To introduce a newly designed massage instrument, the Hand Grip T-bar (HT-bar) and use it to relieve chronic non-specific low back pain (nLBP) through deep cross-friction massage (roptrotherapy).
22 subjects (9 males and 13 females, aged 51.6±6.7) with chronic nLBP were allocated randomly to a Roptrotherapy group (n=12) and a Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) group (n=10). The Roptrotherapy group received deep cross-friction massage with the HT-bar, which was made of metal and had a cylinder for increasing weight and grooves for an easy grip. It was applied across the middle and lower back for 20 minutes a day, 3 days a week for 2 weeks. The TENS group received TENS for 20 minutes a day, 5 days a week for 2 weeks. The outcome was measured on the pain numeric rating scale (PNRS), by the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and by the Roland & Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at pre-treatment, at immediate post-treatment and 2 weeks later. The application of the HT-bar was assessed by a questionnaire to 19 therapists.
At post-treatment, immediately and 2 weeks later, both groups showed significant improvement in PNRS, ODI and RMDQ. During the two weeks after post-treatment, however, the Roptrotherapy group improved in PNRS, ODI and RMDQ, but the TENS group did not. Over 80% of the therapists responded that the HT-bar was useful and comfortable.
This study suggests that deep cross-friction massage can be a beneficial therapeutic technique and that the HT-bar can be a useful instrument in deep cross-friction massage for chronic nLBP patients.
Citations
Objective: To investigate the influence of electronic filter setting change on the parameters of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies.
Method: Median motor and sensory nerve conduction studies were performed in 25 neurologically healthy adult subjects with a mean age of 29 years (range, 20∼50). Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded after fixing the low frequency filter cutoff value of 1 Hz, 10 Hz, 100 Hz and 300 Hz and by changing high frequency filter cutoff level from 10 KHz to 0.5 KHz. Onset and peak latency, amplitude of CMAPs and SNAPs were measured and the area of CMAPs were also recorded. Dantec Counterpoint MK2 machine was used. Skin temperature was maintained at 34oC or above.
Results: As the high frequency filter was changed from 10 KHz to 0.5 KHz, the mean amplitude of SNAPs and CMAPs decreased by 33.5%, 3.3%, respectively. Onset and peak latency prolonged significantly below the high frequency filter level of 2 KHz (p＜0.01). When the low frequency filter was varied form 1 Hz to 300 Hz, large differences were seen in amplitude (69.7%) and area (86.5%) of CMAPs and amplitude of SNAPs (36.6%) (p＜0.01), but onset latency was not changed. Peak latency of CMAPs decreased by 20.8%, however, the peak latency of SNAPs reduced slightly (1.4%) (p＞0.01).
Conclusion: Significant alterations in parameters of CMAPs and SNAPs were produced by modification of filter setting. Optimum filter setting is recommended in nerve conduction study and filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on patients.
First
Prev
