• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

1
results for

"Supraorbital nerve"

Filter

Article category

Publication year

"Supraorbital nerve"

Original Article
Reappraisal of Supraorbital Sensory Nerve Conduction Recordings: Orthodromic and Antidromic Techniques
Hyeun Jun Park, Sung-Hoon Kim, Se Kwang Lee, Hang Jae Lee, Hee Kyu Kwon
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(1):43-49.   Published online February 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.43
Objective

To establish a supraorbital nerve sensory conduction recording method and assess its usefulness.

Methods

Thirty-one healthy subjects without a history of trauma or neurological disease were recruited. For the orthodromic procedure, the recording electrode was attached immediately superior to the supraorbital notch. The stimulation electrode was placed on points along the hairline which evoked the largest sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs). The antidromic sensory response was recorded after switching the recording and stimulating electrodes. The measured parameters were onset latency, peak latency, and baseline to peak amplitude of the SNAPs. The electrophysiological parameters of the bilateral supraorbital nerves were compared. We also recruited two patients who had sensory deficits on one side of their foreheads because of laceration injuries.

Results

The parameters of orthodromically recorded SNAPs were as follows: onset latency 1.21±0.22 ms (range, 0.9–1.6 ms), peak latency 1.54±0.23 ms (range, 1.2–2.2 ms), and baseline to peak amplitude 4.16±1.92 µV (range, 1.4–10 µV). Those of antidromically recorded SNAPs were onset latency 1.31±0.27 ms (range, 0.8–1.7 ms), peak latency 1.62±0.29 ms (range, 1.3–2.2 ms), and baseline to peak amplitude 4.00±1.89 µV (range, 1.5–9.0 µV). There was no statistical difference in onset latency, peak latency, or baseline to peak amplitude between the responses obtained using the orthodromic and antidromic methods, and the parameters also revealed no statistical difference between the supraorbital nerves on both sides.

Conclusion

We have successfully recorded supraorbital SNAPs. This conduction technique could be quite useful in evaluating patients with supraorbital nerve lesions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical Outcomes of Corneal Neurotization in Patients With Herpetic Neurotrophic Keratopathy
    Kuo-Hsuan Hung, Lung-Kun Yeh, Wei-Chi Wu, Chih-Hung Lin
    Annals of Plastic Surgery.2025; 95(5): 537.     CrossRef
  • Electrophysiological characteristics of the frontal nerve in patients with herpetic ophthalmic neuralgia
    Gang XU, Chaosheng Zhou, Shasha Liu, Wen Li, Weizhen Tang
    Muscle & Nerve.2018; 57(6): 973.     CrossRef
  • 6,812 View
  • 63 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
TOP