• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

20
results for

"Stenosis"

Filter

Article category

Publication year

"Stenosis"

Original Article

Association Between Latency of Dermatomal Sensory-Evoked Potentials and Quantitative Radiologic Findings of Narrowing in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Dong Chan Yang, Ho Jun Lee, Jin-Woo Park, Kiyeun Nam, Shengshu Kim, Keun-Tae Cho, Bum Sun Kwon
Ann Rehabil Med 2020;44(5):353-361.   Published online September 28, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.19164
Objective
To identify the difference of quantitative radiologic stenosis between a normal latency group and an abnormal latency group, and to investigate the association of dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potential (DSEP) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of narrowing in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records and P40 latencies of L5 DSEP of 40 patients with unilateral symptoms of LSS at the L4–5 disc level. Quantitative assessments of stenosis in lumbar spine MRI were performed with measurements of the anteroposterior diameter (APD), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dural sac, ligamentous interfacet distance (LID), CSA of the neural foramen (CSA-NF), and subarticular zone width. Analyses were conducted through comparisons of radiologic severity between the normal and abnormal latency groups and correlation between radiologic severity of stenosis and latency of DSEP in absolute (APD <10 mm) and relative (APD <13 mm) stenosis.
Results
The radiologic severities of lumbar stenosis were not significantly different between the normal and abnormal latency groups. In absolute and relative stenosis, latency showed a significant negative correlation with APD (r=-0.539, r=-0.426) and LID (r=-0.459, r=-0.494). In patients with relative stenosis, a weak significant positive correlation was found between latency and CSA-NF (r=0.371, p=0.048). LID was the only significant factor for latency (β=-0.930, p=0.011).
Conclusion
The normal and abnormal DSEP groups showed no significant differences inradiologic severity. The latency of DSEP had a negative correlation with the severity of central stenosis, and LID was an influencing factor.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Role of Electrophysiological Workup in Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis (LSCS)
    Guichande Duarte, Markus Hupp, José Spirig, Mazda Farshad, Martin Schubert, Armin Curt, Patrick Freund, Carl M. Zipser
    Spine.2026; 51(6): E143.     CrossRef
  • Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in congenital scoliosis
    Zhenxing Zhang, Yi Wang, Tao Luo, Huaguang Qi, Lin Cai, Yang Yuan, Jingfeng Li
    BMC Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,617 View
  • 142 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref

Case Report

Thoracolumbar Junction Syndrome Accompanying Renal Artery Stenosis: A Case Report
Kyudong Noh, Jong Burm Jung, Jeong Won Seong, Doh-Eui Kim, Dongrak Kwon, Yuntae Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2020;44(1):85-89.   Published online February 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2020.44.1.85
Flank pain is a common reason for visits to the emergency room. The most common reason warranting hospital visits are urology-related problems. However, there are many other causes, such as musculoskeletal lesions, that difficult to achieve a correct diagnosis. Here, we describe a rare case of flank pain caused by thoracolumbar junction syndrome, accompanying renal artery stenosis. A 54-year-old male with hypertension presented with severe left flank pain for 1 week. Initially, he was diagnosed with left renal artery stenosis by computed tomography and decreased renal function on renal scan (Tc-99m DTPA). Although a stent was inserted into the left renal artery, flank pain persisted with only minor improvement. Through detailed physical examination, he was finally diagnosed with thoracolumbar junction syndrome. After three injections in the left deep paravertebral muscles at the T10–T12 levels, flank pain completely ceased. Clinicians must consider thoracolumbar junction syndrome, when treating patients with flank pain.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of transversus abdominis plane block on postoperative pain after nephrectomy: a systematic review
    Wei Huang, JinPing Wang, Yu Du, Ji Wang
    Frontiers in Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 9,717 View
  • 153 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref

Original Articles

A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Changes in Severity of Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Flexion and Extension
Yookyung Lee, Seung Yeun Kim, Keewon Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(4):584-590.   Published online August 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.584
Objective
To evaluate changes in the severity of cervical spinal stenosis (CSS) in flexion and extension and determine whether the rate of change with motion varied with severity.
Methods
The study included 92 symptomatic patients with a mean age of 57.80±10.41, who underwent cervical spine dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. The severity of stenosis was evaluated using a semi-quantitative CSS score, ranging from 0 (no spinal stenosis) to 18 (severe stenosis). Radiological evaluation included flexion, neutral, and extension measurements, as determined by the C2–C7 Cobb angle. The severity of stenosis was represented by the total CSS score. The total CSS score in flexion, neutral, and extension positions was compared using repeated measures one-way analysis of variance. The change rate of stenosis per angle motion (CRSPAM) was defined as change in total CSS score divided by change in Cobb angle. The correlation of CRSPAM with severity of stenosis, represented by total CSS score in neutral position, was evaluated using Pearson correlation analysis.
Results
The total CSS score was significantly higher in extension (6.04±2.68) than in neutral position (5.25±2.47) (p<0.001), and significantly higher in neutral than in flexion position (4.40±2.45) (p<0.001). The CRSPAM was significantly and positively correlated with total CSS score in neutral position in the flexion-extension range (r=0.22, p=0.04) and flexion-neutral range (r=0.27, p=0.01).
Conclusion
In symptomatic CSS patients, the radiological severity of stenosis increases with extension and decreases with flexion. In patients with CSS, the rate of variation in spinal stenosis increases with increased severity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Does the degree of stenosis affect cervical proprioception in patients with cervical pain?
    Onur Engin, Ayse Sezgi Kizilirmak Karatas, Betul Taspinar, Ferruh Taspinar
    Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2026; 39(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Utility of Dynamic MRI in Surgical Outcome of Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Alangsungyu Ajem, Arunkumar Sekar, Suprava Naik, Sumit Bansal, Mantu Jain, Ashis Patnaik, Rabi Narayan Sahu
    Neurosurgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging indications of spinal cord swelling for cervical spondylotic myelopathy prognosis
    Xiao-Nan Tian, Li Zhang, Hong-Ran Liu, Xue-Song Zhang, Ying-Cai Sun, Yong Wang
    Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(1): 151.     CrossRef
  • Favorable cervical extension capacity preventing loss of cervical lordosis after laminoplasty due to spontaneous restoration of initial lordosis
    Xiaofei Cheng, Zhiqian Chen, Xiaojiang Sun, Changqing Zhao, Jie Zhao
    The Spine Journal.2024; 24(1): 94.     CrossRef
  • Dynamic Flexion-Extension Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cervical Spine: An Evolutionary Tool for Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Ali Mahdavi, Sina Rasti
    World Neurosurgery.2024; 184: 138.     CrossRef
  • Added value of dynamic MRI in assessment of cervical spondylodegenerative diseases
    Menna Ahmad Mohamed Abdalhak, Hossam Mousa Sakr, Mennatallah Hatem Shalaby, Shaimaa Elmetwally El diasty
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Flexion/Extension Cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Potentially Useful Tool for Decision-Making in Patients with Symptomatic Degenerative Cervical Spine
    Hazem M.A. Alkosha, Mohamed A. El Adalany, Hesham Elsobky, Asharaf S. Zidan, Amin Sabry, Basem I. Awad
    World Neurosurgery.2022; 164: e1078.     CrossRef
  • Best cutoff score of cervical-pedicle thickness as a morphological parameter for predicting cervical central stenosis
    Jungho Choi, Hyung-Bok Park, Taeha Lim, Shin Wook Yi, Sooho Lee, Sukhee Park, SoYoon Park, Jungmin Yi, Young Uk Kim
    Medicine.2022; 101(33): e30014.     CrossRef
  • Multidimensional assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Usefulness of a comprehensive score system
    Fabio Pilato, Rosalinda Calandrelli, Marisa Distefano, Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli
    Neurological Sciences.2021; 42(4): 1507.     CrossRef
  • The value of dynamic MRI in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Nanfang Xu, Youyu Zhang, Guangjin Zhou, Qiang Zhao, Shaobo Wang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dynamic Cord Compression Causing Cervical Myelopathy
    Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Griffin R. Baum, Lee A. Tan, K. Daniel Riew
    Neurospine.2019; 16(3): 448.     CrossRef
  • 12,201 View
  • 173 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Relationship of Vascular Factors on Electrophysiologic Severity of Diabetic Neuropathy
Jeong-Won Hwang, Sung-Bom Pyun, Hee Kyu Kwon
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(1):56-65.   Published online February 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.56
Objective

To investigate the impact of vascular factors on the electrophysiologic severity of diabetic neuropathy (DPN).

Methods

Total 530 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled retrospectively. We rated severity of DPN from 1 (normal) to 4 (severe) based on electrophysiologic findings. We collected the data concerning vascular factors (including brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity [PWV], ankle brachial index, ultrasound of carotid artery, lipid profile from the blood test, and microalbuminuria [MU] within 24 hours urine), and metabolic factors of diabetes (such as glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c]). We analyzed the differences among the four subgroups using χ2 test and ANOVA, and ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between significant variables and severity of DPN.

Results

The severity of DPN was significantly associated with duration of diabetes, HbA1c, existence of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, PWV, presence of plaque, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and MU (p<0.05). Among these variables, HbA1c and presence of plaque were more significantly related with severity of DPN in logistic regression analysis (p<0.001), and presence of plaque showed the highest odds ratio (OR=2.52).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that markers for vascular wall properties, such as PWV and presence of plaque, are significantly associated with the severity of DPN. The presence of plaque was more strongly associated with the severity of DPN than other variables.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Metabolomics insights into Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease: toward biomarker discovery
    Signe Setlere, Theresa Schiemer, Annija Vaska, Linda Gailite, Dmitrijs Rots, Viktorija Kenina, Kristaps Klavins
    Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of the serum lipid profile in prediction of diabetic neuropathy
    Zixin Cai, Yan Yang, Jingjing Zhang
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Angiopoietin-1/Tie2 signaling pathway contributes to the therapeutic effect of thymosin β4 on diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Lei Wang, Michael Chopp, Alexandra Szalad, XueRong Lu, Mei Lu, Talan Zhang, Zheng Gang Zhang
    Neuroscience Research.2019; 147: 1.     CrossRef
  • The association between pulse wave velocity and peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Anastasios Tentolouris, Ioanna Eleftheriadou, Pinelopi Grigoropoulou, Alexander Kokkinos, Gerasimos Siasos, Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, Nikolaos Tentolouris
    Journal of Diabetes and its Complications.2017; 31(11): 1624.     CrossRef
  • 6,544 View
  • 74 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref
The Effect and Safety of Steroid Injection in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: With or Without Local Anesthetics
Sung Hyuk Song, Gi Hyeong Ryu, Jin Woo Park, Ho Jun Lee, Ki Yeun Nam, Hyojun Kim, Seung Yeon Kim, Bum Sun Kwon
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(1):14-20.   Published online February 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.14
Objective

To compare the long-term effect and safety of an epidural steroid injection in spinal stenosis patients, with or without local anesthetics.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients diagnosed with spinal stenosis were included and randomly divided into two groups. Translaminar epidural and selective nerve root spinal injection procedures were performed using steroids mixed with local anesthetics or normal saline. The effects of spinal injection procedures were measured with visual analogue scale (VAS) and functional rate index (FRI). These measurements were performed before injection, at 1 month after injection and at 3 months after injection. The occurrence of side effects was investigated each time.

Results

The VAS and FRI scores were significantly reduced in both the local anesthetics group and normal saline group at 1 and 3 months after the injection. However, there was no significant difference in VAS and FRI score reduction between the two groups each time. Side effects are not noted in both groups.

Conclusion

The spinal injection procedures using steroids mixed either with local anesthetics or normal saline have an effect in reducing pain and improving functional activities. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in relation to side effects and the long-term effects of pain and function.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Nonsurgical interventions for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    He Chen, Xun Chen, Jiufei Fang, Wei Wang, Jiarong Fan, Yuan Xie, Hanwei Lun, Zhishun Liu
    Integrative Medicine Research.2026; 15(3): 101321.     CrossRef
  • Real-Time MR-Guided Lumbosacral Periradicular Injection Therapy Using a 0.55 T MRI System: A Phantom Study
    Saher Saeed, Jan Boriesosdick, Arwed Michael, Nina Pauline Haag, Julian Schreck, Denise Schoenbeck, Matthias Michael Woeltjen, Julius Henning Niehoff, Christoph Moenninghoff, Jan Borggrefe, Jan Robert Kroeger
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(11): 1413.     CrossRef
  • Factfinders for patient safety: Epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    George Christolias, Aditya Raghunandan, Byron J. Schneider, Kunj Amin, David Hao, Jaymin Patel
    Interventional Pain Medicine.2024; 3(4): 100444.     CrossRef
  • A comparison between effectiveness of gluteal trigger point and epidural steroid injection in lumbosacral canal stenosis patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Sana Sadat Khoshnazar, Hamid Reza Farpour, Reza Shahriarirad
    British Journal of Neurosurgery.2023; 37(5): 1117.     CrossRef
  • Differentiating Lumbar Spinal Etiology from Peripheral Plexopathies
    Marco Foreman, Krisna Maddy, Aashay Patel, Akshay Reddy, Meredith Costello, Brandon Lucke-Wold
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(3): 756.     CrossRef
  • Safety of Epidural Hyaluronic Acid Injections in Managing the Symptoms of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: A Prospective Preliminary Study
    Piotr Godek, Kuba Ptaszkowski
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(6): 2359.     CrossRef
  • Intralesional corticosteroid injections are less painful without local anesthetic: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Danny Zakria, James R. Patrinely, Anna K. Dewan, Sharon E. Albers, Lee E. Wheless, Aleta N. Simmons, Brian C. Drolet
    Journal of Dermatological Treatment.2022; 33(4): 2034.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the impact of adding bupivacaine on immediate and delayed post-procedure pain scores in interlaminar epidural steroid injections
    Cody R. Quirk, Anthony Onofrio, James T. Patrie, Nicholas C. Nacey
    Skeletal Radiology.2022; 51(1): 161.     CrossRef
  • Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: an updated systematic review
    Carlo Ammendolia, Corey Hofkirchner, Joshua Plener, André Bussières, Michael J Schneider, James J Young, Andrea D Furlan, Kent Stuber, Aksa Ahmed, Carol Cancelliere, Aleisha Adeboyejo, Joseph Ornelas
    BMJ Open.2022; 12(1): e057724.     CrossRef
  • Do steroid injections to the peripheral nerve increase perineural fibrosis? An animal experimental study
    Mustafa ÇELİKTAŞ, Semih Kivanc OLGUNER, Kivilcim ERDOGAN, Remzi ÇAYLAK, Kenan DAĞLIOĞLU
    Journal of Surgery and Medicine.2022; 6(2): 181.     CrossRef
  • Recent Domestic and International Trends on Non-Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Mi-Hyun Kim, K.M.D., Eun-Sang Park, Hyeon-Ho Hwang, Yeo-Gyeong Lee, Geum-Ju Song, Mi-Ri Kwon, Jun-Hyuk Kang
    Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation.2021; 31(3): 1.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Efficacy of Epidural Injection of Triamcinolone Through Translaminar Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Canal Stenosis
    Saeed Sabbaghan, Elham Mirzamohammadi, Maryam Ameri Mahabadi, Farshad Nikouei, Farhad Rahbarian, Susan Ahmadichaboki, Samira Eftekhari, Maryam Zamankhani, Amir Aghaie Aghdam
    Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Interventional Approaches to Low Back Pain
    Ariana M. Nelson, Geeta Nagpal
    Clinical Spine Surgery: A Spine Publication.2018; 31(5): 188.     CrossRef
  • Lumbale Radikulopathie: Klinik steht vor Bildgebung
    Franz Xaver Glocker
    Deutsches Ärzteblatt Online.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 8,854 View
  • 62 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Impact of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on De Novo Coronary Lesion in Patients With Drug Eluting Stent
Hee Eun Choi, Byeong Ju Lee, Chul Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(2):256-262.   Published online April 29, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.2.256
Objective

To compare the rate of progression of de novo lesion between the cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and control groups.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study. Patients who received drug-eluting stent (DES) due to acute coronary syndrome were included as subjects. The CR group received eight weeks of early CR program, and sustained a self-exercise program in the homes. The control group was instructed to exercise independently. Nine months after the first insertion of DES, we implemented follow-up coronary angiography, and compared the rate of progression of de novo lesion by quantitative angiographic measurement between the two groups.

Results

A total of 81 patients were recruited as subjects to CR group (n=32) or control group (n=49). At nine months, late luminal loss was 0.04±0.23 mm in the CR group and 0.00±0.31 mm in the control group (p=0.54, observed power=0.10). Late loss was -0.90%±9.53% in the CR group and 0.80%±11.15% in the control group (p=0.58, observed power=0.05). No target lesion revascularization procedures were needed in the CR group, while two in the control group (p=0.25). In the CR group, mean VO2max was significantly improved from 24.36±5.00 to 27.68±5.24 mL/kg/min (p<0.001).

Conclusion

We could not observe a statistically significant difference in the progression rate of de novo lesion between the CR and control groups. Thus the current amount of nine months exercise-based CR program does not seem to have a distinct impact on the retardation of de novo coronary lesion in patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention with DES.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis
    Min Chen, Lijuan Zhang, Jiawen Lai, Jie Wang, Tianhu Liu
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Using a Smart Ring and Telephone Counselling: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chul Kim, So Myong Jun, Jeong Yeol Yoo, Ha Young Cho, Dong Woon Jeon, Seung Jin Oh, Se-Jung Yoon, Jong-Kwan Park, Hancheol Lee, Ji-Yong Jang, Hyeongsoo Kim, Jang Woo Lee
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Catheterization on Artery Function and Health: When Should Patients Start Exercising Following Their Coronary Intervention?
    Andrea Tryfonos, Daniel J. Green, Ellen A. Dawson
    Sports Medicine.2019; 49(3): 397.     CrossRef
  • 6,434 View
  • 63 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Case Report

Right Calf Claudication Revealing Leriche Syndrome Presenting as Right Sciatic Neuropathy
Do Hyun Yoon, Hyungpil Cho, Seung Jun Seol, Taikon Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(1):132-137.   Published online February 25, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.1.132

The syndrome of aortoiliac occlusive disease, also known as Leriche syndrome, is characterized by claudication, pain, and diminished femoral pulse. We highlight an unusual case of right sciatic neuropathy caused by Leriche syndrome, which was initially misdiagnosed. A 52-year-old male, with a past medical history of hypertension and bony fusion of the thoracolumbar spine, visited our hospital complaining of right leg pain and claudication, and was initially diagnosed with spinal stenosis. The following electrophysiologic findings showed right sciatic neuropathy; but his symptom was not relieved, despite medications for neuropathy. A computed tomography angiography of the lower extremities revealed the occlusion of the infrarenal abdominal aorta, and bilateral common iliac and right external iliac arteries. All these findings suggested omitted sciatic neuropathy associated with Leriche syndrome, and the patient underwent a bilateral axillo-femoral and femoro-femoral bypass graft.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Acute presentation of atherosclerotic total distal abdominal aorta occlusion
    Saurabh Gaba, Monica Gupta, Khushbu Dutta, Gautam Jesrani
    MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences.2023; 11(3): 213.     CrossRef
  • Leriche Syndrome Misdiagnosed as Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in a Patient with Neuropathic Pain Caused by a Chip Fracture: A Case Report
    Byeong-Cheol Lee, Dae-Seok Oh, Hyun-Seong Lee, Se-Hun Kim, Jae-Hong Park, Ki-Hwa Lee, Hyo-Joong Kim, Ji-Hyun Yang, Sang-Eun Lee
    Medicina.2021; 57(5): 486.     CrossRef
  • Leriche syndrome in a patient with acute pulmonary embolism and acute myocardial infarction: a case report and review of literature
    Xuanqi An, Rui Fu, Zhihui Zhao, Xinhai Ni, Changming Xiong, Xiansheng Cheng, Zhihong Liu
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anatomical significance in aortoiliac occlusive disease
    Candace Wooten, Munawar Hayat, Maira du Plessis, Alper Cesmebasi, Michael Koesterer, Kevin P. Daly, Petru Matusz, R. Shane Tubbs, Marios Loukas
    Clinical Anatomy.2014; 27(8): 1264.     CrossRef
  • 8,288 View
  • 59 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Crossref

Original Articles

The Predictive Value of ΣΔST/ΔHR Index for Restenosis after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Chul Kim, Hee Eun Choi
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(4):544-550.   Published online August 27, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.544
Objective

To find out the predictive value of the ΣΔST/ΔHR index for restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Method

Subjects of this research were patients who participated in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program as six to eight weeks of a hospital-based program after receiving PCI to treat acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The patients received coronary angiography (CAG) at the onset of the ACS and nine months after that, and also received an exercise tolerance test (ETT) at the start of the CR program and several days before receiving a follow-up CAG. In ETT, we used the sum of the ST depression (ΣΔST index) of leads II, III, aVF, V4-6 as well as the sum of the ΔST/ΔHR (heart rate) (ΣΔST/ΔHR index) in the same leads and the sum of the ΔST/ΔRPP (rate pressure product) (ΣΔST/ΔRPP index) in the same leads. We compared the predictive power of each index of ETT for restenosis after PCI.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of ΣΔST index were 69%, 47%, 31%, and 82%. The ΣΔST/ΔHR index was 13.7±5.2 in the restenosis group and 9.3±5.6 in the patent group (p=0.017). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 85%, 63%, 44%, and 92%. The ΣΔST/ΔRPP index were 0.10±0.08 in the restenosis group and 0.06±0.04 in the patent group (p=0.016). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this index were 54%, 76%, 44%, and 83%.

Conclusion

The ΣΔST/ΔHR index showed a much higher sensitivity and negative predictive value for restenosis after PCI compared to the ΣΔST index.

  • 5,513 View
  • 33 Download
Injectate Volumes Needed to Reach Specific Landmarks and Contrast Pattern in Kambin's Triangle Approach with Spinal Stenosis
Ki Deok Park, Ji Hae Lee, Yongbum Park
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(4):480-487.   Published online August 27, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.480
Objective

To identify the volumes of contrast material needed to reach the specific landmarks and contrast pattern during Kambin's triangle approach (KB-A) in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Method

Sixty patients undergoing KB-A were investigated. Fifty-six patients were included in this study. KB-A were performed with the use of contrast-enhanced fluoroscopic visualization. After confirming the appropriate spinal needle position, a slow injection of up to 5.0 ml of nonionic contrast material was carried out. Under intermittent fluoroscopic guidance, contrast volumes were recorded as flow reached specific anatomic landmarks: ipsilateral inferior or superior neural foramen.

Results

After 2.0 ml of contrast was injected, 93.2% of KB-A cases spread to the medial aspect of the inferior pedicle of the corresponding level of injection and 86.3% of KB-A spread to the medial aspect of the superior pedicle of the corresponding level of injection. After 3 ml of contrast was injected, 95.3% of KB-A spread to cover both the medial aspect of the inferior pedicle and the superior pedicle of the corresponding level of injection. A volume of 2 ml of injectate reaches the anterior epidural space 100% of the time.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates injectate volumes needed to reach the specific anatomic landmarks in KB-A. A volume of 3.0 ml of injectate reaches both the medial aspect of theinferior pedicle and the superior pedicle 94.6% of the time. Therefore, Interventionalists may consider a 1-level instead of a 2-level injection for patients with a bleeding risk or for 2 level central pathology.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • PVDF promotes TiO2 dispersion to obtain composite films with high dielectric constant and low loss
    Mingyun Peng, Ke Li, Bingliang Huang, Jie Cheng
    High Performance Polymers.2022; 34(1): 95.     CrossRef
  • High dielectric constant of polyimide nanocomposite obtained by introducing graphitized multi-walled carbon nanotubes
    Mingyun Peng, Ke Li, Bingliang Huang, Jie Cheng, Wenyan Zuo
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics.2022; 33(9): 6791.     CrossRef
  • Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections
    Carlos E. Rivera
    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America.2018; 29(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Clinical anatomy and significance of the lumbar intervertebral foramen: A review
    Grigorios Gkasdaris, Stylianos Kapetanakis
    Journal of the Anatomical Society of India.2015; 64(2): 166.     CrossRef
  • MICROSURGICAL LANDMARKS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    Javier Quillo-Olvera, Sergio Soriano-Solis, Ramses Uriel Ortiz-Leyva, Carlos Francisco Gutiérrez-Partida, Manuel Rodríguez-García, José Antonio Soriano-Sánchez
    Coluna/Columna.2015; 14(4): 317.     CrossRef
  • Interventional Therapies for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Focused Review (Efficacy and Outcomes)
    Vikram B. Patel, Ronald Wasserman, Farnad Imani
    Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,898 View
  • 69 Download
  • 6 Crossref
Impact of Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation on In-stent Restenosis with Different Generations of Drug Eluting Stent
Chul Kim, Hee Eun Choi, Byung Ok Kim, Min Ho Lim
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(2):254-261.   Published online April 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.2.254
Objective

To compare the rate of restenosis between a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) group and a control group within three different generations of drug eluting stents (DES).

Method

Patients who received DES due to an acute coronary syndrome were included. They were divided into a CR group and a control group. The CR group received six to eight weeks of early cardiac rehabilitation program in a hospital setting, and sustained a self-exercise program for six months in a community. The control group was instructed to exercise by themselves after leaving the hospital. Nine months after the first onset of disease, we implemented a coronary angiography and compared the two groups. In addition, we divided the patients into three subgroups according to the generation of DES, and compared the rate of restenosis between the CR group and control group within these three subgroups.

Results

At 9 months, in-stent restenosis, measured as an in-segment late luminal loss (LLL) of the stented coronary area, was smaller in the CR group (n=52) 0.16±0.42 mm compared to the control group (n=51) 0.39±0.78 mm (p<0.05). A reduction of LLL in the CR group compared to the control group was consistent among the three different generations of DES.

Conclusion

The CR program is strongly associated with a significant reduction in LLL in the stented coronary segments, regardless of the generation of DES.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Predictors of Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Heart Valve Surgery: A Case–Control Study
    Ji-Hyun Lee, Hye-Ran Choi
    Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing.2026; 41(5): E533.     CrossRef
  • Exercise After Coronary Stenting: Potential Effects on in-Stent Restenosis
    Luigi Spadafora, Stefano Cacciatore, Monica Salvi, Federico Russo, Lorenzo Lo Sasso, Attilio Lauretti, Francesco Perone, Nicola Pierucci, Pierre Sabouret, Giorgio Zangari, Alfredo De Vito, Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai, Marco Bernardi
    Current Atherosclerosis Reports.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stent edge vascular response and in-stent geometry after aerobic exercise
    Maria Dalen Taraldsen, Vibeke Videm, Knut Hegbom, Rune Wiseth, Erik Madssen
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.2021; 36(1): 111.     CrossRef
  • Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
    Grace Dibben, James Faulkner, Neil Oldridge, Karen Rees, David R Thompson, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Rod S Taylor
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of rehabilitation exercise on coronary artery after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chenying Fu, Haiming Wang, Quan Wei, Chengqi He, Chi Zhang
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2019; 41(24): 2881.     CrossRef
  • Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease
    Lindsey Anderson, David R Thompson, Neil Oldridge, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Karen Rees, Nicole Martin, Rod S Taylor
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation on De Novo Coronary Lesion in Patients With Drug Eluting Stent
    Hee Eun Choi, Byeong Ju Lee, Chul Kim
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2014; 38(2): 256.     CrossRef
  • 8,377 View
  • 63 Download
  • 7 Crossref
Kambin's Triangle Approach of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injection with Spinal Stenosis
Ji Woong Park, Hee Seung Nam, Soo Kyoung Cho, Hee Jin Jung, Byeong Ju Lee, Yongbum Park
Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35(6):833-843.   Published online December 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.833
Objective

To compare the short-term effect and advantage of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) performed using the Kambin's triangle and subpedicular approaches.

Method

Forty-two patients with radicular pain from lumbar spinal stenosis were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups. All procedures were performed using C-arm KMC 950. The frequency of complications during the procedure and the effect of TFESI at 2 and 4 weeks after the procedure between the two groups were compared. Short-term outcomes were measured using a visual numeric scale (VNS) and a five-grade scale. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between possible outcome predictors (Kambin's triangle or subpedicular approach, age, duration of symptoms and sex) and the therapeutic effect.

Results

VNS was improved 2 weeks after the injection and continued to improve until 4 weeks in both groups. There were no statistical differences in changes of VNS, effectiveness and contrast spread pattern between these two groups. No correlation was found between the other variables tested and therapeutic effect. Spinal nerve pricking occurred in five cases of the subpedicular and in none of the cases of the Kambin's triangle approach (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The Kambin's triangle approach is as efficacious as the subpedicular approach for short-term effect and offers considerable advantages (i.e., less spinal nerve pricking during procedure). The Kambin's triangle approach maybe an alternative method for transforaminal epidural steroid injection in cases where needle tip positioning in the anterior epidural space is difficult.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of epidural space contrast flow and clinical outcomes in parasagittal versus transforaminal epidural steroid injection
    Narges Khojasteh, Hossein Majedi, Ali Emami Meibodi, Alireza Khajehnasiri, Reza Atef Yekta, Nader Ali Nazemian Yazdi, Mojgan Rahimi, Sogol Alikarami, Koorosh Kamali, Hamed Abdollahi
    Scientific Reports.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Understanding Vascular Risks in Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections: Insights From Anatomy and Clinical Evidence
    Martin Avellanal, Irene Riquelme, Antonio Ferreiro, Francisco Reina, Anna Carrera, R. Shane Tubbs, André P. Boezaart, Miguel A. Reina
    Clinical Anatomy.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Korean Medicine Treatment Including Ultrasound-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Pharmacopuncture on Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Chart Review
    Chang-Myeong Lim, Seung-Won Paik, So-Yeon Jo, Su-Kyung Lee
    Journal of Korean Medicine Rehabilitation.2026; 36(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Scoring System for Predicting Procedural Difficulty in Supraneural L5 TFESI: The L5 TFESI Difficulty Score (LTDS)
    Chul Kim, Jun Hyeong Song
    Pain Practice.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection Approaches: A Practical Overview for Trainees
    Jamal Hasoon, Joey Hung, George Atallah, Alan D Kaye, Christopher L Robinson
    Orthopedic Reviews.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of functional outcomes from spinal root block injections via suprafacetal approach in subacute lumbosacral disc herniation with radiculopathy: A longitudinal analysis
    Aditya Prasad Panda, Geeta Chand Acharya, S. Vishnu, Suhas Sondur, Shankar Acharya
    Journal of Integrative Medicine and Research.2026; 4(3): 190.     CrossRef
  • Biplane Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy for Guidance of Percutaneous Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen Insertion
    Yi Mao, Peng Huang, Yuhong Tao, Chao Zhang, Mingbo Zhang
    Spine.2025; 50(10): 686.     CrossRef
  • Understanding the Landscape of Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections: A Review of Interlaminar, Transforaminal, and Caudal Approaches
    Tommy Li, Cynthia Gonzalez, Jamie Provost, Jamal Hasoon, Anvinh Nguyen
    Orthopedic Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation: Selective nerve root block with percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy
    Bing Xiao, Gu Xin, Jia-Yi Zhang, Xiao-Jian Ye, Yan-Hai Xi, Guo-Hua Xu, Wei-Heng Wang
    World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Transforaminal Nerve Root Block in Lumbar Radiculopathy
    Malkesh Shah, Kunj R Patel, Ravi Undhad, Chintankumar B Patel
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Practice Patterns of Physicians Who Perform Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
    Jamal Hasoon, Moshe Spatz, Rosa A. Garcia, Johnson S. Ho, Jatinder Gill, Thomas T. Simopoulos, Genaro Gutierrez, Jacob Caylor, Trey Mouch, R. Jason Yong, Christopher L. Robinson
    Current Pain and Headache Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Migrated Disc Prolapse: A Retrospective Study of 169 Patients
    Ajay Krishnan, Sandesh Subhash Agarawal, Bharat R Dave, Mahesh Sagar, Shivanand C Mayi, Ravi Ranjan Rai, Mirant B Dave, Mikeson Panthackel, Amritesh Singh, Arjit Vashishtha, Saurabh S Kulkarni, Yogenkumar Adodariya
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of intradiscal autologous platelet-rich plasma injection in chronic lumbar disc prolapse: A quasi-experimental study
    Prabu Mounisamy, Anirudh Dwajan, Dibyajyoti Sahoo, Naveen Jeyaraman, Sathish Muthu, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Madhan Jeyaraman
    World Journal of Orthopedics.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the outcome of transforaminal block for chronic low back pain with lumbar radiculopathy
    Srajan Mittal, Krishna Kumar Pandey
    Orthopaedic Journal of Madhya Pradesh Chapter.2025; 31(2): 69.     CrossRef
  • Dimensions of bony Kambin's triangle pertaining to endoscopic procedure
    Manisha B. Sinha, Meryl Rachel John, Joseph Abraham Poonuraparampil, Human Prasad Sinha
    Medical Journal Armed Forces India.2024; 80: S127.     CrossRef
  • MSEF-Net: Multi-scale edge fusion network for lumbosacral plexus segmentation with MR image
    Junyong Zhao, Liang Sun, Zhi Sun, Xin Zhou, Haipeng Si, Daoqiang Zhang
    Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.2024; 148: 102771.     CrossRef
  • Advances and Challenges in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Timothy Y. Wang, Michael Y. Wang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(11): 3329.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing contrast distribution with the far lateral approach in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: A retrospective analysis
    Ying‐Wei Yang, Chia‐Shiang Lin, Hsuan‐Chih Lao, Ying‐Chun Lin
    Pain Practice.2024; 24(8): 1024.     CrossRef
  • Concomitant epidural and longitudinal anterior spinal artery contrast spread in a lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI)
    Philip J. Koehler, Paul M. Kitei, David S. Stolzenberg, Elaine H. Hatch
    Interventional Pain Medicine.2024; 3(4): 100523.     CrossRef
  • The morphology of the lumbar vertebrae: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 1481 individuals with implications for spine surgery
    Michał Bonczar, Jan Koszewski, Wiktor Czarnota, Martyna Dziedzic, Patryk Ostrowski, Kamil Możdżeń, Agnieszka Murawska, Paweł Hajdyła, Andrzej Walocha, Ewa Walocha, Jerzy Walocha, Mateusz Koziej
    Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Intra-arterial injection of particulate corticosteroids: mechanism of injury
    Jean-Denis Laredo, Marc Wybier, Elisabeth Laemmel, Massoud Mirshahi
    Skeletal Radiology.2023; 52(10): 1887.     CrossRef
  • Supraneural versus Infraneural Approach to transforaMinal Epidural StEroid injection for unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain (SIAMESE): a study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial
    Helen F. Galley, Rosalind Adam, Malachy O. Columb, Uzunma M. Onyeakazi, Saravanakumar Kanakarajan
    BJA Open.2023; 5: 100126.     CrossRef
  • COMPARISON OF SUBPEDICULAR AND KAMBIN’S TRIANGLE APPROACHES IN TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL INJECTION APPLICATIONS IN CASE OF LUMBAR DISC HERNIA
    Bilal Aykaç, Abdullah Küçükalp
    Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery.2023; 34(2): 54.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the effect of diagnosing discogenic low back pain by sinuvertebral nerve block versus discoblock a retrospective cohort study
    Guoliang Wang, Zhenfeng Zhang, Jing Liu, Liang Cheng
    European Spine Journal.2023; 32(6): 2093.     CrossRef
  • Transforaminal Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma Compared with Steroid in Lumbar radiculopathy: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Study
    Amit Saraf, Altaf Hussain, Angad Singh Sandhu, Sandeep Bishnoi, Vaneet Arora
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics.2023; 57(7): 1126.     CrossRef
  • Traditional Safe Triangle Approach Versus Kambin’s Triangle Approach: Does Approach Really Matter in Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection (TFESI) for Lumbar Disc Herniation?
    Sandesh Agarawal, Manoj K Ramachandraiah
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pro-Con Debate: Superior Versus Inferior Triangle Needle Placement in Transforaminal Epidural Injections
    Tina L. Doshi, Alyson M. Engle, Aaron J. Przybysz, Ariana M. Nelson
    Anesthesia & Analgesia.2023; 137(6): 1139.     CrossRef
  • Supraneural transforaminal epidural injection in the treatment of radiculopathy in the lumbar spine – a brief descriptive overview and technique of manipulation
    D. A. Averyanov, K. N. Khrapov
    Messenger of ANESTHESIOLOGY AND RESUSCITATION.2023; 20(6): 80.     CrossRef
  • Posterolateral musculo-fascial approach to the lumbar spine intervertebral discs: Anatomical study
    Denis S. Godanyuk, Dmitriy A. Gulyaev, Ilya I. Korepanov, Ivan A. Kurnosov, Kseniya A. Chizhova, Nikita K. Samochernykh, Maxim M. Efimov
    Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research.2023; 19(3): 251.     CrossRef
  • Effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on low back pain in patients with prolapsed intervertebral disc: A randomised controlled trial
    Girish K. Singh, Praveen Talawar, Ajit Kumar, Ravi S. Sharma, Gaurav Purohit, Baibhav Bhandari
    Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.2023; 67(3): 277.     CrossRef
  • Posterolateral musculofascial approach to intervertebral discs of the lumbar spine: anatomic and topographic study
    Denis S. Godanyuk, Dmitriy A. Gulyaev, Ilya I. Korepanov, Ivan A. Kurnosov, Kseniya A. Chizhova, Nikita K. Samochernykh, Maxim M. Efimov
    Saratov Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Technical Report of Color Doppler Ultrasonography–Assisted Lumbar Spinal Interventions
    Gi-Wook Kim, Jeong-Hwan Seo
    Ultrasound Quarterly.2022; 38(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Three‐dimensional reconstruction of Kambin's triangle based on automated magnetic resonance image segmentation
    Zhihai Su, Zheng Liu, Min Wang, Shaolin Li, Liyan Lin, Zhen Yuan, Shumao Pang, Qianjin Feng, Tao Chen, Hai Lu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Research.2022; 40(12): 2914.     CrossRef
  • Preliminary results of a novel pure endoscopic procedure in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disorders: double endoscopic technique
    Leonello TACCONI, Paolo BOBICCHIO
    Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of radiation exposure to physicians between anteroposterior and lateral real-time fluoroscopy when performing lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: A randomized controlled trial
    Seung Hee Yoo, Won-Joong Kim, Mi Jin Jue, Min Jin Lee
    Medicine.2022; 101(27): e29684.     CrossRef
  • A direct posterior approach for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection
    Matthew Weinstein, Sankeerth Challagundla, Sebastian Rubino, Nam D. Tran
    Interventional Pain Medicine.2022; 1(3): 100119.     CrossRef
  • Fluoroscopy-Guided Robotic System for Transforaminal Lumbar Epidural Injections
    Cong Gao, Henry Phalen, Adam Margalit, Justin H. Ma, Ping-Cheng Ku, Mathias Unberath, Russell H. Taylor, Amit Jain, Mehran Armand
    IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics.2022; 4(4): 901.     CrossRef
  • Pain Management in Neurosurgery
    Yifan Xu, Kimberly M. Mauer, Amit Singh
    Anesthesiology Clinics.2021; 39(1): 179.     CrossRef
  • Comparison Between a Single Subpedicular Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection and Lateral Recess Steroid Injection in Reducing Paracentral Disc Herniation–Related Chronic Neuropathic Leg Pain: A Retrospective Study
    Anuj Jain, Amit Agarwal, Suruchi Jain, Vaishali Waindeskar
    World Neurosurgery.2021; 149: e392.     CrossRef
  • Cadaveric anatomy of the lumbar triangular safe zone of Kambin’s in North West Indian population
    Chiman Kumari, Tulika Gupta, Richa Gupta, Vishal Kumar, Daisy Sahni, Anjali Aggarwal, Neelkamal
    Anatomy & Cell Biology.2021; 54(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • A convenient and stable vertebrae instance segmentation method for transforaminal endoscopic surgery planning
    Wuke Peng, Liang Li, Libin Liang, Hui Ding, Lei Zang, Shuo Yuan, Guangzhi Wang
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.2021; 16(8): 1263.     CrossRef
  • Spinal Injections
    David C. Gimarc, Lindsay M. Stratchko, Corey K. Ho
    Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology.2021; 25(06): 756.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Lumbar Transforaminal Injection of Steroid for the Treatment of Radicular Pain: A Comprehensive Review of the Published Data
    Clark C Smith, Zachary L McCormick, Ryan Mattie, John MacVicar, Belinda Duszynski, Milan P Stojanovic
    Pain Medicine.2020; 21(3): 472.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy and morphometry of lumbar intervertebral foramina to guide safe transforaminal subarachnoid punctures
    Alexander M. Khalaf, Vivek Yedavalli, Tarik F. Massoud
    Clinical Anatomy.2020; 33(3): 405.     CrossRef
  • Relationship of the Exiting Nerve Root and Superior Articular Process in Kambin's Triangle: Assessment of Lumbar Anatomy Using Cadavers and Computed Tomography Imaging
    Liming Zhang, Jincai Yang, Yong Hai, Peng Yin, Yi Ding, Chunyang Xu, Haifeng Gao
    World Neurosurgery.2020; 137: e336.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar radiculopathy
    Pushkaran Jayapaul, Thanga Thirupathi Rajan, Gunasekaran Kaliyaperumal
    Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery.2020; 21: 100706.     CrossRef
  • Is Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Less Invasive Than Conventional Surgery? A Randomized MRI Study
    Leonello Tacconi, Francesco Signorelli, Enrico Giordan
    World Neurosurgery.2020; 138: e867.     CrossRef
  • Effect of supraneural transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with caudal epidural steroid injection with catheter in chronic radicular pain management: Double blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Sithapan Munjupong, Wipoo Kumnerddee
    F1000Research.2020; 9: 634.     CrossRef
  • Effect of supraneural transforaminal epidural steroid injection combined with caudal epidural steroid injection with catheter in chronic radicular pain management: Double blinded randomized controlled trial.
    Sithapan Munjupong, Wipoo Kumnerddee
    F1000Research.2020; 9: 634.     CrossRef
  • Differential rates of intravascular uptake and pain perception during lumbosacral epidural injection among adults using a 22-gauge needle versus 25-gauge needle: a randomized clinical trial
    Robin Raju, Michael Mehnert, David Stolzenberg, Jeremy Simon, Theodore Conliffe, Jeffrey Gehret
    BMC Anesthesiology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Three-dimensional architecture of the neurovascular and adipose zones of the upper and lower lumbar intervertebral foramina: an epoxy sheet plastination study
    Zhaoyang Xu, Guoxiong Lin, Han Zhang, Shengchun Xu, Ming Zhang
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 32(5): 722.     CrossRef
  • Kambin’s triangle: definition and new classification schema
    Andrew A. Fanous, Luis M. Tumialán, Michael Y. Wang
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2020; 32(3): 390.     CrossRef
  • The History of and Controversy over Kambin’s Triangle: A Historical Analysis of the Lumbar Transforaminal Corridor for Endoscopic and Surgical Approaches
    Luis M. Tumialán, Karthik Madhavan, Jakub Godzik, Michael Y. Wang
    World Neurosurgery.2019; 123: 402.     CrossRef
  • Musculoskeletal Corticosteroid Administration: Current Concepts
    Amit Shah, Davina Mak, A. Mark Davies, S.L. James, Rajesh Botchu
    Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal.2019; 70(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • CT angiography depicted lumbar spinal artery anatomic course: defining a safer zone for lumbar sympathetic and splanchnic blocks
    Richard Zhu, Kathryn Dean, Neel Mehta, Ajay Gupta, Jesse Gruber, Amitabh Gulati
    Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.2019; 44(4): 507.     CrossRef
  • Conventional Image-Guided Procedures for Painful Spine
    Miriam E. Peckham, Troy A. Hutchins, Lubdha M. Shah
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America.2019; 29(4): 539.     CrossRef
  • Safe Injectate Choice, Visualization, and Delivery for Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: Evolving Literature and Considerations
    Patricia Zheng, Byron J. Schneider, David J Kennedy, Zachary L. McCormick
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2019; 7(4): 414.     CrossRef
  • Lomber Disk Hernisine Bağlı Radikülopatili Hastalarda Floroskopi Eşlikli LomberTransforaminalEpidural Enjeksiyonun Etkinliği
    Mehmet Sabri GÜRBÜZ
    Dicle Tıp Dergisi.2019; 46(3): 419.     CrossRef
  • Kambin’s Triangle Approach versus Traditional Safe Triangle Approach for Percutaneous Transforaminal Epidural Adhesiolysis Using an Inflatable Balloon Catheter: A Pilot Study
    Ho Young Gil, Sangmin Jeong, Hyunwook Cho, Eunjoo Choi, Francis Sahngun Nahm, Pyung-Bok Lee
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(11): 1996.     CrossRef
  • Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections
    Carlos E. Rivera
    Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America.2018; 29(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • The retroneural approach: an alternative technique for lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections
    Stefan Ignjatovic, Reza Omidi, Rahel A Kubik-Huch, Suzanne Anderson, Frank J Ahlhelm
    Acta Radiologica.2018; 59(12): 1508.     CrossRef
  • Retrodiscal epidural balloon adhesiolysis through Kambin's triangle in chronic lumbar spinal stenosis
    Dong-Kyun Seo, Sookyung Lee, Gunn Lee, Myung-Su Lee, Syn-Hae Yoon, Seong-Soo Choi, Jin-Woo Shin
    Medicine.2018; 97(41): e12791.     CrossRef
  • Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression by Using Rigid Bendable Burr for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: Technique and Clinical Outcome
    Shuo Tang, Song Jin, Xiang Liao, Kun Huang, Jiaquan Luo, Tao Zhu
    BioMed Research International.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Three Epidural Steroid Techniques
    Zachary McCormick, George C. Chang Chien, Mary So, Resham Datta, Jaspal Ricky Singh
    PM&R.2018; 10(11): 1271.     CrossRef
  • Percutaneous Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Extruded Lumbar Disc Herniation
    Mutombo Menga Arsene, Xiao-Tao Wu, Zan- Li Jiang, Lei Zhu
    The Open Orthopaedics Journal.2018; 12(1): 482.     CrossRef
  • Abordaje percutáneo transforaminal: triángulo de seguridad de Kambin.
    Marcos G. Baabor, Martín R. Silvas, Erik D. May Martínez
    NeuroTarget.2018; 12(2): 6.     CrossRef
  • Location of Radicular Spinal Arteries in the Lumbar Spine from Analysis of CT Angiograms of the Abdomen and Pelvis
    Jeremy I. Simon, Matthew McAuliffe, David Smoger
    Pain Medicine.2016; 17(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor: A report of spinal subdural abscess provides incomplete and inaccurate information
    Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Sairam Atluri, Alan David Kaye, Joshua A. Hirsch
    Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine.2016; 24(4): 675.     CrossRef
  • Inadvertent Intradiscal Injection with TFESI Utilizing Kambin's Retrodiscal Approach in the Treatment of Acute Lumbar Radiculopathy
    Kevin H. Trinh, Christopher G. Gharibo, Steve M. Aydin
    Pain Practice.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Spinal Injections for Pain Management
    William E. Palmer
    Radiology.2016; 281(3): 669.     CrossRef
  • Interventional Therapies for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Focused Review (Efficacy and Outcomes)
    Vikram B. Patel, Ronald Wasserman, Farnad Imani
    Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal Angle of Needle Insertion for Fluoroscopy‐Guided Transforaminal Epidural Injection of L5
    In‐Hoo Ra, Woo‐Kie Min
    Pain Practice.2015; 15(5): 393.     CrossRef
  • Intravascular Penetration Following Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections Using the Infraneural Technique
    Jeremy I. Simon, Matthew McAuliffe, Nirav N. Parekh, Justin Petrolla, Michael B. Furman
    Pain Medicine.2015; 16(8): 1647.     CrossRef
  • Ligament, nerve, and blood vessel anatomy of the lateral zone of the lumbar intervertebral foramina
    Shi-guo Yuan, You-liang Wen, Pei Zhang, Yi-kai Li
    International Orthopaedics.2015; 39(11): 2135.     CrossRef
  • Clinical anatomy and significance of the lumbar intervertebral foramen: A review
    Grigorios Gkasdaris, Stylianos Kapetanakis
    Journal of the Anatomical Society of India.2015; 64(2): 166.     CrossRef
  • In Response
    Babita Ghai, Kaivalya Sadashiv Vadaje, Jyotsna Wig, Mandeep Singh Dhillon
    Anesthesia & Analgesia.2014; 118(1): 236.     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated With Pain Reduction After Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain
    Zachary McCormick, Daniel Cushman, Ellen Casey, Cynthia Garvan, David J. Kennedy, Christopher Plastaras
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2014; 95(12): 2350.     CrossRef
  • Safety of Interlaminar and Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections
    Boqing Chen, Todd P. Stitik, Patrick M. Foye
    Anesthesia & Analgesia.2014; 118(1): 236.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Lumbar Transforaminal Injection of Steroids: A Comprehensive Review with Systematic Analysis of the Published Data
    John MacVicar, Wade King, Milton H. Landers, Nikolai Bogduk
    Pain Medicine.2013; 14(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Corticosteroid Choice for Epidural Injections
    Michael J. DePalma, Alison Stout, David J. Kennedy
    PM&R.2013; 5(6): 524.     CrossRef
  • 19,687 View
  • 532 Download
  • 80 Crossref
Effects of Transforaminal Injection for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis Combined with Spinal Stenosis
Hee-Seung Nam, Yong Bum Park
Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35(4):514-523.   Published online August 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.4.514
Objective

The objectives of this study were to clarify the short-term effects of transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with spinal stenosis (DLSS), and to extrapolate factors relating to the prognosis of treatment.

Method

Thirty-six patients with lumbar radicular pain from DLSS were enrolled. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups (steroid or lidocaine group). We compared the effect of pain suppression at 2, 4 and 12 weeks after the procedure between the two groups. Radiographic analysis included measurement of the Cobb's angle, the upper endplate obliquities of L3 and L4, and maximal lateral olisthy between two adjacent lumbar vertebrae. Sagittal plane measurement included lumbar lordosis, and thoracolumbar kyphosis. Statistical analysis of both radiographic and clinical parameters along with treatment outcome was performed to determine any significant correlations between the two.

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographic data, initial visual analogue scale (VAS) or Oswestry disability index (ODI) between the steroid group (n=17) and the lidocaine group (n=19). Two, 4, and 12 weeks after injection VAS, ODI showed a significantly greater improvement in the steroid group compared to the lidocaine group (p<0.05). The radiographic and clinical parameters were not significantly correlated with treatment outcome.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that fluoroscopic transforaminal epidural steroid injections appear to be an effective non-surgical treatment option for patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis combined with spinal stenosis (DLSS) and radicular pain.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Factors associated with transforaminal epidural steroid injection efficacy and prognosis for symptomatic treatment of lumbar stenosis associated with degenerative scoliosis
    Tyler MacNeil, Owen Karsmarski, Amanda Spraggs-Hughes, Isaac L. Moss, Durgadas P. Sakalkale
    North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ).2025; 24: 100807.     CrossRef
  • Nonoperative Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comprehensive Narrative Review
    Christos G. Zlatanos, Mohamed A. Hassanin, Ahmed Aly, Khalid M. Salem, Nasir A. Quraishi
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(24): 8864.     CrossRef
  • Factfinders for patient safety: Epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
    George Christolias, Aditya Raghunandan, Byron J. Schneider, Kunj Amin, David Hao, Jaymin Patel
    Interventional Pain Medicine.2024; 3(4): 100444.     CrossRef
  • Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the management of lumbar spinal stenosis, 2021 - Secondary publication
    Mamoru Kawakami, Katsushi Takeshita, Gen Inoue, Miho Sekiguchi, Yasushi Fujiwara, Masatoshi Hoshino, Takashi Kaito, Yoshiharu Kawaguchi, Masakazu Minetama, Sumihisa Orita, Masahiko Takahata, Kuniyoshi Tsuchiya, Takashi Tsuji, Hiroshi Yamada, Kota Watanabe
    Journal of Orthopaedic Science.2023; 28(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Direct Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Impact of Multiple Prior Epidural Steroid Injections
    Peter Pryzbylkowski, Anjum Bux, Kailash Chandwani, Vishal Khemlani, Shawn Puri, Jason Rosenberg, Harry Sukumaran
    Pain Management.2022; 12(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN)
    Timothy R Deer, Jay S Grider, Jason E Pope, Tim J Lamer, Sayed E Wahezi, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Steven Falowski, Reda Tolba, Jay M Shah, Natalie Strand, Alex Escobar, Mark Malinowski, Anjum Bux, Navdeep Jassal, Jennifer Hah, Jacqueline Weisbein, Nestor D To
    Journal of Pain Research.2022; Volume 15: 1325.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for Chronic Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome in Patients Selected by Guideline-Concordant Dual Comparative Medial Branch Blocks
    Aaron Conger, Taylor Burnham, Fabio Salazar, Quinn Tate, Mathew Golish, Russell Petersen, Shellie Cunningham, Masaru Teramoto, Richard Kendall, Zachary L McCormick
    Pain Medicine.2020; 21(5): 902.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Nonsurgical Treatments for Symptomatic Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Systematic Review
    Carlijn Schoutens, Daniel M Cushman, Zachary L McCormick, Aaron Conger, Barend J van Royen, William R Spiker
    Pain Medicine.2020; 21(6): 1263.     CrossRef
  • Addition of corticosteroids to local anaesthetics for chronic non-cancer pain injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Harsha Shanthanna, Jason Busse, Li Wang, Alka Kaushal, Prathiba Harsha, Erica A. Suzumura, Varun Bhardwaj, Edward Zhou, Rachel Couban, James Paul, Mohit Bhandari, Lehana Thabane
    British Journal of Anaesthesia.2020; 125(5): 779.     CrossRef
  • TheMISTGuidelines: The Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Consensus Group Guidelines for Minimally Invasive Spine Treatment
    Timothy R. Deer, Jay S. Grider, Jason E. Pope, Steven Falowski, Tim J. Lamer, Aaron Calodney, David A. Provenzano, Dawood Sayed, Eric Lee, Sayed E. Wahezi, Chong Kim, Corey Hunter, Mayank Gupta, Rasmin Benyamin, Bohdan Chopko, Didier Demesmin, Sudhir Diwa
    Pain Practice.2019; 19(3): 250.     CrossRef
  • Team Approach: Degenerative Spinal Deformity
    Sigurd Berven, Deeptee Jain, Conor O’Neill, Amy Selinger, Praveen Mummaneni
    JBJS Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Studie zur periduralen Steroidinjektion
    K. Niemier, M. Schindler, T. Volk, K. Baum, B. Wolf, J. Eberitsch, W. Seidel
    Der Schmerz.2016; 30(1): 94.     CrossRef
  • Local anesthetic injections with or without steroid for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Harsha Shanthanna, Jason W. Busse, Lehana Thabane, James Paul, Rachel Couban, Harman Choudhary, Alka Kaushal, Erica Suzumura, Isabel Kim, Prathiba Harsha
    Systematic Reviews.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Postural, Bone, and Joint Disorders in Parkinson's Disease
    Marcie L. Rabin, Mary Cathryn Earnhardt, Anvi Patel, Ivana Ganihong, Roger Kurlan
    Movement Disorders Clinical Practice.2016; 3(6): 538.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Epidural Injections in the Treatment of Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis; A Systematic Review
    Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Alan David Kaye, Kavita Manchikanti, Mark Boswell, Vidyasagar Pampati, Joshua Hirsch
    Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Epidural Corticosteroid Injections for Radiculopathy and Spinal Stenosis
    Roger Chou, Robin Hashimoto, Janna Friedly, Rongwei Fu, Christina Bougatsos, Tracy Dana, Sean D. Sullivan, Jeffrey Jarvik
    Annals of Internal Medicine.2015; 163(5): 373.     CrossRef
  • Comparison in Clinical Outcome of Two Surgical Treatments in Degenerative Scoliosis
    Yapeng Sun, Yong Shen, Wenyuan Ding, Suhui Qie, Wei Zhang, Dalong Yang, Linfeng Wang
    Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.2014; 70(1): 189.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Medial Branch Block in Chronic Facet Joint Pain for Osteoporotic Compression Fracture: One Year Retrospective Study
    Ki Deok Park, Haemi Jee, Hee Seung Nam, Soo Kyoung Cho, Hyoung Seop Kim, Yongbum Park, Oh Kyung Lim
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2013; 37(2): 191.     CrossRef
  • Epidural Steroids
    Steven P. Cohen, Mark C. Bicket, David Jamison, Indy Wilkinson, James P. Rathmell
    Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2013; 38(3): 175.     CrossRef
  • Epidural Injections for Spinal Pain
    Mark C. Bicket, Anita Gupta, Charlie H. Brown, Steven P. Cohen
    Anesthesiology.2013; 119(4): 907.     CrossRef
  • 8,282 View
  • 72 Download
  • 20 Crossref
The Outcomes of Epidural Steroid Injection for Treatment of Patients with Spinal Stenosis.
Kim, Hyun Dong , Lee, Kang Woo
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 1998;22(2):274-281.

The purpose of this study was to see whether there were any correlations between the clinical findings and outcomes after the epidural steroid injection(ESI), and to determine which of the clinical findings might be of importance as favorable signs to predict a good result with the ESI.

The present study involves 23 elderly patients(18 females and 5 males) with spinal stenosis. The participants were divided into several subgroups according to the clinical features, such as presenting symptoms, age, duration of symptoms and physical findings. Subjects received the epidural injection of 80 mg Depo-Medrol with 6 ml of 1.5% lidocaine solution. The subjects completed a questionnaire before the ESI, and at three weeks and two months after the ESI respectively. The questionnaire included three scales on symptom severity, physical function, and satisfaction. The visual analogue pain scale was utilized as well.

At three weeks, satisfaction outcomes were encountered in 82.6 percent of the sudjects. Differences in the satisfaction between the subgroups according to the duration of symptoms and abnormal physical findings were statistically significant(P<0.05). The total scores of symptom severity and physical function had improved from the baseline values(P<0.0001). However, the score changes in each subgroup, for the duration of symptoms differ statistically same (P<0.05) as assessed by the visual analogue pain scale. The results at two months were similar to those of at three weeks. Approximately 78.3% of the patients reported the satisfactory results. Although the follow up period was short, the results demonstrated that the epidural steroid injection afforded much improvement in clinical symptom and physical function in elderly patients with the lumbar spinal stenosis. The only significant difference was the satisfaction outcomes in the groups with short duration of symptoms. The determination of persisting outcomes from the ESI would require a long-term follow-up study.

  • 2,175 View
  • 8 Download
The Effect of Epidural Injection for Spinal Stenosis.
Kim, Chul , Kim, Changhyo , Ahn, Jae Ki
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2000;24(6):1180-1185.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of epidural injection for spinal stenosis with symptoms of low back pain, pseudoclaudication, or radiating pain.

Method: Thirteen patients with spinal stenosis which were confirmed by the computed tomography (CT) studies were treated with epidural injections of steroids and local anesthetics for three times with 1 week interval. The efficacy of epidural injection was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), pain rating score (PRS), treadmill test, and jump test.

Results: 1) The VAS, PRS, pain free walking distances, and jump heights were checked right before injection, and at 1 week and 3 months after injection. The VAS and PRS were significantly decreased after epidural injection. The pain free walking distances and the jump heights were significantly increased after epidural injecton.

Conclusion: Epidural injections of steroid and local anesthetics are effective in the short term period, but also in the long term period for patients with spinal stenosis.

  • 2,114 View
  • 6 Download
Motor Nerve Conduction Study of Lumbosacral Spinal Stenosis with Magnetic Stimulation.
Han, Tai Ryoon , Bang, Moon Suk , Kwon, Bum Sun
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 1998;22(1):77-83.

The diagnostic value of nerve conduction study of spinal stenosis is far limited due to its deeply located lesion and its very short length of diseased nerve compared to the relatively long length of total conduction distance. Recently it became possible to stimulate the deep sited spinal nerve roots non-invasively with magnetic stimulation. The authors made a new method to calculate the motor nerve conduction time of lumbar spinal root using magnetic stimulation and planned to verify the delayed conduction time in patients with spinal stenosis who didn't show any abnormalities in the conventional electrophysiologic studies(peripheral nerve conduction velocity, F-wave and needle EMG).

Three steps of magnetic stimulation were applied to vertex(transcortical stimulation), T12 spinous process(thoracic stimulation) and S1 spinous process(sacral stimulation), and three channel recording were performed at rectus abdominis(RA), right and left abductor hallucis(AH) simultaneously. Central motor conduction time(CMCT) was calculated by time difference between vertex and spinal stimulation at RA and AH. Lumbar-segment motor conduction time(LMCT) was defined as conduction time by subtracting CMCT of RA from CMCT of AH. The results as follows;

LMCT was delayed in the group of patients with spinal stenosis(5.36⁑2.11 msec) compared to the normal control group(4.05⁑1.23 msec), but the range of LMCT was not quite different individually. Dividing the patients group into multi-level and single-level spinal stenosis group, LMCT in the multi-level spinal stenosis group was 6.12⁑1.95 msec which was significantly different from that of single-level(4.48⁑1.96 msec). The authors conclude that LMCT, the short segmental motor nerve conduction study of lumbosacral nerve root, is useful to confirm the entrapment of spinal nerve root across the lumbosacral spinal canal and is also non- invasive, simple and applicable to any other spinal nerve roots.

  • 2,064 View
  • 7 Download

Case Report

Traumatic Cauda Equina Syndrome Due to Spinal Stenosis in an Achondroplastic Patient: A Case Report.
Lee, Sool Ryon , Cho, Seong Chan , Ha, Sang Bae
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2001;25(3):523-526.

Achondroplasia is a congenital developmental condition characterized pathologically by defective enchondral ossification, affecting chiefly the long bones, and clinically by peculiar dwarfism with short extremities and normal trunk. One of the most common neurologic manifestation in achondroplastic patients in adulthood is spinal stenosis where the prominent characteristics of lumbar vertebrae structure are shortening of interpedicular distance and hypertrophy of vertebral pedicle. There has been no case report of traumatic cauda equina syndrome resulted in paraparesis among achondroplasic patients in Korea. We experienced a 30 year-old achondroplastic man sustained paraparesis as the result of an accidental slipping down. After the surgical decompression, the patient made slow recovery in all aspects of function via rehabilitation therapy.

  • 2,620 View
  • 13 Download
Original Articles
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Induced by Epidural Lipomatosis: A case report.
Park, Gi young , Cho, Jang hyuk , Lee, So young
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2004;28(6):618-621.
The epidural lipomatosis is the unusual result of fat deposition in the extradural space of spinal canal, and most cases are associated with the chronic systemic steroid treatment. Symptoms related to spinal stenosis are postulated to result from spinal cord and nerve root compression. MR imaging is the first choice of the investigation method. Patients with acute progressive symptoms are best treated surgically, while others with stable symptoms can initially be treated medically with immediate tapering of their steroid dose. We reported one case of lumbar spinal stenosis induced by epidural lipomatosis receiving chronic steroid treatment. Surgical treatment could not be performed because of the poor general condition. Rehabilitation care and nonoperative therapy were effective in improving symptoms in lumbar epidural spinal stenosis induced by epidural lipomatosis. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2004; 28: 618-621)
  • 1,957 View
  • 9 Download
Clinical Characteristics and Rehabilitative Therapeutic Effect on Peripheral Arterial Disease Combined with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
Kim, Chul , Lee, Dong Woo , Park, Yong Bum
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2011;35(2):250-258.
Objective
To access the clinical features of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) combined with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in patients, and the effects of peripheral arterial disease rehabilitation after peripheral vascular intervention. Method We studied 21 patients who were diagnosed with PAD combined with LSS. We investigated the past histories symptoms, diagnoses and treatment of the 21 patients to determine if there were atypical features that could be attributed to PAD. Thirteen patients who were diagnosed with PAD combined with LSS received peripheral arterial disease rehabilitation after peripheral vascular intervention. A control group (n=11) was instructed to practice self- exercise training in the community exercise program after peripheral vascular intervention. Initial claudication distance (ICD), absolute claudication distance (ACD), peak oxygen uptake, and ankle-brachial index (ABI) were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after peripheral arterial disease rehabilitation. Results Thirteen of 16 patients were satisfied with the cardiac rehabilitation program and experienced symptom relief, however, there was a recurrence of symptoms and peripheral arterial restenosis in 2 patients. After peripheral arterial disease rehabilitation, PAD and LSS groups showed significant changes in ABI, ICD, ACD, and peak oxygen uptake. The control group also showed significant improvements of ABI, ICD, ACD, and peak oxygen uptake. There were significant differences between the two groups in ICD, ACD, and peak oxygen uptake after 6 months. Conclusion Attention should be paid to patients complaining of back pain, lower limb radiating pain, and claudication, because they were diagnosed with neurogenic intermittent claudication by simple spinal stenosis and it would overlook the PAD. We recommend also considering the possibility of PAD. Compared with angioplasty alone, angioplasty in combination with subsequent training is a superior treatment modality for patients with intermittent claudication.
  • 1,703 View
  • 12 Download
The Effect of Caudal Epidural Injection for the Pseudoclaudication of Spinal Stenosis.
Son, Cheol Ho , Kang, Bong Gu , Lee, Yang Gyun
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 1998;22(3):582-586.

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of caudal epidural injection in relieving pseudoclaudication of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Method: Fifteen patients with a spinal stenosis which was confirmed by the magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) studies, received a caudal epidural steroid injection of triamcinolone acetate 120 mg, in a solution mixed with 2 ml of 1% lidocaine, and 15 ml of normal saline.

Results: The visual analogue scales checked at 1 hour prior to injection, 1 hour postinjection, and 1 month postinjection were 8.1⁑0.8, 3.7⁑1.7, and 6.4⁑1.9, respectively.

The exercise tolerance on the treadmill with 0o ramp inclination and 1.8 km/h speed was measured at 1 hour prior to injection, 1 hour postinjection, and 1 month postinjection. The time intervals to the first symptom of the pseudoclaudication were 2.3⁑0.8 minutes, 6.5⁑0.7 minutes, and 4.6⁑1.9 minutes, respectively.

Conclusion: In our study, the caudal epidural injection offered a significant short-term relief for the pseudoclaudication. Also it appeared to be a reasonable therapeutic option among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after 1 month postinjection.

  • 2,530 View
  • 20 Download
Efficacy of Translaminar Epidural Steroid Injection versus Combined Translaminar Epidural Steroid Injection with Selective Nerve Root Injection in Spinal Stenosis.
Nam, Ki Yeon , Ryu, Gi Hyeong , Choi, Jung Min , Choi, Jong Ho , Kwuan, Bum Sun , Park, Jin Woo
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2007;31(1):7-13.
Objective
To compare treatment effects of translaminar epidural steroid injections (TLESIs) only and selective nerve root injections (SNRIs) with TLESIs in lumbosacral spinal stenosis. Method: Thirty-four patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and electromyography (EMG) were included. 16 patients who had somatosensory pathway dysfunction or abnormal spontaneous activity received combined SNRIs with TLESIs and 20 patients received only TLESIs. The visual analogue scale (VAS) and functional rating index (FRI) were measured before injection, 1 week and 3 months after 3 times injection. Results: The mean values of VAS before injection, 1 week and 3 months after 3 times injection were 7.55, 3.22, 3.61 in only TLESIs and 7.37, 2.06, 2.31 in SNRIs with TLESIs. The mean values of FRI before injection, 1 week and 3 months after 3 times injection were 25.16, 16.00, 15.83 in only TLESIs and 22.50, 8.37, 8.31 in SNRIs with TLESIs. In the mean values of VAS and FRI were significantly lower SNRIs with TLESIs than only TLESIs (p<0.05). Conclusion: Combined SNRIs with TLESIs were more effective treatment for reduction of pain and improvement of function than only TLESIs in lumbosacral spinal stenosis. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2007; 31: 7-13)
  • 2,111 View
  • 18 Download
TOP