We used lumbar magnetic resonance image (MRI) findings to determine possible outcome predictors of a caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) for radicular pain caused by a herniated lumbar disc (HLD).
Ninety-one patients with radicular pain whose MRI indicated a HLD were enrolled between September 2010 and July 2013. The CESIs were performed using ultrasound (US). A responder was defined as having complete relief or at least a 50% reduction of pain as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) and functional status on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); responder (VAS n=61, RMDQ n=51), and non-responder (VAS n=30, RMDQ n=40). MRI findings were analyzed and compared between the two groups with regard to HLD level, HLD type (protrusion or exclusion), HLD zone (central, subarticular, foraminal, and extraforaminal), HLD volume (mild, moderate, or severe), relationship between HLD and nerve root (no contact, contact, displaced, or compressed), disc height loss (none, less than half, or more than half ), and disc degeneration grade (homogeneous disc structure or inhomogeneous disc structure-clear nucleus and height of intervertebral disc).
A centrally located herniated disc was more common in the responder group than that in the non-responder group. Treatment of centrally located herniated discs showed satisfactory results. (VAS p=0.025, RMDQ p=0.040). Other factors, such as HLD level, HLD type, HLD volume, relationship to nerve root, disc height loss, and disc degeneration grade, were not critical.
The HLD zone was significant for pain reduction after CESI. A centrally located herniated disc was a predictor of a good clinical outcome.
Citations
To evaluate the short-term effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency on the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in patients with chronic refractory cervical radicular pain.
Fifteen patients (13 males, 2 females; mean age, 55.9 years) with chronic radicular pain due to cervical disc herniation or foraminal stenosis refractory to active rehabilitative management, including transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injection and exercise, were selected. All patients received pulsed radiofrequency on the symptomatic cervical dorsal root ganglion and were carefully evaluated for neurologic deficits and side effects. The clinical outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a neck disability index (NDI) before treatment, one and three months after treatment. Successful pain relief was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the VAS score as compared with the pre-treatment score. After three months, we categorized the patients' satisfaction.
The average VAS for radicular pain was reduced significantly from 5.3 at pretreatment to 2.5 at 3 months post-treatment (p<0.05). Eleven of 15 patients (77.3%) after cervical pulsed RF stimulation reported pain relief of 50% or more at the 3 month follow-up. The average NDI was significantly reduced from 44.0% at pretreatment to 35.8% 3 months post-treatment (p<0.05). At 3 months post-treatment, eleven of fifteen patients (73.3%) were satisfied with their status. No adverse effects were observed.
The results demonstrate that the application of pulsed radiofrequency on DRG might be an effective short-term intervention for chronic refractory cervical radicular pain. Further studies, including a randomized controlled trial with long-term follow-up, are now needed.
Citations
Objective: To determine the therapeutic effect of transforaminal epidural injections in patients with refractory lumbar radicular pain.
Method: Thirty-five patients with lumbar radicular pain who did not receive any other interventional procedures were studied. Transforaminal epidurograms and epidural steroid injections via eighty-nine intervertebral foramens were performed under C-arm fluoroscopic visualization. After confirmation of proper needle placement, 20∼40 mg of triamcinolone and 1 cc of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride were injected into each safe triangle of the intervertebral foramen. Patients were evaluated for visual analogue scale (VAS) and straight leg raising (SLR) test at pre-injection, 1 week post-injection and 3 months post-injection. Changes over time were assessed statistically using ANOVA.
Results: The averages of VAS reduced significantly (p＜0.05) from 5.6⁑1.8 at pre-injection, to 3.5⁑1.7 at 1 week pos-tinjection, to 2.1⁑2.0 at 3 months post-injection, respectively. The averages of SLR augmented significantly (p＜0.05) from 51.6o⁑16.7o at pre-injection, to 66.6o⁑16.0o at 1 week post-injection, to 77.2o⁑15.1o at 3 months post-injection, respectively. Twenty-six out of thirty-five patients (74.3%) had a successful long-term outcome, reporting at least an over 50% reduction between pre-injection and 3 months post-injection in VAS.
Conclusion: Transforaminal epidural injection is an effective treatment for patients with lumbar radicular pain when evaluated after 1 week and 3 months post-injection.
Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the therapeutic and the functional value between translaminar approach and transforaminal approach of epidural steroid injection in patient with refractory radicular pain.
Method: Among 31 patients with unilateral herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) which was confirmed by physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 17 patients received a transforaminal approach and 14 patients received a translaminar approach. All patients were evaluated by independent observer and were checked by visual analogue scale (VAS), functional score before and 1 day, 2 weeks and 4 weeks after injection.
Results: The VAS of transforaminal approach was significantly lower than that of translaminar approach after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks (p＜0.05), although there were no statistical difference before and 1 day after injection. The functional score of transforaminal approach was significantly higher than that of translaminar approach after 4 weeks (p＜0.05), although there were no statistical difference before and 1 day, 2 weeks after injection. The translaminar approach needs more frequent injection (p＜0.05).
Conclusion: This study suggests that both translaminar approach and transforaminal approach could be valuable to the initial management of refractory radicular pain, but the duration of therapeutic effects was relatively short in translaminar approach. Transforaminal approach will be the promising treatment of refractory radicular pain, because it has better therapeutic efficacy, safety and longer duration of therapeutic effects than translaminar approach.
For the management of refractory radicular pain, traditional injection techniques such as transcaudal or translumbar epidural steroid injection may be indicated. This epidural injection, done blindly, may result in improper needle placement. Fluoroscopically guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection and computerized tomography-controlled periganglionic foraminal steroid injection are selective nerve blocks. These procedures are useful for the diagnosis. The advantages of these procedures are precise anatomic location provided by fluoroscope or CT.
Intraforaminal or periganglionic steroid injection is useful in the treatment of radicular pain. Thus we introduce a case of selective epidural steroid injection in a patient with refractory radicular pain.
First
Prev
