Method: 34 spinal cord injured male patients were participated in this study. We measured the maximal detrusor pressure, compliance of detrusor, involuntary detrusor reflex and urethral pressure by urodynamic study. And we induced ejaculatory stimulation by vibratory (FerticareⰒ) and electrical stimulation (SeagerⰒ) and analyzed the sperm volume, the concentration, the total sperm count, the motile sperm count and motility. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test were used to compare sperm quality among groups of urodynamic parameters.
Results: Semen quality such as sperm concentration, sperm volume, motile sperm count was significantly (p<0.05) better in patients with low maximal detrusor pressure, high detrusor compliance, normtonic urethral pressure than with high maximal detrusor pressure, low detrusor compliance, hypertonic urethral pressure, regardless of involuntary detrusor reflex.
Conclusion: The proper management of neurogenic bladder for improving semen quality in spinal cord injured male patients may be needed for better pregnant outcomes. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2003; 27: 875-879)
Method: Thirteen adults with CP were participated in this study. Nine of these thirteen subjects had urological symptoms. The urological history taking, urine analysis, urine culture, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) and urodynamic study were done.
Results: The urinary incontinence was the most common presenting symptom. All subjects without urological symptoms showed normal urodynamic findings. Eight of the subjects who had urological symptoms had abnormal findings on urodynamic study. All subjects showed normal findings on voiding cystourethrography. Based on urodynamic findings, six subjects were treated with anticholinergic drug and five (83.3%) of these subjects showed improvement of their urological symptoms.
Conclusion: Many adults with CP might have the problems in urination. Our study showed that many symptomatic subjects had abnormal urodynamic findings and much of these urological symptoms was improved with proper treatment. These adults with CP would, therefore, benefit from proper assessment and treatment, expecially in the subjects who have urological symptoms. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2003; 27: 198-203)
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical usefulness of KCl provocative urodynamic study in spinal cord injured patients with neurogenic bladder.
Method: Urodynamic studies using normal saline and 0.2 M KCl solution were performed on 46 spinal cord injured patients. The reflex volume was measured on urodynamic study using normal saline and 0.2 M KCl solution. If the reflex volume using KCl solution was smaller than 85% of reflex volume using normal saline, it was considered as positive response. Urine culture and urinalysis were also performed before urodynamic study.
Results: KCl provocative tests showed positive response in patients showing current infection on urine culture and urinalysis (p<0.05). Comparing with the positive response group and negative response group, mean maximal bladder capacity was smaller and mean bladder compliance was lower in the positive response group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found between positive and negative response groups according to age, duration since injury, completeness of injury, voiding methods, and anticholinergic medication. The mean reflex volume provoked by KCl solution was smaller and mean bladder compliance provoked by KCl solution was lower than those provoked by normal saline in the positive response group (p<0.01).
Conclusion: The response of KCl provocative test suggested increased bladder-blood-urine barrier permeability by current urinary tract infection. We conclude that the KCl provocative urodynamic study is a useful method for detection of impaired bladder-blood-urine barrier in spinal cord injuries with neurogenic bladder.
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of a newly devised portable cystometer to measure the pressure of bladder in a low cost and easier accessability.
Method: This study was performed in 47 patients with a conventional instrumental cystometer (Jupiter 8000, Wiest) and the newly devised portable cystometer. In the supine position, we measured the maximal intravesical pressure, abdominal pressure and bladder volume with the portable cystometer just after the measurement of the maximal detrusor pressure and bladder volume with the conventional instrumental cystometer. Paired t-test was utilized to analyze and compare the result.
Results: 1) There was no significant difference in the average maximal detrusor pressures measured by maximal intravesical pressures minus abdominal pressures, which were 38.32⁑20.97 cmH2O by the conventional instrumental cystometer and 40.02⁑20.70 cmH2O by the portable cystometer (p>0.05). 2) There was no significant difference in the average bladder volumes at maximal detrusor pressure, which were 302.13⁑83.92 cc by the conventional instrumental cystometer and 314.04⁑94.17 cc by the portable cystometer (p>0.05).
Conclusion: We conclude that there is no significant difference between the conventional instrumental cystometer and the portable cystometer in the measurement of detrusor pressure and bladder volume. We believe this portable cystometer would be a useful tool to evaluate the function of bladder in a low cost and easier accessability.
Objective: To determine the clinical utility of ice water test for the urodynamic study in neurogenic bladder of spinal cord injured patients.
Method: Warm water (20∼30oC) urodynamic studies were performed on 66 spinal cord injured patients. Subsequently, ice water (4∼8oC) urodynamic studies were performed. We determined the ice water test to be positive if the reflex volume of ice water urodynamic study is lower than the volume of the warm water urodynamic study.
Results: Ice water test was positive in 24 (55.8%) and negative in 19 (44.2%) of the 43 patients showing hyperreflexic detrusor activity in warm water urodynamic study. Ice water test was negative in all 23 cases showing areflexic detrusor activity. No significant difference was found between positive and negative ice water test groups for the level of injury, sex, age, extent of injury and duration since injury. If water was cool enough, positivity of ice water test was not affected by infusion rate. There was no difference between the two urodynamic studies of maximal bladder pressure and compliance.
Conclusion: This study suggests that ice water urodynamic study is a useful method for the evaluation of hyperreflexic neurogenic bladder activated by cold specific receptors via C afferent fibers in spinal cord injured patients.
Objective: To investigate the correlations of neurological level, BCR and urodynamic study (UDS) in the spinal cord injury(SCI) patients, we analyzed the results of BCR and UDS fundings.
Method: The sujects were twenty-four patients with SCI who were beyond 3 months following the SCI. According to the level of injury, the patients were divided into 3 groups: above T10 level, 7; T10 to L2 level, 8; below L2 level, 9. Electrophysiological BCR test and UDS were performed in all patients.
Results: The results showed a significant correlation between the BCR test and level of injury, however there was no correlation between the UDS and level of injury, nor between the detrusor function and BCR test. The results might be from a differential recovery of the somatic and autonomic nervous system.
Conclusion: As a part of comprehensive evaluation for the bladder function in the SCI patients, we recommend both the bulbocavernosus reflex test and urodynamic study. Further neurophysiological research would be needed to understand the urodynamic findings which did not correlate with the level of SCI.