease over 3 months (p=0.05). A multivariate regression analysis revealed that OAB symptoms were negatively correlated with the 3 months MCS score (B=−8.15, p=0.034).

Conclusion

These results indicated that OAB symptoms could have negative effects on HRQOL and performance in patients suffering from a stroke.

INTRODUCTION

Stroke causes significant changes in the urinary system, and various urinary symptoms appear. Urinary incontinence is a known predictor of moderate to severe stroke [1], and the prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after a stroke was higher in stroke patients (64%) than in the general population (34%) [2].
An overactive bladder (OAB) is defined by the International Continence Society for patients with urinary urgency, with or without urge incontinence, and with urinary frequency and nocturia, but in the absence of infection or obvious neoplastic, metabolic, or other pathologies [3]. OAB is related to physical and mental health as well as to other symptoms, including skin breakdown due to leakage, sleep disturbance, fall-related injuries, depression, prolonged hospital stays, admission to a nursing home, and lower quality of life (QOL) [4,5]. Stroke is known as a risk factor for OAB [6], and the OAB prevalence is 12.4%–53.1% in elderly adults [7,8,9]. However, little is known about the prevalence of OAB in stroke patients. Itoh et al. [10] found that of 500 stroke patients, 28% had OAB.
Although OAB is considered to be highly prevalent, its etiology remains unknown. The pathophysiology of OAB is complex and involves both peripheral and central nervous system factors. An increased afferent activity, decreased capacity to process afferent information, decreased suprapontine inhibition, and increased sensitivity to contraction-mediating transmitters are all potential central nervous system causes of OAB that can be induced by stroke.
OAB is an embarrassing condition that interferes with social functioning and daily living activities. However, caregivers and medical staff can overlook a diagnosis of OAB, which may result in an undertreatment of its symptoms. In contrast, urinary incontinence that obviously lowers the health-related QOL (HRQOL) of patients and caregivers can easily be noticed and treated [11]. Although a large proportion of stroke patients seem to have low HRQOL due to OAB symptoms, few studies have investigated the effect of OAB symptoms on stroke patients' HRQOL, especially during rehabilitation.
To understand the effect of OAB symptoms in stroke patients' HRQOL, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey at baseline and at 3 months of follow-up and analyzed the results together with clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and study design

We screened patients who had experienced a stroke and who were admitted to the rehabilitation center between March 2014 and May 2016. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the patient was diagnosed with stroke, (2) the lesion was confirmed via brain magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography imaging, (3) more than 1 month passed after the onset of the stroke, (4) the patient's age was between 20 to 80 years, (5) the patients maintained intact cognitive function and were able to understand and complete the questionnaire. Patients with urinary tract infection, chronic renal failure, pelvic organ prolapse, urethral stricture, prostate-related operation history, prostate specific antigen (PSA) of more than 4.0 ng/mL, history of bladder cancer, severe medical comorbidities, and cognitive impairment disorder were excluded. Patients who were unable to void spontaneously or whose postvoid residual urine volume was greater than 300 mL [12], who had OAB symptoms or urinary incontinence from 6 months before onset, and who did not complete the questionnaire were also excluded.
A total of 30 stroke patients (14 female, 16 male) were enrolled in this study and signed the informed consent forms. Participants were divided into two groups: an OAB group and non-OAB group according to the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), which is a screening tool for OAB symptoms. The OAB group was defined with an urgency score of 2 or more and a total score of 3 or more, in accordance with previous studies [13].
The participants were surveyed to evaluate their HRQOL, and their performance was assessed twice: at the time of enrollment and 3 months later after the baseline survey. A transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) was performed, and the PSA level was assessed in men. All patients were subjected to uroflowmetry to evaluate the urine flow rate.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Rehabilitation Center (IRB No. NRC-2014-01-006), and all participants gave written informed consent.

Questionnaire

OABSS was developed to screen patients with OAB symptoms and to evaluate the severity of OAB symptoms [14,15], and it was recorded in all patients. It consists of four questions covering the daytime frequency, nocturia, urgency, and urgency incontinence, with maximal scores of 2, 3, 5, and 5, respectively. Since urinary urgency is the core symptom of OAB, the OAB group was defined with an urgency score of 2 and total OABSS score of 3 or more [13].
We conducted the survey to evaluate the HRQOL using the Short Form 36 health survey (SF-36) version 2. SF-36 evaluates the following 8 physical and mental health areas: physical functioning (PF), physical role functioning (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social role functioning (SF), emotional role functioning (RE), and mental health (MH). Each of the 8 areas was scored on a scale of 0–100, with a higher score indicating better subjective health. These scores were then calculated from the questionnaires responses as previously described. The physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) measures are calculated from these 8 scales using algorithms recommended by the instrument developers [16]. This study was conducted with permission from QualityMetric Inc., Lincoln, RI, USA.
In addition, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), incontinence quality of life (I-QOL), and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-Q) were conducted to identify urinary symptoms.

Clinical data and functional status score

At the time of enrollment, we measured the prostate volume using TRUS in men to rule out benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), which is very common in elderly men. Patients suspected by an urologist of having BPH were excluded. All patients were examined via uroflowmetry to evaluate the urine flow rate, and clinical information was collected, including types and lesion of stroke, onset of stroke, underlying hypertension, diabetes, and other cardiovascular diseases. The performance scores, such as Function Ambulation Category (FAC), Modified Rankin Scale (MRS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), were assessed by clinical doctors at baseline and at 3 months later.

Statistical analysis

The baseline characteristics were compared between the OAB and non-OAB groups. For the comparison, t-test and chi-square test were used. We used Mann-Whitney U-test to compare two groups at baseline and at 3 months of follow-up. A longitudinal analysis was assessed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We used a correlation analysis and a multivariate regression to assess whether the OAB symptoms were associated with 3-month MCS. The variables obtained through baseline surveys were selected using the backward elimination method during a multiple regression analysis. The statistical significance was confirmed using a goodness-of-fit test and a significance test of the regression coefficient. The statistical significance was considered when p-value was ≤0.05, and the data were analyzed with the SPSS ver. 21 statistical package (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Participant characteristics

From March 2014 to May 2016, a total of 39 stroke patients signed a consent form, but 9 refused the last survey. The mean age of 30 participants was 58.9 years, and the mean onset duration of stroke was 4.6 months. We divided subjects into two groups: OAB group (n=12) and non-OAB group (n=18). The general characteristics and demographic information of the 30 subjects and the differences between the two groups are presented in Table 1. Only one patient had aphasia, and this patient was in the non-OAB group.
OABSS was evaluated twice. Three patients reported aggravation of OAB symptoms over 3 months, and there was no urinary tract infection or other urinary related events. In the initial evaluation, 4 patients were using anticholinergics, and there was no restriction to change medication in this study. All 4 patients maintained the medication, and 1 patient showed deterioration in the OABSS score. After the initial evaluation, 4 patients started taking anticholinergics due to OAB symptoms, and the rest of the patients in the OAB group were symptomatic but did not take medication.

HRQOL and OAB symptoms

Looking at SF-36, which presents the general HRQOL of the patients, both PCS and MCS scores showed no difference between the OAB group and non-OAB group at both baseline and at 3-month follow-up (Table 2). In a longitudinal analysis, the MCS score showed a marginal decrease over time only in the OAB group (p=0.05) (Table 3, Fig. 1). As we look into the subareas of SF-36, no difference was seen between the two groups at baseline, but the general health, vitality, and mental health areas showed a lower score in the OAB group compared to the non-OAB group at 3 months of follow-up (Table 2). The vitality and mental health areas had a significant decrease in scores over 3 months in the OAB group (p=0.011 and p=0.041, respectively) (Table 3). In a multivariate regression, the presence of OAB symptoms was significantly associated with lower MCS scores at 3 months (B=-8.15, p=0.034) (Table 4). Therefore, the OAB symptoms seem to have a negative effect on the mental component of the HRQOL. Other subareas of SF-36 showed no difference at 3 months of follow-up compared to that at baseline, but the physical functioning area showed an improvement at 3-month follow-up (p=0.03).
The I-QOL total score and HRQOL score of OABQ showed no difference between the two groups (p=0.54 and p=0.37 respectively), but the questions regarding lower urinary tract symptoms in OABQ showed a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.001).

Performance scale scores and OAB symptoms

In the non-OAB group, all patient performance scales showed an improvement over time (all p<0.02). However, in the OAB group, the FAC and MBI showed an improvement (p=0.04 and 0.005, respectively), but MRS and MMSE did not improve significantly (p=0.15 and p=0.20, respectively) (Table 2). At 3-month follow-up, the MRS scores were lower in the non-OAB group (p=0.034), indicating less disability.

Assessment of urinary symptoms

At the baseline, the use of anticholinergics and the results of the uroflowmetry and TRUS showed no differences between the OAB and non-OAB groups (Table 1). The international prostate symptom score showed a significant difference in both storage and voiding scores between the two groups at baseline, but there was no longitudinal change over 3 months in both the OAB group (p=0.34) and non-OAB group (p=0.86).

DISCUSSION

We prospectively assessed the HRQOL and performance scale scores at baseline and at 3 months of follow-up of post-acute stroke patients. Patients who had OAB symptoms seemed to have greater burden in the mental aspect of HRQOL at the 3-month follow-up. Moreover, there is a possibility that the OAB symptoms affect the physical and cognitive performance of stroke patients.
Urinary incontinence has been reported to be a predictor of mortality and poor functional outcomes after a stroke [1]. Urinary incontinence negatively affects the QOL in the general population, especially in patients with stroke who have neurologic deficits such as dysphagia, visual field defects, motor weaknesses, and cognition and language impairments [17]. In addition to urinary incontinence, OAB symptoms also cause considerable inconvenience to stroke patients. However, previous studies have mainly focused on the prevalence of urinary incontinence after stroke. Only a few studies were carried out for OAB symptoms, such as urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia, and these studies used a simple questionnaire for community-based stroke patients [2,17,18,19]. Since there was no study on the effect of OAB symptoms during rehabilitation treatments, we found that the vitality and mental health scores of SF-36 exhibited a significant decrease over 3 months in the OAB group, and the presence of OAB symptoms was significantly associated with a lower MCS score at 3 months of follow-up. The OAB symptoms seem to have a negative effect on the mental component of the HRQOL. Although this regression model explains only 22% of the variance in the MCS, it can add strength to our hypothesis.
Several prognostic factors for OAB have been reported in the general population. For men, comorbidities, including arthritis, depression, heart disease, hypertension, mobility limitations, neurological conditions, recurrent urinary tract infection, BPH, and prostatitis, are suggested to be predictors of OAB [7,20]. BPH associated with LUTS prevalence rates ranged from 50%–75% among 50 years and older men to 80% among 70 years and older men [21]. Therefore, an objective evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms due to BPH is necessary to minimize bias in elderly men. We underwent TRUS by an urologist to assess the prostate in male participants.
Itoh et al. [10] analyzed questionnaires on 500 stroke patients. OAB was identified in 28% of patients, with lower HROQL scores in both the physical and mental components of SF-8. The elderly and male patients were also associated with OAB. Compared with a previous study, we found no difference between the two groups in the initial HRQOL evaluation, but HRQOL scores were lower in patients who had OAB symptoms only in the mental component at the 3-month follow-up. Moreover, we can see the change in HRQOL by evaluating SF-36 twice in 3 months.
We found that MRS and MMSE showed less of an improvement in the OAB group than in the non-OAB group, and the physical functioning score of SF-36 showed a significantly higher score at 3 months of follow-up, compared to baseline (p=0.034). We might infer the possibility that OAB symptoms may affect the performance in patients with stroke. Therefore, a further study with more patients and a longer follow-up period is needed to prove this hypothesis.
This study had several limitations. Although this was a prospective study, it was conducted in a single institution with a small number of patients. Only patients with an adequate cognitive level to respond to the questionnaire and with the bladder control to participate in uroflowmetry were included in this study. In addition, due to the small number of patients, it is difficult to analyze the relationship between the changes in HQOL and OAB symptoms according to the use of medication. Therefore, larger prospective investigations are required to overcome these limitations and to determine the precise effects of OAB symptoms after stroke.
In addition to the negative impact of the OAB symptoms on the HRQOL of stroke patients, the detection and proper treatment of OAB symptoms in stroke patients should be encouraged to improve their HRQOL.
In conclusion, our findings indicate that OAB symptoms have negative effects on the physical and cognitive performance of stroke patients, and as the recovery process progresses, the burden of OAB symptoms may become more pronounced on HRQOL, especially regarding the mental component. Therefore, OAB symptoms should not be overlooked, and they need to be treated in stroke patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Brittain KR, Peet SM, Castleden CM. Stroke and incontinence. Stroke 1998;29:524-528. PMID: 9472900.
crossref pmid
2. Brittain KR, Perry SI, Peet SM, Shaw C, Dallosso H, Assassa RP, et al. Prevalence and impact of urinary symptoms among community-dwelling stroke survivors. Stroke 2000;31:886-891. PMID: 10753993.
crossref pmid
3. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167-178. PMID: 11857671.
crossref pmid
4. Liberman JN, Hunt TL, Stewart WF, Wein A, Zhou Z, Herzog AR, et al. Health-related quality of life among adults with symptoms of overactive bladder: results from a U.S. community-based survey. Urology 2001;57:1044-1050. PMID: 11377301.
crossref pmid
5. Milsom I, Abrams P, Cardozo L, Roberts RG, Thuroff J, Wein AJ. How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. BJU Int 2001;87:760-766. PMID: 11412210.
crossref pmid
6. Jo JK, Lee S, Kim YT, Choi HY, Kim SA, Choi BY, et al. Analysis of the risk factors for overactive bladder on the basis of a survey in the community. Korean J Urol 2012;53:541-546. PMID: 22949998.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Sexton CC, Coyne KS, Thompson C, Bavendam T, Chen CI, Markland A. Prevalence and effect on health-related quality of life of overactive bladder in older Americans: results from the epidemiology of lower urinary tract symptoms study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:1465-1470. PMID: 21718275.
crossref pmid
8. Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, Abrams P, Herzog AR, Corey R, et al. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol 2003;20:327-336. PMID: 12811491.
crossref pmid
9. Wein AJ, Rovner ES. Definition and epidemiology of overactive bladder. Urology 2002;60(5 Suppl 1): 7-12.
crossref
10. Itoh Y, Yamada S, Konoeda F, Koizumi K, Nagata H, Oya M, et al. Burden of overactive bladder symptom on quality of life in stroke patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2013;32:428-434. PMID: 23129306.
crossref pmid
11. Minassian VA, Drutz HP, Al-Badr A. Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2003;82:327-338. PMID: 14499979.
crossref pmid
12. Stoffel JT, Peterson AC, Sandhu JS, Suskind AM, Wei JT, Lightner DJ, et al. AUA white paper on nonneurogenic chronic urinary retention: consensus definition, treatment, algorithm, and outcome endpoints. J Urol 2017;198:153-160. PMID: 28163030.
crossref pmid
13. Yamaguchi O, Nishizawa O, Takeda M, Yokoyama O, Homma Y, Kakizaki H, et al. Clinical guidelines for overactive bladder. Int J Urol 2009;16:126-142. PMID: 19228224.
crossref pmid
14. Homma Y, Yoshida M, Seki N, Yokoyama O, Kakizaki H, Gotoh M, et al. Symptom assessment tool for overactive bladder syndrome: overactive bladder symptom score. Urology 2006;68:318-323. PMID: 16904444.
crossref pmid
15. Jeong SJ, Homma Y, Oh SJ. Korean version of the overactive bladder symptom score questionnaire: translation and linguistic validation. Int Neurourol J 2011;15:135-142. PMID: 22087422.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Medicare managed care. Health Care Financ Rev 2004;25:5-25.

17. Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Natural history and effects on 2-year outcomes of urinary incontinence after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:122-127. PMID: 11136926.
crossref pmid
18. Tibaek S, Gard G, Klarskov P, Iversen HK, Dehlendorff C, Jensen R. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in stroke patients: a cross-sectional, clinical survey. Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:763-771. PMID: 18551565.
crossref pmid
19. Williams MP, Srikanth V, Bird M, Thrift AG. Urinary symptoms and natural history of urinary continence after first-ever stroke: a longitudinal populationbased study. Age Ageing 2012;41:371-376. PMID: 22321907.
crossref pmid pdf
20. Willis-Gray MG, Dieter AA, Geller EJ. Evaluation and management of overactive bladder: strategies for optimizing care. Res Rep Urol 2016;8:113-122. PMID: 27556018.
pmid pmc
21. Egan KB. The epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: prevalence and incident rates. Urol Clin North Am 2016;43:289-297. PMID: 27476122.
crossref pmid
Fig. 1

Changes in the performance scale and SF-36 scores over 3 months. (A) Functional Ambulation Category, (B) Modified Rankin Scale, (C) Modified Barthel Index, (D) Mini-Mental State Examination, (E) physical component summary, and (F) mental component summary. OAB, overactive bladder.

arm-41-935-g001.jpg
Table 1

Baseline demographics, performance scale, questionnaire in OAB and non-OAB groups

arm-41-935-i001.jpg

Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.

OAB, overactive bladder; MCA, middle cerebral artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; Qmax, maximum flow rate; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; OABSS, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score.

a)In male patients.

Table 2

Cross-sectional analysis of subjects at baseline and 3-month follow-up

arm-41-935-i002.jpg

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

OAB, overactive bladder; FAC, Functional Ambulation Category; MRS, Modified Rankin Scale; MBI, Modified Barthel Index; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; SF-36 v2, short form-36 version 2; PCS, physical component summary; MCS, mental component summary; PF, physical functioning; RP, role physical; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; VT, vitality; SF, social functioning; RE, role emotional; MH, mental health.

Table 3

Longitudinal analysis of subjects at baseline and 3-month follow-up

arm-41-935-i003.jpg

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

OAB, overactive bladder; SF-36 v2, short form-36 version 2; PF, physical functioning; RP, role physical; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; VT, vitality; SF, social functioning; RE, role emotional; MH, mental health.

Table 4

Results of multivariate regression with MCS score in SF-36 at 3-month follow-up as the dependent variable (n=30)

arm-41-935-i004.jpg

MCS, mental component summary; SF-36, short form-36; CI, confidence interval; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; OAB, overactive bladder.

TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
  • 4 Scopus
  • 5,595 View
  • 79 Download
Related articles in ARM


ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Terms of Use   |   Privacy Polity
Editorial Office
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital
101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea
Tel: +82-10-8678-2671    Fax: +82-2-6072-5244    E-mail: edit@e-arm.org; edit.karm@gmail.com
Business Registration: 110-82-07460                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer