• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Articles

Original Article

A comparison between electrodiagnostic study and clinical features in acute polyradiculoneuropathy.

Han, Tai Ryoon , Kim, Jin Ho , Lee, Jong Min
Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 1991;15(4):451-458.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine
  • 1,377 Views
  • 2 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Electrodiagnostic study in acute polyradiculoneuropathy is considered as the only objective diagnostic tool in diagnosis and predicting prognosis. Because of the temporal change in electrophysiologic findings and discrepancy in prognostic parameters, it has many limitations in applying it clinically. In order to get the most probable electrodiagnostic parameter for prognosis and suggestive protocol in electrodiagnostic study, 36 patients were analyzed clinically and with standard electrodiagnostic findings. There was no consistent parameter of prognosis throughout time but electrodiagnostic findings studied between 8 weeks and 12 weeks since the onset of the disease were well correlated with clinical features and prognosis. It is suggested that the protocol for electrodiagnostic study in acute polyradiculoneuropathy is the baseline study between 2 weeks and 4 weeks since onset and the F/U study for prognosis between 8 weeks and 12 weeks.

TOP