To identify which combination of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) is most reliable for postoperative motor deterioration during spinal cord tumor surgery, according to anatomical and pathologic type.
MEPs and SEPs were monitored in patients who underwent spinal cord tumor surgery between November 2012 and August 2016. Muscle strength was examined in all patients before surgery, within 48 hours postoperatively and 4 weeks later. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of each significant change in SEPs and MEPs.
The overall sensitivity and specificity of SEPs or MEPs were 100% and 61.3%, respectively. The intraoperative MEP monitoring alone showed both higher sensitivity (67.9%) and specificity (83.2%) than SEP monitoring alone for postoperative motor deterioration. Two patients with persistent motor deterioration had significant changes only in SEPs. There are no significant differences in reliabilities between anatomical types, except with hemangioma, where SEPs were more specific than MEPs for postoperative motor deterioration. Both overall positive and negative predictive values of MEPs were higher than the predictive values of SEPs. However, the positive predictive value was higher by the dual monitoring of MEPs and SEPs, compared to MEPs alone.
For spinal cord tumor surgery, combined MEP and SEP monitoring showed the highest sensitivity for the postoperative motor deterioration. Although MEPs are more specific than SEPs in most types of spinal cord tumor surgery, SEPs should still be monitored, especially in hemangioma surgery.
Citations
To evaluate whether the combination of muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) measured during spinal surgery can predict immediate and permanent postoperative motor deficits.
mMEP and SEP was monitored in patients undergoing spinal surgery between November 2012 and July 2014. mMEPs were elicited by a train of transcranial electrical stimulation over the motor cortex and recorded from the upper/lower limbs. SEPs were recorded by stimulating the tibial and median nerves.
Combined mMEP/SEP recording was successfully achieved in 190 operations. In 117 of these, mMEPs and SEPs were stable and 73 showed significant changes. In 20 cases, motor deficits in the first 48 postoperative hours were observed and 6 patients manifested permanent neurological deficits. The two potentials were monitored in a number of spinal surgeries. For surgery on spinal deformities, the sensitivity and specificity of combined mMEP/SEP monitoring were 100% and 92.4%, respectively. In the case of spinal cord tumor surgeries, sensitivity was only 50% but SEP changes were observed preceding permanent motor deficits in some cases.
Intraoperative monitoring is a useful tool in spinal surgery. For spinal deformity surgery, combined mMEP/SEP monitoring showed high sensitivity and specificity; in spinal tumor surgery, only SEP changes predicted permanent motor deficits. Therefore, mMEP, SEP, and joint monitoring may all be appropriate and beneficial for the intraoperative monitoring of spinal surgery.
Citations
Although spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA) literally refers to the specific type of spinal cord injury, however, some extents of spinal cord injuries can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in most of cases. We introduce an atypical case of spinal cord injury without radiologic abnormality. A 42-year-old male tetraplegic patient underwent MRI and computed tomography, and no specific lesions were found in any segments of the spinal cord. Moreover, the tetraplegic patient showed normal urodynamic function despite severe paralysis and absent somatosensory evoked potentials from the lower limbs.
Citations
To evaluate whether an initial complete impairment of spinal cord injury (SCI) contributes to the functional outcome prediction, we analyzed the relationship between the degree of complete impairment according to the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS), the posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential (PTSEP) and the changes of functional indices.
Sixty subjects with SCI were studied who received rehabilitative management for over 2 months. The degree of completeness on basis of the initial AIS and PTSEP were evaluated at the beginning of rehabilitation. Following treatment, several functional indices, such as walking index for spinal cord injury version II (WISCI II), spinal cord independence measure version III (SCIM III), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI), were evaluated until the index score reached a plateau value.
The recovery efficiency of WISCI and BBS revealed a statistically significant difference between complete and incomplete impairments of initial AIS and PTSEP. The SCIM and MBI based analysis did not reveal any significant differences in terms of the degree of AIS and PTSEP completeness.
AIS and PTSEP were highly effective to evaluate the prognosis in post-acute phase SCI patients. BBS and WISCI might be better parameters than other functional indices for activities of daily living to predict the recovery of the walking ability in post-acute SCI.
Citations
To investigate the somatosensory findings of pusher syndrome in stroke patients.
Twelve pusher patients and twelve non-pusher patients were enrolled in this study. Inclusion criteria were unilateral stroke, sufficient cognitive abilities to understand and follow instructions, and no visual problem. Patients were evaluated for pusher syndrome using a standardized scale for contraversive pushing. Somatosensory finding was assessed by the Cumulative Somatosensory Impairment Index (CSII) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) at 1 and 14 weeks after the stroke onset. Data of SEPs with median and tibial nerve stimulation were classified into the normal, abnormal, and no response group.
In the baseline characteristics (sex, lesion character, and side) of both groups, significant differences were not found. The score of CSII decreased in both groups at 14 weeks (p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in the CSII scores between the two groups at 1 and 14 weeks. There were no significant differences in SEPs between the two groups at 1 and 14 weeks after the stroke onset.
It appears that somatosensory input plays a relatively minor role in pusher syndrome. Further study will be required to reveal the mechanism of pusher syndrome.
Citations
Method: Thirty eight complete peripheral nerve injuries, diagnosed by motor and sensory nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography (nEMG), were studied. Nerve injuries were grouped into two groups with and without SEP recorded at the time of initial evaluation. Outcome of nerve injuries was graded from 0 to 3 based on the results of NCSs and nEMG, followed up for more than six months. Grade 0 was designated for those with no evidence of recovery, and grade 3 for those with recovery in nEMG and both motor and sensory NCSs.
Results: At the time of initial electrodiagnosis, SEP study showed no response in 25 cases, but SEP could be observed in 13 cases, although they were attenuated or delayed. Recovery of nerve injury was observed in 22 cases, despite the findings compatible with complete injury in initial NCSs and nEMG. The group in which SEPs were recorded showed significantly higher grades of recovery, compared to no re sponse group.
Conclusion: In predicting the prognosis of complete peripheral nerve injuries, SEP study could be useful as a supplementary electrodiagnostic method.
Method: The subjects were 57 patients with first stroke. Somatosensory evoked potential study was performed at the time of transfer to the rehabilitation department. Data of somatosensory evoked potential with median and tibial nerve stimulations were obtained and classified as normal (group 1), abnormal (group 2), and no response group (group 3). Modified Barthel index (MBI), motor and sensory functions were evaluated at the time of transfer and discharge.
Results: MBI score was statistically different among the 3 groups based on the findings of median and tibial nerve SSEP at the time of transfer, but not different at the time of discharge. Motor function was statistically different among the 3 groups at the time of transfer and discharge. Sensory function was statistically different among the 3 groups at the time of transfer, but not different at the time of discharge.
Conclusion: Even though SSEP study reflects the functional status of the patients and correlates well with the findings of brain image, it has limitation in predicting outcome of the patients with stroke. (J Korean Acad Rehab Med 2003; 27: 355-360)
Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between cognitive function and findings of evoked potential study in chronic renal failure patients.
Method: Thirty chronic renal failure patients with cognitive dysfunction were recruited, whose mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores were less than 24 points. According to the underlying diseases of chronic renal failure, we categorized thirty patients into diabetic group (11 patients) and non-diabetic group (19 patients), and the control-group was composed of 15 normal volunteers. Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) on stimulating median and posterior tibial nerves, and cortical and spinal conduction time of the motor pathways were valuated.
Results: In tibial nerve SEP, N22-P38 interpeak latencies (IPL) were 18.1⁑4.2 msec in the patient group and 15.7⁑1.9 msec in the control group, respectively. In MEP, cortico-lumbar central motor conduction times (CMCT) were 19.5⁑2.7 and 16.5⁑3.0 msec, respectively. CMCT were prolonged in patients than controls (p<0.05). There was significant correlation between serum creatinine concentration and N22-P38 IPL (r=0.64, p<0.05), but, there were no correlations between the underlying diseases of chronic renal failure, duration of disease, MMSE score and cortico-lumbar CMCT, N22-P38 IPL (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Evoked potentials will be helpful in evaluating the patients with cognitive dysfunction in chronic renal failure.
Objective: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEPs) in the unilevel/unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathies.
Method: The study was performed on 41 patients with herniated lumbosacral disc which was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging, and the patients with clinical lumbosacral radiculopathies (L5 radiculopathy in 33 cases and S1 radiculopathy in 8 cases). Stimulation sites were over the dorsum of the foot on the distal fifth metatarsal bone for the S1 dermatome and at the interdigital web space between first and second toe for the L5 dermatome. Recordings were made at Cz' and reference to Fz. Conventional nerve conduction study, needle EMG and H-reflex were also examined.
Results: While the needle EMG showed abnormalities in 32 patients (78.0%), the abnormalities of DSEPs were in 13 patients (31.7%): 33.3% for the L5 radiculopathy and 25.0% for the S1 radiculopathy, respectively. Moreover, there was no significant relationship between the abnormal findings of needle EMG and DSEPs (p>0.05). The H-reflexes were abnormal in 6 of 7 patients (85.7%). And then two of them were found abnormal in S1 DSEPs.
Conclusion: The conventional needle EMG appears to be the more useful electrophysiological technique in the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathies. The ultimate diagnostic value of DSEPs in lumbosacral radiculopathies is doubtful and controversial.
Objective: To investigate the association of the muscle contraction with gating of the sensory input at central and peripheral levels according to the intensity of muscle contraction and location of the muscles, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) studies were evaluated at different levels of isometric contraction in the different muscles.
Method: Median nerve SSEPs were recorded at Erb's point and scalp in the ten healthy adult subjects with isometric contraction of ipsilateral abductor pollicis brevis (APB), ipsilateral abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and contralateral APB. Median nerve SSEPs were recorded in each of these conditions during precontraction, weak contraction, strong contraction and 4 minutes after contraction.
Results: 1) N9 amplitudes of median SSEPs recorded at Erb's point were augumented during weak contraction and these amplitude augumentations were statistically significant in the ipsilateral APB contraction (p<0.05). 2) N20 amplitudes recorded at scalp were inhibited during strong isometric contraction and these amplitude inhibitions were statistically significant in the ipsilateral APB contraction (p<0.05). 3) The latencies of N9 and N20 potentials were not significantly changed during isometric contraction.
Conclusion: Therefore peripheral nervous system as well as central nervous system is responsible for gating, so the subject should be asked for the best relaxation possible for higher reliability of SSEPs.
Object: The isolated posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) neuropathy has rarely been described in the literature and documented electrophysiologically, based on the paucity of published report. The purpose of this study was to assess the reference value of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) in posterior femoral cutaneous nerve.
Method: Both legs of twenty healthy adults were tested. Somatosensory evoked potentials were obtained with the active recording electrode placed at Cz', 2 cm posterior to CZ, and the reference electrode at FZ (international 10∼20 system). The posterior femoral cutaneous nerve was excited 14 cm proximal to the midpopliteal fossa between the long head of the biceps femoris and the semitendinosus muscles.
Results: The mean latency of right P1 were 35.35⁑3.17 msec, N1 were 45.28⁑2.71 msec and mean peak amplitudes were 1.42⁑0.98 μV. In the left side, mean latency of P1 were 34.54⁑2.89 msec, N1 were 43.87⁑2.44 msec and mean peak amplitudes were 1.20⁑0.53 μV.
Conclusion: Based on the result of this study, the reference values could be used to differentiate and detect the lesion in the case of isolated dysfunction of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve.
Objective: Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) study has been used increasingly to monitor neurological function during scoliosis surgery and other high-risk spinal surgeries. However, there are few studies related to this intraoperative monitoring, particularly in severe spinal deformity surgery, in Korea. So we evaluated the clinical efficacy of intraoperative SEP monitoring and considered the risk factors related to spinal surgery.
Method: We performed a posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potential study for intraoperative monitoring during surgical procedures in 101 patients (male 46, female 55).
Results: Neurologic damage occurred in 16 patients (10 congenital scoliosis cases, 5 tuberculous kyphosis cases, and 1 degenerative spondylosis case) after surgical procedures. Delayed postoperative neurologic damage occurred in 4 patients (2 mild damage cases, 2 severe damage cases) among 85 cases which showed normal responses during surgical procedures. Sensitivity of this study was 75%, and specificity was 95.3%.
Conclusion: Somatosensory evoked potential study for intraoperaive monitoring is a sensitive and very useful method to detect iatrogenic lesions during spinal deformity surgery with satisfactory specificity. However, to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the intraoperative monitoring, combination of motor evoked potentials is recommended.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the maturation characteristics of neonates.
Ninety three neonates underwent a somatosensory evoked potentials(SEPs) testing. Twenty four point seven percent of them were neonates at risks including the neonatal asphyxia, low birth weight under 1500 g, or a suspicious CNS abnormality.
Seventy five point three percent of neonates showed normal median SEPs, and 24.7% of them showed abnormal or a flat response. The mean latency of the first cortical component(N1) was 25.3⁑5.4 msec, duration 16.3⁑5.5 msec and amplitude 1.00⁑1.27 ㄍV.
Thirty one point two percent of neonates showed normal posterior tibial SEPs, and 68.8% showed abnormal or a flat response. The mean latency of the first cortical component(P1) was 44.9⁑5.6 msec, duration 17.5⁑3.9 msec and amplitude 0.47⁑0.38 ㄍV.
This result suggests that the maturation of rostal nervous system develops earlier than the caudal system.
Linear decrease of the cortical latency with post-menstrual age reflects maturation of the central pathway and not merely maturation of the peripheral nerves. But our study showed much less frequency of recordings of the tibial nerve SEPs than the median nerve responses, which suggested that the maturation of spinal cord and lower-limb nerves would be slow, in addition to that the length of pathway was increasing. This result suggests that the maturation of the proximal shorter nervous pathway develops earlier than the distal longer pathway.