Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Corresponding author: Yong-Geol Kwon. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, 170 Joowha-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang 411-706, Korea. Tel: +82-31-910-7440, Fax: +82-31-910-7746, I9480@paik.ac.kr
• Received: May 13, 2014 • Accepted: July 14, 2014
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
To investigate the effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on post-stroke dysphagia.
Methods
Subacute (<3 months), unilateral hemispheric stroke patients with dysphagia were randomly assigned to the conventional dysphagia therapy (CDT), rTMS, or NMES groups. In rTMS group, rTMS was performed at 100% resting motor threshold with 1 Hz frequency for 20 minutes per session (5 days per week for 2 weeks). In NMES group, electrical stimulation was applied to the anterior neck for 30 minutes per session (5 days per week for 2 weeks). All three groups were given conventional dysphagia therapy for 4 weeks. We evaluated the functional dysphagia scale (FDS), pharyngeal transit time (PTT), the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS), and the American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) swallowing scale at baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks.
Results
Forty-seven patients completed the study; 15 in the CDT group, 14 in the rTMS group, and 18 in the NMES group. Mean changes in FDS and PAS for liquid during first 2 weeks in the rTMS and NMES groups were significantly higher than those in the CDT group, but no significant differences were found between the rTMS and NMES group. No significant difference in mean changes of FDS and PAS for semi-solid, PTT, and ASHA NOMS was observed among the three groups.
Conclusion
These results indicated that both low-frequency rTMS and NMES could induce early recovery from dysphagia; therefore, they both could be useful therapeutic options for dysphagic stroke patients.
The cerebral cortex, the swallowing center, various motor and sensory nerves, and anatomical structure cooperate in the human body to deliver the food taken from the mouth to the stomach. In addition to brainstem damage, bilateral, unilateral cerebral lesion, structural injury or damage related to swallowing function may cause dysphagia. Dysphagia, often accompanied by muscle weakness after stoke, occurs in 45%-65% of acute stroke patients [1,2]. Most patients recover their swallowing function within a few weeks after stroke. This recovery from dysphagia after stroke might follow the reorganization of the non-injured motor cortex, but the extent of recovery varies widely from patient to patient [3]. Dysphagia may cause serious complications, such as aspiration pneumonia, dehydration, malnutrition, or even death. Thus, following early detection of swallowing dysfunction, immediate and appropriate treatment is needed to prevent possible complications caused by dysphagia.
For the rehabilitation of dysphagia, various treatment methods have been used to improve the swallowing function of patients, including sensory stimulation of the oral and facial areas, oral and pharyngeal muscle strengthening, compensatory techniques, and thermal tactile stimulation [4,5]. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive method of stimulating the brain, has been used recently as it is known to be effective in controlling the excitability of the cortex and in reducing the imbalance between the hemispheres after stroke [6,7]. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has also been used in many studies for the treatment of dysphagia [8,9,10,11,12]. It uses surface electrodes to deliver electrical stimulation to anterior neck muscles causing muscle contraction by depolarizing the nerve fibers within the region of application.
rTMS and NMES are treatment methods commonly used in clinical practice for dysphagia of stroke patients. Michou et al. [13] compared the effect of the 5 Hz-rTMS, the pharyngeal electrical stimulation, and the combined use of the two modalities in patients with chronic dysphagic stroke to that of the control group. However, they used the intraluminal catheter inserted either transnasally or transorally to stimulate the pharyngeal muscles, which was difficult to apply in actual clinical practice. In addition, only single stimulation session was used in that study. Furthermore, the evaluation was conducted immediately and 30 minutes after the session to observe the short-term change. rTMS and NMES are often used clinically during the subacute phase rather than the chronic phase of stroke. NMES with surface electrodes has been widely used in clinical setting because surface electrodes are non-invasive which can be easily applied. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the treatment effects of rTMS and NMES and to follow-up patients with subacute unilateral cerebral infarction or hemorrhage with dysphagia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
Stroke patients with dysphagia were enrolled in this study. Participant selection criteria were 1) primary diagnosis of unilateral cerebral infarction or hemorrhage with computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan; 2) stroke onset <3 months; 3) patients who could maintain their balance during the evaluation and treatment session; and 4) patients who had cognitive function enough to cooperate in the treatment (>15-point on the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination [K-MMSE]). Dysphagia was confirmed using a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) for the subjects who had clinical symptoms, such as difficulty of swallowing as well as chocking, coughing, wet voice or nasal regurgitation after swallowing. Exclusion criteria for the trial were 1) patients who could not undergo the VFSS or who failed the examination; 2) presence of dysphagia before stroke; 3) history of prior stroke, epilepsy, tumor, radiotherapy in the head and neck, or other neurological diseases; 4) unstable medical condition; and 5) contraindication to magnetic or electrical stimulation.
Study design and evaluation
Eligible patients with confirmed dysphagia based on the result of the VFSS were randomly allocated to the conventional dysphagia treatment (CDT) group, the rTMS group, or the NMES group using a randomization table. All patients in the three groups received the conventional dysphagia treatment including oropharyngeal muscle-strengthening, exercise for range of motion of the neck and tongue, thermal tactile stimulation, Mendelson maneuver, and food intake training for 4 weeks. The two groups other than the CDT group underwent either rTMS or NMES for two weeks (Fig. 1).
Measurements
To compare the treatment effects of the three groups, the total score in the functional dysphagia scale (FDS), the pharyngeal transit time (PTT), and the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) were evaluated using the VFSS at baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks. The American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) swallowing scale was assessed. The FDS is based on a physiological scale and is presented as 0-100 points, depending on the severity of dysphagia [14]. The PTT is one of the sub-items of the FDS, which is a quantitative measurement. The PAS is an 8-point scale that measures selected aspects of penetration and aspiration, conveying depth of airway invasion and whether material entering the airway is expelled [15]. The ASHA NORM swallowing scale is a 7-point rating scale whose lower level indicates severer dysphagia. It was clinically evaluated by integrating all the information from the diet level and the supervision level required [16].
VFSS
VFSS is a beneficial assessment tool for visualizing the swallow physiology of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and upper esophagus during deglutition. VFSS can directly confirm aspiration and diagnose the anatomical or functional problems of patients. VFSS can be easily conducted, and the appropriate type of diet, education of posture, or need for tube feeding can be determined for individual patients according to their result. Thus, VFSS is commonly utilized in clinical setting to evaluate dysphagia and aspiration [17]. In this study, VFSS was performed in all subjects, with the same protocol used in the fluoroscopic laboratory. Both the lateral and posteroanterior images were obtained following oral administration of 5 mL semi-solid and 5 mL liquid bolus (viscosity and material were standardized) while the subjects were seated. One rehabilitation physician with considerable experience performed the VFSS examination and determined the PPT as well as the FDS and PAS scores using videofluoroscopic analysis. He was blinded during this study period by the way of not being informed about the study and grouping of the patients.
rTMS
Before performing rTMS, we evaluated motor-evoked potentials using Magstim 200 (Magstim, Whiteland, UK) and a coil stimulator. The potentials in the mylohyoid muscle were recorded using an electromyography device (Medelec Synergy, Oxford, UK). The magnetic stimulation was repeated with a change in intensity. The minimum intensity that showed 100 µV or more amplitude in three of the five consecutive stimulations was determined as the resting motor threshold [18]. The location yielding the largest response amplitude in the pharyngeal motor cortex of the contralesional hemisphere was determined as a hot spot. For the treatment, 1 Hz magnetic stimulation at 100% intensity of the resting motor threshold in the hot spot was applied for 20 minutes each (total 1,200 pulses a day), 5 times a week for 2 weeks.
NMES
NMES was applied using a modified hand-held battery-powered electrical stimulator VitalStim (Chattanooga Group, Hixson, TN, USA) for 30 minutes per day, 5 times a week, for a total of 2 weeks. The equipment used two independent channel methods with alternating currents. Two sets of electrodes were attached between the digastrics muscle and the hyoid bone and between the hyoid bone and the thyroid cartilage for channel 1, and between the thyroid cartilage and the cricoids cartilage and vertically under the cricoid cartilage for channel 2. Through this method, we were able to stimulate the muscles needed for swallowing, such as the digastric, mylohyoid, and thyrohyoid muscles. The waveform produced by the stimulator was a rectangular symmetric biphasic wave mode. The pulse width and the frequency were determined at 300 µs and 80 Hz with, 100 µs in interstimulus intervals. The intensity was between 7 mA and 9 mA, depending on the compliance of the subjects.
Analysis method
The changes in the evaluation parameters from the initial to the 2nd week or 4th week evaluation were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test to determine the statistical difference among three groups. For post-hoc, the Bonferroni method was used. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed in each category between the groups. The significance level of the post-hoc was 0.05/3=0.017. Perprotocol (PP) analysis was performed using the data of the subjects who completed the entire four-week study period, and the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was also performed using the data of all the subjects who completed or withdrew from the study, along with the last observation carried forward method. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS ver. 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was considered when p-value was less than 0.05.
RESULTS
Sixty subjects were randomized into the three aforementioned groups. However, five subjects in the CDT group, six in the rTMS group, and two in the NMES group withdrawn from the study due to follow-up loss at the fourth-week evaluation point. In the PP analysis, the mean age of the CDT group was 62.5±8.2 years old, with nine males and six females; in the rTMS group, the mean age was 59.8±11.8 years old, with 6 males and 8 females; and in the NMES group, the mean age was 66.3±15.4 years old, with 12 males and 6 females. The period from the onset of stroke to the treatment administration was 34.4±10.1 days in the CDT group, 30.3±14.8 days in the rTMS group, and 37.3±16.1 days in the NMES group. In the ITT analysis, the mean age in the CDT group was 60.6±7.7 years old, with 13 males and 7 females; in the rTMS group, the mean age was 61.8±10.4 years old, with 9 males and 11 females; and in the NMES group, the mean age was 65.4±15.5 years old, with 12 males and 8 females. The period from the onset of stroke to the treatment administration was 34.6±12.1 days in the CDT group, 32.0±13.9 days in the rTMS group, and 37.5±15.7 days in the NMES group. The age, sex, type of stroke, location of lesion, score in the K-MMSE and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, and period from the onset of stroke to the treatment administration in both the PP and ITT analysis were not significantly different among the three groups at the initial evaluation (Table 1). The FDS, PTT, PAS, and ASHA NOMS scores at the initial evaluation were not significantly different either among the three groups (Table 2).
FDS
PP analysis
The score change (△) in FDS for semi-solid materials was not significantly different between groups from the baseline to the 2nd week (p=0.792) or to the 4th week evaluation (p=0.962). The mean change for liquid from the baseline to the 2nd and the 4th week evaluations were -6.50±4.41 and -14.25±8.45 in the CDT group, -15.15±9.88 and -19.15±12.95 in the rTMS group, and -17.89±9.61 and -21.47±12.44 in the NMES group, (Fig. 2A). The changes from the baseline to the 2nd week showed a statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.002). The rTMS and NMES groups showed significant decreases (p=0.016 and p<0.001, respectively) compared to the CDT group. However, there was no significant difference between the rTMS and the NMES groups (p=0.617). The change from the initial evaluation to the 4th week evaluation did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.233).
ITT analysis
The change in FDS for the semi-solid material did not show a significant difference among the groups from baseline to the 2nd (p=0.895) or the 4th week evaluation (p=0.828). The mean changes in FDS for liquid from the baseline to the 2nd and the 4th week evaluation were -7.95±4.68 and -12.60±7.35 in the CDT group, -14.40±5.61 and -17.20±11.19 in the rTMS group, and -17.20±9.84 and -20.60±12.71 in the NMES group (Fig. 2B). The change from the baseline to the 2nd week evaluation showed a significant difference among groups (p=0.002). The rTMS and NMES groups showed significant decreases (p=0.013 and p=0.001, respectively) compared to the CDT group. However, the difference between the rTMS and NMES groups was not statistically significant (p=0.473). There was no significant difference in the change from the initial to the 4th week evaluation among groups (p=0.075).
PTT
The PTT result for semi-solid and liquid decreased in all three groups. However, the changes were not statistically significant in either PP or ITT analyses (Table 3).
PAS
PP analysis
The score change in PAS for the semi-solid did not show a significant difference among groups from the baseline to the 2nd or the 4th week evaluation (p=0.677 and p=0.978, respectively). The mean changes in the PAS score for liquid from baseline to the 2nd and the 4th week evaluations were -0.92±0.76 and 2.00±1.00 in the CDT group, -2.08±1.07 and -2.54±1.34 in the rTMS group, and -2.16±1.42 and -2.63±1.46 in the NMES group (Fig. 3A). The change from baseline to the 2nd week evaluation showed a significant difference among groups (p=0.019). The rTMS and NMES groups showed significant decreases (p=0.011 and p=0.014, respectively) compared to the CDT group. However, the difference between the rTMS and NMES groups was not statistically significant (p=0.968). There was no significant difference in the change from baseline to the 4th week evaluation among groups (p=0.540).
ITT analysis
The change in the PAS score for the semi-solid did not show a significant difference among groups from the baseline to the 2nd or the 4th week evaluations (p=0.940 and p=0.860, respectively). The mean changes in the PAS score for liquid from baseline to the 2nd and the 4th week evaluations were -0.90±0.77 and 1.55±1.07 in the CDT group, 1.90±1.30 and -2.25±1.30 in the rTMS group, and -2.10±1.41 and -2.55±1.47 in the NMES group (Fig. 3B). The change from the initial to the 2nd week evaluation showed a significant difference among groups (p=0.008). The rTMS and the NMES groups showed significant decreases (p=0.009 and p=0.005, respectively) compared to the CDT group. However, the difference between the rTMS and the NMES groups was not statistically significant (p=0.473). There was no significant difference in the change from the initial to the 4th week evaluation among groups (p=0.090).
ASHA NOMS swallowing scale
The changes of ASHA NOMs swallowing scale from baseline to the 2nd and 4th week evaluations (p=0.919 and p=0.544, respectively) did not show significant differences among groups (Fig. 4).
Patient safety
Potential adverse events from magnetic stimulation, including headache, pain in the administration site, convulsion, decreased hearing ability, nausea, and visual and neurologic changes, were monitored for two weeks. One subject complained of mild headache which was eventually alleviated without any treatment. For the NMES group, we checked possible adverse effects, such as the pain or skin irritation in the administration site, laryngospasm, or changes of heart rate and blood pressure. Two subjects complained of mild pain at the administration site, but those symptoms were resolved after the adjustment of the stimulation intensity. There was no subject who complained of other adverse events.
DISCUSSION
This study was conducted to compare the effects of rTMS and NMES, which are widely used in clinical practice for subacute patients with dysphagia after stroke in the unilateral cerebral hemisphere. Our results showed that the changes in the FDS and PAS scores of the rTMS and NMES groups had statistically significant differences compared to the CDT group for 2 weeks after baseline evaluation, but the differences between the rTMS and the NMES groups were not significant. Other parameters did not show statistical significance among groups.
rTMS is a non-invasive stimulation method to facilitate neurological recovery after stroke. Patients with unilateral brain damage may have an imbalance between the hemispheres. High-frequency magnetic stimulation of an affected hemisphere increases the excitability of the cortex, whereas low-frequency stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere lowers cortical excitability, which might decrease the imbalance between the hemispheres [6,7]. However, the exact recovery mechanism of rTMS is currently unclear. Effects of rTMS in stroke patients with dysphagia have been reported in some studies. Verin and Leroi [19] found that, after 5 days of low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS in the unaffected hemisphere, the swallowing function improved significantly in patients who suffered from stroke. Khedr et al. [20] also reported that, after the application of 3 Hz-rTMS to the affected hemisphere, a significant improvement in the swallowing function of patients with brain injury compared to the sham-stimulated group. These studies demonstrated the effect of rTMS on dysphagia. However, each study used a different magnetic stimulation frequency with no definitely established protocol. Therefore, the results of those previous studies could not be simply compared. However, Kim et al. [18] conducted a study to compare the 5-Hz stimulation in the affected hemisphere, the 1-Hz stimulation in the unaffected hemisphere, and sham stimulation in patients with brain injury and reported that the FDS and PAS scores showed significant improvement in the low-frequency group compared to the high-frequency or the control groups, with the low-frequency rTMS being effective in improving the swallowing function. It is known that swallowing musculature is discretely and somatotopically represented on the motor and premotor cortex of both hemispheres. It is considered that the dominant hemisphere exerts the principal effect on swallowing function and this dominant hemisphere is independent of handedness [21]. As such, it was reported that patients with a unilateral hemispheric stroke with lesions in the dominant hemisphere in terms of the swallowing function can suffer from severe dysphagia, and that the recovery from dysphagia depends on regulating the non-affected hemisphere to reduce interhemispheric inhibition [21]. Based on these factors, our study focused on the function of the unaffected hemisphere to decrease the interhemispheric inhibition and used low-frequency (1 Hz) magnetic stimulation for the rTMS group.
Patients with unilateral hemispheric infarction or hemorrhage were enrolled in this study, but the incidence of dysphasia was 40% to 80% in brainstem stroke [22,23]. A previous study has reported that swallowing function is improved in patients with stroke in the brainstem after the application of 3 Hz magnetic stimulation in the both hemisphere compared to the control group [24]. The mechanism of dysphagia in brainstem stoke includes damage of the corticobulbar tract and disorder of central control due to lesion of the brainstem swallowing center, which is a different from that of hemispheric stroke causing dysphasia. In addition, magnetic stimulation cannot be directly applied in the brainstem. As such, this study excluded the subjects with lesions in the brainstem from the initial study design stage as it used rTMS to decrease the excitability of the contralesional hemisphere so as to decrease the imbalance between the hemispheres.
Many previous studies have reported significant effects of NMES on dysphasia [8,9,10,11,12,25] and suggested that the electrical stimulation could strengthen swallowing-related muscle and reactivate nerve pathways in the oral cavity. In addition, NMES could increase the local blood flow, reduce the edema, enhance the laryngeal elevation, and protect the striated muscles from the disuse atrophy, which would lead to improved swallowing function [8,10,26]. Two mechanisms have been suggested to explain the strengthened swallowing-related muscle seen with NMES. First, the program of a low number of repetitions with a high-intensity muscle contraction increases the muscle mass, which induces augmentation of muscle strength. The second mechanism proposes that the muscle strengthening seen following NMES results from a reversal of voluntary recruitment order with a selective augmentation of type II muscle fibers. Because type II fibers have a higher specific force than type I fibers, selective augmentation of type II muscle fibers will increase the overall strength of the muscle [27]. Our study result that the NMES group showed greater improvement than the CDT group after electrical stimulation for 2 weeks might be due to the selective recruitment of type II fibers than to the increased amount of muscle mass. Another mechanism of NMES suggests that the remodulation of the corticobulbar tract by somatosensory stimulation of the pharynx increases the excitability of swallowing motor cortex [28,29]. Considering the short study period used in this study, the positive effect of NMES obtained in this study might be caused by the strengthened muscles rather than by the reactivation of the nerve pathways.
All evaluation parameters showed improvement in all three groups. According to the previous studies on dysphagia after stroke, a large proportion of initially dysphagic patients recover their ability to swallow in the acute stage after the stroke, with prevalence of dysphagia of 47% at 2 to 3 weeks after the stroke onset, and of 17% at 2 to 4 months follow-up [30]. About 87% of the survivors have returned to their pre-stroke diet at 6 months after stroke [31]. As subacute stroke patients were enrolled in this study, the natural recovery from stroke must have also contributed to the observed improvement of the swallowing function. For ethical reasons, the control group had to be given at least the conventional rehabilitation treatment for dysphagia, and as such, it is unclear whether the improvement of swallowing function in our study was due to spontaneous recovery or not. Consequently, it cannot be concluded that all three treatments showed effect on swallowing function even if the evaluation parameters at the 4th week evaluation exhibited improvement over those at the initial evaluation. The rTMS and NMES groups, however, showed significantly decreased FDS and PAS scores for liquid at 2nd week compared to the CDT group, and the change from baseline to the 4th week did not show a significant difference among groups, indicating that rTMS and NMES could induce early recovery of dysphagia for liquid. Also, the change from the initial to the 2nd week evaluation did not show a significant difference between the rTMS and NMES groups. The rTMS is central stimulation to control the imbalance between the hemispheres whereas the electrical stimulation applies more to the peripheral nerves and muscles. Even if their mechanisms of action are different, they appear to have the same induction effect for the early recovery of dysphagia for liquid. Considering their different mechanisms, they can be used together for synergic effects in recovering the swallowing function. Future studies are required to verify the effectiveness of the combination method.
Two different viscosities-semi-solid and liquid-were used for the VFSS. The PAS score for the semi-solid material after treatment decreased in all three groups compared to that at the baseline evaluation, but the change was not significantly different among groups. This result could be due to the fact that most patients showed lower PAS scores using a semi-solid material than using a liquid material at the initial evaluation, because PAS has only 8 points whereas FDS has a total of 100 points, which might have resulted in the less significant improvement. The PTT showed a decreased pattern in all three groups. The rTMS and NMES groups showed a greater decrease than the CDT group in the PTT, but the difference among the groups was not significant. The PTT is a quantitative variable as one of the sub-items of FDS. Therefore, PTT cannot generally represent the whole swallowing function.
This study was designed to enroll subacute stroke patients who were admitted in our hospital, many of them showed decreased cognitive function. They could not maintain their sitting balance due to severe muscle weakness. As such, the number of potentially eligible patients was limited, which could affect the interpretation of the study results. Some factors, such as their neurologic impairment and age, may influence on the severity of dysphasia, but stratification considering the aforementioned factors was not done at the randomization. Moreover, the study design did not include the sham-stimulation group for both rTMS and NMES, and the CDT group was used as a control group, which led to incomplete blinding. The FDS score is the sum of the scores of the subitems. In this study, only the FDS total score and the PTT were quantitatively assessed, whereas other sub-items in the FDS were not statistically analyzed. Lastly, the swallowing function at 2 and 4 weeks after baseline was evaluated, but long-term follow-up was not performed. Considering the aforementioned limitations, additional studies should be conducted in the future to supplement the results of this study.
In conclusion, this study evaluated the treatment effect of the CDT, rTMS, and NMES in subacute stroke patients. The results of this study demonstrated that both rTMS and NMES induced the early recovery of the swallowing function for liquid in stroke patients, but no difference was observed between the two methods. Therefore, both low-frequency rTMS and NMES might be useful therapeutic options to recover swallowing function of dysphagic stroke patients.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
REFERENCES
1. Daniels SK, Brailey K, Priestly DH, Herrington LR, Weisberg LA, Foundas AL. Aspiration in patients with acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:14-19.
2. Roth EJ, Lovell L, Harvey RL, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Diaz S. Incidence of and risk factors for medical complications during stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2001;32:523-529.
5. Ludlow CL, Bielamowicz S, Daniels Rosenberg M, Ambalavanar R, Rossini K, Gillespie M, et al. Chronic intermittent stimulation of the thyroarytenoid muscle maintains dynamic control of glottal adduction. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:44-57.
6. Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu WH, Gerloff C, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128(Pt 3):490-499.
8. Blumenfeld L, Hahn Y, Lepage A, Leonard R, Belafsky PC. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation versus traditional dysphagia therapy: a nonconcurrent cohort study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:754-757.
11. Kiger M, Brown CS, Watkins L. Dysphagia management: an analysis of patient outcomes using VitalStim therapy compared to traditional swallow therapy. Dysphagia 2006;21:243-253.
13. Michou E, Mistry S, Jefferson S, Tyrrell P, Hamdy S. Characterizing the mechanisms of central and peripheral forms of neurostimulation in chronic dysphagic stroke patients. Brain Stimul 2014;7:66-73.
14. Han TR, Paik NJ, Park JW. Quantifying swallowing function after stroke: a functional dysphagia scale based on videofluoroscopic studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:677-682.
16. Wesling M, Brady S, Jensen M, Nickell M, Statkus D, Escobar N. Dysphagia outcomes in patients with brain tumors undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. Dysphagia 2003;18:203-210.
18. Kim L, Chun MH, Kim BR, Lee SJ. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on patients with brain injury and Dysphagia. Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35:765-771.
19. Verin E, Leroi AM. Poststroke dysphagia rehabilitation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a noncontrolled pilot study. Dysphagia 2009;24:204-210.
20. Khedr EM, Abo-Elfetoh N, Rothwell JC. Treatment of post-stroke dysphagia with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Acta Neurol Scand 2009;119:155-161.
24. Khedr EM, Abo-Elfetoh N. Therapeutic role of rTMS on recovery of dysphagia in patients with lateral medullary syndrome and brainstem infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:495-499.
25. Lim KB, Lee HJ, Lim SS, Choi YI. Neuromuscular electrical and thermal-tactile stimulation for dysphagia caused by stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:174-178.
26. Sun SF, Hsu CW, Lin HS, Sun HP, Chang PH, Hsieh WL, et al. Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and traditional swallowing rehabilitation in the treatment of stroke-related dysphagia. Dysphagia 2013;28:557-566.
28. Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, Rothwell J, Hobday D, Hollander I, et al. Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 2002;34:831-840.
29. Gow D, Hobson AR, Furlong P, Hamdy S. Characterising the central mechanisms of sensory modulation in human swallowing motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2382-2390.
30. Finestone HM, Greene-Finestone LS, Wilson ES, Teasell RW. Malnutrition in stroke patients on the rehabilitation service and at follow-up: prevalence and predictors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:310-316.
Intervention design. In rTMS group, rTMS is performed for 20 minutes per session, 5 days per week during the first 2 weeks. In NMES group, electrical stimulation is applied for 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week during the first 2 weeks. All three groups are given CDT for 4 weeks. CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Fig. 2
Mean changes in functional dysphagia scale (FDS) scores by both per-protocol analysis (A) and intention-to-treat analysis (B). CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation. *p<0.017 by the Mann-Whitney U test (vs. CDT group).
Fig. 3
Mean changes in penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores by both per-protocol analysis (A) and intention-to-treat analysis (B). CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation. *p<0.017 by the Mann-Whitney U test (vs. CDT group).
Fig. 4
Mean changes in American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) swallowing scale by both per-protocol analysis (A) and intention-to-treat analysis (B). CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Table 1
Biomedical characteristics of the subjects
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; K-MMSE, Korean Mini-Mental State Examination.
Table 2
Initial evaluation of the swallowing function
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; FDS, functional dysphagia scale; PTT, pharyngeal transit time; PAS, penetration-aspiration scale; ASHA NOMS, American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System.
Table 3
Comparison of mean changes in pharyngeal transit time
Cortical and peripheral neurostimulation to improve swallowing function, aspiration, and dysphagia severity in dysphagia management: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Kondwani J. Banda, Hsin Chu, Chien-Mei Sung, Ruey Chen, Pi-Yu Su, Li-Fang Chang, Li-Chung Pien, Chu-Yi Wang, Kuei-Ru Chou Clinical Nutrition.2026; 57: 106567. CrossRef
The neurorehabilitation of post‐stroke dysphagia: Physiology and pathophysiology Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Shaheen Hamdy The Journal of Physiology.2025; 603(3): 617. CrossRef
Effects of Non‐Pharmacological Interventions on the Swallowing Function of Patients With Post‐Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis Bohan Zhang, Ka Po Wong, Cai Guo, Shu‐Cheng Chen, Shuojin Fu, Ruifu Kang, Qian Xiao, Jing Qin Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2025; 52(1): 109. CrossRef
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Strategies for Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis Xiaomin Wu, Baixiang Zhang, Gareth Ambler, Qingfa Chen, Huayao Huang, Huiying Lin, Shuangfang Fang, Nan Liu, Houwei Du Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2025; 106(8): 1248. CrossRef
Effects of four non-invasive stimulations on swallowing function and quality of life of stroke patients—a network meta-analysis Xinyu Lin, Haojie Li, Xie Wu, Rui Huang Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Translation and Cross‐Cultural Adaptation of Sydney Swallow Questionnaire in Urdu and Its Psychometric Properties Among Post‐Stroke Dysphagia Patients Syeda Amna Ejaz, Rania Imran, Anam Jamil, Hadia Furqan, Alina Mehmood World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with different stimulation parameters on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Xu-Miao Peng, Cheng Gong, Mei-Xia Xiao, Liang-Sheng Chen, Yi Li, Jie Chen, Mao-Yuan Wang, Yun Luo Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation 雯倩 闫 Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(06): 753. CrossRef
The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With Different Stimulation Methods on Post‐Stroke Dysphagia: A Network Meta‐Analysis Li Jiayao, Liu Zejian, Zhao Henan, Chen Yuan, Qi Hongjing, Zhang Jun, Sun Jie Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2025; 52(10): 1865. CrossRef
Task-based fMRI study of activation in the brain network: A seed-based functional connectivity analysis M Chen, Y Chen, X Wang, X Ye, Z Huang, W Wu International Journal of Radiation Research.2025; 23(2): 371. CrossRef
Gaps in Guidelines on Long‐Term Management Strategies for Post‐Stroke Dysphagia Anel Karisik, Bendix Labeit, Alois Josef Schiefecker, Simon Sollereder, Oliver Galvan, Simone Graf, Stefan Kiechl, Michael Knoflach, Lukas Mayer‐Suess European Journal of Neurology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Theta-Burst Stimulation on Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Chunhua Liu, Jiayan Wang, Huajian Lin, Zegen Ye, Liqin Wang, Xilin Liu, Yongfei Zheng NeuroRehabilitation.2025; 57(4): 453. CrossRef
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia Treatment: A Systemic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Zhenni Wang, Zihao Xiao, Qin Shen, Na Zhao, Weiming Zhang Dysphagia.2024; 39(3): 424. CrossRef
Efficacy of non‐invasive brain stimulation for post‐stroke dysphagia: a meta‐analysis Shan Yao, Xuxia Wang, Jie Sun, Pengfei Guo Psychogeriatrics.2024; 24(2): 433. CrossRef
The effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia in stroke patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses Anastasios M. Georgiou, Phivos Phylactou, Maria Kambanaros Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of effortful swallowing against kinesiology taping resistance on the swallowing function in patients with poststroke dysphagia: A randomized controlled trial Hwan-Hee Kim, Ji-Su Park Medicine.2024; 103(21): e38344. CrossRef
Effects of different mylohyoid muscle stimulations on swallowing cortex excitability in healthy subjects Zhiyong Wang, Junhui Bai, Keling Cheng, Xia Zhang, Zhenfeng Fan, Yangjia Chen, Jun Ni Behavioural Brain Research.2024; 470: 115055. CrossRef
New and Evolving Treatments for Neurologic Dysphagia Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Bendix Labeit, Sriramya Lapa, Nathalie Rommel, Shaheen Hamdy Drugs.2024; 84(8): 909. CrossRef
Perspective on the clinical management of post-stroke aphasia and dysphagia using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) Anastasios M. Georgiou Frontiers in Neurology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Individualized Spots Based on Task functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Swallowing Function in Poststroke Dysphagia Meiyuan Chen, Ziyang Huang, Yi Chen, Xiaochuan Wang, Xiaojun Ye, Wenjie Wu Brain Connectivity.2024; 14(10): 513. CrossRef
Aspiration after Critical Illness: Role of Endotracheal Tube, Tracheostomy, and Swallowing Disorders Benedict Osorio, Rebecca Krakora, Geraldine Epping, Drew Wright, Kapil Rajwani Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.2024; 45(06): 669. CrossRef
Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Meta-analysis of Stimulation Frequency, Stimulation Site, and Timing of Outcome Measurement Ming-Yen Hsiao, Yoo Jin Choo, I.-Chun Liu, Mathieu Boudier-Revéret, Min Cheol Chang Dysphagia.2023; 38(1): 435. CrossRef
The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Functions in Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Randomized Controlled Trial Elif Tarihci Cakmak, Ekin Ilke Sen, Can Doruk, Comert Sen, Selim Sezikli, Ayse Yaliman Dysphagia.2023; 38(3): 874. CrossRef
Evaluating the Therapeutic Application of Neuromodulation in the Human Swallowing System Ivy Cheng, Ayodele Sasegbon, Shaheen Hamdy Dysphagia.2023; 38(4): 1005. CrossRef
Sensory neuromuscular electrical stimulation for dysphagia rehabilitation: A literature review Itt Assoratgoon, Naru Shiraishi, Ryo Tagaino, Toru Ogawa, Keiichi Sasaki Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2023; 50(2): 157. CrossRef
The effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the unilateral cerebellar hemisphere on swallowing-related brain regions in healthy subjects Bingyan Wang, Hui Sun, Xiaona Pan, Wenshuai Ma, Linghui Dong, Qiang Wang, Pingping Meng Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yuhan Wang, Lu Xu, Linjia Wang, Minjiao Jiang, Ling Zhao Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Post-stroke Dysphagia Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review of Meta-analyses in 2022 Sumiya Shibata, Satoko Koganemaru, Tatsuya Mima Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 8: n/a. CrossRef
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation for gastrointestinal motility disorders Gengqing Song, Sophie Trujillo, Yuhan Fu, Fahmi Shibi, Jiande Chen, Ronnie Fass Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A blended neurostimulation protocol to delineate cortico-muscular and spino-muscular dynamics following neuroplastic adaptation Filip Stefanovic, Julian A. Martinez, Ghazala T. Saleem, Sue Ann Sisto, Michael T. Miller, Yaa A. Achampong, Albert H. Titus Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Seoyon Yang, Jin-Woo Park, Kyunghoon Min, Yoon Se Lee, Young-Jin Song, Seong Hee Choi, Doo Young Kim, Seung Hak Lee, Hee Seung Yang, Wonjae Cha, Ji Won Kim, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo, Min-Wook Kim, Hee-Soon Woo, Sung-Jong Park, Sungju Jee, Ju Sun Oh, Ki De Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 47(Suppl 1): S1. CrossRef
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Seoyon Yang, Jin-Woo Park, Kyunghoon Min, Yoon Se Lee, Young-Jin Song, Seong Hee Choi, Doo Young Kim, Seung Hak Lee, Hee Seung Yang, Wonjae Cha, Ji Won Kim, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo, Min-Wook Kim, Hee-Soon Woo, Sung-Jong Park, Sungju Jee, Ju Sun Oh, Ki De Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society.2023; 13(2): 77. CrossRef
Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Stroke Heather Y.F. Yong, Aravind Ganesh, Carlos Camara-Lemarroy Seminars in Neurology.2023; 43(04): 609. CrossRef
Investigation of the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper-limb motor recovery in subacute ischemic stroke without cortical involvement: a protocol paper for a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled tria Hee-Mun Cho, Seungwoo Cha, Min Kyun Sohn, Sungju Jee, Won Kee Chang, Won-Seok Kim, Nam-Jong Paik Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect of Dysphagia on Quality of Life in Stroke Patients Mohammad Al Rjoob, Nik Fariza Husna Nik Hassan, Mohd Azmarul A Aziz, Faiz Mustafar, Mohd Normani Zakaria Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders.2023; 8(2): 70. CrossRef
Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia patients during recovery stage of stroke: a randomized controlled trial Jiahui TAI, Ruiping HU, Shunjuan FAN, Yi WU, Tingwei WANG, Junfa WU European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Motor Imagery Training on Patients with Post-Stroke Dysphagia Sujian ZHOU, Shuiliang WANG, Xiaoying LIU, Pengqi WANG, Yin QIN Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 33(2): 108. CrossRef
Treatment of Post-Stroke Dysphagia with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Based on the Bimodal Balance Recovery Model: A Pilot Study Lu Wang, Fengyun Wang, Yanmin Lin, Xiaojun Guo, Jingjing Wang, Jianbin Liu, Chunqing Feng, Shibin Xu, Yanhong Wang, Chengfei Gao, Yankang Mei, Yanhui Li Journal of Integrative Neuroscience.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Metaplasticity in the human swallowing system: clinical implications for dysphagia rehabilitation Ivy Cheng, Shaheen Hamdy Neurological Sciences.2022; 43(1): 199. CrossRef
Clinical effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on dysphagia due to stroke Yonggang Jiao, Guocai Li, Yingyi Dai Neurological Sciences.2022; 43(5): 3139. CrossRef
Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part I: Pharyngeal and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Renée Speyer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Liza Bergström, Shaheen Hamdy, Bas Joris Heijnen, Lianne Remijn, Sarah Wilkes-Gillan, Reinie Cordier Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(3): 776. CrossRef
Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation Renée Speyer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Liza Bergström, Shaheen Hamdy, Timothy Pommée, Mathieu Balaguer, Anett Kaale, Reinie Cordier Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(4): 993. CrossRef
Statistical Power and Swallowing Rehabilitation Research: Current Landscape and Next Steps James C. Borders, Alessandro A. Grande, Michelle S. Troche Dysphagia.2022; 37(6): 1673. CrossRef
The Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Xin Wen, Zicai Liu, Lida Zhong, Yang Peng, Jing Wang, Huiyu Liu, Xiaoqian Gong Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Commentary: The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yu-lei Xie, Shan Wang, Yu-han Xie, Xin Chen, Yin-xu Wang, Qing Wu Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Benefits from Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Michał Starosta, Natalia Cichoń, Joanna Saluk-Bijak, Elżbieta Miller Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(8): 2149. CrossRef
The Effectiveness of Transcranial Stimulation in Improving Swallowing Outcomes in Adults with Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Shu Wen Tan, Anping Wu, Ling Jie Cheng, Sai Ho Wong, Ying Lau, Siew Tiang Lau Dysphagia.2022; 37(6): 1796. CrossRef
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Dysphagia After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Yu-lei Xie, Shan Wang, Jia-meng Jia, Yu-han Xie, Xin Chen, Wu Qing, Yin-xu Wang Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Post-stroke Dysphagia: Prognosis and Treatment–A Systematic Review of RCT on Interventional Treatments for Dysphagia Following Subacute Stroke Philipp Balcerak, Sydney Corbiere, Richard Zubal, Georg Kägi Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect and Optimal Parameters of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Poststroke Dysphagia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Jia Qiao, Qiu-ping Ye, Zhi-min Wu, Yong Dai, Zu-lin Dou Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on poststroke dysphagia: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials Hailong Li, Lin Li, Rui Zhang, Xiongang Huang, Jian Lin, Caixia Liu, Weimin Lou International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.2022; 45(2): 109. CrossRef
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Versus Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Post Stroke Dysphagia: A Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial Azza B. Hammad, Eman A. Elhamrawy, Hayam Abdel-Tawab, Mohamed A. Shafik, Yossra Sallam, Hala Mohamed Elzomor, Eshak I. Bahbah Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2022; 31(8): 106554. CrossRef
Therapeutic Effect and Optimal Electrode Placement of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Thanh-Nhan Doan, Wen-Chao Ho, Liang-Hui Wang, Fei-Chun Chang, Trang Thi Quynh Tran, Li-Wei Chou Life.2022; 12(6): 875. CrossRef
Comparison Between Comprehensive Nursing Care Ward and Private Care Ward on Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients Yang Rok Hur, Woo Sup Song, Kyung Min Kim, Ki Hun Hwang Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Improvement of Post-stroke Dysphagia by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Yu-Lei Xie, Wen Li, Shan Wang, Ju Yang, Zheng-Lei Yang, Qing Wu, Yin-Xu Wang Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research.2022; 47(3): 303. CrossRef
High-Frequency Cerebellar rTMS Improves the Swallowing Function of Patients with Dysphagia after Brainstem Stroke Ling-hui Dong, Xiaona Pan, Yuyang Wang, Guangtao Bai, Chao Han, Qiang Wang, Pingping Meng, Xi-Ze Jia Neural Plasticity.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Advances in the Treatment of Dysphagia in Neurological Disorders: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Considerations Ivy Cheng, Adeel Hamad, Ayodele Sasegbon, Shaheen Hamdy Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment.2022; Volume 18: 2251. CrossRef
Commentary: The effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ting Li, Xiao-Yan Duan, Xiu-Mei Zou, Xi Huang, Yu-Juan Kang, Ming-Zhu Sun Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Dysphagia in Lateral Medullary Syndrome: A Narrative Review Sung Ho Jang, Min Son Kim Dysphagia.2021; 36(3): 329. CrossRef
Effects of Neurostimulation on Poststroke Dysphagia: A Synthesis of Current Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials Ivy Cheng, Ayodele Sasegbon, Shaheen Hamdy Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2021; 24(8): 1388. CrossRef
Dysphagia in Wilson’s Disease: A Case Report of One-Year Follow-Up Doyoung Kim, Yoon Ghil Park, Jung Hyun Park, Jinyoung Park Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society.2021; 11(1): 82. CrossRef
Current perspectives on the benefits, risks, and limitations of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for post-stroke dysphagia Ivy Cheng, Shaheen Hamdy Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2021; 21(10): 1135. CrossRef
Comparative efficacy of non-invasive neurostimulation therapies for poststroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Tong Wang, Linghui Dong, Xiaomeng Cong, Hui Luo, Wenyu Li, Pingping Meng, Qiang Wang Neurophysiologie Clinique.2021; 51(6): 493. CrossRef
European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Swallowing Disorders guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of post-stroke dysphagia Rainer Dziewas, Emilia Michou, Michaela Trapl-Grundschober, Avtar Lal, Ethem Murat Arsava, Philip M Bath, Pere Clavé, Jörg Glahn, Shaheen Hamdy, Sue Pownall, Antonio Schindler, Margaret Walshe, Rainer Wirth, David Wright, Eric Verin European Stroke Journal.2021; 6(3): LXXXIX. CrossRef
Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Dysphagia after Stroke Lingling Li, Hailiang Huang, Yuqi Jia, Ying Yu, Zhiyao Liu, Xin Shi, Fangqi Wang, Xue-Qiang Wang Neural Plasticity.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Weiwei Yang, Xiongbin Cao, Xiaoyun Zhang, Xuebing Wang, Xiaowen Li, Yaping Huai Frontiers in Neuroscience.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Use of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in Dysphagia Research: A Systematic Review James C. Borders, Danielle Brates Dysphagia.2020; 35(4): 583. CrossRef
Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018) Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, André Aleman, Chris Baeken, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Saša R. Filipović, Christian Grefkes, Alkomiet Hasan, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Satu K. Jääskeläinen, Berthold Langguth, Letizia Leocani, Alain Londer Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(2): 474. CrossRef
Synergistic Effects of Scalp Acupuncture and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cerebral Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial Jae-Hong Kim, Jae-Young Han, Min-Keun Song, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jeong-Soon Lee Brain Sciences.2020; 10(2): 87. CrossRef
Short‐term neurophysiological effects of sensory pathway neurorehabilitation strategies on chronic poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia Christopher Cabib, Weslania Nascimento, Laia Rofes, Viridiana Arreola, Noemí Tomsen, Lluis Mundet, Ernest Palomeras, Emilia Michou, Pere Clavé, Omar Ortega Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Usefulness of Goal Attainment Scaling in Intensive Stroke Rehabilitation During the Subacute Stage Youngsu Jung, Jaehoon Sim, Joonhyun Park, Jongmoon Kim, MinYoung Kim Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2020; 44(3): 181. CrossRef
Advances in the Use of Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Dysphagia: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Application of Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Mengqing Zhang, Shaheen Hamdy American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2020; 29(2S): 1044. CrossRef
Effects of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Disorders Yuanyuan Sun, Xiaoyun Chen, Jianhong Qiao, Guixiang Song, Yuedong Xu, Yan Zhang, Dongmei Xu, Wei Gao, Yunfeng Li, Cuiping Xu American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2020; 99(8): 701. CrossRef
The impact of dysphagia on quality of life in stroke patients Doo-Young Kim, Hyo-Sik Park, Si-Woon Park, Jae-Hyung Kim Medicine.2020; 99(34): e21795. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Preconditioning human pharyngeal motor cortex enhances directional metaplasticity induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Ivy Cheng, Honor Scarlett, Mengqing Zhang, Shaheen Hamdy The Journal of Physiology.2020; 598(22): 5213. CrossRef
Optimal placement of electrodes for treatment of post-stroke dysphagia by neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with effortful swallowing JW Huh, EH Park, YS Min, AR Kim, WJ Yang, HM Oh, TW Nam, TD Jung Singapore Medical Journal.2020; 61(9): 487. CrossRef
Swallowing Outcomes and Discharge Destinations in Acute Stroke Tube-Feeding Dependent Dysphagia Patients Treated With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation During Inpatient Rehabilitation David S. Kushner, Doug Johnson-Greene, Maite K. Cordero, Stacy A. Thomashaw, Jennifer Rodriguez American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2020; 99(6): 487. CrossRef
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treatment of post-stroke dysphagia Chengliang Zhang, Xiuqin Zheng, Rulan Lu, Wenwei Yun, Huifang Yun, Xianju Zhou Journal of International Medical Research.2019; 47(2): 662. CrossRef
Comparative Efficacy of Noninvasive Neurostimulation Therapies for Acute and Subacute Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis Ching-Fang Chiang, Meng-Ting Lin, Ming-Yen Hsiao, Yi-Chun Yeh, Yun-Chieh Liang, Tyng-Guey Wang Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2019; 100(4): 739. CrossRef
Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Swallowing Function and Quality of Life of Post-stroke Patients Nezehat Özgül Ünlüer, Çağrı Mesut Temuçin, Numan Demir, Selen Serel Arslan, Aynur Ayşe Karaduman Dysphagia.2019; 34(3): 360. CrossRef
Cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation restores pharyngeal brain activity and swallowing behaviour after disruption by a cortical virtual lesion Ayodele Sasegbon, Masahiro Watanabe, Andre Simons, Emilia Michou, Dipesh H. Vasant, Jin Magara, Philip M. Bath, John Rothwell, Makoto Inoue, Shaheen Hamdy The Journal of Physiology.2019; 597(9): 2533. CrossRef
Effects of capsaicin on swallowing function in stroke patients with dysphagia: A randomized controlled trial Zhuo Wang, Lingling Wu, Qi Fang, Meifen Shen, Lulu Zhang, Xueyun Liu Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2019; 28(6): 1744. CrossRef
Genetic influences on the variability of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex Alicja Raginis‐Zborowska, Ivy Cheng, Neil Pendleton, Antony Payton, William Ollier, Emilia Michou, Shaheen Hamdy Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats Chengliang Zhang, Rulan Lu, Linxiao Wang, Wenwei Yun, Xianju Zhou Brain and Behavior.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Change Rate Influences Sensorimotor Cortical Excitability During Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Sheng-Long Jiang, Zhongpeng Wang, Weibo Yi, Feng He, Hongzhi Qi, Dong Ming Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
A Clinical Approach to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Speech and Swallow in an Acute Rehabilitation Facility Melissa M. Howard, Emily R. Rosario Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.2019; 4(5): 1044. CrossRef
Effect of Expiratory Muscle Strength Training on Swallowing and Cough Functions in Patients With Neurological Diseases Zhuo Wang, Zhi Wang, Qi Fang, Huiling Li, Lulu Zhang, Xueyun Liu American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2019; 98(12): 1060. CrossRef
The effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation on patients with post-stroke dysphagia Pingping Meng, Shuchao Zhang, Qiang Wang, Peipei Wang, Chao Han, Jinghui Gao, Shouwei Yue Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2018; 31(2): 363. CrossRef
Effect of chin tuck against resistance exercise on patients with dysphagia following stroke: A randomized pilot study Ji-Su Park, Duk-Hyun An, Dong-Hwan Oh, Moon-Young Chang NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal.2018; 42(2): 191. CrossRef
Combined electrical stimulation and exercise for swallow rehabilitation post‐stroke: a pilot randomized control trial Lise Sproson, Sue Pownall, Pam Enderby, Jenny Freeman International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.2018; 53(2): 405. CrossRef
Acupuncture Treatment for Post-Stroke Dysphagia: An Update Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Ling-xin Li, Kai Deng, Yun Qu Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.2018; 24(9): 686. CrossRef
Neurophysiological Adaptation and Neuromodulatory Treatment Approaches in Patients Suffering from Post-stroke Dysphagia Paul Muhle, Sonja Suntrup-Krueger, Rainer Dziewas Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2018; 6(4): 227. CrossRef
Application of noninvasive brain stimulation for post‐stroke dysphagia rehabilitation Zhuo Wang, Wei‐Qun Song, Liang Wang The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2017; 33(2): 55. CrossRef
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an alternative therapy for dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis Xiang Liao, Guoqiang Xing, Zhiwei Guo, Yu Jin, Qing Tang, Bin He, Morgan A McClure, Hua Liu, Huaping Chen, Qiwen Mu Clinical Rehabilitation.2017; 31(3): 289. CrossRef
Mudança funcional no padrão de deglutição por meio da realização de exercícios orofaciais Irina Claudia Fernandes Alves, Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade CoDAS.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of Shaker exercise in stroke survivors with oropharyngeal dysphagia Jong-Bae Choi, Sun-Hwa Shim, Jong-Eun Yang, Hyun-Dong Kim, Doo-Ho Lee, Ji-Su Park NeuroRehabilitation.2017; 41(4): 753. CrossRef
Genetic determinants of swallowing impairment, recovery and responsiveness to treatment Alicja Raginis-Zborowska, Neil Pendleton, Shaheen Hamdy Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2016; 4(4): 249. CrossRef
Effects of expiratory muscle strength training on oropharyngeal dysphagia in subacute stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial J. S. Park, D. H. Oh, M. Y. Chang, K. M. Kim Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2016; 43(5): 364. CrossRef
Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with effortful swallowing on post‐stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: a randomised controlled trial J.‐S. Park, D.‐H. Oh, N.‐K. Hwang, J.‐H. Lee Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2016; 43(6): 426. CrossRef
Neurorehabilitation strategies for poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: from compensation to the recovery of swallowing function Christopher Cabib, Omar Ortega, Hatice Kumru, Ernest Palomeras, Natalia Vilardell, Daniel Alvarez‐Berdugo, Desirée Muriana, Laia Rofes, Rosa Terré, Fermín Mearin, Pere Clavé Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2016; 1380(1): 121. CrossRef
Is non-invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation effective in severe chronic neurogenic dysphagia? Reporton a post-traumatic brain injury patient Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Valeria Conti Nibali, Antonino Naro, Daniela Floridia, Maria Pizzimenti, Lucia Salmeri, Carlo Salviera, Placido Bramanti NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal.2016; 38(1): 53. CrossRef
Scalp acupuncture and electromagnetic convergence stimulation for patients with cerebral infarction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Jae-Young Han, Jae-Hong Kim, Ju-Hyung Park, Min-Yeong Song, Min-Keun Song, Dong-Joo Kim, Young-Nim You, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jin-Bong Choi, Myung-Rae Cho, Jeong-Cheol Shin, Ji-Hyun Cho Trials.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
The effects of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systemic review and meta-analysis Yi-Wen Chen, Kwang-Hwa Chang, Hung-Chou Chen, Wen-Miin Liang, Ya-Hui Wang, Yen-Nung Lin Clinical Rehabilitation.2016; 30(1): 24. CrossRef
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: a Novel Approach for Treating Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Emilia Michou, Alicja Raginis-Zborowska, Masahiro Watanabe, Taha Lodhi, Shaheen Hamdy Current Gastroenterology Reports.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Noninvasive brain stimulation for dysphagia after acquired brain injury: a systematic review Ryo Momosaki, Shoji Kinoshita, Wataru Kakuda, Naoki Yamada, Masahiro Abo The Journal of Medical Investigation.2016; 63(3.4): 153. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Patients With Dysphagia With Medullary Infarction Ming Zhang, Tao Tao, Zhao-Bo Zhang, Xiao Zhu, Wen-Guo Fan, Li-Jun Pu, Lei Chu, Shou-Wei Yue Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2016; 97(3): 355. CrossRef
Update on management options for dysphagia after acute stroke Jessica Beavan British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.2015; 11(Sup2): 10. CrossRef
Management of oropharyngeal neurogenic dysphagia in adults Anna Miles, Jacqui E. Allen Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery.2015; 23(6): 433. CrossRef
The peculiarities of the application of transcranial magnetic therapy and electrical stimulation for the treatment of the patients presenting with various types of stroke E. A. Melnikova Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kul'tury.2015; 92(5): 12. CrossRef
Effect of Low-Frequency rTMS and NMES on Subacute Unilateral Hemispheric Stroke With Dysphagia
Fig. 1 Intervention design. In rTMS group, rTMS is performed for 20 minutes per session, 5 days per week during the first 2 weeks. In NMES group, electrical stimulation is applied for 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week during the first 2 weeks. All three groups are given CDT for 4 weeks. CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Fig. 2 Mean changes in functional dysphagia scale (FDS) scores by both per-protocol analysis (A) and intention-to-treat analysis (B). CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation. *p<0.017 by the Mann-Whitney U test (vs. CDT group).
Fig. 3 Mean changes in penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores by both per-protocol analysis (A) and intention-to-treat analysis (B). CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation. *p<0.017 by the Mann-Whitney U test (vs. CDT group).
Fig. 4 Mean changes in American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) swallowing scale by both per-protocol analysis (A) and intention-to-treat analysis (B). CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Effect of Low-Frequency rTMS and NMES on Subacute Unilateral Hemispheric Stroke With Dysphagia
Biomedical characteristics of the subjects
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; K-MMSE, Korean Mini-Mental State Examination.
Initial evaluation of the swallowing function
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; FDS, functional dysphagia scale; PTT, pharyngeal transit time; PAS, penetration-aspiration scale; ASHA NOMS, American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System.
Comparison of mean changes in pharyngeal transit time
Table 1 Biomedical characteristics of the subjects
Values are presented as number or mean±standard deviation.
CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; K-MMSE, Korean Mini-Mental State Examination.
Table 2 Initial evaluation of the swallowing function
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
CDT, conventional dysphagia therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; NMES, neuromuscular electrical stimulation; FDS, functional dysphagia scale; PTT, pharyngeal transit time; PAS, penetration-aspiration scale; ASHA NOMS, American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System.
Table 3 Comparison of mean changes in pharyngeal transit time
