Abstract
-
Objective
To evaluate the relationship between the cross sectional area (CSA) and isokinetic strength of the back muscles in patients with chronic low back pain.
-
Method
Data of twenty-eight middle-aged patients with chronic back pain were analyzed retrospectively. CSAs of both paraspinal muscles and the disc at the L4-L5 level were measured in MRI axial images and the relative CSAs (rCSA: CSA ratio of muscle and disc) were calculated. The degree of paraspinal muscle atrophy was rated qualitatively. Isokinetic strengths (peak torque, peak torque per body weight) of back flexor and extensor were measured with the isokinetic testing machine. Multiple regression analysis with backward elimination was used to evaluate relations between isokinetic strength and various factors, such as CSA or rCSA and clinical characteristics in all patients. The same analysis was repeated in the female patients.
-
Results
In analysis with CSA and clinical characteristics, body mass index (BMI) and CSA were significant influencing factors in the peak torque of the back flexor muscles. CSA was a significant influencing factor in the peak torque of total back muscles. In analysis with rCSA and clinical characteristics, BMI was significant in influencing the peak torque of the back flexors. In female patients, rCSA was a significant influencing factor in the peak torque per body weight of the back flexors, and age and BMI were influencing factors in the peak torque of back flexors and total back muscles.
-
Conclusion
In middle-aged patients with chronic low back pain, CSA and rCSA were influencing factors in the strength of total back muscles and back flexors. Also, gender and BMI were influencing factors.
-
Keywords: Low back pain, Muscle strength, Muscle strength dynamometer, Magnetic resonance imaging
INTRODUCTION
Many people suffer from low back pain, the lifetime prevalence of which is about 84%. Low back pain usually leads to disability in activities of daily living and is very costly. Most patients with acute low back pain tend to recover from pain within 8-10 weeks regardless of the treatment, but many suffer recurrence of pain, with some experiencing chronic low back pain that lasts for more than 6 months.
1,
2
Back muscles act to support the spine and maintain the stability of the spine. The weakness of back muscles can lead to low back pain and is known as a main cause of recurrence.
3,
4 Especially, the multifidus and erector spinae, which mainly consist of back muscles, act as back extensors.
5 In patients with chronic low back pain, reflex inhibition induced by pain leads to atrophy of the back muscles and stiffness of the ligaments and joints. Patients reduce their activities due to pain and stiffness, which results in muscle spasm and strain, and eventually this situation aggravates pain in a vicious cycle.
6-
8 Many studies have documented an association between chronic low back pain and deficits in back muscle strength and endurance.
9,
10 Therefore, evaluation of the strength of the back muscles may represent the function of back muscle and the degree of disability caused by the pain. Quantitative evaluation of back muscle strength involves measuring the cross sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus and the erector spinae, and measuring the isometric and isokinetic strength of the trunk muscles. Because muscular strength is proportional to the CSA of the muscle (and is also associated with histologic characteristics such as composition and muscle fiber type), measurement of the CSA of muscle has usually been used to evaluate lumbar muscular strength.
11 It has been reported that in patients with sub acute and chronic low back pain, the CSA of lumbar muscles and fat tissue (as shown by CT analysis) was relatively smaller than that of the control group.
5,
12 However, the relationship between the CSA of the back muscles and functional aspects such as pain or disability has been a matter of controversy.
13
Measurement of isokinetic strength is an effective means of evaluating the functional ability of lumbar muscles, and it is widely used in the field of rehabilitation.
14 The relationships of torque-velocity, in particular, have variability in low back pain, and the therapists can devise the ideal therapy for each patient, taking into account these individual variabilities.
15 There is still controversy about the relationship between the CSA of lumbar muscles and isokinetic strength.
16,
17
Keller et al.
18 reported that for assessing the results of an isokinetic trunk muscle test of chronic low back pain patients, CSA, gender, and pain on exertion should be taken into account. However, this study measured the isokinetic torque of total trunk muscles, which is summation of the torques of the trunk flexors and trunk extensors. Considering the fact that the erector spinae mostly acts globally as a back extensor, the study of the relationship between the muscular strength of back extensors and flexors needs to be approached separately, but no such study has been reported yet. Also, prior to this study, there were no studies in Korea about the relationship between isokinetic strength and the CSA of back muscles.
To analyze the associations between the morphologic characteristics and the functional aspects of back muscles, and to find out the factors that influence lumbar muscular function, we investigated the relationship between the CSA of back muscle and the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and extensors of middle-aged chronic low back pain patients in Korea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects
Patients with chronic low back pain lasting over 6 months who visited our hospital for physical therapy from November 2008 to October 2010 were enrolled. Except for the patients with spine fracture, the patients in the study had been treated with conservative treatment for sprain and degenerative diseases. We investigated the medical records retrospectively for the patients who had had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and isokinetic strength tests of the trunk flexors and extensor muscles among them. We recorded the clinical characteristics of the patients such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), cause of pain, duration of disease and pain intensity, measured with numeric rating scale (NRS). Patients who could not fully perform in the isokinetic strength tests because of severe radiating pain in the lower extremities were excluded from the study. Others excluded from the study were those who showed abnormal neurologic signs, had undergone spinal surgery with implantation of fixating devices, were pregnant woman or had a serious medical illness. In the end, data of twenty-eight patients were gathered. The characteristics of all of the patients were as follows. The patients were composed of 7 men and 21 women and their average age was 48.4±11.9 years. The average duration of the disease was 15.7±8.4 months, and average pain intensity, NRS, was 4.2±1.1 (moderate intensity pain). The causes of low back pain were intervertebral disc herniation for 13 patients and lumbar sprain for 15 patients. The average body weight and height were 59.1 kg and 161.7 cm respectively, and the average BMI was 22.9±2.74. Based on the BMI, one patient belonged to the low body weight category (under 18.5), 21 patients belonged to the normal body weight category (18.5-22.9), and 6 patients belonged to the overweight category (25-29.9).
Methods
Measurement of back muscle cross sectional area (CSA) and fat composition
We captured images of magnetic resonance image (MRI; T1 weighted axial view) at the level of the 4-5 lumbar intervertebral disc using the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Cross sectional areas (CSA) of both sides of the back muscles (multifidus and erector spinae) and intervertebral disc were measured by drawing outlines of them with the Regions of interest (ROI) of PiView (Infinitt, Seoul, Korea) program and were calculated as mm
2 (
Fig. 1). In this study, the multifidus and erector spinae were measured together as back muscles. For the analysis, we measured the CSA of both paraspinal muscles (CSA, PSM) and the CSA of the disc (CSA, disc). Then we calculated the relative CSA (rCSA), which is the ratio of the CSA of back muscles to that of the disc at the same level, and this ratio was used to compensate for the influence of body shape, body weight and height on the CSA of the back muscles.
19,
20
The fat composition was measured in the captured MRI images to evaluate atrophy and degenerative changes of the back muscles. Separation of muscle fibers from fat tissue within a muscle in image cuts of MRI is easy because of the signal intensity difference between them. Therefore we can easily evaluate histological changes of muscle, such as the decrease in muscle size and accumulation of fat or connective tissue within the epimysium, which indicate degenerative change due to denervation or immobilization.
21 Besides the measurement of the cross sectional area of back muscles, assessment of fat composition can also be used to estimate the degree of atrophy of the back muscle. The fat distribution in both sides of the back muscles was measured semi-quantitatively with the 4-point visual scale at the level of L4-5. Assessment with the 4-point visual scale is based on the distribution of fat tissue inside the muscle. The scale defined Grade 1 as a fat portion below 25%, Grade 2 as 25-50%, Grade 3 as 50-75% and Grade 4 as over 75%.
22
Isokinetic strength test
The isokinetic strength test is used widely to quantitatively assess muscle strength through measurement of the torque of the muscle during movement of a joint at a constant angular velocity.
23,
24 We used the isokinetic dynamometer Biodex® isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Corporation, New York, USA) to measure the torque of the trunk flexors and extensors. The examination was performed by seating the patient comfortably in the device, fixing both thighs and the back to the chair by a strap, and making the patient hold the handle placed near the front chest in order to prevent motion of the upper limb and hip joint. If movement of either the upper limbs or hip joints were observed, that data was excluded. The axis of the dynamometer was located on the anterior superior iliac spine of the pelvis of the patient. The range of motion of the arm was adjusted individually according to the patient's maximal flexion and extension. All patients were instructed to flex and extend the back 5 times at an angular velocity of 60°/sec as warm-up before examination. During examination, patients were instructed to execute flexion and extension of the back with maximum effort 5 times at an angular velocity of 60°/sec. The device measured the peak torque (PT) (Nm) and the peak torque per body weight (PT/Bwt) (Nm/kg) (
Fig. 2). The peak torque per body weight is used to compensate for individual differences in muscle power related to body type, height and body weight.
Statistical analysis
For analysis of the correlation between CSA and isokinetic strength, simple Pearson correlation analysis was used with CSA and rCSA. Because the CSA and rCSA can influence each other, the analysis was done separately.
Multiple linear regression analysis with backward elimination was done with CSA or rCSA and clinical characteristics, such as age, sex, BMI, pain intensity, duration of back pain, cause of back pain as the independent variables, and isokinetic strength (peak torque, peak torque per body weight) as the dependent variable, to find out whether CSA and demographic characteristics influence muscle strength. Because the CSA and rCSA can influence each other, the analysis for each of these was done separately. Because much more women than men were included in the study, multiple linear regression analysis with backward elimination was done separately only with the female patients. The correlation between variables was analyzed by Spearmans' rank correlation, and if the p-value was under 0.05, the correlation was determined to be statistically significant. Correlations were classified according to their correlation coefficients, and were considered as a "definite association" (r=0-0.01) or as a "moderate association" (r=0.01-0.05). Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS version 17.0.
RESULTS
The average CSA of the back muscles with MRI was 3421 mm
2, the average CSA of the disc was 1,800.9 mm
2, rCSA was 2.18 and fat composition was 1.5. The average peak torque and average peak torque per body weight as measured by the isokinetic test were 56.3±34.5 (Nm) and 1.0±0.7 (Nm/kg) for trunk flexors, 98.5±51.0 (Nm) and 1.8±1.2 (Nm/kg) for trunk extensors, and 154.8±78.6 (Nm) and 2.8±1.8 (Nm/kg) for total trunk muscles (the sum of trunk flexors and trunk extensors) (
Table 1). The correlations between CSA or rCSA and the variables with the isokinetic strength test were not statistically significant on simple univariate analysis using Spearman's rank correlation.
The results of the multiple linear regression analysis with backward elimination are as follows.
With CSA as an independent variable, no variables were statistically significant with respect to the isokinetic strength of trunk extensors. CSA and BMI had a statistically significant association with the peak torque of trunk flexors, and the regression coefficient of CSA and BMI were 0.016 and 2.837. The p-value for age was 0.094 and was therefore not a statistically significant association factor. With the peak torque/body weight of trunk flexors, gender was likely to be associated (regression coefficient of -11.41), but was not a statistically significant associated factor and the other variables had no significant associations. With the peak torque of total trunk muscles, CSA was significantly associated and no variables were found significant with the peak torque per body weight. Intensity of pain, duration of pain and cause of low back pain had no associations with the strength of trunk muscles (
Table 2).
When rCSA was included as an independent variable, gender and BMI were significantly associated with the peak torque of the trunk flexors. With the trunk flexors' peak torque per body weight, gender was not significantly associated despite regression coefficient of -11.41. With the peak torque of total trunk muscle, age was significantly associated and gender and BMI were not significantly associated despite regression coefficients of -1.609 and -48.283. Intensity of pain, duration of pain and the cause of pain were not associated with trunk muscle strength (
Table 3).
Even though gender was not an associated factor with trunk muscle power, the number of female patients was three times larger than that of male patients, therefore we analyzed multiple linear regression analysis with backward elimination with only female patients.
When CSA was included as an independent variable, age and BMI were significantly associated with the peak torque of trunk flexors. With the peak torque per body weight of trunk flexors, age was significantly associated and BMI was not significantly associated despite a high regression coefficient. With the peak torque of total trunk muscles, BMI was significantly associated and age was not significantly associated despite high a regression coefficient. With the peak torque of total trunk muscles, age and BMI were not significantly associated, with p-values of 0.073 and 0.056 (
Table 4).
When rCSA was included as an independent variable, with peak torque of trunk flexors, age and BMI was significantly associated and rCSA was not significantly associated for a p-value of 0.076. With the peak torque per body weight of trunk flexors, rCSA and age were significantly associated, and the cause of low back pain was not significantly associated for a p-value of 0.059. With peak torque of total trunk muscles, BMI was significantly associated and age was not significantly associated for a p-value of 0.058 despite a high regression coefficient. With peak torque per body weight of total trunk muscles, age and BMI were significantly associated and other factors were not statistically significant (
Table 5).
DISCUSSION
The cross sectional area of the back muscles of patients with chronic low back pain was reported to be smaller than that of people without low back pain.
25,
26
We expected a correlation between the decreased CSA of back muscles and peak torque of trunk extensors. In the result analysis, correlation between the CSA of back muscles and the strength of trunk flexors and also correlation between the CSA of back muscles and strength of total trunk muscles were found. Also no relationship was found between the CSA of back extensors and the strength of trunk extensors.
One factor in the results is that the CSA of the back muscles was calculated as the sum of the multifidus and erector spinae muscles. As for back extensors, the erector spinae acts as a global muscle that affects movement and muscular strength and the multifidus acts as a local muscle which works as a segmental stabilizer.
27 Therefore, the erector spinae muscle might be more related to the isokinetic strength of trunk extensors than the multifidus muscle. It was difficult to separate the multifidus and erector spinae in captured images of MRI, so we measured the cross sectional area of back muscles as the sum of the two muscles and this might act as a limitation in this study. In some patients these two muscles were clearly separated as in other studies, but in others it was hard to separate them as shown in
Fig. 1. Therefore, if enough data of patients whose muscles can be separated are gathered, we could consider analyzing the relationship between the CSA of erector spinae and isokinetic strength.
Other factor is the influence of core stabilizing muscles. The core muscles is a group of trunk muscles that surround the vertebrae and peritoneum, and the group includes not only the diaphragm, hip muscles but also the multifidus, longissimus, ilocostalis, quadratus lumborum in the back and the transversus abdominis, internus abdominis, rectus abdominis in the abdomen.
28 The core muscles contribute to control of the motion of the lumbar spine and stabilize segments of the lumbar spine. Exercise to increase muscular strength to stabilize the lumbar spine is called core muscle strengthening exercise, and recently much attention has been focused on its effect in decreasing disability and pain of chronic low back pain patients.
29 The results of this study suggest that the decrease in the CSA may be related to the weakened strength of trunk flexors and the strength of rectus abdominis, which is a global muscle acting as a trunk flexor among the core muscles and which may have an important role in producing lumbar muscular strength in patients with low back pain.
Another factor is the characteristics of muscle fiber type of back muscles. In the erector spinae of low back pain patients, although structure changes occurred in Type I muscle fiber, it was reported that atrophy of Type II muscle fiber was prominent and that the proportion of Type I muscle fiber in back muscles was higher in women than in men.
30,
31 If the patients had a high proportion of Type I fiber in back muscles, the isokinetic test might not be appropriate for evaluating the strength. Also, while measuring the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors, eccentric contraction of the back muscles might occur to maintain the stability of the trunk. However we did not measure eccentric torque with the isokinetic dynamometer because eccentric contraction has a higher possibility of causing muscle fiber injury than concentric contraction, and we could not find studies about back muscle strength with eccentric torque. Keller et al.
18 reported that there is a correlation between the decreased CSA of back muscle and peak torque, but the measured strength was the peak torque of total trunk muscle, not that of trunk flexors. The results of our study are somewhat similar to the results of this report.
Degenerative change in back muscle may lead to a decrease in the cross sectional area and atrophy of back muscle, so isokinetic strength can be expected to decrease. However, Parkkola et al.
25 reported that although the sign of muscle atrophy was replacement of muscle with adipose tissue or connective tissue, the amount of fat infiltration in lumbar muscle was not related to isokinetic strength. In our study, it also was observed that fat composition and muscular strength have no correlation. But this finding could have resulted from the fact that the fat composition of most patients was grade 1 and 2 (average 1.50), which means no moderate or severe degenerative changes of back muscles, and most of the patients in the study were middle aged.
The result of analysis revealed that factors associated with isokinetic strength of trunk muscles were BMI in all patients and age and BMI in female patients. BMI was found to be associated with peak torque of trunk flexors, and positive regression coefficients (2.837 in CSA and 2.942 in rCSA) were found, which suggests that the bigger the body shape or body weight the stronger the trunk flexor. In regression analysis with rCSA as an independent variable, a high regression coefficient was found between gender and the strength of trunk flexors despite the p-value being over 0.05, which suggests that women may have weaker trunk flexors than men.
Analysis of only the female patients revealed that age and BMI influenced the strength of trunk flexors and total trunk muscles more than CSA did. Although the influence of gender on strength could not be evaluated properly due to a much smaller proportion of male patients in our study, female patients tend to show more weakness of trunk muscles with age, which is similar to the report of Keller et al.
18 BMI and strength of trunk muscle were negatively correlated in the women which is opposite to the results of all the patients. We can assume that, unlike men, obese women might become inactive and obesity in the abdomen might be associated with weakness of the abdominal muscles, which might lead to weakness of the trunk flexors.
There is a limitation with performing the isokinetic test, and that is the precondition of this test is the maximal voluntary participation of the patients. Pain or psychological factors, such as anxiety, could have prevented maximal contraction of the muscles, resulting in the recording of strength values that are less than the real values. In patients with chronic low back pain, anxiety and other psychological aspects caused by chronic pain can have an influence on back muscle performance. Keller et al.
18 reported pain on exertion was a significant predictor of isokinetic back muscle strength bedsides the cross sectional area of muscle, and self-efficacy for pain was a significant predictor of strength only in men. However we did not evaluate the effect of pain and psychological aspects on trunk muscle strength. Additional study on whether or not the psychological problems of anxiety and depression might have an influence on trunk muscle strength in patients of chronic lumbar sprain after trauma such as traffic accident should be considered, because such psychological problems could affect the perception of pain.
CONCLUSION
We found that the cross sectional area of back muscle was an influencing factor in the strength of trunk flexors and total trunk muscles in middle aged chronic low back pain patients in Korea. Besides the cross sectional area of back muscle, physical conditions such as gender and BMI were also influencing factors in the entire population of patients in our study, and age and BMI were influencing factors in the female population of our study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A090084).
REFERENCES
- 1. Carpenter DM, Nelson BW. Low back strengthening for the prevention and treatment of low back pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31:18-24.
- 2. Lewis JS, Hewitt JS, Billington L, Cole S, Byng J, Karayiannis S. A randomized clinical trial comparing two physiotherapy interventions for chronic low back pain. Spine 2005;30:711-721.
- 3. Park YJ, Choi KS, Lee SG. Effect of lumbar extensor strengthening in chronic low back pain patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2000;24:295-300.
- 4. Akuthota V, Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85(3 Suppl 1):S86-S92.
- 5. Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC, Witvrouw EE, De Cuyper HJ. CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Eur Spine J 2000;9:266-272.
- 6. Risch SV, Norvell NK, Pollock ML, Risch ED, Langer H, Fulton M, Graves JE, Leggett SH. Lumbar strengthening in chronic low back pain patients. Physiologic and psychologic benefits. Spine 1993;18:232-238.
- 7. Cholewicki J, McGill SM. Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1996;11:1-15.
- 8. O'Sullivan PB, Burnett A, Floyd AN, Gadsdon K, Logiudice J, Miller D, Quirke H. Lumbar repositioning deficit in a specific low back pain population. Spine 2003;28:1074-1079.
- 9. Cassisi JE, Robinson ME, O'Conner P, MacMillan M. Trunk strength and lumbar paraspinal muscle activity during isometric exercise in chronic low back pain patients and controls. Spine 1993;18:245-251.
- 10. Mandell PJ, Weitz E, Bernstein JI, Lipton MH, Morris J, Bradshaw D, Bodkin KP, Mattmiller B. Isokinetic trunk strength and lifting strength measures. Differences and similarities between low-back-injured and non injured workers. Spine 1993;18:2491-2501.
- 11. Maughan RJ. Relationship between muscle strength and muscle cross-sectional area. Implications for training. Sports Med 1984;1:263-269.
- 12. Storheim K, Holm I, Gunderson R, Brox JI, Bo K. The effect of comprehensive group training on cross-sectional area, density, and strength of paraspinal muscles in patients sick-listed for subacute low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:271-279.
- 13. Mannion AF, Käser L, Weber E, Rhyner A, Dvorak J, Müntener M. Influence of age and duration of symptoms on fiber type distribution and size of the back muscles in chronic low back pain patients. Eur Spine J 2000;9:273-281.
- 14. Thorstensson A, Arvidon A. Trunk muscle strength and low back pain. Scand J Rehabil Med 1982;14:69-75.
- 15. Ripamonti M, Colin D, Rahmani A. Torque-velocity and power-velocity relationship during isokinetic trunk flexion and extension. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008;23:520-526.
- 16. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ, Mooney V, Barnes D, Judge L, Smith S, Terry A. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurement and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 1989;14:33-36.
- 17. Reid JG, Costigan PA. Trunk muscle balance and muscular force. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:783-786.
- 18. Keller A, Johansen JG, Hellensness J, Brox JI. Predictors of isokinetic back muscle strength in patients with low back pain. Spine 1999;24:275-280.
- 19. Kang CH, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Lee CS. MRI of paraspinal muscles in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients and control patients with chronic low back pain. Clin Radiol 2007;62:479-486.
- 20. Lee JC, Cha JG, Kim Y, Kim YI, Shin BJ. Quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration in the patients with the degenerative lumbar flat back using a digital image analysis: comparison with the normal controls. Spine 2008;33:318-325.
- 21. Parkkola R, Kormano M. Lumbar disc and back muscle degeneration on MRI: correlation to age and body mass. J Spinal Disord 1992;5:86-92.
- 22. Ropponen A, Videman T, Battié MC. The reliability of paraspinal muscles composition measurements using routine spine MRI and their association with back function. Man Ther 2008;13:349-356.
- 23. Karatas GK, Gogus F, Meray J. Reliability of isokinetic trunk muscle strength measurement. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;81:79-85.
- 24. Thistle HG, Hislop HJ, Maffroid M, Lowman EW. Isokinetic contraction: a new concept of resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1967;48:279-282.
- 25. Parkkola R, Rytökoski U, Kormano M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the discs and trunk muscles in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. Spine 1993;18:830-836.
- 26. Gibbons LE, Latikka P, Videman T, Manninen H, Battié MC. The association of trunk muscle cross-sectional area and magnetic resonance image parameters with isokinetic and psychophysical lifting strength and static back muscle endurance in men. J Spinal Disord 1997;10:398-403.
- 27. Brukner P, Khan K. Clinical sports medicine. 2010.3rd ed. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill Australia; p. 158-161.
- 28. Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1989;230:1-5.
- 29. Barr KP, Griggs M, Cadby T. Lumbar stabilization: a review of core concepts and current literature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:72-80.
- 30. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Flank B, Alaranta H, Nykvist F, Lehto M, Einola S, Kalimo H. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 1993;18:568-574.
- 31. Mannion AF, Dumas GA, Cooper RG, Espinosa FJ, Faris MW, Stevenson JM. Muscle fiber size and type distribution in thoracic and lumbar regions of erector spinae in healthy subjects without low back pain: normal values and sex differences. J Anat 1997;190:505-513.
Fig. 1Cross sectional area of paraspinal muscles. T1 axial images obtained at the L4-L5 level, showing the lumbar paraspinal muscles. MF: Multifidus muscle, ES: Erector spinae muscle, PS: Psoas muscle, Disc: Intervertebral disc, MF+ES: Paraspinal muscle.
Fig. 2Biodex® isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Corporation, New York, USA). The fixed axis of the machine was aligned with the subject's anterior superior iliac supine (ASIS). Spinal range of motion was not limited. The angular velocity was set at 60°/sec.
Table 1Parameters Measured in MRI (L4-5 Level) and Isokinetic Test of Trunk Muscles
Table 2Multiple Linear Regression Analysis with Backward Elimination (with Respect to Cross Sectional Area)
Table 3Multiple Linear Regression Analysis with Backward Elimination (with Respect to Relative Cross Sectional Area)
Table 4Multiple Linear Regression Analysis with Backward Elimination (with Respect to Cross Sectional Area) in Female Patients
Table 5Multiple Linear Regression Analysis with Backward Elimination (with Respect to Relative Cross Sectional Area) in Female Patients
Figure & Data
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Lumbar Extensor Muscle Strength and Physical Performance in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Findings From SarcoSpine Cohort
Dong Hyun Kim, Sohee Oh, Seungcheol Kim, Sang Yoon Lee
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity.2025; 33(1): 10. CrossRef - The prevalence and multifactor analysis of thoracolumbar fasciitis in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Runsen Chen, Shuao Lei, Guangzhou Li
The Spine Journal.2025; 25(8): 1644. CrossRef - Correlation study and risk assessment of lower back pain and sarcopenia
Wen Hu, Chunlei Wu, Lei Xiao, Qiong Wei, Hao Wang
Medicine.2025; 104(20): e42469. CrossRef - Association Between Paraspinal Muscle Parameters and Single-Segment Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Shuang Liu, Qi Shi, Wei-Wei Da, Chun-Chun Xue, Lin Chen, Yu-Nan Li, Yong-Peng Xue, Wen-Lan Du, Xiao-Feng Li
Spine.2025; 50(12): 841. CrossRef - Effects of paraspinal muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration on segmental kyphosis after conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) in postmenopausal women
Inwook Seo, Minjoon Cho, Taehoon Kang, Sungtaek Chung, Jae Hyup Lee
European Spine Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Research progress on sarcopenia in the musculoskeletal system
Xinning Mao, Ke Lv, Weihui Qi, Wenqiang Cheng, Tenghui Li, Yueli Sun, Hongting Jin, Hao Pan, Dong Wang
Bone Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Evaluation of a Fast-Solving Rigid Body Spine Model Inclusive of Intra-Abdominal Pressure
Siril Teja Dukkipati, Mark Driscoll
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.2025; 72(10): 3108. CrossRef - Comparative analysis of tensiomyographic and isokinetic assessments of the rectus abdominis and erector spinae in bodybuilding trainees with nonspecific low back pain
Ijoon Kim, Jooheon Jee, Sihwa Park
PeerJ.2025; 13: e20309. CrossRef - Comparative cohort study of paraspinal muscle volume change between uniportal full endoscopic and mini open posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Hyeun Sung Kim, Pang Hung Wu
Seminars in Spine Surgery.2024; 36(1): 101081. CrossRef - Trunk Flexor and Extensor Muscle Strength Capacity in Healthy Individuals
Fatma Unver, Elif Gur Kabul, Meryem Buke, Bayram Unver
Turkish Journal of Sports Medicine.2024; 59(3): 112. CrossRef - Isokinetische Krafttestung bei unterschiedlichen biomechanischen Anforderungen an die Rumpfkraft – Vergleich von militärischen Leistungssportlern und Soldaten mit dienstlich bedingt hoher körperlicher Beanspruchung
Thomas Sanjay Weber-Spickschen, Daniel Geißler, Andreas Lison, Christoph Schulze
Sportverletzung · Sportschaden.2024; 38(03): 140. CrossRef - Postoperative Gait Performance Following Pertrochanteric Fractures Is Influenced by the Preoperative Condition of the Gluteal Muscles
Mitsuaki Noda, Shunsuke Takahara, Atsuyuki Inui, Keisuke Oe, Shin Osawa, Takehiko Matsushita
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Evaluation of the reliability of measuring lower back muscles cross-sectional area based on manual segmentation within multi-level MRI images
A.A. Alhulail, M.S. Alshuhri, D.F. AL-jolifiy, M.N. AL-nuwaybit, A.S. AL-tamimi, N.M. AL-qahtani, R.A. AL-hakami, M.A. Almanaa, A.M. Jabour
Radiography.2024; 30(6): 1637. CrossRef - Spinopelvic malalignment correlates to lumbar instability and lumbar musculature in chronic low back pain-an exploratory study
Tahere Seyedhoseinpoor, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, Mohammad Taghipour, Mehdi Dadgoo, Seyed Javad Mousavi
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef - Correlation between posterior paraspinal muscle atrophy and lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration in patients with chronic low back pain
Ziying Cheng, Yuxi Li, Ming Li, Junshen Huang, Jiajun Huang, Yuwei Liang, Shixin Lu, Changchun Liang, Tong Xing, Kaihui Su, Guoming Wen, Weike Zeng, Lin Huang
International Orthopaedics.2023; 47(3): 793. CrossRef - Sex differences in kinematics and quadriceps activity for fast isokinetic knee extension
Jeongwoo Jeon, Dongyeop Lee, Jaeho Yu, Jinseop Kim, Seong-Gil Kim, Jiheon Hong
Isokinetics and Exercise Science.2023; 31(3): 191. CrossRef - Analysis of CT imaging changes of psoas major muscles in patients with lumbar disc herniation mainly based on low back pain and lower limb pain
Mingchao Cui, Qianru Zhang, Xipeng Chen, Han Wu
Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Evaluation of the degeneration of the multifidus and erector spinae muscles in patients with low back pain and healthy individuals
Alikemal Yazici, Tuba Yerlikaya, Adile Oniz
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2023; 36(3): 637. CrossRef - Identification of Novel Genetic Markers for the Risk of Spinal Pathologies
Patawut Bovonratwet, Scott Kulm, David A. Kolin, Junho Song, Kyle W. Morse, Matthew E. Cunningham, Todd J. Albert, Harvinder S. Sandhu, Han Jo Kim, Sravisht Iyer, Olivier Elemento, Sheeraz A. Qureshi
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.2023; 105(11): 830. CrossRef - Prospective Cohort Study with a 2-Year Follow-up of Clinical Results, Fusion Rate, and Muscle Bulk for Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Pang Hung Wu, Hyeun Sung Kim, Jin Woo An, Myeonghun Kim, Inkyung Lee, Jong Seon Park, Jun Hyoung Lee, Sangsoo Kang, Jeongshik Lee, Yeonjin Yi, Jun Hyung Lee, Jun Hwan Park, Jae Hyeon Lim, Il-Tae Jang
Asian Spine Journal.2023; 17(2): 373. CrossRef - Combined exercise and nutrition intervention for older women with spinal sarcopenia: an open-label single-arm trial
Seungcheol Kim, Jinhee Park, Dong Hyun Kim, Jiyu Sun, Sang Yoon Lee
BMC Geriatrics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Deep Learning for Multi-Tissue Segmentation and Fully Automatic Personalized Biomechanical Models from BACPAC Clinical Lumbar Spine MRI
Madeline Hess, Brett Allaire, Kenneth T Gao, Radhika Tibrewala, Gaurav Inamdar, Upasana Bharadwaj, Cynthia Chin, Valentina Pedoia, Mary Bouxsein, Dennis Anderson, Sharmila Majumdar
Pain Medicine.2023; 24(Supplement): S139. CrossRef - Human primary myoblasts derived from paraspinal muscle reflect donor age as an experimental model of sarcopenia
Young Hoon Son, Whoan Jeang Kim, Yeo Jin Shin, Seung-Min Lee, Bora Lee, Kwang-Pyo Lee, Seung Hoon Lee, Kap Jung Kim, Ki-Sun Kwon
Experimental Gerontology.2023; 181: 112273. CrossRef - Fat infiltration of the posterior paraspinal muscles is inversely associated with the fat infiltration of the psoas muscle: a potential compensatory mechanism in the lumbar spine
Maximilian Muellner, Henryk Haffer, Erika Chiapparelli, Yusuke Dodo, Jennifer Shue, Ek T. Tan, Jiaqi Zhu, Matthias Pumberger, Andrew A. Sama, Frank P. Cammisa, Federico P. Girardi, Alexander P. Hughes
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2023;[Epub] CrossRef - Preoperative paraspinal and psoas major muscle atrophy and paraspinal muscle fatty degeneration as factors influencing the results of surgical treatment of lumbar disc disease
Agnieszka Stanuszek, Adrian Jędrzejek, Eliza Gancarczyk-Urlik, Izabela Kołodziej, Magdalena Pisarska-Adamczyk, Olga Milczarek, Jacek Trompeta, Wojciech Chrobak
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2022; 142(7): 1375. CrossRef - Association Between Paravertebral Muscle Mass and Improvement in Sagittal Imbalance After Decompression Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Yuichi Yoshida, Junichi Ohya, Taiki Yasukawa, Yuki Onishi, Junichi Kunogi, Naohiro Kawamura
Spine.2022; 47(6): E243. CrossRef - Muscle strength in Brazilian firefighters with non-specific chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study
Flavia Marques Pedrosa, Alexandre Lima de Araújo Ribeiro, Daltro Izaias Pelozato de Oliveira, Monaliza de Sousa Araújo, Sacha Clael, Ricardo M. Lima, Rodrigo Luiz Carregaro, Wagner Rodrigues Martins
Work.2022; 72(3): 941. CrossRef - Investigation of the relationship between the clinical evaluation results of lumbar region muscles with cross-sectional area and fat infiltration
Alikemal Yazici, Tuba Yerlikaya
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2022; 35(6): 1277. CrossRef - Relationship between the morphology and composition of the lumbar paraspinal and psoas muscles and lumbar intervertebral motion in chronic low‐back pain: An exploratory study
Tahere Seyedhoseinpoor, Mohammad Taghipour, Mehdi Dadgoo, Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, Anoshirvan Kazemnejad, James M. Elliott, Julie Hides
Clinical Anatomy.2022; 35(6): 762. CrossRef - Natural aging course of lumbar extensor muscle mass and strength in community-dwelling older women: a 1-year prospective observational study
Dong Hyun Kim, Jinhee Park, Chang Won Lee, Sang Yoon Lee
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2022; 34(9): 2099. CrossRef - Influence of Chronic Lameness on Thoracolumbar Musculus Multifidus Structure in the Horse
Hayley M. Sullivan, Elizabeth V. Acutt, Myra F. Barrett, Mo D. Salman, Katherine L. Ellis, Melissa R. King
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science.2022; 117: 104053. CrossRef - Psoas weakness following oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: a prospective observational study with an isokinetic dynamometer
Subum Lee, Ae-Ryoung Kim, Woo-Seok Bang, Jin Hoon Park, Sang-Woo Lee, Kyoung-Tae Kim, Dae-Chul Cho
The Spine Journal.2022; 22(12): 1990. CrossRef - Inter-examiner reliability in identifying lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy by lumbar paraspinal muscle atrophy index, a novel parameter
Yuki Hasebe, Kenta Suzuki, Kiyokazu Akasaka, Kazuo Saita, Satoshi Ogihara
Journal of Physical Therapy Science.2022; 34(11): 737. CrossRef - Effects of Virtual Reality Exercises versus Isokinetic Exercises in comparison with Conventional Exercises on the Imaging Findings and Inflammatory Biomarker Changes in Soccer Players with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Gopal Nambi, Mshari Alghadier, Faizan Zaffar Kashoo, Osama R. Aldhafian, Naif A. Nwihadh, Ayman K. Saleh, Mohamed A. Omar, Tohamy G. T. Hassan, Mohamed Nagah Ahmed Ibrahim, Hassan Fathy El Behairy, Abdehamid A. Attallah, Mohammed Abdelgwad Ismail
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 20(1): 524. CrossRef - Effect of race, age, and gender on lumbar muscle volume and fat infiltration in the degenerative spine
Tetsuro Hida, Robert K. Eastlack, Tokumi Kanemura, Gregory M. Mundis, Shiro Imagama, Behrooz A. Akbarnia
Journal of Orthopaedic Science.2021; 26(1): 69. CrossRef - The effect of aquatic exercise on functional disability, flexibility and function of trunk muscles in postmenopausal women with chronic non-specific low back pain: Randomized controlled trial
S. Ansari, A. Elmieh, A. Alipour
Science & Sports.2021; 36(3): e103. CrossRef - Association of Lumbar Paraspinal Muscle Morphometry with Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Eun Taek Lee, Seung Ah Lee, Yunsoo Soh, Myung Chul Yoo, Jun Ho Lee, Jinmann Chon
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(8): 4037. CrossRef - Age-Related Changes in Concentric and Eccentric Isokinetic Peak Torque of the Trunk Muscles in Healthy Older Versus Younger Men
A. Dallaway, J. Hattersley, J. Tallis, D. Renshaw, C. Griffen, M. Duncan
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity.2021; 29(6): 941. CrossRef - Novel lateral whole‐body dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry of lumbar paraspinal muscle mass: results from the SarcoSpine study
Sang Yoon Lee, Dong Hyun Kim, Sang Joon Park, Jinhee Park, Sun Gun Chung, Jae‐Young Lim
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.2021; 12(4): 913. CrossRef - Combined exercise and nutrition intervention for spinal sarcopenia
Sang Yoon Lee, Jinhee Park, Dong Hyun Kim, Jae-Young Lim
Medicine.2021; 100(24): e26421. CrossRef - The Effect of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae (LSTV) on Paraspinal Muscle Volume in Patients with Low Back Pain
Fatma Esra Bahadir Ulger, Ozge Gulsum Illeez
Academic Radiology.2020; 27(7): 944. CrossRef - Age-related degeneration of the lumbar paravertebral muscles: Systematic review and three-level meta-regression
A. Dallaway, C. Kite, C. Griffen, M. Duncan, J. Tallis, D. Renshaw, J. Hattersley
Experimental Gerontology.2020; 133: 110856. CrossRef - Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis of Spinal Sarcopenia and Related Therapeutic Approaches: A Narrative Review
Yu-Kai Kuo, Yu-Ching Lin, Ching-Yu Lee, Chih-Yu Chen, Jowy Tani, Tsung-Jen Huang, Hsi Chang, Meng-Huang Wu
International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 21(8): 3010. CrossRef - Assessment of isokinetic trunk muscle strength and its association with health-related quality of life in patients with degenerative spinal deformity
Sen Yang, Can Chen, Shiyu Du, Yong Tang, Kai Li, Xueke Yu, Jiulin Tan, Chengmin Zhang, Zhigang Rong, Jianzhong Xu, Wenjie Wu, Fei Luo
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - The relationship between cross-sectional area of multifidus muscle and disability index in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain
Fereshteh Rezazadeh, Navid Taheri, Seyed Mehdi Okhravi, Sayed Mohsen Hosseini
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice.2019; 42: 1. CrossRef - Residence could influence the surgical outcome after corrective surgery in adult spinal deformity: comparison study between urban and rural area in Korea
Un-Yong Choi, Ji-In Kang, Jeong-Yoon Park, Sung-Uk Kuh, Dong-Kyu Chin, Keun-Su Kim, Yong-Eun Cho, Kyung-Hyun Kim
European Spine Journal.2019; 28(9): 2216. CrossRef - Effects of exercise therapy on postural stability, multifidus thickness, and pain intensity in patients with chronic low-back pain
R Finta, I Polyák, T Bender, E Nagy
Developments in Health Sciences.2019; 2(1): 15. CrossRef - Natural aging course of paraspinal muscle and back extensor strength in community-dwelling older adults (sarcopenia of spine, SarcoSpine): a prospective cohort study protocol
Ju Chan Kim, Shi-Uk Lee, Se Hee Jung, Jae-Young Lim, Dong Hyun Kim, Sang Yoon Lee
BMJ Open.2019; 9(9): e032443. CrossRef - Lumbar Extensor Muscle Size and Isometric Muscle Strength in Women with Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Diseases
Yong Gon Seo, Won Hah Park, Chong Suh Lee, Kyung Chung Kang
Asian Spine Journal.2018; 12(5): 943. CrossRef - Comparison of MRI-defined back muscles volume between patients with ankylosing spondylitis and control patients with chronic back pain: age and spinopelvic alignment matched study
Doo Hee Bok, Jihye Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim
European Spine Journal.2017; 26(2): 528. CrossRef - Asymmetric Atrophy of Paraspinal Muscles in Patients With Chronic Unilateral Lumbar Radiculopathy
Jinmann Chon, Hee-Sang Kim, Jong Ha Lee, Seung Don Yoo, Dong Hwan Yun, Dong Hwan Kim, Seung Ah Lee, Yoo Jin Han, Hyun Seok Lee, Young Rok Han, Seonyoung Han, Yong Kim
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2017; 41(5): 801. CrossRef - Reliability and Validity of a New Method for Isometric Back Extensor Strength Evaluation Using A Hand-Held Dynamometer
Hee-won Park, Sora Baek, Hong Young Kim, Jung-Gyoo Park, Eun Kyoung Kang
Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2017; 41(5): 793. CrossRef - Does lumbar paraspinal muscles improve after corrective fusion surgery in degenerative flat black?
Jung Hwan Lee, Sang-Ho Lee
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.2017; 51(2): 147. CrossRef - Paraspinal muscle, facet joint, and disc problems: risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion
Jong Yeol Kim, Dal Sung Ryu, Ho Kyu Paik, Sang Soak Ahn, Moo Sung Kang, Kyung Hyun Kim, Jeong Yoon Park, Dong Kyu Chin, Keun Su Kim, Yong Eun Cho, Sung Uk Kuh
The Spine Journal.2016; 16(7): 867. CrossRef - MRI‐determined lumbar muscle morphometry in man and sheep: potential biomechanical implications for ovine model to human spine translation
Stephanie Valentin, Theresia F. Licka, James Elliott
Journal of Anatomy.2015; 227(4): 506. CrossRef - Do variations in paraspinal muscle morphology and composition predict low back pain in men?
M. Fortin, L. E. Gibbons, T. Videman, M. C. Battié
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports.2015; 25(6): 880. CrossRef - Image changes of paraspinal muscles and clinical correlations in patients with unilateral lumbar spinal stenosis
Yan-Yu Chen, Jwo-Luen Pao, Chen-Kun Liaw, Wei-Li Hsu, Rong-Sen Yang
European Spine Journal.2014; 23(5): 999. CrossRef - Changes of Paraspinal Muscles in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Spinal Compression Fractures: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Jong Yun Kim, Soo Uk Chae, Gang Deuk Kim, Myoung Soo Cha
Journal of Bone Metabolism.2013; 20(2): 75. CrossRef
