Correlates of Bone Mineral Density and Sagittal Spinal Balance in the Aged
Article information
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) and sagittal spinal balance in the Korean elderly population.
Methods
The retrospective study included subjects aged 60 years and above, who had whole-spine lateral radiography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) within a year's gap between each other. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) for evaluation of sagittal spinal balance and five spinopelvic parameters were measured through radiography. The presence of compression fracture was identified. Correlations of BMD T-scores with SVA and with the spinopelvic parameters were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Linear regression analyses were performed between SVA and the clinical and radiologic variables.
Results
One hundred twenty-two subjects (42 males and 80 females; mean age, 69.93±5.5 years) were included in the study. BMD, femur or spine, was not correlated with SVA or any spinopelvic parameters in both genders (PCC<±0.2), except that spine BMD in men was associated with sacral slope. Univariate regression analysis revealed association between SVA and lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, and compression fractures in both genders; it was also associated with age and pelvic incidence in females and with sacral slope in males. Multivariate linear regression model showed lumbar lordosis and compression fracture as variables affecting SVA in both sexes; pelvic incidence was another factor affecting SVA in women only.
Conclusion
BMD was not associated with sagittal spinal balance in the aged. Sagittal spinal balance was explained partly by lumbar lordosis and compression fracture. Further study is warranted to understand progression of sagittal imbalance with age.
INTRODUCTION
Degenerative spinal deformities, such as increased thoracic kyphosis and loss of lumbar lordosis, are common in the geriatric population. It often leads to adverse clinical consequences including functional limitations, increased risk of falls or fractures, and impaired quality of life [1,2,3,4,5].
The definition of degenerative spinal deformities is still a matter of controversy and measurement techniques are still being developed. In the past, a number of studies have been focused on localized problems: for example, disregarding the thoracic spine or the pelvis when investigating degenerative lumbar kyphosis. With accumulation of clinical observation, many physicians came to believe that global alignment of the spine was more important than local deformity [6,7]. Thereafter, sagittal spinal balance was conceptualized among the spinal surgeons in the 80's [6]. More recently, the importance of pelvis in the maintenance of normal sagittal balance was recognized and various pelvic parameters have been devised to assess sagittal spinal balance [6].
Decreased bone mineral density (BMD) is one of the suspected causes of degenerative hyperkyphosis and sagittal imbalance. Kyphosis can be precipitated by increasing numbers of vertebral anterior wedge fractures as BMD decreases in the aged [7]. However, a specific study reported no significant association between BMD and thoracic kyphosis [8]. Such contradictory results might reveal that sagittal spinal balance result not only from bony deformity but also from postural control [9]. Thus far, only few studies have specifically investigated the association between global sagittal spinal balance and BMD. Moreover, meager data are available on association between global sagittal spinal balance and BMD in the Korean population, although it is proven that spinopelvic curvature is strongly influenced by ethnicity [10].
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the BMD and sagittal spinal balance in the Korean elderly population including both men and women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
A retrospective chart review screened subjects 60 years old and above, who had a plain lateral radiography of the whole spine and DEXA (GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy Advance, Madison, WI, USA) done within a year's gap between each other amid July 2011 and June 2013 in Seoul National University Hospital (n=219). Subjects with the following conditions were excluded from the study: congenital spinal deformity (n=0), history of vertebral infection (n=3) or trauma (n=34), any malignancy (n=29), previous surgery of the spine (n=29), rheumatologic disease (n=2), problems of the central and peripheral nervous system (n=0), and severe coronal imbalance with Cobb's angle ≥40° (n=0). Finally, 122 subjects (80 women and 42 men) were included in the study. The average age of subjects was 69.93±5.50 years. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight as per electronic medical record (Table 1). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital (No. H-1304 025 478).
Radiologic evaluation
Based on plain radiographs, sagittal spinal imbalance and spinopelvic parameters were measured. In terms of primary measure of global sagittal balance, SVA is defined as a horizontal distance between a plumb line dropped from the center of the C7 body and the posterior-superior corner of the S1 body [11] (Fig. 1A). When the plumb line falls in front of the posterior-superior corner of the S1 body, SVA is designated a positive value.

(A) Methods of measurement of sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and (A, B) spinopelvic parameters are displayed.
Five spinopelvic parameters were employed in this study: thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. Thoracic kyphosis is the angle between the cranial endplate of T4 and the caudal endplate of T12 [12] (Fig. 1A). Lumbar lordosis is the angle between the cranial endplate of L1 and the caudal endplate of L5. Pelvic incidence is the angle between the line perpendicular to the middle of the cranial sacral endplate and the line joining the middle of the cranial endplate to the center of the bicoxofemoral axis (the line between the geometric center of both femoral heads) [12]. Pelvic tilt is the angle between the vertical line and the line joining the middle of the sacral endplate and the center of the bicoxofemoral axis. Sacral slope is calculated by subtracting the pelvic tilt from the pelvic incidence; thus, pelvic incidence equals the sum of pelvic tilt and sacral slope [13] (Fig. 1B). All radiologic parameters were measured twice by one physician. The average of the two values was used for statistical analysis.
BMD was measured at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femur neck, and femur total using a DEXA apparatus (GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy Advance). BMD of lumbar spine was measured in the standard anterior-posterior projection and the results were presented as T-scores. Individual T-scores were calculated by determining the difference between the measured BMD in gram per square centimeter (g/cm2) and the mean BMD of healthy young adults matched for sex and ethnicity and dividing the difference by the standard deviation of the young adult population. In this report, lowest femur T-score and lowest spine T-score was used to denote femur BMD and spine BMD, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Correlations of BMD with sagittal spinal balance (SVA) and spinopelvic parameters were tested using Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). Univariate linear regression analyses were used to evaluate associations of SVA with clinical (age, gender, and BMI) and radiologic variables (BMD, compression fracture, and spinopelvic parameters). Multivariate linear regression analysis was also employed to investigate the association of clinical and radiological variables with SVA. Backward elimination method was used in multivariate linear regression with elimination threshold of 0.1. All the analyses were performed separately for male and female subjects. Differences of parameters between women and men were assessed by chi-square test (for compression fracture) and independent t-test (other variables). A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Parametric variables were expressed with mean±standard deviation. The data were analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS ) ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
RESULTS
Clinical data and radiologic parameters based on gender
Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of the participants were assessed and presented in Table 1. Females had significantly higher BMIs than males (p=0.043). T-scores were significantly lower in females, both at spine (p=0.003) and at the femur (p<0.001). Incidence of compression fractures were more frequent in females (p=0.007). Global sagittal imbalance represented by SVA was significantly larger in women (4.73±4.84 cm) than in men (2.56±5.62 cm) (p=0.028). Thoracic kyphosis was greater in males (p<0.001), while pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt were larger in females (p<0.001 for both). Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope were not significantly different between the genders.
Correlations of BMD with SVA, and spinopelvic parameters
In women, no correlation was observed between BMD of the femur or spine with the SVA (femur: PCC=-0.012, p=0.912; spine: PCC=-0.001, p=0.991) (Fig. 2A, B). In males too, BMD was not correlated with the SVA (femur: PCC=-0.179, p=0.257; spine: PCC=-0.152, p=0.338) (Fig. 2C, D). All the spinopelvic parameters exhibited no as sociation with BMD except for the sacral slope in men; sacral slope in men showed positive correlation with spine T-score (PCC=0.330, p=0.033) (Table 2).

The scatter plot shows no correlation between bone mineral density and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in women (A, B) and men (C, D).
Associations between SVA and clinical/radiological variables
Univariate linear regression analysis showed association between SVA and compression fractures, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt in both the genders. In women, association between age and pelvic incidence was noted; another factor in men was sacral slope. Neither spine nor femur T-score exhibited correlation with SVA in both males and females (Table 3).
Multiple linear regression analysis was performed with variables selected from the univariate analyses. Lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, and compression fracture in women were the explaining parameters for sagittal imbalance; a decrease in lumbar lordosis and an increase in pelvic incidence, and presence of compression fracture were associated with worse sagittal imbalance (increase in SVA). Compression fracture was included in the multivariate regression model, but statistical significance was equivocal (p=0.07). In men, lumbar lordosis and compression fracture were the significant contributing factors to sagittal imbalance; as lumbar lordosis decreased and compression fracture was accompanied, sagittal imbalance increased (Table 4).
DISCUSSION
Abnormal curvature of the spine in the sagittal plane has been documented to cause significant impairments in the aged [4,14]. Previous studies revealed that the sagittal alignment is influenced by multi-factors, such as age, sex, weight, pelvic morphology, and history of spinal fusion [15,16]. However, little is known about the contribution of decreased BMD to sagittal spinal imbalance. In the present study, no association between sagittal spinal balance and BMD was noted.
Previous studies of sagittal spinal balance have reported conflicting results about its association with BMD. Lee et al. [17] showed that femur neck BMD and pelvic incidence contributed significantly to sagittal balance. However, the study population included only patients with osteoporosis; it did not consider subjects with osteopenia or with normal BMD. In addition, they did not explain why the sagittal balance was not associated with the BMD of the spine, which was supposed to have more direct impact on it.
On the other hand, Mika et al. [8] reported that the degree of thoracic kyphosis in the aged female was not different among the groups with osteoporosis, osteopenia, and normal BMD. They also showed that, in multivariate analysis, BMD did not significantly influence thoracic kyphosis. Nevertheless, the study was focused only on thoracic kyphosis, and not on global sagittal balance. Our current study included subjects with wide range of BMD (normal, osteopenia, and osteoporosis) and no correlation with BMD and sagittal balance was observed. In association with previous studies and our current study, we infer that decrease in BMD by itself does not contribute to the progression of sagittal imbalance in the aged population. Rather, BMD and sagittal imbalance might have common confounding factors.
It is noteworthy that the presence of vertebral compression fracture influenced sagittal balance in both males and females based on multivariate regression (although no statistical significance was observed in case of females). This result is consistent with previous studies reporting that a minor part of sagittal imbalance was due to structural deformities [18,19]. Despite the association between sagittal balance and the presence of compression fractures, SVA was not correlated with BMD. Compression fractures might be a cause as well as a result of the sagittal imbalance in the aged. Furthermore, sagittal imbalance may be influenced by other factors, which are associated with compression fracture and not with BMD in the aged persons, such as back muscle weakness, ligament degeneration, sensory deficits, or loss of motor coordination. The risk of development of compression fracture is higher in the presence of osteoporosis. However, the incidence of compression fracture is affected by various factors other than BMD, like increased stress loading from exacerbation of kyphosis [20]; and reduced strength of the back extensor in the aged, which leads to senile kyphosis that subsequently prompts the development of compression fractures.
In both univariate and multivariate regression analyses, lumbar lordosis angle was seen to have a negative correlation with global sagittal imbalance in both the genders. This result is consistent with previous literature, which stated that a loss in lumbar lordosis might be an initiating event for sagittal imbalance [13]. Therefore, decreased lordosis itself can be considered as an indicator of sagittal imbalance. In this study, we included lumbar lordosis as an explaining factor because it could contribute progression of sagittal imbalance structurally.
In the present study, SVA, thoracic kyphosis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt were all significantly different between both the genders. These findings, specifically that for pelvic incidence, are inconsistent with evidence seen from previous literatures [21,22]. Since women's SVA was significantly larger than men's, it may consequently mean that the proportion of imbalanced subjects in women was also higher. This difference in sagittal imbalance between men and women may account for the difference in pelvic incidence, which is consistent with findings from a study by Lee et al. [17], which states that pelvic incidence was higher in cases with worse sagittal imbalance.
Age was one of the statistically significant factors in women in the univariate analysis. This observation is consistent with the findings of the study by Takeda et al. [23], which showed a significant correlation between age and SVA. However, in the multivariate analysis, age did not influence SVA upon adjustment for other variables; this means that age does not directly affect sagittal imbalance. Because regression analysis depends on study population, further research with larger population would be helpful to confirm the contribution of age.
There are a few limitations in this study. First, the position during obtaining the whole-spine radiography was not consistent between subjects and this factor could not be addressed appropriately because of the retrospective nature of the present study. Moreover, the angle of arm forward flexion could shift the SVA [24]. However, most of the plain radiographs of the whole spine in this study were performed with the arm forward flexion to about 45°. In addition, compensatory knee flexion may mask a severe spinal deformity without fully extended knee position [25]. Second, the number of subjects was limited, especially the number of male subjects with low BMD compared to those with normal BMD. It was inevitable because much fewer men than women, in general population, develop very low levels of BMD [26]. Third, SVA was the only method used for evaluating global sagittal balance in this study. Several other ways of assessing sagittal balance have been proposed recently. Barrey et al. [27] suggested the use of angular and/or ratio parameters (spino-sacral angle and/or C7 plumb line/sacro-femoral distance ratio, respectively) rather than employing linear distance measure. Further study using these parameters would corroborate findings of this study. Lastly, the study was retrospective design and the subjects were limited to only those, who visited the hospital. Some of them visited the hospital for routine check-up; however, there were some patients who had various conditions in the spine. Different diagnoses of such patients could have affected the results of the study. For the inclusion of general population, community based cohort study will warrant this study results.
In conclusion, the present study is the first study of its kind to show that BMD was not associated with sagittal spinal balance not only in the aged women, but also in the aged men. Lumbar lordosis and presence of compression fracture had partial effect on sagittal spinal balance. Further prospective study is warranted to understand progression in sagittal imbalance with age.
Notes
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.