Objective: The purposes of these study were to evaluate the changes of temperature and sympathetic skin response (SSR) before and after sympathectomy in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis and to quantify long standing effect of sympathectomy.

Method: The SSR and skin temperature were measured before, one day and 30 days after thoracoscopic sympathectomy. SSR was recorded from palm and sole bilaterally. Temperature was recorded on 9 sites of each hand and 11 site of each sole. Patient's satisfaction with operation was assessed by 10-point scale.

Results: One day after sympathectomy, the amplitude of SSR was significantly decreased and latency of SSR was delayed in all cases on bilateral palm and sole. However, after sympathectomy 30 days, the amplitude of SSR was normalized in all cases on bilateral sole. All patients who had undergone sympathectomy showed significant clinical improvement. The temperature increased dramatically over 3^oC on postoperation 1 day and maintained 1.72^oC higher in post-operation 30 days than pre-operation on both hands. There was no significant difference of temperature among pre-operation and post-operation 1 day and post-operation 30 days on sole.

Conclusion: Our study proved effect of thoracoscopic sympathectomy to the patients with palmar hyperhidrosis objectively and quantified the decrement of sympathetic tone. Further study is needed for long term follow up over 2 months or more. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2002; 26: 543-549)

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of visible light therapy for the management of somatic pain.

Method: Subjects consisted of 42 patients with pain and were divided into two groups; control (n=22) and experimental (n=20) groups. Control group received conventional physical therapy only, while experimental group received additional light therapy with blue light (light intensity 4080 lux, wave length 581 nm, distance from lamp 5 cm). Intensity of pain was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and McGill pain questionnaire. Sympathetic skin response was measured to assess the status of autonomic nervous system. VAS and McGill pain questionnaire were administered before treatment and at 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks after treatment. Sympathetic skin response were performed before and 2 weeks after treatment.

Results: 1) In both experimental and control groups, VAS became significantly lower at two weeks after treatment compared to pretreatment scale (p＜0.05). 2) McGill pain questionnaire showed significantly lower scores two weeks after treatment compared to pretreatment score, only in experimental group (p＜0.05). 3) Experimental group showed significantly lower McGill pain questionnaire score than control group at two weeks after treatment (p＜0.05). 4) Latency and amplitude of sympathetic skin response showed no significant difference between experimental and control groups.

Conclusion: Visible light therapy can be used as an effective therapeutic modality for the management of symptomatic pain in combination with conventional physical therapy. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2002; 26: 81-85)

Objective: To evaluate the autonomic nervous system function in chronic renal failure patients compared to normal control and to assess the effect of dialysis method and underlying diseases such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, on autonomic nervous system function in chronic renal failure patients.

Method: We checked palm and sole skin temperature with digital thermometer, sympathetic skin responses and heart rate variability in chronic renal failure patients (77 persons) and normal control group (77 persons).

Results: The amplitude of sympathetic skin response (SSR) and heart rate variability (RRIV) of patients group showed statistically significant difference compared to control group (p＜0.05). The diabetic patient group with chronic renal failure showed prolonged latency of SSR in sole but significant differences were shown in amplitude and RRIV (p＜0.05). The hypertensive group with chronic renal failure showed prolonged latency of SSR in both palm and sole (p＜0.05) but the amplitude and RRIV of those didn,t show statistical difference (p＞0.05). CRF without diabetes mellitus and hypertension showed significant difference on amplitude of SSR and RRIV (p＜0.05) but autonomic nervous system function tests showed no difference (p＞0.05) between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis groups.

Conclusion: SSR test and RRIV could be valuable measure to evaluate autonomic nervous system functions in the patients with chronic renal failure.

Objective: The sympathetic skin response (SSR) was measured in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) for diagnosis of uremic polyneuropathy and its correlations with nerve conduction study (NCS) and clinical autonomic symptoms were investigated.

Method: The SSR was measured in 15 patients with CRF on regular hemodialysis, aged 26 to 67 years. With median nerve stimulation at the wrist using the extremity without arteriovenous fistula, the SSR was recorded from both palm and sole simultaneously. The responses were interpreted as normal (presence) or abnormal (absence). Routine nerve conduction study was also performed in the same extremities and clinical autonomic symptoms were investigated.

Results: Nine of fifteen patients (60.0%) had symptoms suggestive of autonomic dysfunction: the most frequent findings were orthostatic dizziness and sweating problem. The SSR was absent in four of fifteen patients (26.7%). There is no significant relationship between SSR and autonomic symptoms (P＞0.05). The nerve conduction study was abnormal in eight of fifteen patients (53.3%), and the SSR was absent in two of seven patients with normal NCS. There is no significant relationship between NCS and SSR (P＞0.05).

Conclusion: Although the proportion of abnormal SSR was small, it may be a valuable method in the assessment of uremic polyneuropathy in conjunction with routine nerve conduction study in CRF patients.

Objective: To observe the change of sympathetic skin response (SSR) before and after sympathectomy in patients with idiopathic palmar hyperhidrosis and to find the usefulness of SSR for assessment of the effects of sympathectomy

Method: The SSR was measured in 20 patients with palmar hyperhidrosis and 20 normal control group. Ten days after thoracoscopic sympathectomy, SSR was also measured. A 50∼150 V stimulus was applied over the median nerve and SSR was recorded on bilateral palms and soles with Viking IV (Nicolet Biomedical Ins., U.S.A.). Patient's satisfaction with operation was assessed by questionnaire.

Results: Absent or unstable SSR recordings rate was increased and amplitudes of SSR were significantly decreased in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis compared with control group. After sympathectomy, SSR was absent in all cases on bilateral palms and these results were correlated with clinical improvment. All patients who had undergone surgery showed significant clinical improvement for palmar hyperhidrosis and about 75% of the cases were found to have compensatory sweating from other site of the body.

Conclusion: Abnormal sympathetic nerve system responses were observed in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis. SSR recordings and clinical manifestations were influenced by sysmpathectomy.

Objective: This study was designed to assess the influences of skin temperature and age on latency and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response (SSR).

Method: We examined the sympathetic skin responses in 77 normal subjects aged 25 to 73 years. With stimulation of both median nerve and both tibial nerve at the wrist and ankle, the SSRs were recorded from both palms and soles simulaneously. To determine the effects of skin temperature change on SSR, we examined the SSRs in 12 healthy subjects before and after heating. The heat was applied on right forearm by infra-red lamp.

Results: The mean latency and the mean amplitude of SSR with stimulation of the right median nerve at the wrist were 1.47 sec and 6.08 mV at the right palm, 1.50 sec and 6.07 mV at the left palm, 1.95 sec and 3.38 mV at right sole, and 1.95 sec and 3.09 mV at left sole. There was no side-to-side difference in the latency and the amplitude. Regardless of the site of stimulation, latency was longer at the sole than at the palm, and amplitude was greater at the palm than at the sole (p＜0.05). The latency of the SSR was positively correlated with the age of subjects (p＜0.05), and the amplitude was negatively correlated with the age of subjects (p＜0.05). At higher skin temperature, the latency of SSR was shortened and the amplitude was reduced significantly (p＜0.05).

Conclusion: The amplitude of the SSR decreases with aging and the latency increases with aging. As the skin temperature rises, the latency and amplitude show tendency to decrease. We suggest that the skin temperature and age are important factors to be considered carefully in assessing the SSR parameters.

Objective: Most spinal cord injured patients suffered form various autonomic dysfunction. The purpose of this study is evaluation of sympathetic skin response (SSR) and R-R interval variability (RRIV) as a method of autonomic function test in spinal cord injured patients.

Method: Thirty-six spinal cord injured patients were enrolled in this study. SSR was recorded in the palm and sole by electrical stimulation of right median nerve and RRIV during rest, deep breathing and Valsalva maneuver for 1 minute.

Results: The higher level of spinal cord injury, the higher rate of the abnormal sympathetic skin response in the palm and sole and more reduced values of Valsalva ratio (p＜0.05). The parameters of sympathetic skin response and R-R interval variability were not correlated with injury severity of spinal cord and their autonomic symptoms.

Conclusion: Evaluation of SSR and RRIV could be helpful methods to evaluate autonomic function in the spinal cord injured patients.

Objectives: This study was designed to measure sympathetic skin responses (SSRs) following magnetic stimulation of the cervicothoracic spine and to evaluate its clinical usefulness.

Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers who had no dysautonomic symptoms or signs and a patient with C6 spinal cord transection participated in this study. To evoke SSR, we stimulated the C7 spinous process (SP) and T2 SP with 90 mm circular coil (Magstim 200). We recorded the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) from the right middle finger to ascertain whether the C7 dorsal root was depolarized by the C7 SP stimulation. The same stimulation intensity by which SNAP had been obtained was used to evoke the SSR by the C7 and T2 SP stimulation. The recording of SSR was done in both palms. SNAP was recorded by the magnetic stimulation on the C7 SP in all subjects.

Results: By the C7 SP stimulation, the latency of SSR was 1.35 sec in the right palm, 1.33 sec in the left palm and by the T2 SP stimulation, the latency was 1.24 sec, 1.23 sec in order. The right-left difference was not found by each SP stimulation, but the latency of SSR by the T2 SP stimulation was faster than that by the C7 SP stimulation (p＜0.01). The latency difference of C7 and T2 SP stimulation was 0.11 sec in the right palm, 0.10 sec in the left palm. In a case of C6 cord transection, SSR was evoked neither by the right median electric stimulation, nor by the C7 SP magnetic stimulation. However, SSR was successfully evoked by the T2 SP stimulation.

Conclusion: We believe that the latency difference of C7 and T2 spinous process stimulation reflects the central conduction time of SSR.

Objective: To investigate the conduction velocity of sympathetic skin response(SSR) in normal adults.

Method: The latency of SSR was measured in 41 normal healthy subjects by the simultaneous recordings from three sites of the hand. And we also measured the distance and conduction time between the recording sites of the hand. The conduction velocity of SSR was calculated by dividing the distance by conduction time.

Results: The SSR was obtainable in all subjects from three sites of the hand. The mean latencies of SSR recorded from wrist, midpalm and index finger were 1.29, 1.40 and 1.54 seconds respectively. And the mean latency showed a significant increase from wrist to index finger(p＜0.05). The conduction velocity of the SSR from wrist to index was 0.57 m/sec, and segmental conduction velocities from wrist to palm and palm to index were 0.62 and 0.66 m/sec respectively. The conduction velocity of SSR in the distal segment was slightly faster than in the proximal segment with no statistical significance.

Conclusion: The conduction velocity of SSR by the simultaneous recordings at two or more sites of the hand can be easily obtained and offers a useful parameter along with the amplitude and latency of SSR.

Objective: The purposes of this study were to measure the effect of Stellate ganglion block(SGB) objectively and quantitatively by the use of sympathetic skin response(SSR), and to evaluate the cumulative effects and complications of repetitive SGB and to find out optimal numbers of injection per one cycle in the patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy(RSD).

Method: Six patients with RSD were evaluated with a SSR test before and after the injection of 1% lidocaine 4 ml by SGB method.

Results: There was a significant prolongation of latencies in SSR of the lesion side of sixty mixed cases by the SGB methods and SSR tests. There were no significant changes in the latency and amplitude of SSR from the lesion side between pre- and post injection states. There was a significant decrease of amplitude in the sound side after the injection. The differences of the amplitudes between pre- and post injections were significantly higher in the lesion side than the sound side. The degree of pain of the patients with RSD was evaluated by visual analogue scale(VAS), which scored on pre and post injection state decreased from 10 to 6.5 by 5 times injections, but did not decrease by more injections.

Conclusion: We concluded that SGB is more effective in the RSD lesion side than the sound side and the SSR is a useful test for evaluating the effect of SGB.

Dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system is reported to occur at an incidence of 20% to 40% in diabetes. The clinical symptoms include orthostatic hypotension, vomiting, diarrhea, bladder dysfunction, male impotence, sweating, etc. Two simple noninvasive tests, sympathetic skin response (SSR) and R-R interval variation (RRIV), were used to assess autonomic functions. We performed SSR and RRIV on the diabetic patients and controls. The patients were classified into 4 groups (group I: without peripheral neuropathy or dysautonomia, group II: with dysautonomia only, group III: with peripheral neuropathy only, group IV: with both peripheral neuropathy and dysautonomia). We also tried to correlate their clinical dysautonomic symptoms and the results of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and of SSR and RRIV.

The subjects of this study were 82 diabetic patients, 20 to 73 years old with the mean age of 53, and 12 controls.

Latency, amplitude, and loss of SSR all showed a significant difference in relation to the dysautonomic symptoms. The loss of SSR in the foot showed a remarkable difference in group I.

In groups III and IV, three RRIVs (Valsalva ratio, E:I ratio, 30 : 15 ratio) showed a significant decrease compared with the control group, and in group II, only the 30:15 ratio showed a statistically significant decrease.

In conclusion, the changes in SSR and RRIV were significantly associated with the dysautonomia. Among these, loss of SSR in the foot and decrease in the 30 : 15 ratio were useful parameters for early detection of diabetic autonomic neuropathy without peripheral neuropathy.

The sympathetic skin response(SSR) is a simple test to assess sympathetic nerve function through sudomotor activity after electric stimulation. However the electrophysiologic characteristics of sympathetic skin response have not been fully documented regardless of the impending necessities. To understand the characteristics of central conduction of SSR by taking SSRs in various central nervous system diseases, 336 SSRs were measured in 14 stroke patients, 6 spinal cord injury patients and 2 traumatic brain injury patients and analysed by classifying into no response(NR), slight and normal groups.

In stroke patients, normal SSRs were obtained more in hemiplegic side than non-hemiplegic side after both limb stimulations. And normal SSR were obtained more in left hemiplegic patients than right hemiplegic patients even though number of subject was limited. The patterns of SSR in traumatic brain injured and spinal cord injured patients were not so closely correlated with severity of clinical symptoms and abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials.

The sympathetic skin response seems to be exclusively under the control of central nervous system of which the subcortex would be regarded as the sudomotor reflex center.

Although electrodiagnostic sympathetic skin response(SSR) has been widely assessed the detail procedure, such as filter setting and stimulus intensity, has not been standardized yet. This study was performed to establish optimal settings for SSR recording. In 18 healthy subjects, SSRs were recorded in the left hand while stimulating the right median nerve. The data were analyzed for frequency and amplitude domains and statistically evaluated using the methods of analysis of variance(ANOVA) and regression analysis.

The peak frequency of SSR signal was 18.59⁑8.26 Hz, and the frequency of major signals ranged from 0.5 to 2 Hz. The amplitude of SSR was linearly regressed on the intensity of electical stimulus according to the equation: y=2.60x+277.89(p＜0.05). The latency of SSR was linearly decreased with the intensity of electrical stimulus with the relationship: y=1445.46⁣1.60x (p＜0.05).

On the bases of these results, we conclude that a proper filter setting for SSR measurement would be 1∼100 Hz, and at stimulus intensity below 128 mV, the higher the stimulus intensity, the amplitude was bigger and the latency was shorter.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy(DMD) is an X-linked recessive disease, caused by the mutation of dystrophin gene at Xp21. The dystrophin produced by this gene is therefore absent on the membrane of muscular fiber in the patients with DMD. Recently, it is known that the dystrophin has also been located on the myoepithelial layer of sweat gland in the mice.

We studied the sympathetic skin response(SSR) in a group of DMD patients and a control group to evaluate the function of sympathetic nerve and sweat gland in DMD patients.

Significant prolongation of latency of SSR in the palm and sole was noted in the group of DMD patients compared to the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the amplitude of SSR between two groups. In the patient group, the rise in latency of SSR was closely correlated with the duration of symptoms and weakly associated with the stage of the illness.

Therefore the latency of SSR may be a useful index in assessing the function of sympathetic nerve and sweat gland in DMD patients. These results could be a consequence of a lack of dystrophin at myoepithelium of sweat gland in DMD patients.

Since the myofascial trigger point(MFTrP) has been described fifty years ago, its underlying pathophysiology has been remained unclear. The diagnosis also depends on the characteristic pain, tenderness and physical findings, which is very subjective. In recent years, some physicians investigated the objective findings of MFTrP, using the pressure algo meter and thermography. We investigated the electromyographic findings of MFTrP to evaluate the clinical usefulness of local twitch response(LTR) and sympathetic skin response(SSR), and to evaluate the electrophysiologic characteristics of MFTrP.

21 patients, diagnosed as myofascial trigger point syndrome on upper trapezius and so on, were evaluated for the triggering pain with visual analog scale(VAS), pressure threshold(THpr) using pressure algometer(Dolorimeter), LTR with concentric needle electrode and SSR on the palm. There was a significant negative correlation between VAS and THpr, but no significant correlation with electromyographic findings of LTR. Thus LTR could support the existence of MFTrP electrod iagnostically, but, could not explain the clinically correlated severity of MFTrP. There were only 3 patients showing abnormal SSR, who were all complaining the sympathetic symptoms on the affected arm with reffered pain. Even though referred pain to arm and hand existed, SSR was normal because suggested autonomic dysfunction of MFTrP is localized mechanism.

Among the 13 patients underwent the trigger point block, 8 patients who showed no residual LTR immediate after MFTrP block, had a great symptomatic improvement of MFTrP in a week, but 5 patients who showed the residual LTR did not. Regardless of complaint of pain and soreness immediate after block, loss of LTR would be predicted as a good treatment result.

In some cases, spontaneous EMG activity exist within the 3-4mm sized focus of MFTrP, although the taut band of MFTrP is 3-4cm length and depth. But this focus of MFTrP is a electrophysiologic changes within a muscle, not a structural changes seen by ultrasonography.