1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
2Department of Nanobiomedical Science & WCU Research Center, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
3Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Corresponding author: Jung Yoon Kim. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, 119 Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan 330-997, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-6640, Fax: +82-41-551-7062, schola21@gmail.com
• Received: June 16, 2014 • Accepted: August 11, 2014
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
To assess head posture using cervical spine X-rays to find out whether forward head posture is related to myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) in neck and shoulder.
Methods
Eighty-eight participants who were diagnosed with MPS in neck and shoulder were evaluated in this study. Four parameters (distance among head, cervical spines, and shoulder, and cervical angle) were measured from lateral view of cervical spine X-ray. The location and number of trigger points in the neck and shoulder and symptom duration were evaluated for each patient.
Results
Both horizontal distances between C1 vertebral body and C7 spinous process and between the earhole and C7 vertebral body were negatively correlated with cervical angle reflecting cervical lordosis (p<0.05). Younger patients had significantly (p<0.05) less cervical angle with more forward head posture. There was no relationship between MPS (presence, location, and number of trigger points) and radiologic assessments (distance parameters and the cervical angle).
Conclusion
Forward head posture and reduced cervical lordosis were seen more in younger patients with spontaneous neck pain. However, these abnormalities did not correlate with the location or the number of MPS. Further studies are needed to delineate the mechanism of neck pain in patients with forward head posture.
As Internet network expands, weekly mean time a person spends at a computer has dramatically increased because many people have computers [1]. However, excessive computer use frequently results in musculoskeletal disorder on neck and shoulder [2,3]. The posture of staring at a monitor, located below the height of eyesight, makes the head move forward. Anterior curve in the lower cervical and posterior curve in the upper thoracic vertebrae could be exaggerated [4,5]. This is known as forward head posture or turtle neck syndrome [6,7,8].
A number of people with forward head posture complain of neck problems [9,10,11]. Previous studies reported that abnormal working posture with computer was associated with neck and shoulder pain due to musculoskeletal disorders, especially myofascial pain syndromes (MPS) [12,13]. Prolonged abnormal postures have been regarded as one of the causes of MPS. Therefore, treatment guideline for MPS includes re-education on desirable posture [8,14]. However, few studies have directly evaluated the relationship between forward head posture and MPS in neck and shoulder. The aims of this study were 1) to assess the head posture correctly using cervical spine X-rays and 2) to find out whether abnormal head posture is related to MPS in neck and shoulder.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
The study was conducted from January 2006 to March 2009 at the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Dankook University Hospital in Korea. Data from patients with posterior neck pain as their main complaints who were diagnosed with MPS were retrospectively extracted from their medical records. MPS was defined as regional muscle tenderness originated from myofascial trigger points [15]. Participants were excluded if they had any of the following conditions: 1) history of cervical trauma or surgery; 2) congenital anomalies involving the spine (cervical, thoracic, and lumbar); 3) bony abnormalities in spine; 4) any disorder of the central or peripheral nervous system; and 5) any systemic arthritis. Age, sex, and symptom duration were recorded. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Dankook University Hospital (IRB No. DKUH-2014-05-016).
Methods
Radiologic assessments
Simple cervical spine X-rays were performed for the study subjects. To take a lateral view of the cervical spine, subjects were sitting in neutral position with head straight. Subjects were asked to elevate their chins straightly and to drop their shoulders as far as possible. The following five parameters were measured in the lateral view of cervical spine X-rays: distant 1 (D1), the horizontal distance between the earhole and lateral shoulder; distant 2 (D2), the horizontal distance between plump line of posterior neck and posterior shoulder; distant 3 (D3), the horizontal distance between the anterior margin of C1 body and the posterior margin of C7 spinous process; distant 4 (D4), the horizontal distance between the earhole and midline of C7 lower margin (Fig. 1); and cervical angle (CA) which was measured on lateral view of cervical spine X-ray from the two tangent lines drawn on the posterior vertebral body margins of C2-C7 (posterior tangent method) [16] (Fig. 2).
Clinical assessments
The presence, location, and number of trigger points in neck and shoulder areas were evaluated for each patient. Scalenus, cervical paraspinal muscle, upper trapezius, levator scapulae, infraspinatus, supraspinatus, rhomboid, teres minor, deltoid, and sternocleidomastoid muscles were examined for myofascial trigger point. The following trigger points were diagnosed using the diagnostic criteria described by Travell and Simons [15]: 1) palpable taut band; 2) spot tenderness in taut band; 3) pain complaint by pressure on the tender nodule; 4) painful limit to full stretch range of motion; 5) visual or tactile local twitch response; and 6) local twitch response induced by needle penetration of tender nodule. Findings from (1) to (4) are essential to the diagnosis. Diagnosis is more certain when criterion (5) or (6) is present.
Statistical analysis
Spearman correlation coefficient was used to investigate the correlation between age, symptom duration, and five parameters. The association between MPS and five parameters were also subjected to Spearman correlation coefficient analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was considered when p-values were less than 0.05.
RESULTS
Two hundred and forty-eight persons who visited outpatient clinic with posterior neck pain from January 2006 to March 2009 were screened. Of them, 160 were excluded for the following reasons: history of cervical trauma or surgery (n=45); congenital anomalies involving the spine (n=2); bony abnormalities in spine (n=11); disorder on nervous system diagnosed on electromyography (n=93); and systemic arthritis (n=9). A total of 88 participants (40 men and 48 women) were included in the study. The mean age was 41.4±12.4 years. Symptom duration was 484.9±845.8 days. The demographic data of patients are shown in Table 1.
Spearman correlation coefficients among age, symptom duration, CA, D1, D2, D3, and D4 are summarized in Table 2. D3 (the horizontal distances between C1 vertebral body and C7 spinous process) and the D4 (the horizontal distances between the earhole and C7 vertebral body) were negatively correlated with CA, reflecting cervical lordosis (r=-0.257, p=0.016 and r=-0.374, p<0.001, respectively). All distance parameters had positive correlation with each other. Age was positively correlated with CA (r=0.376, p<0.001) but negatively correlated with D4 (r=-0.357, p=0.001). However, the symptom duration did not show significant correlation with any other parameter (Table 2). There were no significant association between the five parameters and the symptom duration of MPS (Table 3). In addition, the numbers of trigger points did not show correlation with the five parameters. The most common location of trigger points was the upper trapezius muscle. The second most common location was the cervical paraspinal muscles. However, there was no relationship between the location of myofascial trigger points and the five parameters.
DISCUSSION
To our knowledge, this study was the first trial to analyze the relationship between forward head posture and MPS. Our results revealed that the greater the forward head position was, the more reduced the cervical lordosis was. This is consistent with a previous report [9]. In addition, according to linear regression analysis, younger patients showed more reduced CA and greater forward head position. In healthy individuals, the degree of forward head posture tends to be increased with age. The trend of this is associated with reduced range of motion in the cervical region [17,18]. However, after comparing the cervical angle of neck pain patients with age-matched pain-free subjects, one study explained that patients who complained spontaneous neck pain may have poorer posture than healthy individuals [11]. Older neck pain patients who have decreased cervical spine mobility due to age-related degenerative change seem to be little affected by poor posture when compared to younger neck pain patients [11]. The results of our study are consistent with the previous study, suggesting that some age-related factors may reduce the changes of cervical spine alignment in posterior neck pain patients. Further studies are needed to clarify this.
There was no relationship between the forward head position and the presence, location, and number of trigger points, suggesting that the mechanism of pain related to the forward head position does not account for myofascial trigger points. Even though mentally challenging computer work is associated with neck pain and forward head posture, only upper trapezius muscle activation was increased. Psychosocial stress with identical cognitive demands may evoke an increase in arousal along with an increase in upper trapezius muscle activity which might consequently lead to neck disturbance [19].
One plausible biomechanical explanation is that the pain associated with forward head position could be originated from the cervical facet joints. There are two mechanism of facet joint pain: excessive compression of the facet joint articulation and the capsular ligament strain beyond the physiologic limit in the forward head posture which stretches anterior structures of the neck and reduces the length of posterior muscles [11,20]. Facet joint compression could damage synovial folds that contain nociceptive nerve endings immunoreactive for substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide, which could potentially lead to facet pain [21,22]. Because facet joints planes are obliquely oriented, the forward head position might increase the compressive force between the facet articular cartilage of the inferior articular process and the adjacent facet of the superior articular process [23]. The presence of mechanoreceptive and nociceptive nerve endings in cervical facet capsules plays important role in proprioception and pain sensation in the cervical spine [24,25]. Excessive capsular ligaments strain could potentially injure these structures, therefore generating pain [20]. Capsular ligament strain begins during extension but peaks as the facets were returning from maximal extension back to neutral position [20,26]. In patients with forward head position, cervical spine can be considered similar to a protracted position in which the lower cervical vertebrae are flexed in a forward glide with the upper cervical vertebrae extended [1,2,27]. Long standing hyperextensive state of upper cervical vertebrae can cause strain to the upper cervical facet capsular ligament.
Another possible cause is cervical root compression due to decreased cervical foraminal area in the forward head posture. When the forward head posture was corrected especially for lower cervical spine, it would improve the nerve root function by increasing the foraminal volume and area at the foraminal isthmus, which consequently relieves clinical symptoms [10].
There are some limitations of this study. Firstly, during assessment of forward head posture, measurement of CA and distance were disturbed by some technical problems. Forward head posture might be also combined with abnormal posture of shoulder, making it hard to set the fiducial point. In addition, because patients tended to be tense while taking radiographs, it was hard to measure the resting posture. Secondly, there were several difficulties in detecting trigger point. Human neck is covered by numerous layers of cervical muscles in anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects. Consequently, it was hard to distinguish each muscle selectively by manual method. Furthermore, because various factors could influence pain in the forward head posture, it was hard to select the pure effect of abnormal posture on myofascial pain. However, the risks mentioned above would be minimal because a highly trained and specialized medical doctor carefully diagnosed MPS. The measurement of CA and distance were evaluated by one researcher in order to reduce inter-researcher variations.
In conclusion, this study is the first trial to analyze the relationship between forward head posture and MPS assessed by using X-ray measurement. Younger patients with posterior neck pain showed more reduced cervical lordosis with greater forward head position. Reduced cervical lordosis associated with aging was affected by decreased cervical mobility and other factors. However, these abnormalities were not related to the location or the number of trigger points. Further studies are needed to delineate the mechanism of neck pain in patients with forward head posture. Larger controlled studies are needed to confirm the association between head posture and MPS.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
REFERENCES
1. Kang JH, Park RY, Lee SJ, Kim JY, Yoon SR, Jung KI. The effect of the forward head posture on postural balance in long time computer based worker. Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36:98-104.
2. Chiou WK, Chou WY, Chen BH. Notebook computer use with different monitor tilt angle: effects on posture, muscle activity and discomfort of neck pain users. Work 2012;41(Suppl 1):2591-2595.
3. Treaster D, Marras WS, Burr D, Sheedy JE, Hart D. Myofascial trigger point development from visual and postural stressors during computer work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2006;16:115-124.
4. Cho WH, Lee WY, Choi HK. An investigation on the biomechanical effects of turtle neck syndrome through EMG analysis In: Proceedings of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering Conference; 2008 Nov; pp 195-196.
5. Yoo WG, Yi CH, Cho SH, Jeon HS, Cynn HS, Choi HS. Effects of the height of ball-backrest on head and shoulder posture and trunk muscle activity in VDT workers. Ind Health 2008;46:289-297.
7. Peolsson A, Marstein E, McNamara T, Nolan D, Sjaaberg E, Peolsson M, et al. Does posture of the cervical spine influence dorsal neck muscle activity when lifting? Man Ther 2014;19:32-36.
8. Yoo WG. Effect of the neck retraction taping (NRT) on forward head posture and the upper trapezius muscle during computer work. J Phys Ther Sci 2013;25:581-582.
10. Diab AA, Moustafa IM. The efficacy of forward head correction on nerve root function and pain in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a randomized trial. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:351-361.
11. Silva AG, Punt TD, Sharples P, Vilas-Boas JP, Johnson MI. Head posture and neck pain of chronic nontraumatic origin: a comparison between patients and pain-free persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:669-674.
12. Kim DQ, Cho SH, Han TR, Kwon HJ, Ha M, Paik NJ. The Effect of VDT work on work-related musculoskeletal disorder. Korean J Occup Environ Med 1998;10:524-533.
14. Gupta BD, Aggarwal S, Gupta B, Gupta M, Gupta N. Effect of deep cervical flexor training vs. conventional isometric training on forward head posture, pain, neck disability index in dentists suffering from chronic neck pain. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:2261-2264.
15. Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual (Volume 1. The upper extremities). 1st ed. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 1983. p. 18-19.
16. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:2072-2078.
17. Hsiao LP, Cho CY. The effect of aging on muscle activation and postural control pattern for young and older computer users. Appl Ergon 2012;43:926-932.
18. Boyle JJ, Milne N, Singer KP. Influence of age on cervicothoracic spinal curvature: an ex vivo radiographic survey. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002;17:361-367.
19. Shahidi B, Haight A, Maluf K. Differential effects of mental concentration and acute psychosocial stress on cervical muscle activity and posture. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2013;23:1082-1089.
20. Pearson AM, Ivancic PC, Ito S, Panjabi MM. Facet joint kinematics and injury mechanisms during simulated whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:390-397.
21. Inami S, Shiga T, Tsujino A, Yabuki T, Okado N, Ochiai N. Immunohistochemical demonstration of nerve fibers in the synovial fold of the human cervical facet joint. J Orthop Res 2001;19:593-596.
22. Lee KE, Winkelstein BA. Joint distraction magnitude is associated with different behavioral outcomes and substance P levels for cervical facet joint loading in the rat. J Pain 2009;10:436-445.
25. Lee KE, Davis MB, Mejilla RM, Winkelstein BA. In vivo cervical facet capsule distraction: mechanical implications for whiplash and neck pain. Stapp Car Crash J 2004;48:373-395.
27. Yoo WG, An DH. The relationship between the active cervical range of motion and changes in head and neck posture after continuous VDT work. Ind Health 2009;47:183-188.
The horizontal distance 1, 2, 3, and 4 were measured by using the lateral view of cervical spine X-ray. Distant 1 was the horizontal distance between the earhole and lateral shoulder. Distant 2 was the horizontal distance between plump line of posterior neck and posterior shoulder. Distant 3 was the horizontal distance between the anterior margin of C1 body and the posterior margin of C7 spinous process. Distant 4 was the horizontal distance between the earhole and midline of C7 lower margin.
Fig. 2
The cervical angle was measured by using lateral view of cervical spine X-ray. The angle from the C2 through C7 vertebrae using the posterior tangent method for analysis of cervical lordosis was depicted. The angle between the two tangent lines (C2-C7) at the posterior vertebral margins represented the curvature of the cervical spine [16].
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of patients used in this study
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
Table 2
Spearman correlation coefficient (r) among age, duration of symptom, and the five parameters
*p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Table 3
Correlation between myofascial pain syndrome and the five parameters
*p<0.05, significantly different according to Spearman correlation.
Figure & Data
References
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Effects of Cervical Manipulation Compared with a Conventional Physiotherapy Program for Patients with Acute Whiplash Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial Joan Parera-Turull, Maite Garolera, Jose-Blas Navarro, Dolors Esteve Bech-Decareda, Josep Gual-Beltran, Jose-Vicente Toledo-Marhuenda, Emilio-Jose Poveda-Pagan Healthcare.2025; 13(7): 710. CrossRef
Effect of digital health corrective posture exercise program on head and shoulder posture in adolescents: A cluster randomized controlled trial Chang-Yoon Baek, Jung-Hoon Ahn, Jinyoung Lee, Hee-Hwa Lee, Woo-Taek Lim, Hye-Kang Park, Hyeong-Dong Kim Medicine.2025; 104(12): e41893. CrossRef
A structural relationship model of cervicobrachial region for the treatment of shoulder dysfunction: Evidence-Based clinical reasoning narrative Timas Peteraitis Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2025; 43: 394. CrossRef
The correlation between pain and flexor and extensor muscles endurance and size with craniovertebral angle changes during prolong sitting task Fatemeh Binaei, Amir Hossein Kahlaee, Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Nahid Rahmani, Mohammad Ali Mohseni Bandpei, Mohammad Saatchi Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.2025; 45: 400. CrossRef
The relationship between myofascial trigger points sensitivity, cervical postural abnormality, and clinical tension-type headache parameters Eman Embaby, Aya A Khalil, Abdallah Mansour, Hend A Hamdy Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy.2024; 32(4): 390. CrossRef
Correlations between the Frankfort Plane and the Presence of Myofascial Trigger Points in Posterior Cervical Musculature: An Exploratory Study Darío Sánchez-Guilabert, Ángel Martínez-Carrasco Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(12): 3614. CrossRef
Is cervical sagittal alignment associated with pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome?: A cross-sectional study Murat Korkmaz, Cansin Medin Ceylan, Merve Damla Korkmaz Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2024; 245: 108458. CrossRef
Are cervical curvature and axioscapular muscle activity associated with disability in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain? – a cross sectional exploratory study Yanfeng Huang, Aliaa M. Elabd, Roger Adams, Omar M. Elabd, Ahmed A. Torad, Jia Han Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of Sensorimotor Integration and Skill-Related Physical Fitness Components Between College Athletes With and Without Forward Head Posture Ibrahim Moustafa, Meeyoung Kim, Deed E. Harrison Journal of Sport Rehabilitation.2023; 32(1): 53. CrossRef
Does Forward Head Posture Influence Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Somatosensory Processing in Asymptomatic Young Adults? Ibrahim M. Moustafa, Aliaa Attiah Mohamed Diab, Deed E. Harrison Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(9): 3217. CrossRef
Scapular dyskinesis and loss of cervical lordosis in myofascial pain syndrome and its effects on pain and posture disorders Hilal Telli, Gonca Sağlam Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2023; 69(2): 188. CrossRef
Assessment of Forward Head Posture and Ergonomics in Young IT Professionals – Reasons to Worry? Oana-Ruxandra Stincel, Mihaela Oravitan, Corina Pantea, Bogdan Almajan-Guta, Nicoleta Mirica, Alexandru Boncu, Claudiu Avram La Medicina del Lavoro.2023; 114(1): e2023006. CrossRef
Relationship between the Craniovertebral Angle, Cervical Lordosis, and Cervical Muscles Joo-Hee Park, One-Bin Lim Journal of The Korean Society of Physical Medicine.2022; 17(1): 40. CrossRef
A standard for measuring the relative spine values of adults A. M. Orel, O. K. Semenova Medical Visualization.2022; 26(4): 136. CrossRef
Does forward head posture change subacromial space in active or passive arm elevation? Behdokht Dehqan, Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush, Majid Mirmohammadkhani, Fatemeh Ehsani Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy.2021; 29(4): 227. CrossRef
Correlation between craniovertebral angle in the sagittal plane and angles and indices measured in the frontal plane at the moment of inducing forward head posture Samira Molaeifar, Farzaneh Yazdani, Amin Kordi Yoosefinejad, Mohammad Taghi Karimi Work.2021; 68(4): 1221. CrossRef
Comparison of Cross-sectional Areas using Computerized Tomography of the Cervical Muscles between Straight Neck Patients and Normal Participants during Cranio-cervical Flexion Exercise Joo-Hee Park, One-Bin Lim Journal of The Korean Society of Physical Medicine.2021; 16(3): 81. CrossRef
Kyphosis types of the spine cervical-thoracic junction A. M. Orel, O. K. Semenova Russian Osteopathic Journal.2021; (3): 8. CrossRef
Comparison of Sensorimotor Integration and Athletic Performance between Collegiate Athletes with and Without Forward Head Posture Ibrahim Moustafa, Meeyoung Kim, Deed E. Harrison SSRN Electronic Journal .2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Neurodynamic evaluation and nerve conduction studies in patients with forward head posture Tugba Ozudogru Celik, Burcu Duyur Cakit, Baris Nacir, Hakan Genc, Mehmet Onat Cakit, Aynur Karagoz Acta Neurologica Belgica.2020; 120(3): 621. CrossRef
Efficacy of Kinesio Taping and Postural Correction Exercises on Levator Scapula Electromyographic Activities in Mechanical Cervical Dysfunction: A Randomized Blinded Clinical Trial Aliaa M. Elabd, Abeer R. Ibrahim, Haytham M. Elhafez, Hussien A. Hussien, Omar M. Elabd Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics.2020; 43(6): 588. CrossRef
Effective Assessments of a Short-Duration Poor Posture on Upper Limb Muscle Fatigue Before Physical Exercise Lei Lu, Mark Robinson, Ying Tan, Kusal Goonewardena, Xinliang Guo, Iven Mareels, Denny Oetomo Frontiers in Physiology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Anatomic considerations in headaches associated with cervical sagittal imbalance: A cadaveric biomechanical study Olivia A. Kalmanson, Saeed Khayatzadeh, Anand Germanwala, Matthew Scott-Young, Robert M. Havey, Leonard I. Voronov, Avinash G. Patwardhan Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2019; 65: 140. CrossRef
The Effects of Force That Pushes Forward Lumbar Region on Sagittal Spinal Alignment When Wearing Backpack Tae-sung In, Seung-man Yu, Sang-hun Jang International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(19): 3643. CrossRef
Analysis of the Effect of Backpack Design with Reduced Load Moment Arm on Spinal Alignment Kyung-hun Kim, Jihyeon Ann, Sang-hun Jang International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2019; 16(22): 4351. CrossRef
The Relationship Between Forward Head Posture and Neck Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nesreen Fawzy Mahmoud, Karima A. Hassan, Salwa F. Abdelmajeed, Ibraheem M. Moustafa, Anabela G. Silva Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.2019; 12(4): 562. CrossRef
Ergonomics in the Operating Room: The Cervicospinal Health of Today’s Surgeons Sean M. Fisher, Chad M. Teven, David H. Song Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.2018; 142(5): 1380. CrossRef
Does improvement towards a normal cervical sagittal configuration aid in the management of cervical myofascial pain syndrome: a 1- year randomized controlled trial Ibrahim M. Moustafa, Aliaa A. Diab, Fatma Hegazy, Deed E. Harrison BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Quantitative measurements of forward head posture in a clinical settings: a technical feasibility study Suresh Mani, Shobha Sharma, Baharuddin Omar, Kartini Ahmad, Yughdtheswari Muniandy, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh European Journal of Physiotherapy.2017; 19(3): 119. CrossRef
Manual Acupuncture for Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Rong Wang, Xiuxia Li, Shenghu Zhou, Xiaogang Zhang, Kehu Yang, Xusheng Li Acupuncture in Medicine.2017; 35(4): 241. CrossRef
Relationships among head posture, pain intensity, disability and deep cervical flexor muscle performance in subjects with postural neck pain Arun V. Subbarayalu, Mariam A. Ameer Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences.2017; 12(6): 541. CrossRef
Cervical Spine Muscle-Tendon Unit Length Differences Between Neutral and Forward Head Postures: Biomechanical Study Using Human Cadaveric Specimens Saeed Khayatzadeh, Olivia A. Kalmanson, Dale Schuit, Robert M. Havey, Leonard I. Voronov, Alexander J. Ghanayem, Avinash G. Patwardhan Physical Therapy.2017; 97(7): 756. CrossRef
Is Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Effective in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome? Jong-Ick Kim, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hyung-Youl Park, Won-Hee Lee, Yang-Soo Kim Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow.2016; 19(1): 20. CrossRef
Effects of Therapeutic Exercise on Posture, Pain and Asymmetric Muscle Activity in a Patient with Forward Head Posture: case report Kyung-Tae Yoo, Ho-Seong Lee Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine.2016; 11(1): 71. CrossRef
Relationship Between Active Trigger Points and Head/Neck Posture in Patients with Migraine Gabriela Natália Ferracini, Thaís Cristina Chaves, Fabíola Dach, Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, José Geraldo Speciali American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2016; 95(11): 831. CrossRef
Potentiation of physiotherapy by low-level laser or kinesio taping for treatment of cervicogenic headache: a randomized controlled study Hazem Mohamed Saleh, Marina Onsy Fahim Edward, Ahmed Al Farouk Abdel Fattah, Mohamed Farouk Ali The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology.2016; 32(4): 248. CrossRef
Deep cervical flexor training with a pressure biofeedback unit is an effective method for maintaining neck mobility and muscular endurance in college students with forward head posture Dong Yeon Kang Journal of Physical Therapy Science.2015; 27(10): 3207. CrossRef
Radiologic Assessment of Forward Head Posture and Its Relation to Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Fig. 1 The horizontal distance 1, 2, 3, and 4 were measured by using the lateral view of cervical spine X-ray. Distant 1 was the horizontal distance between the earhole and lateral shoulder. Distant 2 was the horizontal distance between plump line of posterior neck and posterior shoulder. Distant 3 was the horizontal distance between the anterior margin of C1 body and the posterior margin of C7 spinous process. Distant 4 was the horizontal distance between the earhole and midline of C7 lower margin.
Fig. 2 The cervical angle was measured by using lateral view of cervical spine X-ray. The angle from the C2 through C7 vertebrae using the posterior tangent method for analysis of cervical lordosis was depicted. The angle between the two tangent lines (C2-C7) at the posterior vertebral margins represented the curvature of the cervical spine [16].
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Radiologic Assessment of Forward Head Posture and Its Relation to Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Demographic characteristics of patients used in this study
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
Spearman correlation coefficient (r) among age, duration of symptom, and the five parameters
*p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Correlation between myofascial pain syndrome and the five parameters
*p<0.05, significantly different according to Spearman correlation.
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of patients used in this study
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
Table 2 Spearman correlation coefficient (r) among age, duration of symptom, and the five parameters
*p<0.05, **p<0.01.
Table 3 Correlation between myofascial pain syndrome and the five parameters
*p<0.05, significantly different according to Spearman correlation.
