Abstract
-
Objective
To compare the efficacy of ultrasonography guided stellate ganglion block (US-SGB) with that of blind SGB in management of the stroke patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1.
-
Method
Forty-two patients with post-stroke CRPS were randomly assigned to either US-guided SGB (22 patients) or blind SGB group (20 patients). The mean age of US-guided SGB and blind SGB groups was 61.3±5.6 years and 59.1±4.5 years. We performed two blockades at 7-day intervals on the affected side of patients with CRPS. Pain intensity, using a visual analog score (VAS), score of CRPS clinical severity, and the amounts of affected hand swelling with a hand volumeter were assessed before, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after treatment.
-
Results
In both groups, VAS and the amount of hand swelling were significantly decreased after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks. Between two groups, VAS difference of US-guided SGB group and that of blind SGB group were 2.61±1.09, 1.88±0.62 at 2 weeks and 3.67±1.03, 3.13±0.62 at 4 weeks, respectively. US-guided SGB group showed more significant improvement in mean change of VAS compared to the blind SGB group (p-value<0.05).
-
Conclusion
Both US-guided SGB and blind SGB techniques were effective in relieving pain in subacute stroke patients with CRPS. US-guided SGB was better in pain relief but has no advantages in reduction of hand swelling in this study.
-
Keywords: Complex regional pain syndrome, Stroke, Ultrasonography guided Stellate ganglion blockade
INTRODUCTION
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), the current diagnostic label for the syndrome historically referred to as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, causalgia, and a variety of other terms, can be difficult to treat.
1 CRPS manifests as persistent burning pain on a limb, with a region of intense allodynia, hyperalgesia, and objective evidence of local autonomic dysfunction and trophic changes.
2 Dysfunction of the sympathetic nervous system is believed to be attributed to changes in microcirculatory disturbances resulting from extensive sprouting of noradrenergic sympathetic fibers in the sensory ganglia and the peripheral nerves.
2-
5
Stroke is a common cause of CRPS, and between 1.5% and 61% of patients following stroke have been reported to develop CRPS.
6-
8 Various management modes for CRPS have been introduced but only a few techniques have been effective. The sympathetic nervous system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of CRPS, and consequently, sympathetic nerve blockade (SGB) is widely used for the treatment of CRPS.
9
Classical "blind" injection of anesthetic at the C6 level has a long history, but its reliability in achieving blockade of the sympathetic trunk and stellate ganglion remains uncertain. In addition, blind injection is associated with a variety of adverse effects and complications, such as intravascular injection, formation of hematomas and temporary paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve.
10-
13
A method of stellate ganglion blockade under ultrasonography (US) guidance was described in 1995, but only recently gained popularity. Kapral et al.
12 found that compared with the blind technique, ultrasonography-guided SGB used a lower volume of local anesthetics (5 ml rather than 8 ml) and there were more rapid onsets of Horner's syndrome. Application of US for sympathetic nerve blockade has proven to be useful for the swift and accurate placement of local anesthetics on a targeted area. Thus, it might reduce the required volume of local anesthetics compared with blind technique.
The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of US-guide SGB by comparing with the blind SGB in post-stroke CRPS patients in reducing pain and swelling of the affected limb.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Among 59 patients with the presence of CRPS following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), patients whose CVA occurred in 2009 or 2010 were selected.
The inclusion criteria were the presence of regional pain and sensory changes of hemiplegic unilateral upper extremity following a stroke; pain was associated with findings such as abnormal skin color, temperature change, abnormal sudomotor activity or edema; no distribution of the pain of a single nerve in the extremity. Seventeen subjects were excluded from this study if they had a history of upper extremity cellulitis, other autonomic nerve disease, peripheral nerve disease, bleeding disorder or severe cognitive impairment.
We therefore studied 42 patients with CRPS following stroke [19 right (45.3%) and 23 left (54.7%)] and patient signed informed consent. All 42 patients had the modified diagnostic criteria for CRPS as International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).
14 Twenty-five patients were women (59.6%) and 17 (40.4%) were men. All patients were divided randomly into US-guided SGB group (22 patients) and blind SGB group (20 patients). The mean age was 61.3±5.6 (range 34-77) years and 59.1±4.5 (range 36-71) years and the mean duration since stroke occurred were 2.8±1.1 (range 1-7) months, 2.3±0.9 (range 1-6) months, respectively (
Table 1).
Kapral et al.
12 reported that US-guided SGB, by comparing with the blind technique, used a lower volume of local anesthetics and proved to be more effective. In this study, the blind SGB group patients and US-guided SGB group patients received the procedure using a volume of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine or 5 ml of 0.5% lidocaine, respectively. SGB was performed two times with an interval of 1 week between each treatments.
12
The anterior paratracheal approach was used in the procedure on the cervical sympathetic chain without fluoroscopic guidance in blind group. A 22-gauge, 5-cm needle was perpendicularly inserted to the skin until bone contact was made and then withdrawn to rest anteriorly to the precervical fascia. The patient was encouraged to lie in the supine position for 3 minute after the injection and then developed injected-sided Horner's syndrome.
15
In US-guided group, procedure was performed using same needle at same posture. After passing through the skin and subcutaneous tissue and stabilizing the needle, a 3-12 MHz linear array probe of HD11-XE® (Philips, Washington, USA) was used to verify the position of the needle. The needle was shown to be aiming towards the thyroid tissue anteriorly and then the esophagus posteriorly. At this point the needle was withdrawn, reinserted obliquely, and advanced with real-time US so that the needle tip lay anterior to the longus coli muscle (anterior to C6 transverse process) (
Fig. 1). After negative aspiration, 5 ml of lidocaine 0.5% were injected.
The primary outcome was evaluated by pain intensity and the amount of hand swelling. Pain intensity was evaluated by using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) in which 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'the highest pain'. Determination of the volume of the hands (hand volume) was assessed by a hand volumeter. The hand volumeter set (8×13×28 cm) used was made of translucent material (acrylic), "Hand Volumeter" (Volumeter Unlimited, Phoenix, USA) and filled with room temperature water.
The volunteer was positioned beside the instrument during the procedure and the hand also positioned vertically, to avoid contact with the sides of the equipment. The hand was immersed slowly into the volumeter until it was immersed into water 2 cm above wrist crease. Additionally, the severity score for CRPS that was introduced by Harden in 2010 was evaluated as secondary outcome measure (
Appendix 1).
16 All these parameters were checked before procedure, after 2 weeks and 4 weeks following the SGB.
Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 11.0 version SPSS V11.0K (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare VAS values and difference of hand volume before, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after the blockade for all patients and for each group. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for group comparisons on the mean differences of VAS values, hand volume and score of CRPS clinical severity. Null hypotheses of no difference were rejected if p-values were less than 0.05.
RESULTS
Patient demographics are summarized in
Table 1. There were no significant differences in characteristics included hemi-side, bone scan findings, and CRPS stage between the two groups. Within each group, VAS values were significantly decreased after two weeks and after four weeks (p-value<0.05) (
Table 2). Between each group, VAS reductions were 2.61±1.09, 1.88±0.62 at 2 weeks and 3.86±1.03, 2.97±0.62 at 4 weeks, respectively. The US-guided SGB group showed more significant improvement in mean change of VAS compared with the blind SGB group (p-value<0.05) (
Table 3).
SGB significantly improved in dealing the swelling of hand in both treatment groups at 2 weeks and 4 weeks, following SGB compared to pretreatment (p-value<0.05) (
Table 3). Between each group, differences of hand volume were 61.2±36.4, 67.4±27.7 at 2 weeks and 86.7±33.9, 95.7±25.8 at 4 weeks. There were no significant differences between the two groups.
Additionally, score of CRPS clinical severity between the two groups didn't significantly decrease (p-value>0.05) (
Table 3).
In US-guided group, no adverse effects to the procedure itself were documented during the procedure or follow-up period, but 2 patients from the blind group experienced a formation of hematoma on injected site. There were no long term sequelae.
DISCUSSION
The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of US-guided SGB treatment on CRPS following stroke. Treatment produced a statistically significant difference in pain reduction and improvement of edema of upper extremity in both groups. However, US guided SGB was better in pain relief but has no advantages in reduction of hand swelling comparing with blind SGB.
The number of studies of SGB in the literature is limited. Cepeda published review in 2002, they concluded that there are questions as to the efficacy of local anesthetic sympathetic blockade in treating CRPS because its efficacy is based mainly on case series.
9 Many imaging devices have been studied for enhancing the accuracy of SGB to prevent serious side effects. Among these, computerized tomography and MRI are considered to be time-consuming and expensive, and above of all, are impractical for most practitioners.
17,
18 Fluoroscopy has gained popularity for its convenience and the relatively familiar real-time imaging, but fluoroscopy still cannot prevent improper injections into other important anatomical structures, such as the esophagus, which may be accidentally punctured, leading to infection of the neck.
19 Ultrasonography imaging can easily identify soft tissue around the sympathetic ganglion and this study showed that only two patients in blind group experienced short-term complications on the injected site.
This study showed improvement of hand swelling in both groups but no advantages in reduction of hand swelling comparing with blind SGB. It may be that the etiology of post-stroke hand swelling is obscure. Vasomotor dysfunction, part of the unilateral disturbance of the autonomic nervous system that may follow stroke was mentioned as a causative factor.
20 However, other possible explanations for post-stroke hand swelling are impaired lymphatic or venous drainage due to loss of muscle tone and of muscle pump activity. The possibility of increased capillary permeability in paretic limbs as the cause of post-stroke hand swelling was also raised.
21 It follows that the role of sympathetic vasomotor dysfunction in post-stroke hand swelling formation is unclear. Therefore, reduction of hand swelling might be affected by various factors as well as SGB in our study.
We report that US-guided SGB successfully relieved pain in patients with CRPS following stroke, as indicated by a significant reduction in VAS values for all patients following the block. A relatively small sample and a wide range of conditions causing upper extremities pain following stroke limited in this study. The other weaknesses of this study were the lack of long-term results of the blockades and the lack of analysis based on CRPS stage. Further additional studies on these limitations will be required to identify the SGB efficacy which is related to the degree of symptoms. Despite these limitations, this study is a preliminary study which reveals that the efficacy of US-guided SGB is superior to blind SGB in post-stroke CRPS. US-guided sympathetic block treatment may be particularly helpful in cases when pain limits a patient's participation in stroke rehabilitation.
CONCLUSION
US-guided stellate ganglion block may improve the efficacy and safety of the procedure by direct visualization of the related anatomical structures and accordingly the risk of thyroid gland and vessels, vertebral artery, or esophagus injury may be minimized. Also ultrasound guidance will allow direct monitoring of the spread of the local anesthetics.
We concluded that treating post-stroke CRPS with US-guided SGB successfully decreased VAS values compared to the classical blind approach technique. Additionally, compared with blind SGB, US-guided SGB can reduce the volume of anesthetic required to achieve therapeutic effect compared with blind SGB.
REFERENCES
- 1. Drummond PD, Finch PM, Skipworth S, Blockey P. Pain increases during sympathetic arousal in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Neurology 2001;57:1296-1303.
- 2. Chung OY, Bruehl SP. Complex regional pain syndrome. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2003;5:499-511.
- 3. Zhang JM, Li H, Munir MA. Decreasing sympathetic sprouting in pathologic sensory ganglia: a new mechanism for treating neuropathic pain using lidocaine. Pain 2004;109:143-149.
- 4. Chung KS, Lee BH, Yoon YW, Chung JM. Sympathetic sprouting in the dorsal root ganglia of the injured peripheral nerve in a rat neuropathic pain model. J Comp Neurol 1996;376:241-252.
- 5. McLachlan EM, Janig W, Devor M, Michaelis M. Peripheral nerve injury triggers noradrenergic sprouting within dorsal root ganglia. Nature 1993;363:543-546.
- 6. Kumar V, Kalita J, Gujral RB, Sharma VP, Misra UK. A study of bone densitometry in patient with complex regional pain syndrome after stroke. Postgrad Med J 2001;77:519-522.
- 7. Braus DF, Krauss JK, Strobel J. The shoulder hand syndrome after stroke: a prospective clinical trial. Ann Neurol 1994;36:728-733.
- 8. Gellman H, Keenan MA, Stone L, Hardy SE, Waters RL, Stewart C. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in brain injured patients. Pain 1992;51:307-311.
- 9. Cepeda MS, Lau J, Carr DB. Defining the therapeutic role of local anesthetic sympathetic blockade in complex regional pain syndrome: a narrative and systematic review. Clin J Pain 2002;18:216-233.
- 10. Higa K, Hirata K, Hirota K, Nitahara K, Shono S. Retropharyngeal hematoma after stellate ganglion block: analysis of 27 patients reported in the literature. Anesthesiology 2006;105:1238-1245.
- 11. Mahli A, Coskun D, Akcali DT. Aetiology of convulsions due to stellate ganglion block. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002;19:376-380.
- 12. Kapral S, Krafft P, Gosch M, Fleischmann D, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound imaging for stellate ganglion block: direct visualization of puncture site and local anesthetic spread. A pilot study. Reg Anesth 1995;20:323-328.
- 13. Narouze S, Vydyanathan A, Patel N. Ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block successfully prevented esophageal puncture. Pain Physician 2007;10:747-752.
- 14. Harden RN, Bruehl S, Perez RS, Birklein F, Marinus J, Maihofner C, Lubenow T, Buvanendran A, Mackey S, Graciosa J, et al. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain 2010;150:268-274.
- 15. Elias M. Cervical sympathetic and stellate ganglion blocks. Pain Physician 2000;3:294-304.
- 16. Harden RN, Bruehl S, Perez RS, Birklein F, Marinus J, Maihofner C, Lubenow T, Buvanendran A, Mackey S, Graciosa J, et al. Development of a severity score for CRPS. Pain 2010;151:870-876.
- 17. Erickson SJ, Hogan QH. CT-guided injection of the stellate ganglion: description of technique and efficacy of sympathetic blockade. Radiology 1993;188:707-709.
- 18. Hogan Q, Erickson SJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the stellate ganglion: normal appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:655-659.
- 19. Siegenthaler A, Mlekusch S, Schliessbach J, Curatolo M, Eichenberger U. Ultrasound imaging to estimate risk of esophageal and vascular puncture after conventional stellate ganglion block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012;37:224-227.
- 20. Redisch W, Tangco FT, Wertheimer L, Lewis AJ, Steele JM. Vasomotor responses in the extremities of subjects with various neurologic lesions. I. Reflex responses to warming. Circulation 1957;15:518-524.
- 21. Exton-Smith AN, Crockett DJ. Nature of oedema in paralyzed limbs of hemiplegic patients. Br Med J 1957;2:1280-1283.
Appendix
- Appendix 1
Clinical Score of CRPS
1=presence, 0=absence
Total: 17 points
Fig. 1Ultrasonography imaging of the left stellate ganglion & prevertebral fascia (asterisks). Needle was advanced with real-time ultrasonography so that the needle tip will lie anterior to the longus coli. Th: Thyroid, LCo: Longus coli muscle, LCp: Longus capitus muscle, CA: Carotid artery, SCM: Sternocleidomastoid muscle, TP: Transverse process.
Table 1Clinical Characteristics of Subjects
Table 2Changes of Visual Analogue Scale
Table 3Intergroup Comparison of the Efficacy by Stellate Ganglion Block
Figure & Data
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Updates and Current Evidence
Yeng F. Her, Eva Kubrova, Marissa Dombovy-Johnson, Mariam ElSaban, Karson Mostert, Ryan S. D’Souza
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2024; 12(1): 50. CrossRef - Prospective study on ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block improves cerebral blood flow in patients with stroke
Lin Sun, Gu Wu, Yuan Zhou, Ansong Deng, Zongjie Chen
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2024; 33(4): 107593. CrossRef - The Role of Neuroglia in Administrating Nerve Blockers and Anesthesia to Patients
Anjali Patel, Raja Al-Bahou, Rajvi Thakkar, Drashti Patel, Devon Foster, Jonathan Benjamin, Marian Pedreira, Brandon Lucke-Wold
Neuroglia.2024; 5(1): 13. CrossRef - Use of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Explore the Effectiveness of Stellate Ganglion Block in Patients with Post-Stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Pilot Study
Jin-Whan Ryu, In-Su Hwang, Seung-Kyu Lim
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(3): 258. CrossRef - Síndrome da dor complexa regional
Giana Silveira Giostri, Camila Deneka Arantes Souza
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia.2024; 59(04): e497. CrossRef - Ultrasound-guided Stellate Ganglion Block for Upper Extremity Phantom Limb Pain - A Case Series
Sonal Goyal, Ajit Kumar, Manasa Kantha, Ravi Shankar Sharma, Sanjay Agrawal, Girish Kumar Singh
Indian Journal of Pain.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Review of Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in the Management of Chronic Pain
Anuj K. Aggarwal, Einar Ottestad, Kayla E. Pfaff, Alice Huai-Yu Li, Lei Xu, Ryan Derby, Daniel Hecht, Jennifer Hah, Scott Pritzlaff, Nitin Prabhakar, Elliot Krane, Genevieve D’Souza, Yasmine Hoydonckx
Anesthesiology Clinics.2023; 41(2): 395. CrossRef - Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews
Michael C Ferraro, Aidan G Cashin, Benedict M Wand, Keith M Smart, Carolyn Berryman, Louise Marston, G Lorimer Moseley, James H McAuley, Neil E O'Connell
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Efficacy of stellate ganglion interventions for complex regional pain syndrome in the upper limb—A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gaurav Purohit, Baibhav Bhandari, Ajit Kumar, Praveen Talawar, Shiwam Gupta, Pradeep Atter
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.2023; 67(8): 675. CrossRef - FactFinders for patient safety: Preventing local anesthetic-related complications: Local anesthetic chondrotoxicity and stellate ganglion blocks
Mathew Saffarian, Eric K. Holder, Ryan Mattie, Clark C. Smith, George Christolias, Jaymin Patel, Zachary L. McCormick
Interventional Pain Medicine.2023; 2(4): 100282. CrossRef - Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block Combined with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Postherpetic Neuralgia
Changsheng Wang, Fei Yuan, Lu Cai, Haiqin Lu, Gongjin Chen, Jinping Zhou, Kalidoss Rajakani
Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef - Current and investigational therapies for the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation
Nicholas Scaturo, Eileen Shomo, Marshall Frank
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy.2022; 79(12): 935. CrossRef - Stellate ganglion block reduces inflammation and improves neurological function in diabetic rats during ischemic stroke
Ting-Ting Li, Qiang Wan, Xin Zhang, Yuan Xiao, Li-Ying Sun, Yu-Rong Zhang, Xiang-Nan Liu, Wan-Chao Yang
Neural Regeneration Research.2022; 17(9): 1991. CrossRef - Stellate ganglion intervention for chronic pain: A review
Qingyang Luo, Song Wen, Xinran Tan, Xi Yi, Song Cao
Ibrain.2022; 8(2): 210. CrossRef - Agents Used for Nerve Blocks and Neurolysis
Richard Wu, Bill S. Majdalany, Meghan Lilly, J. David Prologo, Nima Kokabi
Seminars in Interventional Radiology.2022; 39(04): 387. CrossRef - Patient tolerability of suprascapular and median nerve blocks for the management of pain in post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome
Marc Monsour, Rosendo A. Rodriguez, Adnan Sheikh, T. Mark Campbell
Neurological Sciences.2021; 42(3): 1123. CrossRef - Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictive Potential in Ultrasound‐Guided Stellate Ganglion Blockades for the Treatment of Sympathetically Maintained Pain
Ruben Aleanakian, Boo‐Young Chung, Robert E. Feldmann, Justus Benrath
Pain Practice.2020; 20(6): 626. CrossRef - Post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome and related factors: Experiences from a tertiary rehabilitation center
Elif Umay Altas, Şule Şahin Onat, Hatice Ecem Konak, Cemile Sevgi Polat
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2020; 29(9): 104995. CrossRef - Effect of Stellate Ganglion Block on Intraoperative Propofol and Fentanyl Consumption in Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Undergoing Surgical Repair of Brachial Plexus Injury: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial
Vanitha Rajagopalan, RajendraSingh Chouhan, MihirPrakash Pandia, Ritesh Lamsal, ParmodKumar Bithal, GirijaPrasad Rath
Neurology India.2020; 68(3): 617. CrossRef - A Randomized Comparison between 4, 6 and 8 mL of Local Anesthetic for Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Block
Yongjae Yoo, Chang-soon Lee, Yong-Chul Kim, Jee Youn Moon, Roderick J. Finlayson
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(9): 1314. CrossRef - Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: an updated systematic review and narrative synthesis
Silvia Duong, Daniela Bravo, Keith J. Todd, Roderick J. Finlayson, De Q. Tran
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.2018; 65(6): 658. CrossRef - Effects on hemodynamic variables and echocardiographic parameters after a stellate ganglion block in 15 healthy volunteers
Katia Puente de la Vega Costa, Miquel A. Gómez Perez, Cristina Roqueta, Lorenz Fischer
Autonomic Neuroscience.2016; 197: 46. CrossRef - Local anaesthetic sympathetic blockade for complex regional pain syndrome
Neil E O'Connell, Benedict M Wand, William Gibson, Daniel B Carr, Frank Birklein, Tasha R Stanton
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2016;[Epub] CrossRef - Stellate Ganglion Block for Painful Congenital Venous Malformation of the Arm
Adam Woo, Liza Tharakan, Razvan Vargulescu
Pain Practice.2015;[Epub] CrossRef - Ultrasound-Guided Stellate Ganglion Blocks Combined with Pharmacological and Occupational Therapy in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): A Pilot Case SeriesAd Interim
Karin Wei, Robert E. Feldmann, Anne-Kathrin Brascher, Justus Benrath
Pain Medicine.2014; 15(12): 2120. CrossRef - Ultrasound Guided Stellate Ganglion Block in Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Comparison of Ketamine versus Morphine as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine
Ola T. Abdel Dayem, Mostafa M. Saeid, Olfat M. Ismail, Adel M. El Badrawy, Nevert A. Abdel Ghaffar
Journal of Anesthesiology.2014; 2014: 1. CrossRef
