• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

4
results for

"Specific language impairment"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Specific language impairment"

Original Articles
The Differences in Clinical Aspect Between Specific Language Impairment and Global Developmental Delay
Seong Woo Kim, Ha Ra Jeon, Eun Ji Park, Hee Jung Chung, Jung Eun Song
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(6):752-758.   Published online December 24, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.6.752
Objective

To compare and analyze the clinical characteristics of children with delayed language acquisition due to two different diagnoses, which were specific language impairment (SLI, a primarily delayed language development) and global developmental delay (GDD, a language delay related to cognitive impairment).

Methods

Among 1,598 children who had visited the developmental delay clinic from March 2005 to February 2011, 467 children who were diagnosed with GDD and 183 children who were diagnosed with SLI were included in this study. All children were questioned about past, family, and developmental history, and their language competences and cognitive function were assessed. Some children got electroencephalography (EEG), in case of need.

Results

The presence of the perinatal risk factors showed no difference in two groups. In the children with GDD, they had more delayed acquisition of independent walking and more frequent EEG abnormalities compared with the children with SLI (p<0.01). The positive family history of delayed language development was more prevalent in children with SLI (p<0.01). In areas of language ability, the quotient of receptive language and expressive language did not show any meaningful statistical differences between the two groups. Analyzing in each group, the receptive language quotient was higher than expressive language quotient in both group (p<0.01). In the GDD group, the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) showed a marked low mental and motor quotient while the Wechsler Intelligence Scale showed low verbal and nonverbal IQ. In the SLI group, the BSID-II and Wechsler Intelligence Scale showed low scores in mental area and verbal IQ but sparing motor area and nonverbal IQ.

Conclusion

The linguistic profiles of children with language delay could not differentiate between SLI and GDD. The clinicians needed to be aware of these developmental issues, and history taking and clinical evaluation, including cognitive assessment, could be helpful to diagnose adequately and set the treatment plan for each child.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Correlation of Language Assessment Batteries of Toddlers With Developmental Language Delay
    Jin A Yoon, Shin Wook An, Ye Seul Choi, Jae Sik Seo, Seon Jun Yoon, Soo-Yeon Kim, Yong Beom Shin
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2022; 46(5): 256.     CrossRef
  • Diferencias del vocabulario en niños con y sin retraso del lenguaje
    Alba Ayuso Lanchares, Rosa Belén Santiago Pardo, Inés Ruiz Requies
    HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades.2022; 11(Monográfic): 1.     CrossRef
  • Machine-Learning-Aided Self-Powered Assistive Physical Therapy Devices
    Xiao Xiao, Yunsheng Fang, Xiao Xiao, Jing Xu, Jun Chen
    ACS Nano.2021; 15(12): 18633.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Copy Number Variations on Developmental Aspects of Children With Delayed Development
    Kee-Boem Park, Kyung Eun Nam, Ah-Ra Cho, Woori Jang, Myungshin Kim, Joo Hyun Park
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2019; 43(2): 215.     CrossRef
  • Specificity of spontaneous EEG associated with different levels of cognitive and communicative dysfunctions in children
    Nadezhda Ju. Kozhushko, Zhanna V. Nagornova, Sergey A. Evdokimov, Natalia V. Shemyakina, Valery A. Ponomarev, Ekaterina P. Tereshchenko, Jury D. Kropotov
    International Journal of Psychophysiology.2018; 128: 22.     CrossRef
  • Case History Risk Factors for Specific Language Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Johanna M. Rudolph
    American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2017; 26(3): 991.     CrossRef
  • 5,267 View
  • 101 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
Effects of Speech Therapy in Children with Specific Language Impairment and Mild Intellectual Disability.
Kim, Seong Woo , Shin, Jung Bin , Bae, Myoung Sik , Chung, Hee Jung , Kim, Young Ki , Song, Jeong Hee
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2011;35(1):48-54.
Objective
To analyze the effects of speech therapy between children with specific language impairment (SLI) and mild intellectual disability (ID). Method Fourteen children with SLI and thirteen children with mild ID who had received speech therapy for more than 1 year were enrolled. The language function and cognitive function of all subjects were assessed before and after speech therapy. Results Improvement of receptive and expressive language development were shown in 78.5% and 71.4% of children with SLI, respectively. However improvement of receptive and expressive language development was shown in only 30.7% of children with ID. Improvement of verbal intelligence which had appeared in the SLI group was not shown in the ID group. Conclusion Effects of speech therapy were different in children with SLI and mild ID and more favorable outcomes were demonstrated in children with SLI.
  • 1,868 View
  • 45 Download
Diagnosis and Clinical Features of Children with Language Delay.
Kim, Seong Woo , Shin, Jung Bin , You, Sung , Yang, Eun Ju , Lee, Sun Kyoung , Chung, Hee Jung , Song, Dong Ho
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2005;29(6):584-590.
Objective
To determine the diagnosis and investigate the clinical features of children with language delay. Method: One hundred seventy-eight children who were referred to the Developmental Delay Clinic for the evaluation of suspected language delay were prospectively enrolled. Multidisciplinary assessment was done by a physiatrist, pediatric neurologist and pediatric psychiatrist. All patients took speech evaluation, full battery of cognitive assessment and hearing test. Results: The common diagnoses of children with language delay were mental retardation (MR), specific language impairment (SLI) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the order of frequency. The early developmental history showed delay of acquisition of motor milestone in MR group. The brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) and single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) findings couldn't help to distinguish the brain pathology in SLI, MR and ASD. The result of speech evaluation showed more severely involved in ASD and MR rather than SLI. Conclusion: In the clinical assesment and management of the children with language delay, the comprehensive assessment which includes cognition and personal-social area as well as language itself would be helpful for the understanding and setting up the therapeutic plan of these children. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2005; 29: 584-590)
  • 2,085 View
  • 60 Download
A Study on Clinical and Phonological Characteristics of Patients with Specific Language Impairment.
Kim, Yun Hee , Park, Se Hoon , Shin, Yong Il , Kim, Chan Yang , Kim, Hyun Gi , Kim, Jung Soo
J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 2000;24(1):21-27.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine clinical and phonological characteristics of the patients with specific language impairment (SLI).

Method: Subjects were 24 SLI patients without known mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, hearing loss or structural brain lesion and 23 normal children. Developmental history, oropharyngeal abnormality, and brainstem auditory evoked potentials were obtained in SLI patients. Receptive language age and quotient were assessed by Peabody picture vocabulary test. Phonetic characteristics of subjects were analysed using Visi-Pitch and computerized speech laboratory.

Results: In perceptual evaluation, 32.3% of SLI patients showed incomplete articulation pattern. The patterns of incomplete articulation were substitution, distortion, nasalization, and addition. The receptive language of SLI patients (0.89⁑0.28) was significantly lower than control group (1.16⁑0.18). In Visi-Pitch analysis, diadochokinetic rate and maximal phonation time were decreased in SLI patients. The total duration of three syllables in SLI patients were significantly prolonged, especially for bilabial heavily asperated and glottalized consonants and alveolar and velar slightly asperated, heavily asperated, and glottalized consonants.

Conclusion: The patients with SLI showed characteristic defect in articulation as well as expressive and receptive language delayment. This articulatory defect may be resulted from disturbance of central programming and coordination of articulation. The objective and quantitative analysis of Phonological characteristics using computerized speech system in SLI patients can contribute to diagnose and evaluate the treatment outcome for the patients.

  • 1,544 View
  • 16 Download
TOP