• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

73
results for

"Magnetic stimulation"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

Funded articles

"Magnetic stimulation"

Original Articles

Brain disorders

Effect of Low Frequency Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Balance Impairment in Patients With Cerebral Infarction
Nam-Gyu Im, Kyung-Rok Oh, Min-gil Kim, Young Lee, Na-Na Lim, Tae-Hwan Cho, Su-Ra Ryu, Seo-Ra Yoon
Ann Rehabil Med 2022;46(6):275-283.   Published online December 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.22058
Objective
To investigate the effect of low frequency cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on balance impairment in patients with cerebral infarction.
Methods
Thirty-two patients were randomly divided into two groups: rTMS group (n=16) and control (n=16). In the rTMS group, treatment was performed five times per week for 2 weeks (10 sessions), and in the control group, a sham coil was used with the sound and sensation of scalp similar to the rTMS coil. Patients in both groups underwent a conventional rehabilitation program. Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used as the primary outcome measurement. Timed Up and Go test (TUG), 10-m walk test (10mWT), and Activity-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC) were used as the secondary outcome measurement. All scales were measured at baseline (T0), after 10 sessions of rTMS (T1), and at 4 weeks after treatment completion (T2) by therapists with over 5 years of clinical experience.
Results
There were significant improvements between T0 and T1, and between T0 and T2, for all assessed items in the rTMS group. Whereas there were significant improvements between T0 and T1, and between T0 and T2, for the BBS and 10mWT in the control group. TUG (-4.87±5.05 vs. -0.50±2.97 seconds) and ABC score (8.10±8.33 vs. 0.16±0.97) were observed significant differences in comparison of the changes from T0 to T1 between the two group. BBS score (4.40±3.66 vs. 1.88±3.14), TUG (-4.87±4.56 vs. -0.62±2.96 seconds) and ABC score (8.22±7.70 vs. -0.09±0.86) differed significantly from T0 to T2 between the two groups.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that low-frequency cerebellar rTMS is helpful for improving balance in patients with cerebral infarction, and maybe a beneficial treatment for these patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Exploring cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke limb dysfunction rehabilitation: a narrative review
    Zhan Wang, Likai Wang, Fei Gao, Yongli Dai, Chunqiao Liu, Jingyi Wu, Mengchun Wang, Qinjie Yan, Yaning Chen, Chengbin Wang, Litong Wang
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xin Wang, Guilan Huang, Daoran Wang, Lu Sun, Haobo Leng, Kai Zheng, Xinlei Xu, Guofu Zhang, Caili Ren
    Brain Research Bulletin.2025; 225: 111341.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Motor Function of Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
    Yongxin Zhu, Juncong Yang, Kun Wang, Xianwen Li, Jiahui Ling, Xie Wu, Lianhui Fu, Qi Qi
    Brain and Behavior.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Balance and Limb Motor Function Impairments: Meta-analyses of Random Controlled Trials and Resting-State fMRI Studies
    Yuheng Zeng, Zujuan Ye, Wanxin Zheng, Jue Wang
    The Cerebellum.2024; 23(4): 1678.     CrossRef
  • Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving balance capacity and activity of daily living in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jingfeng Wang, Zhisheng Wu, Shanshan Hong, Honghong Ye, Yi Zhang, Qiuxiang Lin, Zehuang Chen, Liling Zheng, Jiawei Qin
    BMC Neurology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Cerebellar Non-Invasive Stimulation on Neurorehabilitation in Stroke Patients: An Updated Systematic Review
    Qi Liu, Yang Liu, Yumei Zhang
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(6): 1348.     CrossRef
  • Bilateral Cerebellar Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Ataxia After Hemorrhagic Stroke: a Case Report
    Evan Hy Einstein, Juliana Corlier, Cole Matthews, Doan Ngo, Michael K. Leuchter, Cole Citrenbaum, Nikita Vince-Cruz, Bhavna Ramesh, Aaron Slan, Scott A. Wilke, Nathaniel Ginder, Thomas Strouse, Andrew F. Leuchter
    The Cerebellum.2023; 23(3): 1254.     CrossRef
  • 5,603 View
  • 141 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref

Brain disorders

Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Early Subacute Phase of Stroke Enhances Angiogenic Mechanisms in Rats
Yookyung Lee, Byung-Mo Oh, Sung-Hye Park, Tai Ryoon Han
Ann Rehabil Med 2022;46(5):228-236.   Published online October 31, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.22040
Objective
To characterize the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) induced changes in angiogenic mechanisms across different brain regions.
Methods
Seventy-nine adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to a middle cerebral artery occlusion (day 0) and then treated with 1-Hz, 20-Hz, or sham stimulation of their lesioned hemispheres for 2 weeks. The stimulation intensity was set to 100% of the motor threshold. The neurological function was assessed on days 3, 10, and 17. The infarct volume and angiogenesis were measured by histology, immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. Brain tissue was harvested from the ischemic core (IC), ischemic border zone (BZ), and contralateral homologous cortex (CH).
Results
Optical density of angiopoietin1 and synaptophysin in the IC was significantly greater in the low-frequency group than in the sham group (p=0.03 and p=0.03, respectively). The 1-Hz rTMS significantly increased the level of Akt phosphorylation in the BZ (p<0.05 vs. 20 Hz). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation was increased in the IC (p<0.05 vs. 20 Hz), BZ (p<0.05 vs. 20 Hz), and CH (p<0.05 vs. 20 Hz and p<0.05 vs. sham). Real-time PCR demonstrated that low-frequency stimulation significantly increased the transcriptional activity of the TIE2 gene in the IC (p<0.05).
Conclusion
Low-frequency rTMS of the ipsilesional hemisphere in the early subacute phase of stroke promotes the expression of angiogenic factors and related genes in the brain, particularly in the injured area.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Novel emerging therapy for erectile dysfunction: efficacy and safety of flat magnetic stimulation
    Daniel Galimberti, Agustina Vila Echague, Ery A. Ko, Laura Pieri, Alessandra Comito, Irene Fusco, Tiziano Zingoni
    Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Determining the Optimal Stimulation Sessions for TMS-Induced Recovery of Upper Extremity Motor Function Post Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yichen Lv, Jack Jiaqi Zhang, Kui Wang, Leilei Ju, Hongying Zhang, Yuehan Zhao, Yao Pan, Jianwei Gong, Xin Wang, Kenneth N. K. Fong
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(12): 1662.     CrossRef
  • 6,536 View
  • 90 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Comparison of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Recovery Among Patients With Recent Stroke
Ka Ying Doris Miu, Ching Kok, Sau Shan Leung, Elaine Y. L. Chan, Elaine Wong
Ann Rehabil Med 2020;44(6):428-437.   Published online December 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.20093
Objective
To compare the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on upper limb function recovery among patients who recently had stroke.
Methods
Subjects with recent stroke (within 1 month) were randomized to rTMS (n=25) and tDCS (n=26) applied over the non-lesioned hemisphere for three sessions per week, followed by tailored upper limb rehabilitation training for a total of 2 weeks. The primary outcomes were changes in the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer arm score test, Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), hand grip strength, and modified Barthel Index at weeks 2 and 4. Both therapists responsible for training and assessment were blinded to the intervention allocated.
Results
There was an improvement in all the motor performance scales among both groups (p<0.001). These improvements persisted at discharge. However, there was no significant difference in any of the assessment scales between the two groups. The rTMS group showed a statistically non-significant greater improvement in MAS, 9HPT, and handgrip strength than the tDCS group.
Conclusion
Both interventions produce a statistically significant improvement in upper limb function. There was no statistically significant difference between the two intervention methods with respect to motor performance. It is suggested that a larger study may help to clarify the superiority of either methods.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A protocol to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation
    Ayesha Juhi, Manul Das, Dinesh Bhatia, Suman Dhaka, Rajesh Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Shreya Sharma, Pritam Kumar Chaudhary, Chanchal Goyal, Md Asif Khan, Himel Mondal
    MethodsX.2025; 14: 103209.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy of different protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function, activities of daily living, and neurological function in patients with early stroke: a systema
    Xueyi Ni, Zinan Yuan, Ruimou Xie, Xiaoxue Zhai, Xiang Cheng, Yu Pan
    Neurological Sciences.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Multi-Electrode Transcranial Direct Current Stimulator (ME-tDCS): Design considerations and safety aspects
    Cassandra Solomons, Vivekanandan Shanmugasundaram, Sivasakthi Murugan Velayutham
    Heliyon.2025; 11(7): e43039.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation for functional recovery in animal models of stroke: A systematic review
    Antonio Rodríguez, Laura Amaya-Pascasio, María Gutiérrez-Fernández, José García-Pinteño, Margarita Moreno, Patricia Martínez-Sánchez
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2024; 156: 105485.     CrossRef
  • The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review
    Benedetta Capetti, Lorenzo Conti, Chiara Marzorati, Roberto Grasso, Roberta Ferrucci, Gabriella Pravettoni, J. Michael Wyss
    Neural Plasticity.2024; 2024: 1.     CrossRef
  • Gamma oscillations induced by 40-Hz visual-auditory stimulation for the treatment of acute-phase limb motor rehabilitation after stroke: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Wang Fu, Xiaoming Yu, Minghui Lai, Yuanli Li, Yingting Yang, Yong Qin, Min Yu, Feng Wang, Cong Wang
    Trials.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular Changes in the Ischemic Brain as Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Targets—TMS and tDCS Mechanisms, Therapeutic Challenges, and Combination Therapies
    Aleksandra Markowska, Beata Tarnacka
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(7): 1560.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coupled With Visual‐Feedback Cycling Exercise Improves Walking Ability and Walking Stability After Stroke: A Randomized Pilot Study
    Yixiu Wang, Xiaoming Chen, Menghuan Wang, Yingying Pan, Shiyi Li, Mengfei He, Feng Lin, Zhongli Jiang, Zhiyong Zhao
    Neural Plasticity.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Cancer Pain Management in Nonbrain Malignancy: A Meta-Analysis
    Yung-Jiun Chien, Chun-Yu Chang, Meng-Yu Wu, Yung-Chen Chien, Hsin-Chi Wu, Yi-Shiung Horng, Saskia F. A. Duijts
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Relieving Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
    Ji-Soo Baik, Jung-Hyun Yang, Sung-Hwa Ko, So-Jung Lee, Yong-Il Shin
    Life.2023; 13(5): 1172.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Lower Limb Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation
    Qian Duan, Wenying Liu, Jinhui Yang, Ben Huang, Jie Shen, Laura Baroncelli
    Neural Plasticity.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • A blended neurostimulation protocol to delineate cortico-muscular and spino-muscular dynamics following neuroplastic adaptation
    Filip Stefanovic, Julian A. Martinez, Ghazala T. Saleem, Sue Ann Sisto, Michael T. Miller, Yaa A. Achampong, Albert H. Titus
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for the Improvement of Upper Limb Motor Function and Performance in Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Ishtiaq Ahmed, Rustem Mustafaoglu, Simone Rossi, Fatih A. Cavdar, Seth Kwame Agyenkwa, Marco Y.C. Pang, Sofia Straudi
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2023; 104(10): 1683.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper-limb motor recovery in subacute ischemic stroke without cortical involvement: a protocol paper for a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled tria
    Hee-Mun Cho, Seungwoo Cha, Min Kyun Sohn, Sungju Jee, Won Kee Chang, Won-Seok Kim, Nam-Jong Paik
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation associated mirror therapy for upper-limb rehabilitation after stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Qingqing Zhao, Hong Li, Yu Liu, Haonan Mei, Liying Guo, Xianying Liu, Xiaolin Tao, Jiang Ma
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial-Direct-Current-Stimulation Accelerates Motor Recovery After Cortical Infarction in Mice: The Interplay of Structural Cellular Responses and Functional Recovery
    Helene Luise Walter, Anton Pikhovych, Heike Endepols, Steffen Rotthues, Johannes Bärmann, Heiko Backes, Mathias Hoehn, Dirk Wiedermann, Bernd Neumaier, Gereon Rudolf Fink, Maria Adele Rueger, Michael Schroeter
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2022; 36(10-11): 701.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neurostimulations for Upper Extremity Function Recovery after Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Tao Xue, Zeya Yan, Jiahao Meng, Wei Wang, Shujun Chen, Xin Wu, Feng Gu, Xinyu Tao, Wenxue Wu, Zhouqing Chen, Yutong Bai, Zhong Wang, Jianguo Zhang
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(20): 6162.     CrossRef
  • 5,532 View
  • 199 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Recovery in Central Cord Syndrome Patients
Hana Choi, Kyung Cheon Seo, Tae Uk Kim, Seong Jae Lee, Jung Keun Hyun
Ann Rehabil Med 2019;43(1):62-73.   Published online February 28, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.62
Objective
To investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on neurological and functional recovery in patients with central cord syndrome (CCS) involving the upper extremities between the treated and non-treated sides of the treated group and whether the outcomes are comparable to that of the untreated control group.
Methods
Nineteen CCS patients were treated with high-frequency (20 Hz) rTMS over the motor cortex for 5 days. The stimulation side was randomly selected, and all the subjects received conventional occupational therapy during the rTMS-treatment period. Twenty CCS patients who did not receive rTMS were considered as controls. Clinical assessments, including those by the International Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test, and the O'Connor Finger Dexterity Test were performed initially and followed up for 1 month after rTMS treatment or 5 weeks after initial assessments.
Results
The motor scores for upper extremities were increased and the number of improved cases was greater for the treated side in rTMS-treated patients than for the non-treated side in rTMS-treated patients or controls. The improved cases for writing time and score measured on the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test were also significantly greater in number on the rTMS-treated side compared with the non-treated side and controls. There were no adverse effects during rTMS therapy or the follow-up period.
Conclusion
The results of the application of high-frequency rTMS treatment to CCS patients suggest that rTMS can enhance the motor recovery and functional fine motor task performance of the upper extremities in such individuals.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on gait and limb balance function in patients with lower limb dysfunction post-cerebral infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De-mei Jia, Xuan Li, Bin-cang Zhang, Bing-ran Zhang, Qiu-juan Zhang, Ming-wei Liu, Lin-ming Zhang
    BMC Neurology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stimulation Parameters Used During Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery and Corticospinal Excitability Modulation in SCI: A Scoping Review
    Nabila Brihmat, Didier Allexandre, Soha Saleh, Jian Zhong, Guang H. Yue, Gail F. Forrest
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • rTMS induces analgesia and modulates neuroinflammation and neuroplasticity in neuropathic pain model rats
    Roberta Ströher Toledo, Dirson João Stein, Paulo Roberto Stefani Sanches, Lisiane Santos da Silva, Helouise Richardt Medeiros, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo, Iraci L.S. Torres
    Brain Research.2021; 1762: 147427.     CrossRef
  • Research on Assisting Clinicians to Operate rTMS Precisely Based on the Coil Magnetic Field Spatial Distribution With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Navigation
    Shijun Li, Yi Wang, ShengJie Li, Yanwei Lv, Lei Zhang, Jun Zou, Lin Ma
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Combined Upper Limb Robotic Therapy in Patients With Tetraplegic Spinal Cord Injury
    Joo Hwan Jung, Hye Jin Lee, Duk Youn Cho, Jung-Eun Lim, Bum Suk Lee, Seung Hyun Kwon, Hae Young Kim, Su Jeong Lee
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2019; 43(4): 445.     CrossRef
  • 9,914 View
  • 205 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Transabdominal Functional Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Constipation in Brain-Injured Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Young-Cheol Yun, Yong-Soon Yoon, Eun-Sil Kim, Young-Jae Lee, Jin-Gyeong Lee, Won-Jae Jo, Kwang Jae Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2019;43(1):19-26.   Published online February 28, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2019.43.1.19
Objective
To investigate the effects of the transabdominal functional magnetic stimulation (A-FMS) for constipation in stroke or brain-injured patients.
Methods
Twenty-four brain-injured patients (11 males and 13 females; median age, 65 years; 22 cases of stroke and 2 cases of traumatic brain injury) with constipation, who were admitted to the rehabilitation department, were enrolled and randomly divided into magnetic stimulation (MS) group and sham stimulation (Sham) group. Several parameters related with constipation such as total and segmental colon transit time (CTT), defecation frequency, and Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) before and after 2 weeks of A-FMS (5 times per week, total 10 times of A-FMS) were evaluated. The Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) was also evaluated.
Results
A significant decrease in segmental CTT in the left colon (-8.2±3.9 vs. 4.1±2.5 hours; p<0.05 by paired sample t-test) and a significant increase in the frequency of defecation (1.5±0.2 vs 0.7±0.3; p<0.05 by paired sample t-test) were observed in the MS group compared with the Sham group. Stool hardness became significantly softer in the MS group compared with the Sham group (2.3–3.5 in the MS and 2.6–3.1 in the Sham; p<0.05 by chi-square test) as evaluated by BSS. No difference in the K-MBI was observed between the two groups.
Conclusion
The present study suggests that A-FMS can be an additional therapeutic tool for managing constipation in brain-injured patients with abnormal bowel movement, defecation frequency, and stool hardness.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Effect of Magnetic Therapy on Postoperative Urinary Retention in Patients Undergoing Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Ghasem Zarei, Sorour Mosleh, Soraya Zare, Mohammad Sadegh Abotalebi
    Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research.2024; 29(4): 417.     CrossRef
  • Conservative, physical and surgical interventions for managing faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases
    Claire L Todd, Eugenie E Johnson, Fiona Stewart, Sheila A Wallace, Andrew Bryant, Sue Woodward, Christine Norton
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High-Frequency Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation at the Sacrum Alleviates Chronic Constipation in Parkinson’s Patients
    Mei Huang, Bofang Zheng, Wanfei Zhou, Huaili Fu, Xinrun Chen, Heyong Wu, Jianguo Zhang, Xianju Zhou
    Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology.2023; 26(3): 235.     CrossRef
  • Bowel dysfunctions after acquired brain injury: a scoping review
    Matteo Zandalasini, Laura Pelizzari, Gianluca Ciardi, Donatella Giraudo, Massimo Guasconi, Stefano Paravati, Gianfranco Lamberti, Antonio Frizziero
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effect of the therapy of “combination 3 methods progression” in patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction (constipated type)
    Qing Li, Yin-Li Shen, Yun-Lan Jiang, Dong-Shuang Li, Song Jin
    Medicine.2021; 100(7): e24662.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of functional magnetic stimulation in improving upper extremity function after stroke: a randomized, single-blind, controlled study
    Xiaowei Chen, Xuncan Liu, Yinxing Cui, Guoxing Xu, Lu Liu, Xueru Zhang, Kun Jiang, Zhenlan Li
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dose–response of rPMS for upper Limb hemiparesis after stroke
    Shoji Kinoshita, Kumi Ikeda, Shinji Yasuno, Sho Takahashi, Naoki Yamada, Yumi Okuyama, Nobuyuki Sasaki, Takuya Hada, Chiaki Kuriyama, Shin Suzuki, Midori Hama, Naoto Ozaki, Shu Watanabe, Masahiro Abo
    Medicine.2020; 99(24): e20752.     CrossRef
  • 7,921 View
  • 163 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Effect of Combined Therapy of Robot and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Hemispatial Neglect in Stroke Patients
Sang Beom Kim, Kyeong Woo Lee, Jong Hwa Lee, Sook Joung Lee, Jin Gee Park, Joung Bok Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(6):788-797.   Published online December 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.6.788
Objective
To investigate the effect of upper limb rehabilitation combining robot with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients.
Methods
Patients who had hemispatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke were randomly divided into rTMS only group, robot only group, and combined group. All groups received conventional neglect therapy and additional treatment for each group. rTMS group received rTMS therapy. Robot group received robot therapy, while combined group received both therapies. The effect of therapy was assessed with Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-3 (MVPT-3), line bisection test, star cancellation test, Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI). These measurements were evaluated before and after treatment.
Results
For each group, 10 patients were recruited. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or initial values among the three groups. Two weeks after the therapy, all groups showed significant improvement in MVPT-3, line bisection test, star cancellation test, CBS, MMSE, and K-MBI. However, changes in measurements showed no significant differences among groups.
Conclusion
Treatment effect of the combined therapy of robotic therapy and low-frequency rTMS therapy for hemispatial neglect was not statistically different from that of each single treatment. Results of this study did not prove the superiority of any of the three treatments. Further study with large number of patients is needed to evaluate the superiority of these treatments.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Anas R. Alashram
    Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2025; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke cognitive impairment: a network meta-analysis
    Mengyu Yan, Jiarui Liu, Yiming Guo, Qingtao Hou, Jiaqi Song, Xiaoqin Wang, Weihua Yu, Yang Lü
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of rTMS in treating functional impairment in post-stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaodong Duan, Delong Huang, Haoshu Zhong, Junhao Wu, Zhihan Xiao, Peng Yang, Yuanhang Han, Haodong Jiang, Ping Zhou, Xi Liu
    Neurological Sciences.2024; 45(8): 3887.     CrossRef
  • Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation have a beneficial effect on improving unilateral spatial neglect caused by stroke? A meta-analysis
    Ruixuan Lin, Jack Jiaqi Zhang, Lingling Zhong, Sofina S. Y. Chan, Patrick W. H. Kwong, Lukas Lorentz, Usman Jawed Shaikh, Tommy L. H. Lam, David M. A. Mehler, Kenneth N. K. Fong
    Journal of Neurology.2024; 271(10): 6494.     CrossRef
  • A Review on Combined Strategy of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation and Robotic Therapy
    Leiyu Zhang, Yawei Chang, Feiran Zhang, Jianfeng Li
    Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in treatment of spatial neglect: networks and neuropsychology
    Alex R. Carter, A.M. Barrett
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2023; 23(7): 587.     CrossRef
  • Current trends in the treatment of patients with post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: a scoping review
    Chuka Umeonwuka, Ronel Roos, Veronica Ntsiea
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2022; 44(11): 2158.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Robot-Assisted Training on Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Rodrigo Bazan, Bruno Henrique de Souza Fonseca, Jessica Mariana de Aquino Miranda, Hélio Rubens de Carvalho Nunes, Silméia Garcia Zanati Bazan, Gustavo José Luvizutto
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2022; 36(8): 545.     CrossRef
  • A Complex Intervention Integrating Prism Adaptation and Neck Vibration for Unilateral Neglect in Patients of Chronic Stroke: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Hyun-Se Choi, Bo-Min Lee
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(20): 13479.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review and network meta-analysis of effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on post-stroke cognitive impairment
    Yueying Wang, Ning Xu, Runfang Wang, Weiyi Zai
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neglect syndrome in post-stroke conditions: assessment and treatment (scoping review)
    Ibolya Tavaszi, Alexandra Szilvia Nagy, Gabor Szabo, Gabor Fazekas
    International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.2021; 44(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • The effects of robot-assisted left-hand training on hemispatial neglect in older patients with chronic stroke
    Jin-Hyuck Park
    Medicine.2021; 100(9): e24781.     CrossRef
  • Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury
    Verity Longley, Christine Hazelton, Calvin Heal, Alex Pollock, Kate Woodward-Nutt, Claire Mitchell, Gorana Pobric, Andy Vail, Audrey Bowen
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted therapy for arm recovery for stroke patients: state of the art and clinical implication
    Giovanni Morone, Ilaria Cocchi, Stefano Paolucci, Marco Iosa
    Expert Review of Medical Devices.2020; 17(3): 223.     CrossRef
  • 8,362 View
  • 200 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref
Effects of Hand Training During the Aftereffect Period of Low-Frequency rTMS in Subacute Stroke Patients
Joo Won Park, Sang Beom Kim, Kyeong Woo Lee, Jong Hwa Lee, Jin Gee Park, Sook Joung Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(4):521-527.   Published online August 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.521
Objective
To investigate the effects of hand training using low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) within the aftereffect period on hand function in patients with subacute stroke.
Methods
The subacute stroke patients with hand weaknesses were divided randomly into two groups. Patients in the intervention group underwent hand training within the aftereffect period, that is, immediately after receiving low-frequency rTMS treatment. Patients in the control group underwent hand training 2 hours after the lowfrequency rTMS treatment. A manual function test (MFT) for ‘grasp and pinch’ and ‘hand activities’; a manual muscle test (MMT) for ‘grasp’, ‘release’, and ‘abductor pollicis brevis (APB)’; and the Modified Ashworth Scale for finger flexion were performed and measured before and immediately after combined therapy as well as 2 weeks after combined therapy.
Results
Thirty-two patients with hand weakness were enrolled in this study. The intervention group patients showed more improvements in grasp MMT and MMT APB tested immediately after combined therapy. However, the changes in all measurements were not significantly different between the two groups 2 weeks after the combined therapy. In both groups, hand functions improved significantly immediately after combined therapy and 2 weeks after combined therapy.
Conclusion
Hand training immediately after low-frequency rTMS showed more rapid improvement in the motor power of hands than hand training conducted 2 hours after low-frequency rTMS. Our results suggest that conducting hand training immediately after low-frequency rTMS could be an improved useful therapeutic option in subacute stroke patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Combined effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical exercise on cortical plasticity
    Ya-Wen Yang, Wen-Xiu Pan, Qing Xie
    Neural Regeneration Research.2020; 15(11): 1986.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Combined Therapy of Robot and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Hemispatial Neglect in Stroke Patients
    Sang Beom Kim, Kyeong Woo Lee, Jong Hwa Lee, Sook Joung Lee, Jin Gee Park, Joung Bok Lee
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(6): 788.     CrossRef
  • 6,432 View
  • 141 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
Changes in Intracortical Excitability of Affected and Unaffected Hemispheres After Stroke Evaluated by Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Ho Youn Seo, Gi-Wook Kim, Yu Hui Won, Sung-Hee Park, Jeong-Hwan Seo, Myoung-Hwan Ko
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(4):495-501.   Published online August 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.495
Objective
To assess the altered pattern of intracortical excitability of the affected and unaffected hemispheres in stroke patients using paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Methods
We evaluated intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) in both hemispheres at acute and subacute stages of 103 stroke patients using paired-pulse TMS. The patients were divided into two groups: mild-to-moderate patients whose motor evoked potential (MEP) was recorded in the affected hemisphere; and severe patients whose MEP was not recorded in the affected hemisphere.
Results
In mild-to-moderate patients, the value of ICI in the affected hemisphere was increased from 70.3% to 77.9% and the value of ICI in the unaffected hemisphere was decreased from 74.8% to 70.3% with eventual progression in acute to subacute stages of stroke. In severe patients, the value of ICI in the unaffected hemisphere was increased from 65.4% to 75.6%. The changes in ICF were not significantly different in this study.
Conclusion
We conclude that the unaffected hemisphere was more disinhibited than the affected hemisphere in acute phase of mild-to-moderate stroke, and the affected hemisphere was more disinhibited in the subacute stage. The unaffected hemisphere was inhibited in severe cases in acute-to-subacute phases of stroke. This finding facilitates appropriate neuromodulation of acute-to-subacute phases in mild-to-severe stroke patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Primed low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation rebalances cortical excitatory-inhibitory circuitry and improves functional outcomes in infantile cerebral palsy patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Aliya Mufti, Suman Jain, Kanwal Preet Kochhar, Sheffali Gulati, Sanjay Wadhwa, Kapil Sikka, Rohit Saxena, Md Iqbal Alam
    Journal of Neurorestoratology.2025; 13(1): 100169.     CrossRef
  • Altered Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Edward P. Washabaugh, Sierra A. Foley, Emily G. Czopek, Chandramouli Krishnan
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2024; 38(11-12): 845.     CrossRef
  • Corticomotor excitability is altered in central neuropathic pain compared with non-neuropathic pain or pain-free patients
    Luciana Mendonça Barbosa, Fernanda Valerio, Valquíria Aparecida da Silva, Antônia Lilian de Lima Rodrigues, Ricardo Galhardoni, Lin Tchia Yeng, Jefferson Rosi Junior, Adriana Bastos Conforto, Leandro Tavares Lucato, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Daniel Ciampi
    Neurophysiologie Clinique.2023; 53(3): 102845.     CrossRef
  • Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Stroke Recovery: A Novel Deep Brain Stimulation Approach for Neurorehabilitation?
    Mahmut Martin Yüksel, Shiqi Sun, Charles Latchoumane, Jocelyne Bloch, Gregoire Courtine, Estelle Emeline Raffin, Friedhelm Christoph Hummel
    IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology.2023; 4: 300.     CrossRef
  • Central Post-Stroke Pain: An Integrative Review of Somatotopic Damage, Clinical Symptoms, and Neurophysiological Measures
    Daniel Fernando Arias Betancur, Maria da Graça Lopes Tarragó, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo
    Frontiers in Neurology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Motor excitability in bilateral moyamoya vasculopathy and the impact of revascularization
    Gueliz Acker, Davide Giampiccolo, Kerstin Rubarth, Robert Mertens, Anna Zdunczyk, Juliane Hardt, Daniel Jussen, Heike Schneider, Tizian Rosenstock, Vera Mueller, Thomas Picht, Peter Vajkoczy
    Neurosurgical Focus.2021; 51(3): E7.     CrossRef
  • Nabiximols plus robotic assisted gait training in improving motor performances in people with Multiple Sclerosis.
    Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Margherita Russo, Antonino Naro, Rossella Ciurleo, Giangaetano D'Aleo, Carmela Rifici, Tina Balletta, Cristian La Via, Massimo Destro, Placido Bramanti, Edoardo Sessa
    Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders.2020; 43: 102177.     CrossRef
  • The balance recovery bimodal model in stroke patients between evidence and speculation: Do recent studies support it?
    Giovanni Di Pino, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(10): 2488.     CrossRef
  • Promotion of Poststroke Motor-Function Recovery with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation by Regulating the Interhemispheric Imbalance
    Xiaoxia Yuan, Yuan Yang, Na Cao, Changhao Jiang
    Brain Sciences.2020; 10(9): 648.     CrossRef
  • Does hand robotic rehabilitation improve motor function by rebalancing interhemispheric connectivity after chronic stroke? Encouraging data from a randomised-clinical-trial
    Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Maria Accorinti, Bruno Porcari, Luigi Carioti, Laura Ciatto, Luana Billeri, Veronica Agata Andronaco, Franco Galletti, Serena Filoni, Antonino Naro
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2019; 130(5): 767.     CrossRef
  • Association of Lesion Location With Long-Term Recovery in Post-stroke Aphasia and Language Deficits
    Bomi Sul, Kyoung Bo Lee, Bo Young Hong, Joon Sung Kim, Jaewon Kim, Woo Seop Hwang, Seong Hoon Lim
    Frontiers in Neurology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6,659 View
  • 163 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 11 Crossref
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Acute Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study
Young-Ho Lim, Ji Min Song, Eun-Hi Choi, Jang Woo Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(2):229-238.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.2.229
Objective

To investigate the effects of real repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) treatment compared to sham rPMS treatment on pain reduction and functional recovery of patients with acute low back pain.

Methods

A total of 26 patients with acute low back pain were randomly allocated to the real rPMS group and the sham rPMS group. Subjects were then administered a total of 10 treatment sessions. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was assessed before and after each session. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were employed to assess functional recovery at baseline and after sessions 5 and 10.

Results

Real rPMS treatment showed significant pain reduction immediately after each session. Sustained and significant pain relief was observed after administering only one session in the real rPMS group. Significant functional improvement was observed in the real rPMS group compared to that in the sham rPMS group after sessions 5 and 10 based on ODI and after session 5 based on RMDQ.

Conclusion

Real rPMS treatment has immediate effect on pain reduction and sustained effect on pain relief for patients with acute low back pain compared to sham rPMS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and safety of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy during early postoperative rehabilitation period following microdiscectomy
    V. N. Blokhina
    Journal of Medical Rehabilitation.2025; 2(3): 277.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of repeated peripheral magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Defu Liao, Ziyan He, Shichang Yan, Qipei Ji, Yuanlin Li, Yuyuan Tu, Zihao Zhou, Shuangchun Ai
    Frontiers in Neurology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Integrating Ultrasound-Guided Injections and Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation in Chronic Myofascial/Lumbar Pain
    Wei-Ting Wu, Ke-Vin Chang, Kamal Mezian, Vincenzo Ricci, Levent Özçakar
    Life.2025; 15(4): 563.     CrossRef
  • Spinal Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Chronic Back Pain: A Feasibility Study In Veterans
    Asrat Tesfa, Hayk Petrosyan, Magda Fahmy, Thomas Sexton, Victor Arvanian
    Pain Management.2024; 14(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • Đánh giá hiệu quả điều trị đau cột sống bằng kích thích từ trường ngoại biên lặp lại tại Bệnh viện Quân y 175
    Minh Đăng Lý, Ngọc Duy Võ, Trọng Nghĩa Hoàng Tiến
    Tạp chí thần kinh học Việt Nam.2024; (38): 13.     CrossRef
  • Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Dynamic and Static Postural Control in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Takyu Yan, Meizhen Liang, Jiahui Peng, Qiuhua Yu, Yan Li, Jiajia Yang, Siyun Zhang, Chuhuai Wang
    Pain and Therapy.2024; 13(4): 953.     CrossRef
  • Non-Surgical Electromagnetic and Thermal Therapies for Chronic Lower Back Pain
    Bruno Kehrwald-Balsimelli, Larissa Abussafi Miranda , Aryani Magalhães Pinheiro de Almeida, Filipe Ribeiro Peixoto , Samuel de Souza Bezerra, Diego Henrique Campaneruti , Julia Medeiros Amaral, André Luiz Siqueira da Silva , Raianny Christina Niesing Rach
    Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental.2024; 18(2): e07503.     CrossRef
  • Pioneering Non-Invasive Neuromodulatory Techniques for Amelioration of Radiculopathic Pain: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials
    Sidharth Bansal, Simranjeet Kaur, Parveen Kumar, Bimal K. Agrawal, Nidhi Sharma
    Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2024; 36(4): 65.     CrossRef
  • Integrating Ultrasound-Guided Multifidus Injections with Repeated Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation for Low Back Pain: A Feasibility Study
    Wei-Ting Wu, Ke-Vin Chang, Levent Özçakar
    Journal of Pain Research.2024; Volume 17: 2873.     CrossRef
  • Ultrasound-guided repetitive pulsed peripheral magnetic stimulation provides pain relief in refractory glossopharyngeal neuralgia: A case report
    James S. Khan, Duncan Westwood, Massieh Moayedi
    Canadian Journal of Pain.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yingxiu Diao, Jiaxin Pan, Yuhua Xie, Manxia Liao, Dongyu Wu, Hao Liu, Linrong Liao
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2023; 104(9): 1526.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Application of High Frequency Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Magnetic Stimulation for Pain and Development of a Stimulator Specialized for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
    Shin-Ichi Izumi
    The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 60(3): 210.     CrossRef
  • Response to Letter to the Editor on “Effect of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Low Back Pain: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials”
    Yingxiu Diao, Jiaxin Pan, Yuhua Xie, Manxia Liao, Dongyu Wu, Hao Liu, Linrong Liao
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2023; 104(12): 2174.     CrossRef
  • Cervical repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation relieves idiopathic persistent hiccups: A preliminary study of case report
    Weisen Cai, Guangqing Xu, Zongguang Tian, Feng Xiong, Jiajing Yang, Tong Wang
    Medicine.2022; 101(43): e31324.     CrossRef
  • Application of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation for recovery of motor function after stroke based on neuromodulation
    Jia-Xin Pan, Yan-Bing Jia, Hao Liu
    Brain Network and Modulation.2022; 1(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Prophylaxe Beckenboden
    S. Kickmaier, D. Hestmann, R. Krapf
    Journal für Urologie und Urogynäkologie/Österreich.2021; 28(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • The effect of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on insomnia improving and pain in patients with chronic low back pain
    Jumraini Tammasse, Natalia Tening Lawing, Abdul Muis, Muhammad Iqbal Basri, Andi Kurnia Bintang
    Medicina Clínica Práctica.2021; 4: 100211.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of anxiety and pain in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy at the early stage of rehabilitation with various rehabilitation programs after microdiscectomy
    V. N. Blokhina, E. G. Melikyan
    Almanac of Clinical Medicine.2020; 48(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of functional magnetic stimulation in improving upper extremity function after stroke: a randomized, single-blind, controlled study
    Xiaowei Chen, Xuncan Liu, Yinxing Cui, Guoxing Xu, Lu Liu, Xueru Zhang, Kun Jiang, Zhenlan Li
    Journal of International Medical Research.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and Clinical Application of a High-frequency Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulator
    Shin-ichi Izumi
    The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2020; 57(5): 431.     CrossRef
  • The experience with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation in subjects with lumbosacral radiculopathy
    V. N. Blokhina, M. M. Kopachka, E. M. Troshina, D. S. Kanshin, S. G. Nikolaev
    Neuromuscular Diseases.2020; 10(2): 31.     CrossRef
  • 7,461 View
  • 300 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Over Vastus Lateralis in Patients After Hip Replacement Surgery
Junghyun Baek, Nohkyoung Park, Bongju Lee, Sungju Jee, Shinseung Yang, Sangkuk Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2018;42(1):67-75.   Published online February 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.1.67
Objective

To investigate the effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on the vastus lateralis (VL) in the early stage after hip replacement surgery.

Methods

Twenty-two patients who underwent hip replacement after proximal femur fracture were included in this study. After hip surgery, the experimental group was applied with 15 sessions of 10 Hz rPMS over the VL 5 times per week for 3 weeks, while the control group took sham stimulation. All patients were also given conventional physical therapy. The VL strength was measured with the root mean square (RMS) value of the VL with surface electromyography technique. The ratio of RMS values between fractured and unfractured legs and tandem stand test were used to assess standing balance. Usual gait speed was measured to evaluate gait function. Pain in two groups was assessed with visual analog scale (VAS).

Results

Both RMS value of the VL and the ratio of RMS values after rPMS were significantly improved (p<0.05). Also, tandem standing time and usual gait speed in rPMS group were dramatically increased (p<0.05). However, no significant difference in VAS was found between the two groups after 3 weeks.

Conclusion

rPMS on the VL improved muscle strength, standing balance and gait function in the early stage after hip surgery. Therefore, rPMS could be applied to patients who cannot take electrical stimulation due to pain and an unhealed wound.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Effect of Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Mobility and Morphology in Cerebral Palsy with Spastic Diplegia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kultida Klarod, Oranat Sukkho, Sirirat Kiatkulanusorn, Phurichaya Werasirirat, Chananwan Wutthithanaphokhin, Danguole Satkunskienė, Siraya Lueang-On, Pornpimol Muanjai, Nongnuch Luangpon
    Life.2025; 15(3): 416.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of mobility recovery after hip fracture: a scoping review of randomized controlled studies
    K. Taraldsen, A. Polhemus, M. Engdal, C.-P. Jansen, C. Becker, N. Brenner, H. Blain, L.G. Johnsen, B. Vereijken
    Osteoporosis International.2024; 35(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Measurement of Knee Extensor Torque During Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation: Comparison of the Forces Induced by Different Stimulators
    Masanori Kamiue, Akio Tsubahara, Tomotaka Ito, Yasuhiro Koike
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2024; 48(3): 203.     CrossRef
  • Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on a patient with severe lower limb muscle weakness due to coronavirus disease-2019
    Masanori Kamiue, Akio Tsubahara, Tomotaka Ito
    Japanese Journal of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Science.2024; 15: 27.     CrossRef
  • [Erratum] Brain Imaging and neurostimulation in health and disorders: status report
    Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Adenauer Girardi Casali, Adriana Leico Oda, Alexandre Hideki Okano, Alexandre Moreira, Ana Lúcia Yaeko da Silva Santos, Ana Mércia Fernandes, Ana Paula Fontana, André Brunoni, André Fonseca, Artur Padão Gosling, Catarina Costa Bof
    Brain Imaging and Stimulation.2024; 3: e5952.     CrossRef
  • Effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation on knee joint extensor strength in older persons receiving day services
    Masanori Kamiue, Akio Tsubahara, Tomotaka Ito, Yasuhiro Koike
    Japanese Journal of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Science.2024; 15: 49.     CrossRef
  • Magnetic and electrical stimulation in complex rehabilitation for myelodysplasia in children: a clinical randomized study
    Anna M. Nekrasova, Rezeda A. Bodrova, Darya L. Nefedeva
    Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine.2024; 23(5): 87.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of Functional Repetitive Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation (frNMS) Targeting the Gluteal Muscle in a Child with Cerebral Palsy: A Case Report
    Michaela V. Bonfert, Anne Meuche, Giada Urban, Corinna Börner, Ute Breuer, Birgit Warken, Christine Wimmer, Henriette Strattner, Tessa Müller, Matthias Hösl, Florian Heinen, Steffen Berweck, Sebastian A. Schröder
    Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics.2023; 43(3): 338.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Application of High Frequency Repetitive Peripheral Nerve Magnetic Stimulation for Pain and Development of a Stimulator Specialized for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
    Shin-Ichi Izumi
    The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 60(3): 210.     CrossRef
  • Addressing gross motor function by functional repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation targeting to the gluteal muscles in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy: benefits of functional repetitive neuromuscular magnetic stimulation targeting
    Leonie Grosse, Malina A. Späh, Corinna Börner, Julian F. Schnabel, Anne C. Meuche, Barbara Parzefall, Ute Breuer, Birgit Warken, Alexandra Sitzberger, Matthias Hösl, Florian Heinen, Steffen Berweck, Sebastian A. Schröder, Michaela V. Bonfert
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Functional Repetitive Neuromuscular Magnetic Stimulation (frNMS) Targeting the Tibialis Anterior Muscle in Children with Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome: A Feasibility Study
    Leonie Grosse, Anne C. Meuche, Barbara Parzefall, Corinna Börner, Julian F. Schnabel, Malina A. Späh, Pia Klug, Nico Sollmann, Luisa Klich, Matthias Hösl, Florian Heinen, Steffen Berweck, Sebastian A. Schröder, Michaela V. Bonfert
    Children.2023; 10(10): 1584.     CrossRef
  • Factors involved in higher knee extension torque induced by repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation
    Masanori KAMIUE∗, Tomotaka ITO∗, Akio TSUBAHARA∗, Tomoya KISHIMOTO∗
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation and Its Clinical Application
    Hitoshi Kagaya
    The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2022; 59(1): 68.     CrossRef
  • Prophylaxe Beckenboden
    S. Kickmaier, D. Hestmann, R. Krapf
    Journal für Urologie und Urogynäkologie/Österreich.2021; 28(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Modulation of the Corticomotor Excitability by Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on the Median Nerve in Healthy Subjects
    Yanbing Jia, Xiaoyan Liu, Jing Wei, Duo Li, Chun Wang, Xueqiang Wang, Hao Liu
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Measurement of maximal muscle contraction force induced by high-frequency magnetic stimulation: a preliminary study on the identification of the optimal stimulation site
    Akio Tsubahara, Masanori Kamiue, Tomotaka Ito, Tomoya Kishimoto, Chiharu Kurozumi
    Japanese Journal of Comprehensive Rehabilitation Science.2021; 12: 27.     CrossRef
  • Development and Clinical Application of a High-frequency Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulator
    Shin-ichi Izumi
    The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2020; 57(5): 431.     CrossRef
  • 10,261 View
  • 256 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref

Case Report

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome: A Case Report
So Won Chung, Shin Who Park, Young Jae Seo, Jae-Hyung Kim, Chan Ho Lee, Jong Youb Lim
Ann Rehabil Med 2017;41(1):162-166.   Published online February 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.1.162

A 57-year-old man who was diagnosed with Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome showed severe impairment of cognitive function and a craving for alcohol, even after sufficient supplementation with thiamine. After completing 10 sessions of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at 100% of the resting motor threshold over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dramatic improvement in cognitive function and a reduction in craving for alcohol were noted. This is the first case report of the efficacy of a high-frequency rTMS in the treatment of Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Managing substance use in patients receiving therapeutic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A scoping review
    Victor M. Tang, Christine Ibrahim, Terri Rodak, Rachel Goud, Daniel M. Blumberger, Daphne Voineskos, Bernard Le Foll
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2023; 155: 105477.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for Alcohol Use Disorders: State of the Art and Future Directions
    Noah S. Philip, David O. Sorensen, Daniel M. McCalley, Colleen A. Hanlon
    Neurotherapeutics.2020; 17(1): 116.     CrossRef
  • Effects of neuromodulation on cognitive performance in individuals exhibiting addictive behaviors: A systematic review
    Katherine R. Naish, Lana Vedelago, James MacKillop, Michael Amlung
    Drug and Alcohol Dependence.2018; 192: 338.     CrossRef
  • 5,634 View
  • 83 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Original Articles

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over Trunk Motor Spot on Balance Function in Stroke Patients
Cheol-Min Choi, Jin-Hong Kim, June-Kyung Lee, Bong-Yeon Lee, Hoi-Sung Kee, Kwang-Ik Jung, Seo-Ra Yoon
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(5):826-834.   Published online October 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.826
Correction in: Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(6):1151
Objective

To assess the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on balance function in patients with chronic stroke.

Methods

Thirty participants with chronic stroke were enrolled in this study. High frequency (10 Hz) rTMS was delivered with butterfly-coil on trunk motor spot. Each patient received both real and sham rTMS in a random sequence. The rTMS cycles (real or sham) were composed of 10 sessions each, administered over two weeks, and separated by a 4-week washout period. Balance function was measured by Berg Balance Scale and computerized dynamic posturography to determine the effect of rTMS before and one day after the end of each treatment period, as well as at a 1-month follow-up.

Results

The balance function was significantly improved after high frequency rTMS as compared with that after sham rTMS (p<0.05). There was no serious adverse effect in patients during the treatment period.

Conclusion

In the chronic stroke patients, high frequency rTMS to the trunk motor area seems to be a helpful way to improve balance function without any specific adverse effects. Further studies are needed to identify the underlying mechanism and generate a detailed protocol.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on gait and limb balance function in patients with lower limb dysfunction post-cerebral infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De-mei Jia, Xuan Li, Bin-cang Zhang, Bing-ran Zhang, Qiu-juan Zhang, Ming-wei Liu, Lin-ming Zhang
    BMC Neurology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal timing and neural loci: a scoping review on the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke gait and balance recovery
    Vyoma Parikh, Ann Medley, Yu-Chen Chung, Hui-Ting Goh
    Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2023; 30(1): 84.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Standing Balance and Walking in Older Adults with Age-related Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Jun Zhou, Yan Chen, Trenton Gin, Dapeng Bao, Junhong Zhou, Roger Fielding
    The Journals of Gerontology: Series A.2023; 78(5): 842.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke rehabilitation: insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms of neuroinflammation
    Rongjun Sheng, Changchun Chen, Huan Chen, Peipei Yu
    Frontiers in Immunology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidence of rTMS for Motor or Cognitive Stroke Recovery: Hype or Hope?
    Jeannette Hofmeijer, Florien Ham, Gert Kwakkel
    Stroke.2023; 54(10): 2500.     CrossRef
  • Aquatic Therapy for improving Lower Limbs Function in Post-stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Mahboubeh Ghayour Najafabadi, Ardalan Shariat, Jan Dommerholt, Azadeh Hakakzadeh, Amin Nakhostin-Ansari, Maryam Selk-Ghaffari, Lee Ingle, Joshua A Cleland
    Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2022; 29(7): 473.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for lower extremity motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Yun-Juan Xie, Yi Chen, Hui-Xin Tan, Qi-Fan Guo, BensonWui-Man Lau, Qiang Gao
    Neural Regeneration Research.2021; 16(6): 1168.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Lower-Limb Motor Ability in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review
    Huiliu Fan, Yang Song, Xuanzhen Cen, Peimin Yu, István Bíró, Yaodong Gu
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Functional Balance and Postural Control Improvements in Patients With Stroke After Noninvasive Brain Stimulation: A Meta-analysis
    Nyeonju Kang, Ru Da Lee, Joon Ho Lee, Moon Hyon Hwang
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2020; 101(1): 141.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, André Aleman, Chris Baeken, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Saša R. Filipović, Christian Grefkes, Alkomiet Hasan, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Satu K. Jääskeläinen, Berthold Langguth, Letizia Leocani, Alain Londer
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(2): 474.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing Stroke Recovery Across the Life Span With Noninvasive Neurostimulation
    Sean Dukelow, Adam Kirton
    Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 37(2): 150.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Lower Limb Dysfunction in Patients Poststroke: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Mahboubeh Ghayour-Najafabadi, Amir-Hossein Memari, Lida Hosseini, Ardalan Shariat, Joshua A. Cleland
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2019; 28(12): 104412.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Excitatory Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the P3 Point in Chronic Stroke Patients—Case Reports
    Ronaldo Luis Da Silva, Angela Maria Costa De Souza, Francielly Ferreira Santos, Sueli Toshie Inoue, Johanne Higgins, Victor Frak
    Brain Sciences.2018; 8(5): 78.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Walking and Balance Function after Stroke
    Yi Li, Jingjing Fan, Jingyi Yang, Chengqi He, Shasha Li
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2018; 97(11): 773.     CrossRef
  • An Erratum to Correct Typographical Errors

    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2016; 40(6): 1151.     CrossRef
  • 6,197 View
  • 112 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 15 Crossref
Prediction of Motor Recovery Using Quantitative Parameters of Motor Evoked Potential in Patients With Stroke
Jae Yong Jo, Ahee Lee, Min Su Kim, Eunhee Park, Won Hyuk Chang, Yong-Il Shin, Yun-Hee Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(5):806-815.   Published online October 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.806
Objective

To investigate the clinical significance of quantitative parameters in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEP) which can be adopted to predict functional recovery of the upper limb in stroke patients in the early subacute phase.

Methods

One hundred thirteen patients (61 men, 52 women; mean age 57.8±12.2 years) who suffered faiarst-ever stroke were included in this study. All participants underwent TMS-induced MEP session to assess the corticospinal excitability of both hand motor cortices within 3 weeks after stroke onset. After the resting motor threshold (rMT) was assessed, five sweeps of MEP were performed, and the mean amplitude of the MEP was measured. Latency of MEP, volume of the MEP output curve, recruitment ratios, and intracortical inhibition and facilitation were also measured. Motor function was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMA) within 3 weeks and at 3 months after stroke onset. Correlation analysis was performed between TMS-induced MEP derived measures and FMA scores.

Results

In the MEP response group, rMT and rMT ratio measures within 3 weeks after stroke onset showed a significant negative correlation with the total and upper limb FMA scores at 3 months after stroke (p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that FMA score and rMT ratio, but not rMT within 3 weeks were independent prognostic factors for FMA scores at 3 months after stroke.

Conclusion

These results indicated that the quantitative parameter of TMS-induced MEP, especially rMT ratio in the early subacute phase, could be used as a parameter to predict motor function in patients with stroke.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Stratified predictions of upper limb motor outcomes after stroke
    Chang-hyun Park, Min-Su Kim
    Frontiers in Neurology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of non-invasive cervical spinal cord neuromodulation by trans-spinal electrical stimulation on cortico-muscular descending patterns in upper extremity of chronic stroke
    Jianing Zhang, Maner Wang, Monzurul Alam, Yong-Ping Zheng, Fuqiang Ye, Xiaoling Hu
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation with task-oriented training improves upper extremity function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized clinical trial
    Meng-Huan Wang, Yi-Xiu Wang, Min Xie, Li-Yan Chen, Meng-Fei He, Feng Lin, Zhong-Li Jiang
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A neural signature for brain compensation in stroke with EEG and TMS: Insights from the DEFINE cohort study
    Guilherme JM Lacerda, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Sara Pinto Barbosa, Lucas M Marques, Linamara Battistella, Felipe Fregni
    Neurophysiologie Clinique.2024; 54(5): 102985.     CrossRef
  • Effects of rTMS with Rehabilitation in Poststroke Hemiparetic Patients:
    Moe Fujita, Shuntarou Kawaguchi, Kota Nakamura, Shota Emi, Chikashi Fukaya, Sadahiro Maejima, Takamitsu Yamamoto
    Journal of Nihon University Medical Association.2024; 83(3): 91.     CrossRef
  • The Use of Diagnostic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Predictor of the Functional Outcome in Ischemic Stroke
    I. V. Pogonchenkova, S. S. Petrikov, E. V. Kostenko, A. G. Kashezhev, L. V. Petrova, M. V. Sinkin
    Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care".2024; 13(3): 375.     CrossRef
  • Do kinematic measures, added to clinical measures, better predict upper extremity motor impairments at three months post-stroke?
    Sanjukta Sardesai, John M Solomon, A Sulfikar Ali, Ashokan Arumugam, Elton Dylan Nazareth, Aparna S Pai, Vasudeva Guddattu, Senthil Kumaran D
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2023; 32(8): 107245.     CrossRef
  • Possibilities neuroimaging and neurophysiological research methods to objectify rehabilitation potential in patients with ischemic stroke (analytical review of the literature)
    E. V. Kostenko, A. G. Kashezhev, D.  I. Nakhrapov, I. V. Pogonchenkova
    Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council.2023; (10): 32.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Neurorehabilitation Prognosis Prediction Modeling on Separated Left-Right Hemiplegia Based on Brain-Computer Interfaces Assisted Rehabilitation
    Zhimin Shao, Weibei Dou, Di Ma, Xiaoxue Zhai, Quan Xu, Yu Pan
    IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.2023; 31: 3375.     CrossRef
  • Integrative Approaches in Acute Ischemic Stroke: From Symptom Recognition to Future Innovations
    Vicentiu Mircea Saceleanu, Corneliu Toader, Horia Ples, Razvan-Adrian Covache-Busuioc, Horia Petre Costin, Bogdan-Gabriel Bratu, David-Ioan Dumitrascu, Andrei Bordeianu, Antonio Daniel Corlatescu, Alexandru Vlad Ciurea
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(10): 2617.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation implementation on stroke prognosis
    Stella Karatzetzou, Dimitrios Tsiptsios, Aikaterini Terzoudi, Nikolaos Aggeloussis, Konstantinos Vadikolias
    Neurological Sciences.2022; 43(2): 873.     CrossRef
  • Neuroimaging Techniques as Potential Tools for Assessment of Angiogenesis and Neuroplasticity Processes after Stroke and Their Clinical Implications for Rehabilitation and Stroke Recovery Prognosis
    Lidia Włodarczyk, Natalia Cichon, Joanna Saluk-Bijak, Michal Bijak, Agata Majos, Elzbieta Miller
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(9): 2473.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning Methods Predict Individual Upper-Limb Motor Impairment Following Therapy in Chronic Stroke
    Ceren Tozlu, Dylan Edwards, Aaron Boes, Douglas Labar, K. Zoe Tsagaris, Joshua Silverstein, Heather Pepper Lane, Mert R. Sabuncu, Charles Liu, Amy Kuceyeski
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2020; 34(5): 428.     CrossRef
  • Neurophysiological signatures of hand motor response to dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke: a TMS and MEG study
    I-Ju Kuo, Chih-Wei Tang, Yun-An Tsai, Shuen-Chang Tang, Chun-Jen Lin, Shih-Pin Hsu, Wei-Kuang Liang, Chi-Hung Juan, Catharina Zich, Charlotte J. Stagg, I-Hui Lee
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of Recovery and Outcome Using Motor Evoked Potentials and Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Subacute Stroke
    Jan P. Bembenek, Katarzyna Kurczych, Bożena Kłysz, Agnieszka Cudna, Jakub Antczak, Anna Członkowska
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2020; 29(11): 105202.     CrossRef
  • Clinical improvement with intensive robot-assisted arm training in chronic stroke is unchanged by supplementary tDCS
    Dylan J. Edwards, Mar Cortes, Avrielle Rykman-Peltz, Johanna Chang, Jessica Elder, Gary Thickbroom, Juan J. Mariman, Linda M. Gerber, Clara Oromendia, Hermano I Krebs, Felipe Fregni, Bruce T. Volpe, Alvaro Pascual-Leone
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2019; 37(2): 167.     CrossRef
  • Effects of a tailored strength training program of the upper limb combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in chronic stroke patients: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial
    Marie-Hélène Milot, Stephania Palimeris, Hélène Corriveau, François Tremblay, Marie-Hélène Boudrias
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combining Fluoxetine and rTMS in Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial
    Camila Bonin Pinto, Leon Morales-Quezada, Polyana Vulcano de Toledo Piza, Dian Zeng, Faddi Ghassan Saleh Vélez, Isadora Santos Ferreira, Pedro Henrique Lucena, Dante Duarte, Fernanda Lopes, Mirret M. El-Hagrassy, Luiz Vicente Rizzo, Erica C. Camargo, Davi
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2019; 33(8): 643.     CrossRef
  • Mylohyoid motor evoked potentials can effectively predict persistent dysphagia 3 months poststroke
    K. M. Lee, M. C. Joo, Y. M. Yu, M.‐S. Kim
    Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Restoring Motor Functions After Stroke: Multiple Approaches and Opportunities
    Estelle Raffin, Friedhelm C. Hummel
    The Neuroscientist.2018; 24(4): 400.     CrossRef
  • Does Resting Motor Threshold Predict Motor Hand Recovery After Stroke?
    Charlotte Rosso, Jean-Charles Lamy
    Frontiers in Neurology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors for recovery of motor dysfunction following ischemic stroke
    Yury D. Barkhatov, Albert S. Kadykov
    Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology.2017; 11(1): 80.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors for recovery of motor dysfunction following ischemic stroke
    Yury D. Barkhatov, Albert S. Kadykov
    Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology.2017; 11(1): 80.     CrossRef
  • 7,232 View
  • 132 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
Virtual Reality-Guided Motor Imagery Increases Corticomotor Excitability in Healthy Volunteers and Stroke Patients
Hyungjun Im, Jeunghun Ku, Hyun Jung Kim, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(3):420-431.   Published online June 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.420
Objective

To investigate the effects of using motor imagery (MI) in combination with a virtual reality (VR) program on healthy volunteers and stroke patients. In addition, this study investigated whether task variability within the VR-guided MI programs would influence corticomotor excitability.

Methods

The present study included 15 stroke patients and 15 healthy right-handed volunteers who were presented with four different conditions in a random order: rest, MI alone, VR-guided MI, and VR-guided MI with task variability. The corticomotor excitability of each participant was assessed before, during, and after each condition by measuring changes in the various parameters of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the extensor carpi radials (ECR). Changes in intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were calculated after each condition as percentages of inhibition (%INH) and facilitation (%FAC) at rest.

Results

In both groups, the increases in MEP amplitudes were greater during the two VR-guided MI conditions than during MI alone. Additionally, the reductions in ECR %INH in both groups were greater under the condition involving VR-guided MI with task variability than under that involving VR-guided MI with regular interval.

Conclusion

The corticomotor excitability elicited by MI using a VR avatar representation was greater than that elicited by MI with real body observations. Furthermore, the use of task variability in a VR program may enhance neural regeneration after stroke by reducing ICI. The present findings support the use of various VR programs as well as the concept of combining MI with VR programs for neurorehabilitation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Investigation of the effect of a virtual reality-based imagery training model on muscle activation in athletes
    Fatih Bedir, Deniz Bedir, Hasan Hüseyin Yılmaz, Fatih Ağduman, İlhan Şen, Fatih Kıyıcı, Onur Erdem Korkmaz, Mustafa Onur Yıldız, Erkan Çelik
    Frontiers in Psychology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Covariation of corticospinal excitability and the autonomous nervous system by virtual reality: the roller coaster effect
    Sidney Grosprêtre, Johanna Mathiot, Pauline Eon, Célia Ruffino
    Experimental Brain Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using Humanoid Robots to Obtain High-Quality Motor Imagery Electroencephalogram Data for Better Brain–Computer Interaction
    Shiwei Cheng, Jialing Wang, Jieming Tian, Anjie Zhu, Jing Fan
    IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.2024; 16(2): 706.     CrossRef
  • Virtual Reality Action Observation and Motor Imagery to Enhance Neuroplastic Capacity in the Human Motor Cortex: A Pilot Double-blind, Randomized Cross-over Trial
    Niamh Connelly, Ellana Welsby, Belinda Lange, Brenton Hordacre
    Neuroscience.2024; 549: 92.     CrossRef
  • Editorial: The role of perceptual manipulations of XR in neurological rehabilitation
    Omar Janeh, Keigo Matsumto, Brian Horsak
    Frontiers in Virtual Reality.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Altered Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Edward P. Washabaugh, Sierra A. Foley, Emily G. Czopek, Chandramouli Krishnan
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2024; 38(11-12): 845.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of virtual reality based aerobic exercise on walking endurance, gait kinematics, and function in patients with chronic stroke: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
    Mostafa Fahmy, Eman Samir, Moussa A Sharaf, Nevein MM Gharib, Wael Shendy, Yasser Salem, Hatem Samir, Shereen H. ElSayed
    Fizjoterapia Polska.2024; 24(3): 293.     CrossRef
  • Multimodal Sensing in Stroke Motor Rehabilitation
    Zihe Zhao, Jiaqi Wang, Shengbo Wang, Rui Wang, Yao Lu, Yan Yuan, Junliang Chen, Yanning Dai, Yong Liu, Xiaomeng Wang, Yu Pan, Shuo Gao
    Advanced Sensor Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Environmental enrichment through virtual reality as multisensory stimulation to mitigate the negative effects of prolonged bed rest
    Luka Šlosar, Manca Peskar, Rado Pišot, Uros Marusic
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Motor Imagery and Action Observation: A Case for the Integration of 360°VR
    Riki Lindsay, Aden Kittel, Michael Spittle
    Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Tasks for Post-Stroke Neuro-Rehabilitation of Distal Upper-Extremities: A Case Report
    Debasish Nath, Neha Singh, Megha Saini, Onika Banduni, Nand Kumar, Madakasira Vasantha Padma Srivastava, Shanmugam Senthil Kumaran, Amit Mehndiratta
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 12(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • Virtual reality exposure therapy for neuro-psychomotor recovery in adults: a systematic review
    Luan Freitas, Sabrina de Araújo Val, Francisco Magalhães, Victor Marinho, Carla Ayres, Silmar Teixeira, Victor Hugo Bastos
    Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.2021; 16(6): 646.     CrossRef
  • Prospects for intelligent rehabilitation techniques to treat motor dysfunction
    Cong-Cong Huo, Ya Zheng, Wei-Wei Lu, Teng-Yu Zhang, Dai-Fa Wang, Dong-Sheng Xu, Zeng-Yong Li
    Neural Regeneration Research.2021; 16(2): 264.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Virtual Reality Technology on the Imagery Skills and Performance of Target-Based Sports Athletes
    Deniz Bedir, Süleyman Erim Erhan
    Frontiers in Psychology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mental rotation performance in young adults with and without developmental coordination disorder
    Pamela Barhoun, Ian Fuelscher, Michael Do, Jason L. He, Soukayna Bekkali, Andris Cerins, George J. Youssef, Jacqueline Williams, Peter G. Enticott, Christian Hyde
    Human Movement Science.2021; 77: 102787.     CrossRef
  • Stationary walking performance of post-stroke patients and healthy individuals in real and virtual non-immersive environments
    Ailton Barbosa da Silva Júnior, Beatriz Cristina Medeiros de Lucena, Edson Meneses Silva-Filho, Aline Braga Galvão Silveira Fernandes
    Physiotherapy Practice and Research.2021; 42(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality-based intervention on upper limb function in chronic individuals post-stroke with persistent severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial
    Roberto Llorens, María Antonia Fuentes, Adrián Borrego, Jorge Latorre, Mariano Alcañiz, Carolina Colomer, Enrique Noé
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Virtual Reality Rehabilitation With Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Upper Extremity Function in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study
    Stephanie Hyeyoung Lee, Ji-Yeong Lee, Mi-Young Kim, Yu-Jin Jeon, Suyoung Kim, Joon-Ho Shin
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2018; 99(8): 1447.     CrossRef
  • Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality-Based Paradigm for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Individuals with Restricted Movements. A Feasibility Study with a Chronic Stroke Survivor with Severe Hemiparesis
    María Antonia Fuentes, Adrián Borrego, Jorge Latorre, Carolina Colomer, Mariano Alcañiz, María José Sánchez-Ledesma, Enrique Noé, Roberto Llorens
    Journal of Medical Systems.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Sensorimotor Rhythm Modulation on the Human Flexor Carpi Radialis H-Reflex
    Aiko K. Thompson, Hannah Carruth, Rachel Haywood, N. Jeremy Hill, William A. Sarnacki, Lynn M. McCane, Jonathan R. Wolpaw, Dennis J. McFarland
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mobile Game Induces Active Engagement on Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training in Patients with Stroke
    Jeonghun Ku, Teo Lim, Yong Han, Youn Joo Kang
    Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.2018; 21(8): 504.     CrossRef
  • 8,400 View
  • 123 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
Factors Associated With Upper Extremity Functional Recovery Following Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients
Seo Young Kim, Sung Bong Shin, Seong Jae Lee, Tae Uk Kim, Jung Keun Hyun
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(3):373-382.   Published online June 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.373
Objective

To investigate the factors related to upper extremity functional improvement following inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke patients.

Methods

Forty-one stroke patients received low-frequency rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere according to a standard protocol, in addition to conventional physical and occupational therapy. The rTMS-treated patients were divided into two groups according to their responsiveness to rTMS measured by the self-care score of the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): responded group (n=19) and non-responded group (n=22). Forty-one age-matched stroke patients who had not received rTMS served as controls. Neurological, cognitive and functional assessments were performed before rTMS and 4 weeks after rTMS treatment.

Results

Among the rTMS-treated patients, the responded group was significantly younger than the non-responded group (51.6±10.5 years and 65.5±13.7 years, respectively; p=0.001). Four weeks after rTMS, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, the Brunnstrom recovery stage and upper extremity muscle power scores were significantly more improved in the responded group than in the control group. Besides the self-care score, the mobility score of the K-MBI was also more improved in the responded group than in the non-responded group or controls.

Conclusion

Age is the most obvious factor determining upper extremity functional responsiveness to low-frequency rTMS in stroke patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of lower limb resistance exercise with abdominal draw-in on stroke survivors: A pilot study
    Myunggi Cho, Miyoung Lee, Taewoong Jeong, Yijung Chung
    NeuroRehabilitation.2024; 55(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on rehabilitation of upper limb motor function after stroke
    Qiuwen Gong, Rubing Yan, Han Chen, Xia Duan, Xiaoyu Wu, Xin Zhang, Yi Zhou, Zhou Feng, Ya Chen, Jianbo Liu, Peng Xu, Jing Qiu, Hongliang Liu, Jingming Hou
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Applications of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Upper Limb Motor Performance After Stroke: A Systematic Review
    Afifa Safdar, Marie-Claire Smith, Winston D. Byblow, Cathy M. Stinear
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2023; 37(11-12): 837.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of dance therapy using telerehabilitation on trunk control and balance training in patients with stroke: A pilot study
    So Jung Lee, Eun Chae Lee, Muhyun Kim, Sung-Hwa Ko, Sungchul Huh, Woosik Choi, Yong-Il Shin, Ji Hong Min
    Medicine.2022; 101(35): e30286.     CrossRef
  • Synergistic Effects of Scalp Acupuncture and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cerebral Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Jae-Hong Kim, Jae-Young Han, Min-Keun Song, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jeong-Soon Lee
    Brain Sciences.2020; 10(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • Effects of trunk stabilization training robot on postural control and gait in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial
    Ji Hong Min, Hyun Yong Seong, Sung Hwa Ko, Woo-Ri Jo, Hyun-Ju Sohn, Young Hyun Ahn, Ju Hyun Son, Ho-Yeon Seo, Yeong-Ran Son, Seong-Jun Mun, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Yong-Il Shin
    International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.2020; 43(2): 159.     CrossRef
  • Safety and Efficacy of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol in Elderly Depressed Unipolar and Bipolar Patients
    Véronique Desbeaumes Jodoin, Jean-Philippe Miron, Paul Lespérance
    The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.2019; 27(5): 548.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Enhances Recovery in Central Cord Syndrome Patients
    Hana Choi, Kyung Cheon Seo, Tae Uk Kim, Seong Jae Lee, Jung Keun Hyun
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2019; 43(1): 62.     CrossRef
  • Effects and safety of combined rTMS and action observation for recovery of function in the upper extremities in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Jun Soo Noh, Ji Hoon Lim, Tae Woong Choi, Seung Gul Jang, Sung-Bom Pyun
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2019; 37(3): 219.     CrossRef
  • Changes in Intracortical Excitability of Affected and Unaffected Hemispheres After Stroke Evaluated by Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Ho Youn Seo, Gi-Wook Kim, Yu Hui Won, Sung-Hee Park, Jeong-Hwan Seo, Myoung-Hwan Ko
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(4): 495.     CrossRef
  • Role of the Contralesional vs. Ipsilesional Hemisphere in Stroke Recovery
    Keith C. Dodd, Veena A. Nair, Vivek Prabhakaran
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
    Lan Zhang, Guoqiang Xing, Shiquan Shuai, Zhiwei Guo, Huaping Chen, Morgan A. McClure, Xiaojuan Chen, Qiwen Mu
    Neural Plasticity.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Effects of virtual reality intervention on upper limb motor function and activity of daily living in patients with lesions in different regions of the brain
    Sang-Mi Jung, Won-Ho Choi
    Journal of Physical Therapy Science.2017; 29(12): 2103.     CrossRef
  • 7,379 View
  • 69 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 13 Crossref
Usefulness of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Assess Motor Function in Patients With Parkinsonism
Jaechan Park, Won Hyuk Chang, Jin Whan Cho, Jinyoung Youn, Yun Kwan Kim, Sun Woong Kim, Yun-Hee Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(1):81-87.   Published online February 26, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.81
Objective

To investigate the clinical significance of upper and lower extremity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in patients with parkinsonism.

Methods

Twenty patients (14 men, 6 women; mean age 70.5±9.1 years) suffering from parkinsonism were included in this study. All participants underwent single-pulse TMS session to assess the corticospinal excitability of the upper and lower extremity motor cortex. The resting motor threshold (RMT) was defined as the lowest stimulus intensity able to evoke MEPs of an at least 50 µV peak-to-peak amplitude in 5 of 10 consecutive trials. Five sweeps of MEPs at 120% of the RMT were performed, and the mean amplitude and latency of the MEPs were calculated. Patients were also assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS-III) and the 5-meter Timed Up and Go (5m-TUG) test.

Results

There was a significant positive correlation between the RMTs of MEPs in the upper and lower extremities (r=0.612, p=0.004) and between the amplitude of MEPs in the upper and lower extremities (r=0.579, p=0.007). The RMT of upper extremity MEPs showed a significant negative relationship with the UPDRS-III score (r=–0.516, p=0.020). In addition, RMTs of lower extremity MEPs exhibited a negative relationship with the UPDRS-III score, but the association was not statistically significant (r=–406, p=0.075).

Conclusion

These results indicated that the RMT of MEPs reflect the severity of motor dysfunction in patients with parkinsonism. MEP is a potential quantitative, electrodiagnostic method to assess motor function in patients with parkinsonism.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Motor evoked potentials versus Macrostimulation in predicting the postoperative motor threshold in STN Deep brain stimulation
    Lutz Martin Weise, Ian McCormick, Carlos Restrepo, Ron Hill, Ryan Greene, Murray Hong, Christine Potvin, Peggy Flynn, Susan Morris, Johanna Quick-Weller
    Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.2022; 219: 107332.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation in exploring neurophysiology of cortical circuits and potential clinical implications
    Kaviraja Udupa
    Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology.2021; 64: 244.     CrossRef
  • Neurophysiological markers of network dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases
    Roisin McMackin, Peter Bede, Niall Pender, Orla Hardiman, Bahman Nasseroleslami
    NeuroImage: Clinical.2019; 22: 101706.     CrossRef
  • Measuring network disruption in neurodegenerative diseases: New approaches using signal analysis
    Roisin McMackin, Muthuraman Muthuraman, Sergiu Groppa, Claudio Babiloni, John-Paul Taylor, Matthew C Kiernan, Bahman Nasseroleslami, Orla Hardiman
    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.2019; 90(9): 1011.     CrossRef
  • The effect of balance training with Tetra-ataxiometric posturography on balance function in patients with parkinsonism
    Min Cheol Chang, Min Ho Chun
    NeuroRehabilitation.2019; 45(3): 379.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation in hereditary ataxias: Diagnostic utility, pathophysiological insight and treatment
    Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada, Luis Velázquez-Pérez, Ulf Ziemann
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2018; 129(8): 1688.     CrossRef
  • Anatomical and functional correlates of cortical motor threshold of the dominant hand
    Charlotte Rosso, Vincent Perlbarg, Romain Valabregue, Mickaël Obadia, Claire Kemlin-Méchin, Eric Moulton, Sara Leder, Sabine Meunier, Jean-Charles Lamy
    Brain Stimulation.2017; 10(5): 952.     CrossRef
  • 5,764 View
  • 68 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Crossref
Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Dysarthria After Subacute Stroke
Yong Gyu Kwon, Kyung Hee Do, Sung Jong Park, Min Cheol Chang, Min Ho Chun
Ann Rehabil Med 2015;39(5):793-799.   Published online October 26, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.5.793
Objective

To evaluate whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could improve dysarthria in stroke patients at the subacute stage.

Methods

This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Patients who had unilateral middle cerebral artery infarction were enrolled. In patients in the rTMS group, we found hot spots by searching for the evoked motor potential of the orbicularis oris on the non-affected side. We performed rTMS at a low frequency (1 Hz), 1,500 stimulations/day, 5 days a week for 2 weeks on the hotspots. We used the same protocol in the sham stimulation group patients as that in the rTMS group, except that the angle of the coil was perpendicular to the skull rather than tangential to it. The patients in both groups received speech therapy for 30 minutes, 5 days a week from a skilled speech therapist. The speech therapist measured the Urimal Test of Articulation and Phonology, alternative motion rates, sequential motion rates, and maximal phonation time before and after intervention sessions.

Results

Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study and 20 completed the study. Statistical analysis revealed significant improvements on the dysarthria scales in both groups. The sequential motion rate (SMR)-PǝTǝKǝ showed significantly greater improvement in the rTMS group patients than in the sham stimulation group.

Conclusion

Patients in the rTMS group showed greater improvement in articulation than did patients in the sham rTMS group. Therefore, rTMS can have a synergistic effect with speech therapy in treating dysarthria after stroke.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Translating Technology Into Speech–Language Pathology Practice: Qualitative Interviews Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Case Study
    Ellen E. R. Williams, Brenton Hordacre, Nigel C. Rogasch, Mitchell Goldsworthy, Stacie Attrill
    International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and feasibility of a digital speech therapy for post-stroke dysarthria: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Yuyoung Kim, Minjung Kim, Jinwoo Kim, Tae-Jin Song
    Frontiers in Neurology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlation Between Articulatory Diadochokinetic Parameters and Dysphagia Parameters in Subacute Stroke Patients
    Back Min Oh, Hyun Seok, Sang-Hyun Kim, Seung Yeol Lee, Su Jung Park, Beom Jin Kim, Hyun Jung Kim
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 47(3): 192.     CrossRef
  • Exploring research trends and focal points in the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation for enhancing motor function in post-stroke patients: A bibliometric and content analytical approach
    Manju Devi
    Injury.2023; 54(12): 111116.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation for treating neurogenic dysarthria: A systematic review
    Pasquale Balzan, Catherine Tattersall, Rebecca Palmer
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2022; 65(5): 101580.     CrossRef
  • Management of communication disability in the first 90 days after stroke: a scoping review
    Caroline Baker, Abby M. Foster, Sarah D’Souza, Erin Godecke, Ciara Shiggins, Edwina Lamborn, Lucette Lanyon, Ian Kneebone, Miranda L. Rose
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2022; 44(26): 8524.     CrossRef
  • Oral and Laryngeal Diadochokinesis Across the Life Span: A Scoping Review of Methods, Reference Data, and Clinical Applications
    Ray D. Kent, Yunjung Kim, Li-mei Chen
    Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.2022; 65(2): 574.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex beyond Motor Rehabilitation: A Review of the Current Evidence
    Abdulhameed Tomeh, Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan, Liyana Najwa Inche Mat, Hamidon Basri, Wan Aliaa Wan Sulaiman
    Brain Sciences.2022; 12(6): 761.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in stroke survivors-more than motor rehabilitation: A mini-review
    Abdulhameed Tomeh, Abdul Hanif Khan Yusof Khan, Wan Aliaa Wan Sulaiman
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex improves speech production in post-stroke dysarthric speakers: A randomized pilot study
    Min Ney Wong, Faisal Nouman Baig, Yeuk Ki Chan, Manwa L. Ng, Frank F. Zhu, Joseph Shiu Kwong Kwan, Rita Bella
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(10): e0275779.     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review of Measures of Dysarthria Severity in Stroke Patients
    Rita Chiaramonte, Michele Vecchio
    PM&R.2021; 13(3): 314.     CrossRef
  • Dysarthria and stroke. The effectiveness of speech rehabilitation. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies
    Rita CHIARAMONTE, Michele VECCHIO
    European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Speech pathology management of non-progressive dysarthria: a systematic review of the literature
    Emma Finch, Anna F. Rumbach, Stacie Park
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2020; 42(3): 296.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, André Aleman, Chris Baeken, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Saša R. Filipović, Christian Grefkes, Alkomiet Hasan, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Satu K. Jääskeläinen, Berthold Langguth, Letizia Leocani, Alain Londer
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(2): 474.     CrossRef
  • Updated Approach to Stroke Rehabilitation
    Leroy R. Lindsay, Diane A. Thompson, Michael W. O’Dell
    Medical Clinics of North America.2020; 104(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Stimulating ideas for disorders of breathing, speech and swallowing
    Ken D. O'Halloran
    The Journal of Physiology.2020; 598(22): 5007.     CrossRef
  • Speech rehabilitation in dysarthria after stroke: a systematic review of the studies
    Rita Chiaramonte, Piero Pavone, Michele Vecchio
    European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidencias actuales sobre la estimulación magnética transcraneal y su utilidad potencial en la neurorrehabilitación postictus: Ampliando horizontes en el tratamiento de la enfermedad cerebrovascular
    M. León Ruiz, M.L. Rodríguez Sarasa, L. Sanjuán Rodríguez, J. Benito-León, E. García-Albea Ristol, S. Arce Arce
    Neurología.2018; 33(7): 459.     CrossRef
  • ReaDySpeech for people with dysarthria after stroke: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
    Claire Mitchell, Audrey Bowen, Sarah Tyson, Paul Conroy
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current evidence on transcranial magnetic stimulation and its potential usefulness in post-stroke neurorehabilitation: Opening new doors to the treatment of cerebrovascular disease
    M. León Ruiz, M.L. Rodríguez Sarasa, L. Sanjuán Rodríguez, J. Benito-León, E. García-Albea Ristol, S. Arce Arce
    Neurología (English Edition).2018; 33(7): 459.     CrossRef
  • Interventions for dysarthria due to stroke and other adult-acquired, non-progressive brain injury
    Claire Mitchell, Audrey Bowen, Sarah Tyson, Zoe Butterfint, Paul Conroy
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biofeedback eletromiográfico no tratamento das disfunções orofaciais neurogênicas: revisão sistemática de literatura
    Gabriela Silva de Freitas, Claudia Tiemi Mituuti, Ana Maria Furkim, Angela Ruviaro Busanello-Stella, Fabiane Miron Stefani, Marcela Maria Alves da Silva Arone, Giédre Berretin-Felix
    Audiology - Communication Research.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application for Rehabilitation Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Naoyuki Takeuchi
    The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2016; 53(6): 440.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Management of Dementia in Parkinson Disease
    Delaram Safarpour, Allison W. Willis
    American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®.2016; 31(7): 585.     CrossRef
  • 5,960 View
  • 145 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 24 Crossref

Case Report

Successful Treatment of Phantom Limb Pain by 1 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over Affected Supplementary Motor Complex: A Case Report
Jong-Hoo Lee, Jeong-Hyun Byun, Yu-Ri Choe, Seung-Kyu Lim, Ka-Young Lee, In-Sung Choi
Ann Rehabil Med 2015;39(4):630-633.   Published online August 25, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.4.630

A 37-year-old man with a right transfemoral amputation suffered from severe phantom limb pain (PLP). After targeting the affected supplementary motor complex (SMC) or primary motor cortex (PMC) using a neuro-navigation system with 800 stimuli of 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at 85% of resting motor threshold, the 1 Hz rTMS over SMC dramatically reduced his visual analog scale (VAS) of PLP from 7 to 0. However, the 1 Hz rTMS over PMC failed to reduce pain. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a successfully treated severe PLP with a low frequency rTMS over SMC in affected hemisphere.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of phantom limb pain: a systematic review
    Gabriel Rocha Santos Knorst, Phamella Rocha de Souza, Armani Gontijo Plácido Di Araújo, Samantha Avanço Ferraz Knorst, Denise Sisterolli Diniz, Hélio Fernandes da Silva Filho
    Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria.2024; 82(01): 001.     CrossRef
  • Non-surgical Management of Phantom Limb Pain: Current and Emerging Clinical Approaches
    Amy L. de Jongh Curry, Morgan E. Hunt, Paul F. Pasquina, Robert S. Waters, Jack W. Tsao
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2023; 11(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Evidencias actuales sobre las potenciales aplicaciones terapéuticas de la estimulación magnética transcraneal en la esclerosis múltiple: Revisión sistemática de la literatura
    M. León Ruiz, M. Sospedra, S. Arce Arce, J. Tejeiro-Martínez, J. Benito-León
    Neurología.2022; 37(3): 199.     CrossRef
  • Current evidence on the potential therapeutic applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of the literature
    M. León Ruiz, M. Sospedra, S. Arce Arce, J. Tejeiro-Martínez, J. Benito-León
    Neurología (English Edition).2022; 37(3): 199.     CrossRef
  • A scoping review of current non-pharmacological treatment modalities for phantom limb pain in limb amputees
    Brian Hyung, Catherine Wiseman-Hakes
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2022; 44(19): 5719.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in the management of phantom limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Víctor NAVARRO-LÓPEZ, Manuel DEL-VALLE-GRATACÓS, Diego FERNÁNDEZ-VÁZQUEZ, Pilar FERNÁNDEZ-GONZÁLEZ, María CARRATALÁ-TEJADA, Francisco MOLINA-RUEDA
    European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nonsurgical Approaches to Neuroma Management
    Yusha Liu, Dennis S. Kao
    Hand Clinics.2021; 37(3): 323.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation for the Management of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review
    Abdullah Aamir, Ayesha Girach, Ptolemaios Georgios Sarrigiannis, Marios Hadjivassiliou, Antonela Paladini, Giustino Varrassi, Panagiotis Zis
    Advances in Therapy.2020; 37(3): 998.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Pain Management: A Systematic Narrative Review
    Seoyon Yang, Min Cheol Chang
    Frontiers in Neurology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Phantom limb pain: peripheral neuromodulatory and neuroprosthetic approaches to treatment
    Bailey A. Petersen, Ameya C. Nanivadekar, Santosh Chandrasekaran, Lee E. Fisher
    Muscle & Nerve.2019; 59(2): 154.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive neuromodulation techniques for the management of phantom limb pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Gulseren Akyuz, Esra Giray
    International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.2019; 42(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (ctDCS) Ameliorates Phantom Limb Pain and Non-painful Phantom Limb Sensations
    Tommaso Bocci, Giuliano De Carolis, Roberta Ferrucci, Mery Paroli, Federica Mansani, Alberto Priori, Massimiliano Valeriani, Ferdinando Sartucci
    The Cerebellum.2019; 18(3): 527.     CrossRef
  • rTMS combined with motor training changed the inter-hemispheric lateralization
    Jing-na Jin, Xin Wang, Ying Li, He Wang, Zhi-peng Liu, Tao Yin
    Experimental Brain Research.2019; 237(10): 2735.     CrossRef
  • Coping with Phantom Limb Pain
    Damien P. Kuffler
    Molecular Neurobiology.2018; 55(1): 70.     CrossRef
  • Evidencias actuales sobre la estimulación magnética transcraneal y su utilidad potencial en la neurorrehabilitación postictus: Ampliando horizontes en el tratamiento de la enfermedad cerebrovascular
    M. León Ruiz, M.L. Rodríguez Sarasa, L. Sanjuán Rodríguez, J. Benito-León, E. García-Albea Ristol, S. Arce Arce
    Neurología.2018; 33(7): 459.     CrossRef
  • Current evidence on transcranial magnetic stimulation and its potential usefulness in post-stroke neurorehabilitation: Opening new doors to the treatment of cerebrovascular disease
    M. León Ruiz, M.L. Rodríguez Sarasa, L. Sanjuán Rodríguez, J. Benito-León, E. García-Albea Ristol, S. Arce Arce
    Neurología (English Edition).2018; 33(7): 459.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Maladaptive Plasticity, and Bayesian Analysis in Phantom Limb Pain
    Leon Morales-Quezada
    Medical Acupuncture.2017; 29(4): 220.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Phantom Limb Pain: Probably Effective but Understudied
    Arman Taheri, Mahbod Lajevardi, Saghar Arab, Abolfazl Firouzian, Hassan Sharifi
    Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2017; 20(1): 88.     CrossRef
  • 5,508 View
  • 54 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 18 Crossref

Original Articles

Objective

To determine the predictability of motor evoked potentials (MEP) in patients with putaminal hemorrhage (PH) according to the time of MEP from the onset of stroke.

Methods

Sixty consecutive patients with PH from January 2006 to November 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Motor function of affected extremities was measured at onset time and at six months after the onset. Patients were classified into two groups according to the time of MEP from the onset of stroke: early MEP group (within 15 days from onset) and late MEP group (16-30 days from onset). Patients were also classified into two groups according to the presence of MEP on the affected abductor pollicis brevis (APB): MEP (+) group-patients (showing MEP in the affected APB) and MEP (-) group-patients (no MEP in the affected APB). Motor outcome was compared between the two early and late MEP groups or between the presence and absence of MEP in the affected APB groups.

Results

For patients with MEP (+), a larger portion in the late MEP group showed good prognosis compared to the early MEP group (late MEP, 94.4%; early MEP, 80%). In contrast, in patients with MEP (-), a larger portion of patients in the late MEP group showed bad prognosis compared to the early MEP group (late MEP, 80%; early MEP, 71.4%). No significant improvement of MI between MEP (+) and MEP (-) was observed when MEP was performed early or late.

Conclusion

Our results revealed that the predictability of motor outcome might be better if MEP is performed late compared to that when MEP is performed early in patients with PH.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Central motor conduction time predicts new pyramidal MRI lesion and stroke-in-evolution in acute ischemic stroke
    Li-Min Liou, Ching-Fang Chien, Meng-Ni Wu, Ming-Yue Ren, Kun-Ze Lee, Ping-Song Chuo, Chung-Yao Hsu, Shiou-Lan Chen, Chiou-Lian Lai
    Journal of the Neurological Sciences.2024; 466: 123275.     CrossRef
  • Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with different motor evoked potential status: a randomized controlled trial
    Wenjun Qian, Xiaoyu Liao, Xiaowen Ju, Yaxin Gao, Miao Wu, Chen Xie, Yaoying Zhang, Xianming Long, Surong Qian, Yan Gong
    Frontiers in Neurology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neurophysiological Examinations as Adjunctive Tool to Imaging Techniques in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: IRONHEART Study
    Klára Fekete, Judit Tóth, László Horváth, Sándor Márton, Máté Héja, László Csiba, Tamás Árokszállási, Zsuzsa Bagoly, Dóra Sulina, István Fekete
    Frontiers in Neurology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multimodal Assessment of the Motor System in Patients With Chronic Ischemic Stroke
    Maria Nazarova, Sofya Kulikova, Michael A. Piradov, Alena S. Limonova, Larisa A. Dobrynina, Rodion N. Konovalov, Pavel A. Novikov, Bernhard Sehm, Arno Villringer, Anastasia Saltykova, Vadim V. Nikulin
    Stroke.2021; 52(1): 241.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic capabilities of transcranial magnetic stimulation to predict motor recovery after a stroke
    M. A. Nazarova, P. A. Novikov, V. V. Nikulin, G. E. Ivanova
    Neuromuscular Diseases.2020; 10(1): 64.     CrossRef
  • 4,901 View
  • 38 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 5 Crossref
Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation According to the Stimulation Site in Stroke Patients With Dysphagia
Jong Hwa Lee, Sang Beom Kim, Kyeong Woo Lee, Sook Joung Lee, Jae Uk Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2015;39(3):432-439.   Published online June 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.3.432
Objective

To investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) according to the stimulation site in subacute stroke patients with dysphagia.

Methods

This study was designed as a matched comparative study. Twenty-four patients who had dysphagia after ischemic stroke were recruited, and they were divided into two groups after matching for age and stroke lesion. The patients in group A received rTMS over the brain cortex where motor evoked potential (MEP) was obtained from the suprahyoid muscle. Group B received rTMS over the brain cortex where MEP was obtained from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. rTMS was performed at 110% of MEP threshold, 10 Hz frequency for 10 seconds, and then repeated every minute for 10 minutes. Dysphagia status was measured by the Functional Dysphagia Scale (FDS), the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), and the Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) using the results of a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. These evaluations were measured before, immediately, and 4 weeks after rTMS.

Results

Group A showed significant improvement compared to group B in the DOSS score immediately and 4 weeks after rTMS. There were no significant differences in the changes of FDS and PAS scores between groups A and B immediately and 4 weeks after rTMS.

Conclusion

rTMS over a hot spot for the suprahyoid muscle caused more improvement in swallowing function when compared to that over the interconnected site.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation versus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia in hospitalised patients: study protocol for a prospective, randomised controlled trial
    Xi Chen, Jiayi Zhu, Wenjing Bai, Xueling Li, Min Yang, Jianxiong Wang, Jihua Yu, Rui Jian
    BMJ Open.2025; 15(4): e097034.     CrossRef
  • The effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia in stroke patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Anastasios M. Georgiou, Phivos Phylactou, Maria Kambanaros
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modalities for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol
    Qiang Chen, Mengfan Kan, Xiaoyu Jiang, Huifen Liu, Deqi Zhang, Lin Yuan, Qiling Xu, Hongyan Bi
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(4): e080289.     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive assessment of HF-rTMS treatment mechanism for post-stroke dysphagia in rats by integration of fecal metabolomics and 16S rRNA sequencing
    Fei Zhao, Jiemei Chen, Yilong Shan, Jiena Hong, Qiuping Ye, Yong Dai, Jiahui Hu, Jiantao Zhang, Chao Li, Hongmei Wen
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New and Evolving Treatments for Neurologic Dysphagia
    Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Bendix Labeit, Sriramya Lapa, Nathalie Rommel, Shaheen Hamdy
    Drugs.2024; 84(8): 909.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for stroke rehabilitation: insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms of neuroinflammation
    Rongjun Sheng, Changchun Chen, Huan Chen, Peipei Yu
    Frontiers in Immunology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on patients with swallowing disorders after cerebral infarction
    Yupeng Du, Li Wei, Ying Lu, Hong Gao
    NeuroRehabilitation.2022; 50(1): 115.     CrossRef
  • Statistical Power and Swallowing Rehabilitation Research: Current Landscape and Next Steps
    James C. Borders, Alessandro A. Grande, Michelle S. Troche
    Dysphagia.2022; 37(6): 1673.     CrossRef
  • The Effect and Optimal Parameters of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Poststroke Dysphagia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jia Qiao, Qiu-ping Ye, Zhi-min Wu, Yong Dai, Zu-lin Dou
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hemodynamic signal changes and swallowing improvement of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on stroke patients with dysphagia: A randomized controlled study
    Huiyu Liu, Yang Peng, Zicai Liu, Xin Wen, Fang Li, Lida Zhong, Jinzhu Rao, Li Li, Minghong Wang, Pu Wang
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Different Sites for Dysphagia After Stroke: A Randomized, Observer-Blind Clinical Trial
    Lida Zhong, Jinzhu Rao, Jing Wang, Fang Li, Yang Peng, Huiyu Liu, Yan Zhang, Pu Wang
    Frontiers in Neurology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current perspectives on the benefits, risks, and limitations of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for post-stroke dysphagia
    Ivy Cheng, Shaheen Hamdy
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2021; 21(10): 1135.     CrossRef
  • European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Swallowing Disorders guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of post-stroke dysphagia
    Rainer Dziewas, Emilia Michou, Michaela Trapl-Grundschober, Avtar Lal, Ethem Murat Arsava, Philip M Bath, Pere Clavé, Jörg Glahn, Shaheen Hamdy, Sue Pownall, Antonio Schindler, Margaret Walshe, Rainer Wirth, David Wright, Eric Verin
    European Stroke Journal.2021; 6(3): LXXXIX.     CrossRef
  • Scoping review to identify and map non-pharmacological, non-surgical treatments for dysphagia following moderate-to-severe acquired brain injury
    Signe Janum Eskildsen, Ingrid Poulsen, Daniela Jakobsen, Christian Gunge Riberholt, Derek John Curtis
    BMJ Open.2021; 11(12): e053244.     CrossRef
  • Use of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in Dysphagia Research: A Systematic Review
    James C. Borders, Danielle Brates
    Dysphagia.2020; 35(4): 583.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Use of Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Dysphagia: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Application of Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Mengqing Zhang, Shaheen Hamdy
    American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2020; 29(2S): 1044.     CrossRef
  • Swallowing therapy for dysphagia in acute and subacute stroke
    Philip M Bath, Han Sean Lee, Lisa F Everton
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neurophysiological Adaptation and Neuromodulatory Treatment Approaches in Patients Suffering from Post-stroke Dysphagia
    Paul Muhle, Sonja Suntrup-Krueger, Rainer Dziewas
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2018; 6(4): 227.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-Stroke Dysphagia
    Eunhee Park, Min Su Kim, Won Hyuk Chang, Su Mi Oh, Yun Kwan Kim, Ahee Lee, Yun-Hee Kim
    Brain Stimulation.2017; 10(1): 75.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an alternative therapy for dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiang Liao, Guoqiang Xing, Zhiwei Guo, Yu Jin, Qing Tang, Bin He, Morgan A McClure, Hua Liu, Huaping Chen, Qiwen Mu
    Clinical Rehabilitation.2017; 31(3): 289.     CrossRef
  • Genetic determinants of swallowing impairment, recovery and responsiveness to treatment
    Alicja Raginis-Zborowska, Neil Pendleton, Shaheen Hamdy
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2016; 4(4): 249.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: a Novel Approach for Treating Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
    Emilia Michou, Alicja Raginis-Zborowska, Masahiro Watanabe, Taha Lodhi, Shaheen Hamdy
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 6,045 View
  • 124 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 22 Crossref
Effect of Epidural Electrical Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Rats With Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury
Yong-Soon Yoon, Kang Hee Cho, Eun-Sil Kim, Mi-Sook Lee, Kwang Jae Lee
Ann Rehabil Med 2015;39(3):416-424.   Published online June 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.3.416
Objective

To evaluate the effects of epidural electrical stimulation (EES) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor recovery and brain activity in a rat model of diffuse traumatic brain injury (TBI) compared to the control group.

Methods

Thirty rats weighing 270-285 g with diffuse TBI with 45 kg/cm2 using a weight-drop model were assigned to one of three groups: the EES group (ES) (anodal electrical stimulation at 50 Hz), the rTMS group (MS) (magnetic stimulation at 10 Hz, 3-second stimulation with 6-second intervals, 4,000 total stimulations per day), and the sham-treated control group (sham) (no stimulation). They were pre-trained to perform a single-pellet reaching task (SPRT) and a rotarod test (RRT) for 14 days. Diffuse TBI was then induced and an electrode was implanted over the dominant motor cortex. The changes in SPRT success rate, RRT performance time rate and the expression of c-Fos after two weeks of EES or rTMS were tracked.

Results

SPRT improved significantly from day 8 to day 12 in the ES group and from day 4 to day 14 in the MS group (p<0.05) compared to the sham group. RRT improved significantly from day 6 to day 11 in ES and from day 4 to day 9 in MS compared to the sham group. The ES and MS groups showed increased expression of c-Fos in the cerebral cortex compared to the sham group.

Conclusion

ES or MS in a rat model of diffuse TBI can be used to enhance motor recovery and brain activity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Neurophysiological Markers of Reward Processing Can Inform Preclinical Neurorehabilitation Approaches for Cognitive Impairments Following Brain Injury
    Miranda Francoeur Koloski, Reyana Menon, Victoria Krasnyanskiy
    Brain Sciences.2025; 15(5): 471.     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation techniques in traumatic brain injury: a narrative review of the current state
    Mrinmoy Kundu, Vallabh Shet, Tariq Janjua, Luis Rafael Moscote
    Acta Neurologica Belgica.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes neurological functional recovery in rats with traumatic brain injury by upregulating synaptic plasticity-related proteins
    Fang-Fang Qian, You-Hua He, Xiao-Hui Du, Hua-Xiang Lu, Ren-Hong He, Jian-Zhong Fan
    Neural Regeneration Research.2023; 18(2): 368.     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation Therapies in Pre-Clinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Translational Applications
    Shanan Surendrakumar, Thallita Kelly Rabelo, Ana Carolina P. Campos, Adriano Mollica, Agessandro Abrahao, Nir Lipsman, Matthew J. Burke, Clement Hamani
    Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 40(5-6): 435.     CrossRef
  • Electrical stimulation methods and protocols for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of preclinical research
    D. Ziesel, M. Nowakowska, S. Scheruebel, K. Kornmueller, U. Schäfer, R. Schindl, C. Baumgartner, M. Üçal, T. Rienmüller
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Rehabilitation Potential of Neurostimulation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Animal and Human Studies
    M. Windy McNerney, Gene G. Gurkoff, Charlotte Beard, Marian E. Berryhill
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(10): 1402.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in traumatic brain injury: Evidence from animal and human studies
    Raffaele Nardone, Luca Sebastianelli, Viviana Versace, Francesco Brigo, Stefan Golaszewski, Paolo Manganotti, Leopold Saltuari, Eugen Trinka
    Brain Research Bulletin.2020; 159: 44.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the correction of consequences of minor traumatic brain injury
    I. V. Litvinenko, A. A. Yurin
    Marine Medicine.2020; 6(2): 36.     CrossRef
  • Motor cortex stimulation does not lead to functional recovery after experimental cortical injury in rats
    Lisa-Maria Schönfeld, Ali Jahanshahi, Evi Lemmens, Matthias Bauwens, Sarah-Anna Hescham, Sandra Schipper, Melanie Lagiere, Sven Hendrix, Yasin Temel
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2017; 35(3): 295.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Intermediate-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Recovery following Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats
    Leticia Verdugo-Diaz, Francisco Estrada-Rojo, Aron Garcia-Espinoza, Eduardo Hernandez-Lopez, Alejandro Hernandez-Chavez, Carlos Guzman-Uribe, Marina Martinez-Vargas, Adan Perez-Arredondo, Tomas Calvario, David Elias-Viñas, Luz Navarro
    BioMed Research International.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF DISEASES AND INJURIES OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM
    Igor V Litvinenko, Anton A Yurin, Daria N Frunza, Tatyana V Bodrova
    Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy.2017; 19(3): 49.     CrossRef
  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Other Neuromodulation Methods for Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury
    Daniel Neren, Matthew D. Johnson, Wynn Legon, Salam P. Bachour, Geoffrey Ling, Afshin A. Divani
    Neurocritical Care.2016; 24(2): 308.     CrossRef
  • 6,091 View
  • 73 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 12 Crossref
Factors Associated With Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients
Jong Hwa Lee, Sang Beom Kim, Kyeong Woo Lee, Min Ah Kim, Sook Joung Lee, Su Jin Choi
Ann Rehabil Med 2015;39(2):268-276.   Published online April 24, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.2.268
Objective

To determine factors associated with motor recovery of the upper extremity after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment in stroke patients.

Methods

Twenty-nine patients with subacute stroke participated in this study. rTMS was applied to the hand motor cortex for 10 minutes at a 110% resting motor threshold and 10 Hz frequency for two weeks. We evaluated the biographical, neurological, clinical, and functional variables, in addition to the motor-evoked potential (MEP) response. The Manual Function Test (MFT) was performed before, immediately after, and two weeks after, the treatment. Patients were divided into a responder and non-responder group according to their respective improvements on the MFT. Data were compared between the two groups.

Results

Patients with exclusively subcortical stroke, absence of aphasia, the presence of a MEP response, high scores on the Mini-Mental Status Examination, Motricity Index arm score, Functional Independence Measure, and Functional Ambulatory Classification; and a shorter period from stroke onset to rTMS were found to be significantly associated with a response to rTMS.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that rTMS may have a greater effect on upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients who have a MEP response, suffer an exclusively subcortical stroke, mild paresis, and have good functional status. Applying rTMS early would have additional positive effects in the patients with the identified characteristics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Lesion-specific cortical activation following sensory stimulation in patients with subacute stroke
    Wei Li, Chong Li, Aixian Liu, Ping-Ju Lin, Linhong Mo, Hongliang Zhao, Quan Xu, Xiangzun Meng, Linhong Ji
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Contralateral Limb Cross Education and High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Indices of the Affected Upper Limb in Subacute Phase of Stroke
    Katayoon Rezaei, Amin Kordi Yoosefinejad, Farzaneh Moslemi Haghighi, Mohsen Razeghi, Anwen Shao
    Stroke Research and Treatment.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Individual Treatment Response to rTMS for Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Review and the CanStim Perspective
    Franziska E. Hildesheim, Alexander N. Silver, Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas, Justin W. Andrushko, Jodi D. Edwards, Numa Dancause, Alexander Thiel
    Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive models for response to non-invasive brain stimulation in stroke: A critical review of opportunities and pitfalls
    Maximilian J. Wessel, Philip Egger, Friedhelm C. Hummel
    Brain Stimulation.2021; 14(6): 1456.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-stroke Patients with Severe Upper-Limb Motor Impairment
    Ju Sun Kim, Dae Hyun Kim, Hyun Jung Kim, Kang Jae Jung, Juntaek Hong, Deog Young Kim
    Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Synergistic Effects of Scalp Acupuncture and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cerebral Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Jae-Hong Kim, Jae-Young Han, Min-Keun Song, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jeong-Soon Lee
    Brain Sciences.2020; 10(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • White Matter Biomarkers Associated with Motor Change in Individuals with Stroke: A Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation Study
    K. P. Wadden, S. Peters, M. R. Borich, J. L. Neva, K. S. Hayward, C. S. Mang, N. J. Snow, K. E. Brown, T. S. Woodward, S. K. Meehan, L. A. Boyd
    Neural Plasticity.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Application of rTMS for Chronic Upper Limb Hemiparesis
    Wataru Kakuda
    The Japanese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.2019; 56(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Effects and safety of combined rTMS and action observation for recovery of function in the upper extremities in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial
    Jun Soo Noh, Ji Hoon Lim, Tae Woong Choi, Seung Gul Jang, Sung-Bom Pyun
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2019; 37(3): 219.     CrossRef
  • The effects of five sessions of continuous theta burst stimulation over contralesional sensorimotor cortex paired with paretic skilled motor practice in people with chronic stroke
    J.L. Neva, K.E. Brown, K.P. Wadden, C.S. Mang, M.R. Borich, S.K. Meehan, L.A. Boyd
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2019; 37(3): 273.     CrossRef
  • Long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on disability in patients with stroke
    Kyung Eun Nam, Leechan Jo, So Yeon Jun, Won Jin Sung, Joon Sung Kim, Bo Young Hong, Bomi Sul, Seong Hoon Lim
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2018; 47: 218.     CrossRef
  • Late functional improvement after lacunar stroke: a population-based study
    Aravind Ganesh, Sergei A Gutnikov, Peter Malcolm Rothwell
    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.2018; 89(12): 1301.     CrossRef
  • Toward precision medicine: tailoring interventional strategies based on noninvasive brain stimulation for motor recovery after stroke
    Philipp J. Koch, Friedhelm C. Hummel
    Current Opinion in Neurology.2017; 30(4): 388.     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated With Upper Extremity Functional Recovery Following Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients
    Seo Young Kim, Sung Bong Shin, Seong Jae Lee, Tae Uk Kim, Jung Keun Hyun
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2016; 40(3): 373.     CrossRef
  • Effects of repetitive facilitative exercise with neuromuscular electrical stimulation, vibratory stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the hemiplegic hand in chronic stroke patients
    Seiji Etoh, Tomokazu Noma, Yuko Takiyoshi, Michiko Arima, Rintaro Ohama, Katsuya Yokoyama, Akihiko Hokazono, Yumeko Amano, Megumi Shimodozono, Kazumi Kawahira
    International Journal of Neuroscience.2016; 126(11): 1007.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Multimodal Neuroimaging to Characterize Post-Stroke Neuroplasticity
    Angela M. Auriat, Jason L. Neva, Sue Peters, Jennifer K. Ferris, Lara A. Boyd
    Frontiers in Neurology.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The modern approaches to the prognostication of rehabilitation of the patients after stroke on an individual basis: a review of the literature and the results of original investigations
    A. N. Razumov, E. A. Melnikova
    Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kul'tury.2015; 92(6): 11.     CrossRef
  • 5,485 View
  • 63 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Reduction of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation-Induced Motor Plasticity in Healthy Elderly With COMT Val158Met Polymorphism
Nam Jae Lee, Hyun Jung Ahn, Kwang-Ik Jung, Suk Hoon Ohn, Jeonghoon Hong, Yun Joong Kim, Woo-Kyoung Yoo
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(5):658-664.   Published online October 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.658
Objective

To delineate whether cortical plasticity induced by continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) differed according to catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene polymorphism in healthy older adults.

Methods

Eighteen healthy older volunteers (mean age 73.78±5.04; 12 females and 6 males) were recruited. Volunteers randomly assigned in either a sham-first or real cTBS first group participated in two separate TMS visits with at least a 2-day wash-out period. Genotyping was carried out at baseline by a separate researcher who was blinded. cTBS was delivered in a hot spot over M1 at an active motor threshold of 80%. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained at 120% of the resting motor threshold before and after sham/cTBS.

Results

The relative MEP to baseline was significantly decreased 0 and 10 minutes post-stimulation and increased 40 minutes post-stimulation, as compared with the sham condition. Immediately after cTBS, the Val/Val group had a significantly reduced relative MEP value, as compared with the MET carrier group.

Conclusion

In healthy older persons, cTBS-induced motor plasticity was reduced in the COMT Val/Val group as compared with the 158Met carrier group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Age-related changes in responsiveness to non-invasive brain stimulation neuroplasticity paradigms: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Mahima Shah, Suraj Suresh, Johanna Paddick, Maddison L. Mellow, Amy Rees, Carolyn Berryman, Tasha R. Stanton, Ashleigh E. Smith
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2024; 162: 53.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the mechanisms of brain plasticity by transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Ali Jannati, Lindsay M. Oberman, Alexander Rotenberg, Alvaro Pascual-Leone
    Neuropsychopharmacology.2023; 48(1): 191.     CrossRef
  • Correlations between COMT polymorphism and brain structure and cognition in elderly subjects
    Eunsil Cha, Hyun Jung Ahn, Wonil Kang, Kwang-Ik Jung, Suk Hoon Ohn, Shahid Bashir, Woo-Kyoung Yoo
    Medicine.2022; 101(18): e29214.     CrossRef
  • Identifying novel biomarkers with TMS-EEG – Methodological possibilities and challenges
    Elisa Kallioniemi, Zafiris J. Daskalakis
    Journal of Neuroscience Methods.2022; 377: 109631.     CrossRef
  • Cortical hyperexcitability and plasticity in Alzheimer’s disease: developments in understanding and management
    Mehdi A. J van den Bos, Parvathi Menon, Steve Vucic
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2022; 22(11-12): 981.     CrossRef
  • Determining the optimal pulse number for theta burst induced change in cortical excitability
    Daniel M. McCalley, Daniel H. Lench, Jade D. Doolittle, Julia P. Imperatore, Michaela Hoffman, Colleen A. Hanlon
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modulation of motor cortical excitability by continuous theta-burst stimulation in adults with autism spectrum disorder
    Ali Jannati, Mary A. Ryan, Gabrielle Block, Fae B. Kayarian, Lindsay M. Oberman, Alexander Rotenberg, Alvaro Pascual-Leone
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(7): 1647.     CrossRef
  • Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in single and paired-pulse TMS data
    Daniel T. Corp, Hannah G.K. Bereznicki, Gillian M. Clark, George J. Youssef, Peter J. Fried, Ali Jannati, Charlotte B. Davies, Joyce Gomes-Osman, Melissa Kirkovski, Natalia Albein-Urios, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Giacomo Koch, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Alvaro Pascua
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(10): 2639.     CrossRef
  • A Checklist to Reduce Response Variability in Studies Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Assessment of Corticospinal Excitability: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Michael Pellegrini, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour Jaberzadeh
    Brain Connectivity.2020; 10(2): 53.     CrossRef
  • Cognitive Enhancement via Neuromodulation and Video Games: Synergistic Effects?
    Marc Palaus, Raquel Viejo-Sobera, Diego Redolar-Ripoll, Elena M. Marrón
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Large-scale analysis of interindividual variability in theta-burst stimulation data: Results from the ‘Big TMS Data Collaboration’
    Daniel T. Corp, Hannah G.K. Bereznicki, Gillian M. Clark, George J. Youssef, Peter J. Fried, Ali Jannati, Charlotte B. Davies, Joyce Gomes-Osman, Julie Stamm, Sung Wook Chung, Steven J. Bowe, Nigel C. Rogasch, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Giacomo Koch, Vincenzo Di
    Brain Stimulation.2020; 13(5): 1476.     CrossRef
  • Age-related differences of motor cortex plasticity in adults: A transcranial direct current stimulation study
    Ensiyeh Ghasemian-Shirvan, Leila Farnad, Mohsen Mosayebi-Samani, Stefanie Verstraelen, Raf L.J. Meesen, Min-Fang Kuo, Michael A. Nitsche
    Brain Stimulation.2020; 13(6): 1588.     CrossRef
  • Genetic influences on the variability of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex
    Alicja Raginis‐Zborowska, Ivy Cheng, Neil Pendleton, Antony Payton, William Ollier, Emilia Michou, Shaheen Hamdy
    Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Variability and Predictors of Response to Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation: A TMS-EEG Study
    Lorenzo Rocchi, Jaime Ibáñez, Alberto Benussi, Ricci Hannah, Vishal Rawji, Elias Casula, John Rothwell
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Interindividual variability in response to continuous theta-burst stimulation in healthy adults
    Ali Jannati, Gabrielle Block, Lindsay M. Oberman, Alexander Rotenberg, Alvaro Pascual-Leone
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2017; 128(11): 2268.     CrossRef
  • Genetic polymorphisms and the adequacy of brain stimulation: state of the art
    Amene Saghazadeh, Shadi A. Esfahani, Nima Rezaei
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2016; 16(9): 1043.     CrossRef
  • Ten Years of Theta Burst Stimulation in Humans: Established Knowledge, Unknowns and Prospects
    A. Suppa, Y.-Z. Huang, K. Funke, M.C. Ridding, B. Cheeran, V. Di Lazzaro, U. Ziemann, J.C. Rothwell
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(3): 323.     CrossRef
  • 4,755 View
  • 53 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 17 Crossref
Effect of Low-Frequency rTMS and NMES on Subacute Unilateral Hemispheric Stroke With Dysphagia
Kil-Byung Lim, Hong-Jae Lee, Jeehyun Yoo, Yong-Geol Kwon
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(5):592-602.   Published online October 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.592
Objective

To investigate the effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on post-stroke dysphagia.

Methods

Subacute (<3 months), unilateral hemispheric stroke patients with dysphagia were randomly assigned to the conventional dysphagia therapy (CDT), rTMS, or NMES groups. In rTMS group, rTMS was performed at 100% resting motor threshold with 1 Hz frequency for 20 minutes per session (5 days per week for 2 weeks). In NMES group, electrical stimulation was applied to the anterior neck for 30 minutes per session (5 days per week for 2 weeks). All three groups were given conventional dysphagia therapy for 4 weeks. We evaluated the functional dysphagia scale (FDS), pharyngeal transit time (PTT), the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS), and the American Speech-Language Hearing Association National Outcomes Measurement System (ASHA NOMS) swallowing scale at baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 4 weeks.

Results

Forty-seven patients completed the study; 15 in the CDT group, 14 in the rTMS group, and 18 in the NMES group. Mean changes in FDS and PAS for liquid during first 2 weeks in the rTMS and NMES groups were significantly higher than those in the CDT group, but no significant differences were found between the rTMS and NMES group. No significant difference in mean changes of FDS and PAS for semi-solid, PTT, and ASHA NOMS was observed among the three groups.

Conclusion

These results indicated that both low-frequency rTMS and NMES could induce early recovery from dysphagia; therefore, they both could be useful therapeutic options for dysphagic stroke patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The neurorehabilitation of post‐stroke dysphagia: Physiology and pathophysiology
    Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Shaheen Hamdy
    The Journal of Physiology.2025; 603(3): 617.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Non‐Pharmacological Interventions on the Swallowing Function of Patients With Post‐Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis
    Bohan Zhang, Ka Po Wong, Cai Guo, Shu‐Cheng Chen, Shuojin Fu, Ruifu Kang, Qian Xiao, Jing Qin
    Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2025; 52(1): 109.     CrossRef
  • Effects of four non-invasive stimulations on swallowing function and quality of life of stroke patients—a network meta-analysis
    Xinyu Lin, Haojie Li, Xie Wu, Rui Huang
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Translation and Cross‐Cultural Adaptation of Sydney Swallow Questionnaire in Urdu and Its Psychometric Properties Among Post‐Stroke Dysphagia Patients
    Syeda Amna Ejaz, Rania Imran, Anam Jamil, Hadia Furqan, Alina Mehmood
    World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia Treatment: A Systemic Evaluation and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhenni Wang, Zihao Xiao, Qin Shen, Na Zhao, Weiming Zhang
    Dysphagia.2024; 39(3): 424.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of non‐invasive brain stimulation for post‐stroke dysphagia: a meta‐analysis
    Shan Yao, Xuxia Wang, Jie Sun, Pengfei Guo
    Psychogeriatrics.2024; 24(2): 433.     CrossRef
  • The effectiveness of transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia in stroke patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Anastasios M. Georgiou, Phivos Phylactou, Maria Kambanaros
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of effortful swallowing against kinesiology taping resistance on the swallowing function in patients with poststroke dysphagia: A randomized controlled trial
    Hwan-Hee Kim, Ji-Su Park
    Medicine.2024; 103(21): e38344.     CrossRef
  • Effects of different mylohyoid muscle stimulations on swallowing cortex excitability in healthy subjects
    Zhiyong Wang, Junhui Bai, Keling Cheng, Xia Zhang, Zhenfeng Fan, Yangjia Chen, Jun Ni
    Behavioural Brain Research.2024; 470: 115055.     CrossRef
  • New and Evolving Treatments for Neurologic Dysphagia
    Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Bendix Labeit, Sriramya Lapa, Nathalie Rommel, Shaheen Hamdy
    Drugs.2024; 84(8): 909.     CrossRef
  • Perspective on the clinical management of post-stroke aphasia and dysphagia using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
    Anastasios M. Georgiou
    Frontiers in Neurology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Individualized Spots Based on Task functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Swallowing Function in Poststroke Dysphagia
    Meiyuan Chen, Ziyang Huang, Yi Chen, Xiaochuan Wang, Xiaojun Ye, Wenjie Wu
    Brain Connectivity.2024; 14(10): 513.     CrossRef
  • Aspiration after Critical Illness: Role of Endotracheal Tube, Tracheostomy, and Swallowing Disorders
    Benedict Osorio, Rebecca Krakora, Geraldine Epping, Drew Wright, Kapil Rajwani
    Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.2024; 45(06): 669.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Strategies for Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Xiaomin Wu, Baixiang Zhang, Gareth Ambler, Qingfa Chen, Huayao Huang, Huiying Lin, Shuangfang Fang, Nan Liu, Houwei Du
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Meta-analysis of Stimulation Frequency, Stimulation Site, and Timing of Outcome Measurement
    Ming-Yen Hsiao, Yoo Jin Choo, I.-Chun Liu, Mathieu Boudier-Revéret, Min Cheol Chang
    Dysphagia.2023; 38(1): 435.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Functions in Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Elif Tarihci Cakmak, Ekin Ilke Sen, Can Doruk, Comert Sen, Selim Sezikli, Ayse Yaliman
    Dysphagia.2023; 38(3): 874.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Therapeutic Application of Neuromodulation in the Human Swallowing System
    Ivy Cheng, Ayodele Sasegbon, Shaheen Hamdy
    Dysphagia.2023; 38(4): 1005.     CrossRef
  • Sensory neuromuscular electrical stimulation for dysphagia rehabilitation: A literature review
    Itt Assoratgoon, Naru Shiraishi, Ryo Tagaino, Toru Ogawa, Keiichi Sasaki
    Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2023; 50(2): 157.     CrossRef
  • The effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the unilateral cerebellar hemisphere on swallowing-related brain regions in healthy subjects
    Bingyan Wang, Hui Sun, Xiaona Pan, Wenshuai Ma, Linghui Dong, Qiang Wang, Pingping Meng
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yuhan Wang, Lu Xu, Linjia Wang, Minjiao Jiang, Ling Zhao
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Post-stroke Dysphagia Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review of Meta-analyses in 2022
    Sumiya Shibata, Satoko Koganemaru, Tatsuya Mima
    Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 8: n/a.     CrossRef
  • Transcutaneous electrical stimulation for gastrointestinal motility disorders
    Gengqing Song, Sophie Trujillo, Yuhan Fu, Fahmi Shibi, Jiande Chen, Ronnie Fass
    Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A blended neurostimulation protocol to delineate cortico-muscular and spino-muscular dynamics following neuroplastic adaptation
    Filip Stefanovic, Julian A. Martinez, Ghazala T. Saleem, Sue Ann Sisto, Michael T. Miller, Yaa A. Achampong, Albert H. Titus
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
    Seoyon Yang, Jin-Woo Park, Kyunghoon Min, Yoon Se Lee, Young-Jin Song, Seong Hee Choi, Doo Young Kim, Seung Hak Lee, Hee Seung Yang, Wonjae Cha, Ji Won Kim, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo, Min-Wook Kim, Hee-Soon Woo, Sung-Jong Park, Sungju Jee, Ju Sun Oh, Ki De
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 47(Suppl 1): S1.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
    Seoyon Yang, Jin-Woo Park, Kyunghoon Min, Yoon Se Lee, Young-Jin Song, Seong Hee Choi, Doo Young Kim, Seung Hak Lee, Hee Seung Yang, Wonjae Cha, Ji Won Kim, Byung-Mo Oh, Han Gil Seo, Min-Wook Kim, Hee-Soon Woo, Sung-Jong Park, Sungju Jee, Ju Sun Oh, Ki De
    Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society.2023; 13(2): 77.     CrossRef
  • Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in Stroke
    Heather Y.F. Yong, Aravind Ganesh, Carlos Camara-Lemarroy
    Seminars in Neurology.2023; 43(04): 609.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper-limb motor recovery in subacute ischemic stroke without cortical involvement: a protocol paper for a multi-center, double-blind randomized controlled tria
    Hee-Mun Cho, Seungwoo Cha, Min Kyun Sohn, Sungju Jee, Won Kee Chang, Won-Seok Kim, Nam-Jong Paik
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Dysphagia on Quality of Life in Stroke Patients
    Mohammad Al Rjoob, Nik Fariza Husna Nik Hassan, Mohd Azmarul A Aziz, Faiz Mustafar, Mohd Normani Zakaria
    Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders.2023; 8(2): 70.     CrossRef
  • Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation for dysphagia patients during recovery stage of stroke: a randomized controlled trial
    Jiahui TAI, Ruiping HU, Shunjuan FAN, Yi WU, Tingwei WANG, Junfa WU
    European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Motor Imagery Training on Patients with Post-Stroke Dysphagia
    Sujian ZHOU, Shuiliang WANG, Xiaoying LIU, Pengqi WANG, Yin QIN
    Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 33(2): 108.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of Post-Stroke Dysphagia with Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Based on the Bimodal Balance Recovery Model: A Pilot Study
    Lu Wang, Fengyun Wang, Yanmin Lin, Xiaojun Guo, Jingjing Wang, Jianbin Liu, Chunqing Feng, Shibin Xu, Yanhong Wang, Chengfei Gao, Yankang Mei, Yanhui Li
    Journal of Integrative Neuroscience.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metaplasticity in the human swallowing system: clinical implications for dysphagia rehabilitation
    Ivy Cheng, Shaheen Hamdy
    Neurological Sciences.2022; 43(1): 199.     CrossRef
  • Clinical effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on dysphagia due to stroke
    Yonggang Jiao, Guocai Li, Yingyi Dai
    Neurological Sciences.2022; 43(5): 3139.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part I: Pharyngeal and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
    Renée Speyer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Liza Bergström, Shaheen Hamdy, Bas Joris Heijnen, Lianne Remijn, Sarah Wilkes-Gillan, Reinie Cordier
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(3): 776.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials—Part II: Brain Neurostimulation
    Renée Speyer, Anna-Liisa Sutt, Liza Bergström, Shaheen Hamdy, Timothy Pommée, Mathieu Balaguer, Anett Kaale, Reinie Cordier
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(4): 993.     CrossRef
  • Statistical Power and Swallowing Rehabilitation Research: Current Landscape and Next Steps
    James C. Borders, Alessandro A. Grande, Michelle S. Troche
    Dysphagia.2022; 37(6): 1673.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xin Wen, Zicai Liu, Lida Zhong, Yang Peng, Jing Wang, Huiyu Liu, Xiaoqian Gong
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Commentary: The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yu-lei Xie, Shan Wang, Yu-han Xie, Xin Chen, Yin-xu Wang, Qing Wu
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Benefits from Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Rehabilitation
    Michał Starosta, Natalia Cichoń, Joanna Saluk-Bijak, Elżbieta Miller
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(8): 2149.     CrossRef
  • The Effectiveness of Transcranial Stimulation in Improving Swallowing Outcomes in Adults with Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shu Wen Tan, Anping Wu, Ling Jie Cheng, Sai Ho Wong, Ying Lau, Siew Tiang Lau
    Dysphagia.2022; 37(6): 1796.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Dysphagia After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yu-lei Xie, Shan Wang, Jia-meng Jia, Yu-han Xie, Xin Chen, Wu Qing, Yin-xu Wang
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Post-stroke Dysphagia: Prognosis and Treatment–A Systematic Review of RCT on Interventional Treatments for Dysphagia Following Subacute Stroke
    Philipp Balcerak, Sydney Corbiere, Richard Zubal, Georg Kägi
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect and Optimal Parameters of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Poststroke Dysphagia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jia Qiao, Qiu-ping Ye, Zhi-min Wu, Yong Dai, Zu-lin Dou
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on poststroke dysphagia: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Hailong Li, Lin Li, Rui Zhang, Xiongang Huang, Jian Lin, Caixia Liu, Weimin Lou
    International Journal of Rehabilitation Research.2022; 45(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Versus Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Post Stroke Dysphagia: A Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial
    Azza B. Hammad, Eman A. Elhamrawy, Hayam Abdel-Tawab, Mohamed A. Shafik, Yossra Sallam, Hala Mohamed Elzomor, Eshak I. Bahbah
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2022; 31(8): 106554.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Effect and Optimal Electrode Placement of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Thanh-Nhan Doan, Wen-Chao Ho, Liang-Hui Wang, Fei-Chun Chang, Trang Thi Quynh Tran, Li-Wei Chou
    Life.2022; 12(6): 875.     CrossRef
  • Comparison Between Comprehensive Nursing Care Ward and Private Care Ward on Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients
    Yang Rok Hur, Woo Sup Song, Kyung Min Kim, Ki Hun Hwang
    Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Improvement of Post-stroke Dysphagia by Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
    Yu-Lei Xie, Wen Li, Shan Wang, Ju Yang, Zheng-Lei Yang, Qing Wu, Yin-Xu Wang
    Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research.2022; 47(3): 303.     CrossRef
  • High-Frequency Cerebellar rTMS Improves the Swallowing Function of Patients with Dysphagia after Brainstem Stroke
    Ling-hui Dong, Xiaona Pan, Yuyang Wang, Guangtao Bai, Chao Han, Qiang Wang, Pingping Meng, Xi-Ze Jia
    Neural Plasticity.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Treatment of Dysphagia in Neurological Disorders: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Considerations
    Ivy Cheng, Adeel Hamad, Ayodele Sasegbon, Shaheen Hamdy
    Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment.2022; Volume 18: 2251.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: The effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ting Li, Xiao-Yan Duan, Xiu-Mei Zou, Xi Huang, Yu-Juan Kang, Ming-Zhu Sun
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dysphagia in Lateral Medullary Syndrome: A Narrative Review
    Sung Ho Jang, Min Son Kim
    Dysphagia.2021; 36(3): 329.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Neurostimulation on Poststroke Dysphagia: A Synthesis of Current Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ivy Cheng, Ayodele Sasegbon, Shaheen Hamdy
    Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2021; 24(8): 1388.     CrossRef
  • Dysphagia in Wilson’s Disease: A Case Report of One-Year Follow-Up
    Doyoung Kim, Yoon Ghil Park, Jung Hyun Park, Jinyoung Park
    Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society.2021; 11(1): 82.     CrossRef
  • Current perspectives on the benefits, risks, and limitations of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for post-stroke dysphagia
    Ivy Cheng, Shaheen Hamdy
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics.2021; 21(10): 1135.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy of non-invasive neurostimulation therapies for poststroke dysphagia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tong Wang, Linghui Dong, Xiaomeng Cong, Hui Luo, Wenyu Li, Pingping Meng, Qiang Wang
    Neurophysiologie Clinique.2021; 51(6): 493.     CrossRef
  • European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Swallowing Disorders guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of post-stroke dysphagia
    Rainer Dziewas, Emilia Michou, Michaela Trapl-Grundschober, Avtar Lal, Ethem Murat Arsava, Philip M Bath, Pere Clavé, Jörg Glahn, Shaheen Hamdy, Sue Pownall, Antonio Schindler, Margaret Walshe, Rainer Wirth, David Wright, Eric Verin
    European Stroke Journal.2021; 6(3): LXXXIX.     CrossRef
  • Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Dysphagia after Stroke
    Lingling Li, Hailiang Huang, Yuqi Jia, Ying Yu, Zhiyao Liu, Xin Shi, Fangqi Wang, Xue-Qiang Wang
    Neural Plasticity.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Weiwei Yang, Xiongbin Cao, Xiaoyun Zhang, Xuebing Wang, Xiaowen Li, Yaping Huai
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Use of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in Dysphagia Research: A Systematic Review
    James C. Borders, Danielle Brates
    Dysphagia.2020; 35(4): 583.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, André Aleman, Chris Baeken, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Saša R. Filipović, Christian Grefkes, Alkomiet Hasan, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Satu K. Jääskeläinen, Berthold Langguth, Letizia Leocani, Alain Londer
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(2): 474.     CrossRef
  • Synergistic Effects of Scalp Acupuncture and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cerebral Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Jae-Hong Kim, Jae-Young Han, Min-Keun Song, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jeong-Soon Lee
    Brain Sciences.2020; 10(2): 87.     CrossRef
  • Short‐term neurophysiological effects of sensory pathway neurorehabilitation strategies on chronic poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia
    Christopher Cabib, Weslania Nascimento, Laia Rofes, Viridiana Arreola, Noemí Tomsen, Lluis Mundet, Ernest Palomeras, Emilia Michou, Pere Clavé, Omar Ortega
    Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of Goal Attainment Scaling in Intensive Stroke Rehabilitation During the Subacute Stage
    Youngsu Jung, Jaehoon Sim, Joonhyun Park, Jongmoon Kim, MinYoung Kim
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2020; 44(3): 181.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Use of Neuromodulation for Neurogenic Dysphagia: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Application of Pharyngeal Electrical Stimulation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Ayodele Sasegbon, Ivy Cheng, Mengqing Zhang, Shaheen Hamdy
    American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology.2020; 29(2S): 1044.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Swallowing Disorders
    Yuanyuan Sun, Xiaoyun Chen, Jianhong Qiao, Guixiang Song, Yuedong Xu, Yan Zhang, Dongmei Xu, Wei Gao, Yunfeng Li, Cuiping Xu
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2020; 99(8): 701.     CrossRef
  • The impact of dysphagia on quality of life in stroke patients
    Doo-Young Kim, Hyo-Sik Park, Si-Woon Park, Jae-Hyung Kim
    Medicine.2020; 99(34): e21795.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials


    Abayneh Alamer, Haimanot Melese, Fetene Nigussie
    Clinical Interventions in Aging.2020; Volume 15: 1521.     CrossRef
  • Preconditioning human pharyngeal motor cortex enhances directional metaplasticity induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Ivy Cheng, Honor Scarlett, Mengqing Zhang, Shaheen Hamdy
    The Journal of Physiology.2020; 598(22): 5213.     CrossRef
  • Optimal placement of electrodes for treatment of post-stroke dysphagia by neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with effortful swallowing
    JW Huh, EH Park, YS Min, AR Kim, WJ Yang, HM Oh, TW Nam, TD Jung
    Singapore Medical Journal.2020; 61(9): 487.     CrossRef
  • Swallowing Outcomes and Discharge Destinations in Acute Stroke Tube-Feeding Dependent Dysphagia Patients Treated With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation During Inpatient Rehabilitation
    David S. Kushner, Doug Johnson-Greene, Maite K. Cordero, Stacy A. Thomashaw, Jennifer Rodriguez
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2020; 99(6): 487.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in combination with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for treatment of post-stroke dysphagia
    Chengliang Zhang, Xiuqin Zheng, Rulan Lu, Wenwei Yun, Huifang Yun, Xianju Zhou
    Journal of International Medical Research.2019; 47(2): 662.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Efficacy of Noninvasive Neurostimulation Therapies for Acute and Subacute Poststroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    Ching-Fang Chiang, Meng-Ting Lin, Ming-Yen Hsiao, Yi-Chun Yeh, Yun-Chieh Liang, Tyng-Guey Wang
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2019; 100(4): 739.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Swallowing Function and Quality of Life of Post-stroke Patients
    Nezehat Özgül Ünlüer, Çağrı Mesut Temuçin, Numan Demir, Selen Serel Arslan, Aynur Ayşe Karaduman
    Dysphagia.2019; 34(3): 360.     CrossRef
  • Cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation restores pharyngeal brain activity and swallowing behaviour after disruption by a cortical virtual lesion
    Ayodele Sasegbon, Masahiro Watanabe, Andre Simons, Emilia Michou, Dipesh H. Vasant, Jin Magara, Philip M. Bath, John Rothwell, Makoto Inoue, Shaheen Hamdy
    The Journal of Physiology.2019; 597(9): 2533.     CrossRef
  • Effects of capsaicin on swallowing function in stroke patients with dysphagia: A randomized controlled trial
    Zhuo Wang, Lingling Wu, Qi Fang, Meifen Shen, Lulu Zhang, Xueyun Liu
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2019; 28(6): 1744.     CrossRef
  • Genetic influences on the variability of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in human pharyngeal motor cortex
    Alicja Raginis‐Zborowska, Ivy Cheng, Neil Pendleton, Antony Payton, William Ollier, Emilia Michou, Shaheen Hamdy
    Neurogastroenterology & Motility.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Restraint devices for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in mice and rats
    Chengliang Zhang, Rulan Lu, Linxiao Wang, Wenwei Yun, Xianju Zhou
    Brain and Behavior.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Change Rate Influences Sensorimotor Cortical Excitability During Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
    Sheng-Long Jiang, Zhongpeng Wang, Weibo Yi, Feng He, Hongzhi Qi, Dong Ming
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Clinical Approach to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Speech and Swallow in an Acute Rehabilitation Facility
    Melissa M. Howard, Emily R. Rosario
    Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.2019; 4(5): 1044.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Expiratory Muscle Strength Training on Swallowing and Cough Functions in Patients With Neurological Diseases
    Zhuo Wang, Zhi Wang, Qi Fang, Huiling Li, Lulu Zhang, Xueyun Liu
    American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.2019; 98(12): 1060.     CrossRef
  • The effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation on patients with post-stroke dysphagia
    Pingping Meng, Shuchao Zhang, Qiang Wang, Peipei Wang, Chao Han, Jinghui Gao, Shouwei Yue
    Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation.2018; 31(2): 363.     CrossRef
  • Effect of chin tuck against resistance exercise on patients with dysphagia following stroke: A randomized pilot study
    Ji-Su Park, Duk-Hyun An, Dong-Hwan Oh, Moon-Young Chang
    NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal.2018; 42(2): 191.     CrossRef
  • Combined electrical stimulation and exercise for swallow rehabilitation post‐stroke: a pilot randomized control trial
    Lise Sproson, Sue Pownall, Pam Enderby, Jenny Freeman
    International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders.2018; 53(2): 405.     CrossRef
  • Acupuncture Treatment for Post-Stroke Dysphagia: An Update Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ling-xin Li, Kai Deng, Yun Qu
    Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine.2018; 24(9): 686.     CrossRef
  • Neurophysiological Adaptation and Neuromodulatory Treatment Approaches in Patients Suffering from Post-stroke Dysphagia
    Paul Muhle, Sonja Suntrup-Krueger, Rainer Dziewas
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2018; 6(4): 227.     CrossRef
  • Application of noninvasive brain stimulation for post‐stroke dysphagia rehabilitation
    Zhuo Wang, Wei‐Qun Song, Liang Wang
    The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2017; 33(2): 55.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as an alternative therapy for dysphagia after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiang Liao, Guoqiang Xing, Zhiwei Guo, Yu Jin, Qing Tang, Bin He, Morgan A McClure, Hua Liu, Huaping Chen, Qiwen Mu
    Clinical Rehabilitation.2017; 31(3): 289.     CrossRef
  • Mudança funcional no padrão de deglutição por meio da realização de exercícios orofaciais
    Irina Claudia Fernandes Alves, Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade
    CoDAS.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Shaker exercise in stroke survivors with oropharyngeal dysphagia
    Jong-Bae Choi, Sun-Hwa Shim, Jong-Eun Yang, Hyun-Dong Kim, Doo-Ho Lee, Ji-Su Park
    NeuroRehabilitation.2017; 41(4): 753.     CrossRef
  • Genetic determinants of swallowing impairment, recovery and responsiveness to treatment
    Alicja Raginis-Zborowska, Neil Pendleton, Shaheen Hamdy
    Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports.2016; 4(4): 249.     CrossRef
  • Effects of expiratory muscle strength training on oropharyngeal dysphagia in subacute stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial
    J. S. Park, D. H. Oh, M. Y. Chang, K. M. Kim
    Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2016; 43(5): 364.     CrossRef
  • Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with effortful swallowing on post‐stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: a randomised controlled trial
    J.‐S. Park, D.‐H. Oh, N.‐K. Hwang, J.‐H. Lee
    Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.2016; 43(6): 426.     CrossRef
  • Neurorehabilitation strategies for poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: from compensation to the recovery of swallowing function
    Christopher Cabib, Omar Ortega, Hatice Kumru, Ernest Palomeras, Natalia Vilardell, Daniel Alvarez‐Berdugo, Desirée Muriana, Laia Rofes, Rosa Terré, Fermín Mearin, Pere Clavé
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2016; 1380(1): 121.     CrossRef
  • Is non-invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation effective in severe chronic neurogenic dysphagia? Reporton a post-traumatic brain injury patient
    Rocco Salvatore Calabrò, Valeria Conti Nibali, Antonino Naro, Daniela Floridia, Maria Pizzimenti, Lucia Salmeri, Carlo Salviera, Placido Bramanti
    NeuroRehabilitation: An International, Interdisciplinary Journal.2016; 38(1): 53.     CrossRef
  • Scalp acupuncture and electromagnetic convergence stimulation for patients with cerebral infarction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jae-Young Han, Jae-Hong Kim, Ju-Hyung Park, Min-Yeong Song, Min-Keun Song, Dong-Joo Kim, Young-Nim You, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jin-Bong Choi, Myung-Rae Cho, Jeong-Cheol Shin, Ji-Hyun Cho
    Trials.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The effects of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systemic review and meta-analysis
    Yi-Wen Chen, Kwang-Hwa Chang, Hung-Chou Chen, Wen-Miin Liang, Ya-Hui Wang, Yen-Nung Lin
    Clinical Rehabilitation.2016; 30(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: a Novel Approach for Treating Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
    Emilia Michou, Alicja Raginis-Zborowska, Masahiro Watanabe, Taha Lodhi, Shaheen Hamdy
    Current Gastroenterology Reports.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive brain stimulation for dysphagia after acquired brain injury: a systematic review
    Ryo Momosaki, Shoji Kinoshita, Wataru Kakuda, Naoki Yamada, Masahiro Abo
    The Journal of Medical Investigation.2016; 63(3.4): 153.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Patients With Dysphagia With Medullary Infarction
    Ming Zhang, Tao Tao, Zhao-Bo Zhang, Xiao Zhu, Wen-Guo Fan, Li-Jun Pu, Lei Chu, Shou-Wei Yue
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2016; 97(3): 355.     CrossRef
  • Update on management options for dysphagia after acute stroke
    Jessica Beavan
    British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.2015; 11(Sup2): 10.     CrossRef
  • Management of oropharyngeal neurogenic dysphagia in adults
    Anna Miles, Jacqui E. Allen
    Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery.2015; 23(6): 433.     CrossRef
  • The peculiarities of the application of transcranial magnetic therapy and electrical stimulation for the treatment of the patients presenting with various types of stroke
    E. A. Melnikova
    Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kul'tury.2015; 92(5): 12.     CrossRef
  • 7,651 View
  • 234 Download
  • 94 Web of Science
  • 103 Crossref
Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
Chul Kim, Hee Eun Choi, Heejin Jung, Byeong-Ju Lee, Ki Hoon Lee, Young-Joon Lim
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(5):585-591.   Published online October 30, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.5.585
Objective

To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients.

Methods

Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this study. The first group received 10 sessions of 20 Hz rTMS at ipsilesional M1 area and the other group received 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS at contralesional M1 area. Motor training of the hemiparetic hand was conducted after each rTMS train. All the patients received conventional occupational therapy immediately after each rTMS session. Manual function test (MFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Brunnstrom recovery stage, and grip strength were used to assess motor function before, at the end of, and one month after the last session of rTMS.

Results

No adverse side effects were reported during the course of the experiment using rTMS. No significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity was observed between the two groups before rTMS. Significant improvements in MFT, FMS, MBI, and Brunnstrom stage were observed in the both groups at the end of the last rTMS session and one month later (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity between 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS during the subacute period of ischemic stroke. Thus, we cannot conclude which has a greater effect.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Observing the Therapeutic Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Scalp Acupuncture Therapy on Hand Dysfunction after Stroke
    克伟 张
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(03): 513.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint-induced movement therapy combined in the treatment of post-stroke movement disorders: a narrative review
    Zhennan Liu, Qingying Yu, Feng Zhou, Muyao Yu, Huan Shu, Manhua Zhu, Tianzhong Peng
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulatory Responses Elicited by Intermittent versus Continuous Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Rats
    Tsung-Hsun Hsieh, Po-Chun Chu, Thi Xuan Dieu Nguyen, Chi-Wei Kuo, Pi-Kai Chang, Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen, Hao-Li Liu
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(11): 5687.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Treatment on ASD Symptoms in Children: A Pilot Study
    Kierra Pietramala, Alessandro Greco, Alberto Garoli, Danielle Roblin
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(12): 1293.     CrossRef
  • Applications of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Upper Limb Motor Performance After Stroke: A Systematic Review
    Afifa Safdar, Marie-Claire Smith, Winston D. Byblow, Cathy M. Stinear
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2023; 37(11-12): 837.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Contralateral Limb Cross Education and High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Indices of the Affected Upper Limb in Subacute Phase of Stroke
    Katayoon Rezaei, Amin Kordi Yoosefinejad, Farzaneh Moslemi Haghighi, Mohsen Razeghi, Anwen Shao
    Stroke Research and Treatment.2023; 2023: 1.     CrossRef
  • Low-Frequency rTMS over Contralesional M1 Increases Ipsilesional Cortical Excitability and Motor Function with Decreased Interhemispheric Asymmetry in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Ka Yan Luk, Hui Xi Ouyang, Marco Yiu Chung Pang, Takashi Hanakawa
    Neural Plasticity.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates cortical–subcortical connectivity in sensorimotor network
    Jing Chen, Yanzi Fan, Wei Wei, Luoyu Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Fengmei Fan, Zejuan Jia, Mengting Li, Jinhui Wang, Qihong Zou, Bing Chen, Yating Lv
    European Journal of Neuroscience.2022; 55(1): 227.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke: a protocol of a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Yue Lu, Yuan Xia, Yue Wu, Xinyong Pan, Zhenyu Wang, Yongjie Li
    BMJ Open.2022; 12(3): e051630.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Immobilization Promotes a Rapid Loss of Motor Evoked Potentials and Strength That Is Not Rescued by rTMS Treatment
    Christopher J. Gaffney, Amber Drinkwater, Shalmali D. Joshi, Brandon O'Hanlon, Abbie Robinson, Kayle-Anne Sands, Kate Slade, Jason J. Braithwaite, Helen E. Nuttall
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Physiology of Cerebellar Reserve: Redundancy and Plasticity of a Modular Machine
    Hiroshi Mitoma, Shinji Kakei, Kazuhiko Yamaguchi, Mario Manto
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2021; 22(9): 4777.     CrossRef
  • Corticomotor Plasticity Predicts Clinical Efficacy of Combined Neuromodulation and Cognitive Training in Alzheimer’s Disease
    Anna-Katharine Brem, Riccardo Di Iorio, Peter J. Fried, Albino J. Oliveira-Maia, Camillo Marra, Paolo Profice, Davide Quaranta, Lukas Schilberg, Natasha J. Atkinson, Erica E. Seligson, Paolo Maria Rossini, Alvaro Pascual-Leone
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
    Ana Dionísio, Isabel Catarina Duarte, Miguel Patrício, Miguel Castelo-Branco
    Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.2018; 27(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Combined rTMS and virtual reality brain–computer interface training for motor recovery after stroke
    N N Johnson, J Carey, B J Edelman, A Doud, A Grande, K Lakshminarayan, B He
    Journal of Neural Engineering.2018; 15(1): 016009.     CrossRef
  • Cerebellar Cortex as a Therapeutic Target for Neurostimulation
    Kim van Dun, Hiroshi Mitoma, Mario Manto
    The Cerebellum.2018; 17(6): 777.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) after acute stroke: A one‐year longitudinal randomized trial
    Yu‐Zhou Guan, Jing Li, Xue‐Wei Zhang, Shuang Wu, Hua Du, Li‐Ying Cui, Wei‐Hong Zhang
    CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics.2017; 23(12): 940.     CrossRef
  • Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
    Lan Zhang, Guoqiang Xing, Shiquan Shuai, Zhiwei Guo, Huaping Chen, Morgan A. McClure, Xiaojuan Chen, Qiwen Mu
    Neural Plasticity.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in the early period after stroke: a preliminary study
    Aliye Tosun, Sabiha Türe, Ayhan Askin, Engin Ugur Yardimci, Secil Umit Demirdal, Tülay Kurt Incesu, Ozgur Tosun, Hikmet Kocyigit, Galip Akhan, Fazıl Mustafa Gelal
    Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2017; 24(5): 361.     CrossRef
  • Role of the Contralesional vs. Ipsilesional Hemisphere in Stroke Recovery
    Keith C. Dodd, Veena A. Nair, Vivek Prabhakaran
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of different frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the recovery of upper limb motor dysfunction in patients with subacute cerebral infarction
    Jiang Li, Xiang-min Meng, Ru-yi Li, Ru Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Yi-feng Du
    Neural Regeneration Research.2016; 11(10): 1584.     CrossRef
  • Scalp acupuncture and electromagnetic convergence stimulation for patients with cerebral infarction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jae-Young Han, Jae-Hong Kim, Ju-Hyung Park, Min-Yeong Song, Min-Keun Song, Dong-Joo Kim, Young-Nim You, Gwang-Cheon Park, Jin-Bong Choi, Myung-Rae Cho, Jeong-Cheol Shin, Ji-Hyun Cho
    Trials.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Framework for Combining rTMS with Behavioral Therapy
    K. Zoe Tsagaris, Douglas R. Labar, Dylan J. Edwards
    Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Factors Associated With Upper Extremity Functional Recovery Following Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients
    Seo Young Kim, Sung Bong Shin, Seong Jae Lee, Tae Uk Kim, Jung Keun Hyun
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2016; 40(3): 373.     CrossRef
  • Bursts of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), together with lorazepam, suppress seizures in a rat kainate status epilepticus model
    Roman Gersner, Sameer C. Dhamne, Abraham Zangen, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Alexander Rotenberg
    Epilepsy & Behavior.2016; 62: 136.     CrossRef
  • Effects of low- and high-frequency repetitive magnetic stimulation on neuronal cell proliferation and growth factor expression: A preliminary report
    Ji Yong Lee, Hyung Joong Park, Ji Hyun Kim, Byung Pil Cho, Sung-Rae Cho, Sung Hoon Kim
    Neuroscience Letters.2015; 604: 167.     CrossRef
  • 5,634 View
  • 69 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 25 Crossref
Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function
Eunhee Park, Yun-Hee Kim, Won Hyuk Chang, Tae Gun Kwon, Yong-Il Shin
Ann Rehabil Med 2014;38(3):297-303.   Published online June 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.3.297
Objective

To investigate the effects of simultaneous, bihemispheric, dual-mode stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor functions and cortical excitability in healthy individuals.

Methods

Twenty-five healthy, right-handed volunteers (10 men, 15 women; mean age, 25.5 years) were enrolled. All participants received four randomly arranged, dual-mode, simultaneous stimulations under the following conditions: condition 1, high-frequency rTMS over the right primary motor cortex (M1) and sham tDCS over the left M1; condition 2, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and anodal tDCS over the left M1; condition 3, high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 and cathodal tDCS over the left M1; and condition 4, sham rTMS and sham tDCS. The cortical excitability of the right M1 and motor functions of the left hand were assessed before and after each simulation.

Results

Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes after stimulation were significantly higher than before stimulation, under the conditions 1 and 2. The MEP amplitude in condition 2 was higher than both conditions 3 and 4, while the MEP amplitude in condition 1 was higher than condition 4. The results of the Purdue Pegboard test and the box and block test showed significant improvement in conditions 1 and 2 after stimulation.

Conclusion

Simultaneous stimulation by anodal tDCS over the left M1 with high-frequency rTMS over the right M1 could produce interhemispheric modulation and homeostatic plasticity, which resulted in modulation of cortical excitability and motor functions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression
    Dongsheng Zhou, Xingxing Li, Shuochi Wei, Chang Yu, Dongmei Wang, Yuchen Li, Jiaxin Li, Junyao Liu, Shen Li, Wenhao Zhuang, Yanli Li, Ruichenxi Luo, Zhiwang Liu, Jimeng Liu, Yongming Xu, Jialin Fan, Guidong Zhu, Weiqian Xu, Yiping Tang, Raymond Y. Cho, Th
    JAMA Network Open.2024; 7(11): e2444306.     CrossRef
  • Hemispheric Differences of 1 Hz rTMS over Motor and Premotor Cortex in Modulation of Neural Processing and Hand Function
    Jitka Veldema, Dennis Alexander Nowak, Kathrin Bösl, Alireza Gharabaghi
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(5): 752.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive Brain Imaging and Stimulation in Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Review
    Hui Chang, Yixuan Sheng, Jinbiao Liu, Hongyu Yang, Xiangyu Pan, Honghai Liu
    IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.2023; 15(3): 1085.     CrossRef
  • Canadian Platform for Trials in Noninvasive Brain Stimulation (CanStim) Consensus Recommendations for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Upper Extremity Motor Stroke Rehabilitation Trials
    Jodi D. Edwards, Sandra E. Black, Shaun Boe, Lara Boyd, Arthur Chaves, Robert Chen, Sean Dukelow, Joyce Fung, Adam Kirton, Jed Meltzer, Zahra Moussavi, Jason Neva, Caroline Paquette, Michelle Ploughman, Sepideh Pooyania, Tarek K. Rajji, Marc Roig, Francoi
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2021; 35(2): 103.     CrossRef
  • Effects of combined theta burst stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on stress
    Stefanie De Smet, Chris Baeken, Rudi De Raedt, Matias M. Pulopulos, Lais B. Razza, Stefaan Van Damme, Sara De Witte, Andre R. Brunoni, Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(5): 1116.     CrossRef
  • rTMS combined with motor training changed the inter-hemispheric lateralization
    Jing-na Jin, Xin Wang, Ying Li, He Wang, Zhi-peng Liu, Tao Yin
    Experimental Brain Research.2019; 237(10): 2735.     CrossRef
  • Neuromodulation in the restoration of function after spinal cord injury
    Nicholas D James, Stephen B McMahon, Edelle C Field-Fote, Elizabeth J Bradbury
    The Lancet Neurology.2018; 17(10): 905.     CrossRef
  • The Persisted Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Task-Specific Induced Hand Recovery Following Subacute Stroke: Extended Study
    Jarugool Tretriluxana, Jenjira Thanakamchokchai, Chutima Jalayondeja, Narawut Pakaprot, Suradej Tretriluxana
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2018; 42(6): 777.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Dual-Mode and Dual-Site Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Freezing of Gait in Patients With Parkinson Disease
    Won Hyuk Chang, Min Soo Kim, Eunhee Park, Jin Whan Cho, Jinyoung Youn, Yun Kwan Kim, Yun-Hee Kim
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2017; 98(7): 1283.     CrossRef
  • Can neurophysiologic measures serve as biomarkers for the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of major depressive disorder?
    Brian Kobayashi, Ian A. Cook, Aimee M. Hunter, Michael J. Minzenberg, David E. Krantz, Andrew F. Leuchter
    International Review of Psychiatry.2017; 29(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to both primary motor cortices improves unimanual and bimanual dexterity
    Nils H. Pixa, Fabian Steinberg, Michael Doppelmayr
    Neuroscience Letters.2017; 643: 84.     CrossRef
  • Novel Neuromodulation Techniques to Assess Interhemispheric Communication in Neural Injury and Neurodegenerative Diseases
    Samuel S. Shin, Galit Pelled
    Frontiers in Neural Circuits.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dual-mode noninvasive brain stimulation over the bilateral primary motor cortices in stroke patients
    Jae Yong Cho, Ahee Lee, Min Su Kim, Eunhee Park, Won Hyuk Chang, Yong-Il Shin, Yun-Hee Kim
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2017; 35(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • The effects of anodal-tDCS on corticospinal excitability enhancement and its after-effects: conventional vs. unihemispheric concurrent dual-site stimulation
    Bita Vaseghi, Maryam Zoghi, Shapour Jaberzadeh
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 4,517 View
  • 62 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 14 Crossref

Case Report

Diagnosis With Manometry and Treatment With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Dysphagia
Won Ihl Rhee, Sun Jae Won, Sae Byuk Ko
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(6):907-912.   Published online December 23, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.907

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) used for the diagnosis of dysphagia has limitations in objectively assessing the contractility of the pharyngeal muscle or the degree of the upper esophageal sphincter relaxation. With a manometer, however, it is possible to objectively assess the pressure changes in the pharynx caused by pharyngeal muscle contraction during swallowing or upper esophageal sphincter relaxation, hence remedying the limitations of VFSS. The following case report describes a patient diagnosed with lateral medullar infarction presenting a 52-year-old male who had dysphagia. We suggested that the manometer could be used to assess the specific site of dysfunction in patients with dysphagia complementing the limitations of VFSS. We also found that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was effective in treating patients refractory to traditional dysphagia rehabilitation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Dysphagia in Lateral Medullary Syndrome: A Narrative Review
    Sung Ho Jang, Min Son Kim
    Dysphagia.2021; 36(3): 329.     CrossRef
  • Neurorehabilitation strategies for poststroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: from compensation to the recovery of swallowing function
    Christopher Cabib, Omar Ortega, Hatice Kumru, Ernest Palomeras, Natalia Vilardell, Daniel Alvarez‐Berdugo, Desirée Muriana, Laia Rofes, Rosa Terré, Fermín Mearin, Pere Clavé
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.2016; 1380(1): 121.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial non-invasive brain stimulation in swallowing rehabilitation following stroke — A review of the literature
    Sebastian H. Doeltgen, Lynley V. Bradnam, Jessica A. Young, Eric Fong
    Physiology & Behavior.2015; 143: 1.     CrossRef
  • 4,660 View
  • 66 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 3 Crossref

Original Article

Comparison of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroneuronography Between Bell's Palsy and Ramsay Hunt Syndrome in Their Acute Stages
Dong Min Hur, Seong Hoon Kim, Young Hee Lee, Sung Hoon Kim, Jung Mi Park, Ji Hyun Kim, Sang Yeol Yong, Jong Mock Shinn, Kyung Joon Oh
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(1):103-109.   Published online February 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.103
Objective

To examine the neurophysiologic status in patients with idiopathic facial nerve palsy (Bell's palsy) and Ramsay Hunt syndrome (herpes zoster oticus) within 7 days from onset of symptoms, by comparing the amplitude of compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) of facial muscles in electroneuronography (ENoG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

Methods

The facial nerve conduction study using ENoG and TMS was performed in 42 patients with Bell's palsy and 14 patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome within 7 days from onset of symptoms. Denervation ratio was calculated as CMAP amplitude evoked by ENoG or TMS on the affected side as percentage of the amplitudes on the healthy side. The severity of the facial palsy was graded according to House-Brackmann facial grading scale (H-B FGS).

Results

In all subjects, the denervation ratio in TMS (71.53±18.38%) was significantly greater than the denervation ratio in ENoG (41.95±21.59%). The difference of denervation ratio between ENoG and TMS was significantly smaller in patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome than in patients with Bell's palsy. The denervation ratio of ENoG or TMS did not correlated significantly with the H-B FGS.

Conclusion

In the electrophysiologic study for evaluation in patients with facial palsy within 7 days from onset of symptoms, ENoG and TMS are useful in gaining additional information about the neurophysiologic status of the facial nerve and may help to evaluate prognosis and set management plan.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Differential Diagnosis of Unilateral Peripheral Facial Nerve Palsy
    Vera E. A. Kleinveld, Sarah Platzgummer, Julia Wanschitz, Corinne G. C. Horlings, Wolfgang N. Löscher
    Brain Sciences.2023; 13(4): 624.     CrossRef
  • Mastoid effusion on temporal bone MRI in patients with Bell’s palsy and Ramsay Hunt syndrome
    Jin Woo Choi, Jiyeon. Lee, Dong-Han Lee, Jung Eun Shin, Chang-Hee Kim
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Facial nerve electrodiagnostics for patients with facial palsy: a clinical practice guideline
    Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Gerd Fabian Volk, Kerry D. Olsen, Antti A. Mäkitie, Carl E. Silver, Mark E. Zafereo, Alessandra Rinaldo, Gregory W. Randolph, Ricard Simo, Ashok R. Shaha, Vincent Vander Poorten, Alfio Ferlito
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.2020; 277(7): 1855.     CrossRef
  • Electrophysiological Evaluation of the Facial Muscles in Congenital Unilateral Lower Lip Palsy
    Shintaro Baba, Kenji Kondo, Tatsuya Yamasoba
    Otology & Neurotology.2018; 39(1): 106.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of High-Resolution 3D Multi-Sequences for Peripheral Facial Palsy: Differentiation Between Bell's Palsy and Ramsay Hunt Syndrome
    Junko Kuya, Keita Kuya, Yuki Shinohara, Yasuomi Kunimoto, Hiroaki Yazama, Toshihide Ogawa, Hiromi Takeuchi
    Otology & Neurotology.2017; 38(10): 1523.     CrossRef
  • Compound motor action potential duration and latency are markers of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury
    Neel K. Bhatt, Andrea M. Park, Mohammad T. Al‐Lozi, Derrick C. Gale, Randal C. Paniello
    The Laryngoscope.2017; 127(8): 1855.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors of Bell's palsy and Ramsay Hunt syndrome
    Zhengyi Cai, Huijing Li, Xun Wang, Xiaoting Niu, Peiqi Ni, Wanli Zhang, Bei Shao
    Medicine.2017; 96(2): e5898.     CrossRef
  • Early Observations on Facial Palsy
    J. M. S. Pearce
    Journal of the History of the Neurosciences.2015; 24(4): 319.     CrossRef
  • 6,738 View
  • 81 Download
  • 8 Crossref

Case Report

Corticospinal Tract and Pontocerebellar Fiber of Central Pontine Myelinolysis
Yong Min, Sung-Hee Park, Seung-Bae Hwang
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(6):887-892.   Published online December 28, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.6.887

Central pontine myelinolysis is a rare neurologic disorder that is defined by demyelination of longitudinally descending tracts and transversly crossing fibers in the basis pontis. Frequently observed clinical manifestations of this disorder include sudden weakness, dysphagia, loss of consciouness and locked-in syndrome. However, there have been a few studies that reported a benign course of this disease, which include cerebellar signs, such as ataxia, intention tremor, and dysarthria. Here we report on a 53-year-old male with a history of liver cirrhosis who showed the cerebellar type of central pontine myelinolysis. The patient was diagnosed with central pontine myelinolysis based on clinical presentations and magnetic resonance imaging findings after a liver transplantation. Conventional magenetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the preservation of the corticospinal tract and abnormal pontocerebellar fibers. However, these findings were not sufficient to define the pathophysiology of our patient. Electrophysiologic analysis and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) were performed to investigate cerebellar signs in this case. Delayed central motor conduction time (CMCT) to the tibialis anterior muscle with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was observed, which indicated demyelination of the corticospinal tract. Also, diffusion tensor imaging showed abnormal pontocerebellar fibers, which might have been caused by cerebellar dysfunction in our patient. A combination of TMS and DTI was also used to determine the pathophysiology of this disease.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Locked‐in syndrome after central pontine myelinolysis, an outstanding outcome of two patients
    Maïlys Chabert, Corentin Dauleac, Maude Beaudoin‐Gobert, Mélaine De‐Quelen, Sophie Ciancia, Timothée Jacquesson, Simon Bertrand, Emmanuel Vivier, Donatien De‐Marignan, Julien Jung, Nathalie Andre‐Obadia, Florent Gobert, François Cotton, Jacques Luauté
    Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology.2024; 11(3): 826.     CrossRef
  • Neuroimaging in alcohol use disorder: From mouse to man
    Michael Fritz, Anna M. Klawonn, Natalie M. Zahr
    Journal of Neuroscience Research.2022; 100(5): 1140.     CrossRef
  • Ataxia due to injury of the cortico-ponto-cerebellar tract in patients with mild traumatic brain injury
    Sung Ho Jang, Han Do Lee
    Medicine.2021; 100(48): e28024.     CrossRef
  • Jaw clonus in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with subsequent osmotic demyelination syndrome
    Ritwik Ghosh, Devlina Roy, Souvik Dubey, Durjoy Lahiri, Subhankar Chatterjee, Josef Finsterer
    Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2020; 9(2): 1209.     CrossRef
  • An Unusual, Intermediate-Sized Lesion Affecting Motor Organization in a Patient With Schizencephaly: A Case Report
    Sung-Woon Baik, Gi-Wook Kim, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Jeoung-Hwan Seo, Yu-Hui Won, Sung-Hee Park
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Injury of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract in a patient with intentional tremor after mild traumatic brain injury: a case report
    Min Cheol Chang, Jeong Pyo Seo
    Brain Injury.2020; 34(9): 1283.     CrossRef
  • Improvement of ataxia in a patient with cerebellar infarction by recovery of injured cortico-ponto-cerebellar tract and dentato-rubro-thalamic tract: a diffusion tensor tractography study
    SungHo Jang, HyeokGyu Kwon
    Neural Regeneration Research.2019; 14(8): 1470.     CrossRef
  • Injury of the cortico-ponto-cerebellar tract in a patient with mild traumatic brain injury
    Sung Ho Jang, Hyeok Gyu Kwon
    Medicine.2017; 96(49): e8749.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral brainstem: anatomical feasibility and surgical limitations
    Walid I. Essayed, Harminder Singh, Gennaro Lapadula, Gustavo J. Almodovar-Mercado, Vijay K. Anand, Theodore H. Schwartz
    Journal of Neurosurgery.2017; 127(5): 1139.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Cuprizone Feeding Induces Selective Amino Acid Deprivation with Concomitant Activation of an Integrated Stress Response in Oligodendrocytes
    Johannes Goldberg, Moritz Daniel, Yasemin van Heuvel, Marion Victor, Cordian Beyer, Tim Clarner, Markus Kipp
    Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology.2013; 33(8): 1087.     CrossRef
  • 5,425 View
  • 44 Download
  • 10 Crossref
Original Article
Prediction of Motor Function Recovery after Subcortical Stroke: Case Series of Activation PET and TMS Studies
Se Hee Jung, Yu Kyeong Kim, Sang Eum Kim, Nam-Jong Paik
Ann Rehabil Med 2012;36(4):501-511.   Published online August 27, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2012.36.4.501
Objective

To examine whether the pattern of brain activation induced by a motor task and the motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have prognostic implications for motor recovery after stroke.

Method

Ten patients with first-ever subcortical stroke (55.7±17.3 years, 5 ischemic and 5 hemorrhagic) underwent 2 FDG PET studies under different conditions (1: rest, 2: activation with a specific motor task) at 37.7±25.2 days after stroke. The regions showing more than a 10% increase in glucose metabolism on subtraction images during activation and rest were considered to be significantly activated. Cortical excitability of intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were assessed using the TMS from both abductor pollicis brevis muscles within 7 days of PET scans. Recovery of motor function was assessed at the point of the neurological plateau.

Results

The presence of a motor response at the plegic site to TMS and normal intracortical inhibition, and facilitation patterns in the unaffected hemisphere were found to be related to good recovery. An association between an ipsilesional activation on PET and good motor recovery was also observed, but this was significantly weaker than that between TMS measured cortical excitability and motor recovery.

Conclusion

Integrity of the ipsilesional corticospinal pathway, normalized contralesional intracortical excitability, and task-related activation in the ipsilesional hemisphere were found to predict post-stroke motor recovery significantly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Biochemical and structural magnetic resonance imaging in chronic stroke and the relationship with upper extremity motor function
    Mohamed Mahmoud Mostafa, Eman Mahmoud Awad, Ahmed Mohamed Hazzou, Mohamed Khaled Ahmed Elewa, Tougan Taha Abdel Aziz, Dalia Maher Samy
    The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cortical thickness and metabolite concentration in chronic stroke and the relationship with motor function
    Paul W. Jones, Michael R. Borich, Irene Vavsour, Alex Mackay, Lara A. Boyd
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2016; 34(5): 733.     CrossRef
  • Brain–machine interfaces in neurorehabilitation of stroke
    Surjo R. Soekadar, Niels Birbaumer, Marc W. Slutzky, Leonardo G. Cohen
    Neurobiology of Disease.2015; 83: 172.     CrossRef
  • Changes of oscillatory brain activity induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in healthy subjects
    Agata Woźniak-Kwaśniewska, David Szekely, Pierre Aussedat, Thierry Bougerol, Olivier David
    NeuroImage.2014; 88: 91.     CrossRef
  • Lasting Modulation Effects of rTMS on Neural Activity and Connectivity as Revealed by Resting-State EEG
    Lei Ding, Guofa Shou, Han Yuan, Diamond Urbano, Yoon-Hee Cha
    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.2014; 61(7): 2070.     CrossRef
  • 4,645 View
  • 37 Download
  • 5 Crossref
TOP