• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

6
results for

"Youn Joo Kang"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Youn Joo Kang"

Case Report

Effects of Radiation Therapy on Established Neurogenic Heterotopic Ossification
Chan Ho Lee, Su Jung Shim, Hyun Jung Kim, Hyuna Yang, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(6):1135-1139.   Published online December 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.6.1135

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is frequently seen on rehabilitation units after spinal cord injuries, fractures, brain injuries, and limb amputations. Currently, there is no effective treatment for HO other than prophylaxis with anti-inflammatory medications, irradiation, and bisphosphonate administration. These prophylactic treatments are not effective for managing ectopic bone once it has formed. Here we describe three cases of established neurogenic HO treated with radiation therapy (RT). All patients had decreased serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and bone-specific ALP levels with decreased pain but increased range of motion immediately after RT. Post-treatment X-rays revealed no further growth of the HO. All patients maintained clinical and laboratory improvements 4 or 6 months after the RT. Our results suggest that RT is safe and effective in decreasing pain and activity of neurogenic HO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Histology of neurogenic heterotopic ossification and comparison with its radiological expression in acute spinal cord injured patients
    Eugen Ulrich, Alexis Brinkemper, Manfred Köller, Ingo Stricker, Astrid Gisevius, Thomas A. Schildhauer, Renate Meindl, Dennis Grasmücke, Sabrina Buche-Lyding, Volkmar Nicolas, Mirko Aach
    Spinal Cord.2025; 63(4): 227.     CrossRef
  • Neurogenic heterotopic ossification: A review. Part 2
    Vladimir A. Novikov, Alina M. Khodorovskaya, Valery V. Umnov, Evgenii V. Melchenko, Dmitry V. Umnov
    Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery.2023; 11(4): 557.     CrossRef
  • Heterotopic ossification in COVID-19 patient on anticoagulation with limited treatment options
    Natalie A. Van Ochten, Akhil Shori, Matthew A. Puderbaugh, Joseph Benert, Murali Krishnamurthy
    Medicine: Case Reports and Study Protocols.2022; 3(2): e0212.     CrossRef
  • A new mouse model of post-traumatic joint injury allows to identify the contribution of Gli1+ mesenchymal progenitors in arthrofibrosis and acquired heterotopic endochondral ossification
    Jenny Magallanes, Nancy Q. Liu, Jiankang Zhang, Yuxin Ouyang, Tadiwanashe Mkaratigwa, Fangzhou Bian, Ben Van Handel, Tautis Skorka, Frank A. Petrigliano, Denis Evseenko
    Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Progressive Heterotopic Ossification: The Relationship between Dose and Efficacy
    Dong Soo Lee, Youngwoo Kim, Hang Joo Cho, Maru Kim, In Yong Whang
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2020; 106(5): 993.     CrossRef
  • When the Nervous System Turns Skeletal Muscles into Bones: How to Solve the Conundrum of Neurogenic Heterotopic Ossification
    Kylie A. Alexander, Hsu-Wen Tseng, Marjorie Salga, François Genêt, Jean-Pierre Levesque
    Current Osteoporosis Reports.2020; 18(6): 666.     CrossRef
  • Heterotopic ossifications: role of radiotherapy as prophylactic treatment
    Maria Grazia Ruo Redda, Chiara De Colle, Lavinia Bianco, Andrea Ruggieri, Daniela Nassisi, Annalisa Rossi, Eva Gino, Claudia Airaldi
    La radiologia medica.2018; 123(6): 463.     CrossRef
  • Cirugía de la anquilosis de cadera por osificación heterotópica secundaria a lesión medular
    L.M. Romero-Muñoz, A. Barriga-Martín, J. DeJuan-García
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología.2018; 62(6): 458.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of hip ankylosis due to heterotopic ossification secondary to spinal cord injury
    L.M. Romero-Muñoz, A. Barriga-Martín, J. DeJuan-García
    Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition).2018; 62(6): 458.     CrossRef
  • 5,738 View
  • 58 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 9 Crossref
Original Articles
Virtual Reality-Guided Motor Imagery Increases Corticomotor Excitability in Healthy Volunteers and Stroke Patients
Hyungjun Im, Jeunghun Ku, Hyun Jung Kim, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2016;40(3):420-431.   Published online June 29, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.420
Objective

To investigate the effects of using motor imagery (MI) in combination with a virtual reality (VR) program on healthy volunteers and stroke patients. In addition, this study investigated whether task variability within the VR-guided MI programs would influence corticomotor excitability.

Methods

The present study included 15 stroke patients and 15 healthy right-handed volunteers who were presented with four different conditions in a random order: rest, MI alone, VR-guided MI, and VR-guided MI with task variability. The corticomotor excitability of each participant was assessed before, during, and after each condition by measuring changes in the various parameters of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) of the extensor carpi radials (ECR). Changes in intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were calculated after each condition as percentages of inhibition (%INH) and facilitation (%FAC) at rest.

Results

In both groups, the increases in MEP amplitudes were greater during the two VR-guided MI conditions than during MI alone. Additionally, the reductions in ECR %INH in both groups were greater under the condition involving VR-guided MI with task variability than under that involving VR-guided MI with regular interval.

Conclusion

The corticomotor excitability elicited by MI using a VR avatar representation was greater than that elicited by MI with real body observations. Furthermore, the use of task variability in a VR program may enhance neural regeneration after stroke by reducing ICI. The present findings support the use of various VR programs as well as the concept of combining MI with VR programs for neurorehabilitation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Investigation of the effect of a virtual reality-based imagery training model on muscle activation in athletes
    Fatih Bedir, Deniz Bedir, Hasan Hüseyin Yılmaz, Fatih Ağduman, İlhan Şen, Fatih Kıyıcı, Onur Erdem Korkmaz, Mustafa Onur Yıldız, Erkan Çelik
    Frontiers in Psychology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Covariation of corticospinal excitability and the autonomous nervous system by virtual reality: the roller coaster effect
    Sidney Grosprêtre, Johanna Mathiot, Pauline Eon, Célia Ruffino
    Experimental Brain Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Using Humanoid Robots to Obtain High-Quality Motor Imagery Electroencephalogram Data for Better Brain–Computer Interaction
    Shiwei Cheng, Jialing Wang, Jieming Tian, Anjie Zhu, Jing Fan
    IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.2024; 16(2): 706.     CrossRef
  • Virtual Reality Action Observation and Motor Imagery to Enhance Neuroplastic Capacity in the Human Motor Cortex: A Pilot Double-blind, Randomized Cross-over Trial
    Niamh Connelly, Ellana Welsby, Belinda Lange, Brenton Hordacre
    Neuroscience.2024; 549: 92.     CrossRef
  • Editorial: The role of perceptual manipulations of XR in neurological rehabilitation
    Omar Janeh, Keigo Matsumto, Brian Horsak
    Frontiers in Virtual Reality.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Altered Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Edward P. Washabaugh, Sierra A. Foley, Emily G. Czopek, Chandramouli Krishnan
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2024; 38(11-12): 845.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of virtual reality based aerobic exercise on walking endurance, gait kinematics, and function in patients with chronic stroke: A double blinded randomized controlled trial
    Mostafa Fahmy, Eman Samir, Moussa A Sharaf, Nevein MM Gharib, Wael Shendy, Yasser Salem, Hatem Samir, Shereen H. ElSayed
    Fizjoterapia Polska.2024; 24(3): 293.     CrossRef
  • Multimodal Sensing in Stroke Motor Rehabilitation
    Zihe Zhao, Jiaqi Wang, Shengbo Wang, Rui Wang, Yao Lu, Yan Yuan, Junliang Chen, Yanning Dai, Yong Liu, Xiaomeng Wang, Yu Pan, Shuo Gao
    Advanced Sensor Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Environmental enrichment through virtual reality as multisensory stimulation to mitigate the negative effects of prolonged bed rest
    Luka Šlosar, Manca Peskar, Rado Pišot, Uros Marusic
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Motor Imagery and Action Observation: A Case for the Integration of 360°VR
    Riki Lindsay, Aden Kittel, Michael Spittle
    Frontiers in Psychology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Tasks for Post-Stroke Neuro-Rehabilitation of Distal Upper-Extremities: A Case Report
    Debasish Nath, Neha Singh, Megha Saini, Onika Banduni, Nand Kumar, Madakasira Vasantha Padma Srivastava, Shanmugam Senthil Kumaran, Amit Mehndiratta
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 12(1): 92.     CrossRef
  • Virtual reality exposure therapy for neuro-psychomotor recovery in adults: a systematic review
    Luan Freitas, Sabrina de Araújo Val, Francisco Magalhães, Victor Marinho, Carla Ayres, Silmar Teixeira, Victor Hugo Bastos
    Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology.2021; 16(6): 646.     CrossRef
  • Prospects for intelligent rehabilitation techniques to treat motor dysfunction
    Cong-Cong Huo, Ya Zheng, Wei-Wei Lu, Teng-Yu Zhang, Dai-Fa Wang, Dong-Sheng Xu, Zeng-Yong Li
    Neural Regeneration Research.2021; 16(2): 264.     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Virtual Reality Technology on the Imagery Skills and Performance of Target-Based Sports Athletes
    Deniz Bedir, Süleyman Erim Erhan
    Frontiers in Psychology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mental rotation performance in young adults with and without developmental coordination disorder
    Pamela Barhoun, Ian Fuelscher, Michael Do, Jason L. He, Soukayna Bekkali, Andris Cerins, George J. Youssef, Jacqueline Williams, Peter G. Enticott, Christian Hyde
    Human Movement Science.2021; 77: 102787.     CrossRef
  • Stationary walking performance of post-stroke patients and healthy individuals in real and virtual non-immersive environments
    Ailton Barbosa da Silva Júnior, Beatriz Cristina Medeiros de Lucena, Edson Meneses Silva-Filho, Aline Braga Galvão Silveira Fernandes
    Physiotherapy Practice and Research.2021; 42(1): 61.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality-based intervention on upper limb function in chronic individuals post-stroke with persistent severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial
    Roberto Llorens, María Antonia Fuentes, Adrián Borrego, Jorge Latorre, Mariano Alcañiz, Carolina Colomer, Enrique Noé
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Virtual Reality Rehabilitation With Functional Electrical Stimulation Improves Upper Extremity Function in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study
    Stephanie Hyeyoung Lee, Ji-Yeong Lee, Mi-Young Kim, Yu-Jin Jeon, Suyoung Kim, Joon-Ho Shin
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2018; 99(8): 1447.     CrossRef
  • Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Virtual Reality-Based Paradigm for Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Individuals with Restricted Movements. A Feasibility Study with a Chronic Stroke Survivor with Severe Hemiparesis
    María Antonia Fuentes, Adrián Borrego, Jorge Latorre, Carolina Colomer, Mariano Alcañiz, María José Sánchez-Ledesma, Enrique Noé, Roberto Llorens
    Journal of Medical Systems.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Sensorimotor Rhythm Modulation on the Human Flexor Carpi Radialis H-Reflex
    Aiko K. Thompson, Hannah Carruth, Rachel Haywood, N. Jeremy Hill, William A. Sarnacki, Lynn M. McCane, Jonathan R. Wolpaw, Dennis J. McFarland
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mobile Game Induces Active Engagement on Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training in Patients with Stroke
    Jeonghun Ku, Teo Lim, Yong Han, Youn Joo Kang
    Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.2018; 21(8): 504.     CrossRef
  • 8,409 View
  • 123 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 21 Crossref
Utility of a Three-Dimensional Interactive Augmented Reality Program for Balance and Mobility Rehabilitation in the Elderly: A Feasibility Study
Dal Jae Im, Jeunghun Ku, Yeun Joon Kim, Sangwoo Cho, Yun Kyung Cho, Teo Lim, Hye Sun Lee, Hyun Jung Kim, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2015;39(3):462-472.   Published online June 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.3.462
Objective

To improve lower extremity function and balance in elderly persons, we developed a novel, three-dimensional interactive augmented reality system (3D ARS). In this feasibility study, we assessed clinical and kinematic improvements, user participation, and the side effects of our system.

Methods

Eighteen participants (age, 56-76 years) capable of walking independently and standing on one leg were recruited. The participants received 3D ARS training during 10 sessions (30-minute duration each) for 4 weeks. Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) scores were obtained before and after the exercises. Outcome performance variables, including response time and success rate, and kinematic variables, such as hip and knee joint angle, were evaluated after each session.

Results

Participants exhibited significant clinical improvements in lower extremity balance and mobility following the intervention, as shown by improved BBS and TUG scores (p<0.001). Consistent kinematic improvements in the maximum joint angles of the hip and knee were observed across sessions. Outcome performance variables, such as success rate and response time, improved gradually across sessions, for each exercise. The level of participant interest also increased across sessions (p<0.001). All participants completed the program without experiencing any adverse effects.

Conclusion

Substantial clinical and kinematic improvements were observed after applying a novel 3D ARS training program, suggesting that this system can enhance lower extremity function and facilitate assessments of lower extremity kinematic capacity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Emerging Applications of Augmented and Mixed Reality Technologies in Motor Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
    Arman Farsi, Giacinto Luigi Cerone, Deborah Falla, Marco Gazzoni
    Sensors.2025; 25(7): 2042.     CrossRef
  • Virtual rehabilitation for patients with osteoporosis or other musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review
    Eléa Thuilier, John Carey, Mary Dempsey, John Dingliana, Bryan Whelan, Attracta Brennan
    Virtual Reality.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The evolution of augmented reality to augment physical therapy: A scoping review
    Po-Yao Hsu, Jonas Singer, Julie J Keysor
    Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lessons Learned from Older Adults Fusing of an Augmented Reality, Assisted Living and Social Interaction Platform
    Achilleas Achilleos, Christos Mettouris, Alexandros Yeratziotis, Joanna Starosta-Sztuczka, Sotiria Moza, Andria Hadjicosta, Stylianos Georgiou, Charalampos Theodorou, Constantinos Tevkros Loizou, Karol Pecyna, Kale Strahinja Lazic, Stefan Parker, George A
    SN Computer Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Training Systems
    Isidro III Mendoza Butaslac, Yuichiro Fujimoto, Taishi Sawabe, Masayuki Kanbara, Hirokazu Kato
    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.2023; 29(12): 5062.     CrossRef
  • KeepStep: Accommodating user diversity through individualized, projection-mapping based exergames for rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis
    Zahra Amiri, Yoones A. Sekhavat, Sakineh Goljaryan, Samad Roohi
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2022; 81(19): 27991.     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of exergaming in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Emel Mete, Zübeyir Sari
    Physiotherapy Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Augmented Reality-Based Proprioceptive Training Program on Balance, Positioning Sensation and Flexibility in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jaewon Lee, Jaeho Yu, Jiheon Hong, Dongyeop Lee, Jinseop Kim, Seonggil Kim
    Healthcare.2022; 10(7): 1202.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Augmented Reality for Lower Limb Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
    Hongbin Chang, Yang Song, Xuanzhen Cen, Wen-Ming Chen
    Applied Bionics and Biomechanics.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Virtual and augmented reality applications to improve older adults’ quality of life: A systematic mapping review and future directions
    Reem Sulaiman Baragash, Hanan Aldowah, Samar Ghazal
    DIGITAL HEALTH.2022; 8: 205520762211320.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Exercise Using an Exoskeletal Hip-Assist Robot on Physical Function and Walking Efficiency in Older Adults
    Su-Hyun Lee, Hwang-Jae Lee, Kyungrock Kim, Byoung-Hee Lee, Yun-Hee Kim
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(12): 2077.     CrossRef
  • Using augmented reality technology for balance training in the older adults: a feasibility pilot study
    Sven Blomqvist, Stefan Seipel, Maria Engström
    BMC Geriatrics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Shaping technologies for older adults with and without dementia: Reflections on ethics and preferences
    Unai Diaz-Orueta, Louise Hopper, Evdokimos Konstantinidis
    Health Informatics Journal.2020; 26(4): 3215.     CrossRef
  • Usability Issues of Clinical and Research Applications of Virtual Reality in Older People: A Systematic Review
    Cosimo Tuena, Elisa Pedroli, Pietro Davide Trimarchi, Alessia Gallucci, Mattia Chiappini, Karine Goulene, Andrea Gaggioli, Giuseppe Riva, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Fabrizio Giunco, Marco Stramba-Badiale
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The HoloLens Augmented Reality System Provides Valid Measures of Gait Performance in Healthy Adults
    Mandy Miller Koop, Anson B. Rosenfeldt, Joshua D. Johnston, Matthew C. Streicher, Jingan Qu, Jay L. Alberts
    IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.2020; 50(6): 584.     CrossRef
  • Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality System for Balance and Mobility Rehabilitation in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jeonghun Ku, Yeun Joon Kim, Sangwoo Cho, Teo Lim, Hye Sun Lee, Youn Joo Kang
    Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.2019; 22(2): 132.     CrossRef
  • Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies to Promote Wellbeing in Older Adults
    Li Na Lee, Mi Jeong Kim, Won Ju Hwang
    Applied Sciences.2019; 9(17): 3556.     CrossRef
  • Active seniors perceived value within digital museum transformation
    Christelle Traboulsi, Moreno Frau, Francesca Cabiddu
    The TQM Journal.2018; 30(5): 530.     CrossRef
  • Myo-Art: An innovative system to monitor muscle activity in Augmented Reality
    M. Gazzoni, G.L. Cerone
    Gait & Posture.2018; 66: S16.     CrossRef
  • Using communication and visualization technologies with senior citizens to facilitate cultural access and self-improvement
    María Dolores Meneses Fernández, Juana Dolores Santana Hernández, Jorge Martín Gutiérrez, María Reyes Henríquez Escuela, Eulalia Rodríguez Fino
    Computers in Human Behavior.2017; 66: 329.     CrossRef
  • The use of step aerobics and the stability ball to improve balance and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults – a randomized exploratory study
    Ayelet Dunsky, Tal Yahalom, Michal Arnon, Ronnie Lidor
    Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics.2017; 71: 66.     CrossRef
  • First-Person Point-of-View–Augmented Reality for Central Line Insertion Training
    Lauryn R. Rochlen, Robert Levine, Alan R. Tait
    Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.2017; 12(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • 6,960 View
  • 96 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 22 Crossref
Randomized, Sham Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Yon Joon Kim, Jeonghun Ku, Hyun Jung Kim, Dal Jae Im, Hye Sun Lee, Kyung Ah Han, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(6):766-776.   Published online December 23, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.766
Objective

To investigate the analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and sham tDCS in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN).

Methods

Patients with PDPN (n=60) were divided randomly into the three groups (n=20 per group). Each group received anodal tDCS with the anode centered over the left M1, DLPFC, or sham stimulation for 20 minutes at intensity of 2 mA for 5 consecutive days. A blinded physician rated the patients' pain using a visual analog scale (VAS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score, anxiety score, sleep quality, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the pain threshold (PT) to pressure.

Results

After the tDCS sessions, the M1 group showed a significantly greater reduction in VAS for pain and PT versus the sham and DLPFC groups (p<0.001). The reduction in VAS for pain was sustained after 2 and 4 weeks of follow-up in the M1 group compared with the sham group (p<0.001, p=0.007). Significant differences were observed among the three groups over time in VAS for pain (p<0.001), CGI score (p=0.01), and PT (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed among the groups in sleep quality, anxiety score, or BDI score immediately after tDCS.

Conclusion

Five daily sessions of tDCS over the M1 can produce immediate pain relief, and relief 2- and 4-week in duration in patients with PDPN. Our findings provide the first evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS on PDPN.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Working memory ımprovement after transcranial direct current stimulation paired with working memory training ın diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Serkan Aksu, Buse Rahime Hasırcı Bayır, Ceyhun Sayman, Ahmet Zihni Soyata, Gökalp Boz, Sacit Karamürsel
    Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2025; 32(1): 231.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive brain stimulation beyond the motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring effects on quantitative sensory testing in clinical pain
    Andrew Flood, Rocco Cavaleri, We-Ju Chang, Jason Kutch, Constantino Toufexis, Simon J Summers
    Pain Medicine.2025; 26(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • The comparative evidence of efficacy of non-invasive brain and nerve stimulation in diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ping-Tao Tseng, Bing-Yan Zeng, Chih-Wei Hsu, Chao-Ming Hung, Brendon Stubbs, Yen-Wen Chen, Tien-Yu Chen, Jiann-Jy Chen, Wei-Te Lei, Yow-Ling Shiue, Chih-Sung Liang
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the separate and combined effects of anodal tDCS over the M1 and F3 regions on pain relief in patients with type-2 diabetes suffering from neuropathic pain
    Ahmad Alipour, Roghayeh Mohammadi
    Neuroscience Letters.2024; 818: 137554.     CrossRef
  • Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review
    Qiao Kong, Tingting Li, Sveta Reddy, Sierra Hodges, Jian Kong
    Neurotherapeutics.2024; 21(1): e00297.     CrossRef
  • Inflammation, brain connectivity, and neuromodulation in post-traumatic headache
    Fernando da Silva Fiorin, Caroline Cunha do Espírito Santo, Joyce T. Da Silva, Man-Kyo Chung
    Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health.2024; 35: 100723.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Ameliorates Stress-Induced Sleep Disruption via Activating Infralimbic-Ventrolateral Preoptic Projections
    Yu-Jie Su, Pei-Lu Yi, Fang-Chia Chang
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • Analgesia of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiqi Wu, Xiaoyun Li, Yinhua Zhang, Shengxiong Chen, Richu Jin, Weiwei Peng
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research.2024; 185: 111868.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Strategies for Brain Doping in an Animal Model via Quantitative Analysis of Neurochemicals
    Yoeseph Cho, Seongeun Jeon, Yejin Lee, Hana Park, Yinglan Xu, Mijin Jeon, Sunmi Jung, Minyoung Kim, Ahlim Chin, Sang Sun Yoon, Junghyun Son
    Separations.2023; 10(7): 413.     CrossRef
  • Stimulation corticale pour le traitement de la douleur
    L. Garcia-Larrea, N. André-Obadia, S. Rostaing, C. Colomb
    Douleur et Analgésie.2023; 36(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Brain stimulation for chronic pain management: a narrative review of analgesic mechanisms and clinical evidence
    Michał Szymoniuk, Jia-Hsuan Chin, Łukasz Domagalski, Mateusz Biszewski, Katarzyna Jóźwik, Piotr Kamieniak
    Neurosurgical Review.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive cortical stimulation for drug-resistant pain
    Luis Garcia-Larrea
    Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care.2023; 17(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • Long-term analgesic effect of trans-spinal direct current stimulation compared to non-invasive motor cortex stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome
    Hasan Hodaj, Jean-Francois Payen, Enkelejda Hodaj, Marc Sorel, Anne Dumolard, Laurent Vercueil, Chantal Delon-Martin, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Brain Communications.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of massage, passive neural mobilization and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI) of the tibial nerve in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus induced neuropathy: a case report
    Goyal Manu, Mittal Amit, Samuel Asir John
    Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.2022; 38(13): 3273.     CrossRef
  • Effects of rTMS and tDCS on neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot study
    Erickson Duarte Bonifácio de Assis, Wanessa Kallyne Nascimento Martins, Carolina Dias de Carvalho, Clarice Martins Ferreira, Ruth Gomes, Evelyn Thais de Almeida Rodrigues, Ussânio Mororó Meira, Ledycnarf Januário de Holanda, Ana Raquel Lindquist, Edgard M
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relieving Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Effects on Pain Intensity, Quality, and Pain-Related Outcomes
    Marie-Philippe Harvey, Marylie Martel, Francis Houde, Inès Daguet, Eléonor Riesco, Guillaume Léonard
    Frontiers in Pain Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD)
    Jooyeon Jamie Im, Seunghee Na, Sanghoon Kang, Hyeonseok Jeong, Eek-Sung Lee, Tae-Kyeong Lee, Woo-Young Ahn, Yong-An Chung, In-Uk Song
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cortical stimulation for chronic pain: from anecdote to evidence
    Luis GARCIA-LARREA, Charles QUESADA
    European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is transcranial direct current stimulation beneficial for treating pain, depression, and anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu-Rong Wen, Jian Shi, Zheng-Yu Hu, Yang-Yang Lin, You-Tian Lin, Xue Jiang, Rui Wang, Xue-Qiang Wang, Yu-Ling Wang
    Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Sleep Disturbances
    Young-Ji Lee, Bong-Jo Kim, Cheol-Soon Lee, Boseok Cha, So-Jin Lee, Jae-Won Choi, Eunji Lim, Nuree Kang, Dongyun Lee
    Chronobiology in Medicine.2022; 4(4): 141.     CrossRef
  • Can a tDCS treatment enhance subjective and objective sleep among student-athletes?
    Jonathan Charest, Alexandre Marois, Celyne H. Bastien
    Journal of American College Health.2021; 69(4): 378.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Visual Illusion Effect According to Sensory Phenotypes in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury and Neuropathic Pain
    Dolors Soler, David Moriña, Hatice Kumru, Joan Vidal, Xavier Navarro
    The Journal of Pain.2021; 22(1): 86.     CrossRef
  • The effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on sleep disturbances among different neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions: A systematic review
    Alberto Herrero Babiloni, Audrey Bellemare, Gabrielle Beetz, Sophie-A. Vinet, Marc O. Martel, Gilles J. Lavigne, Louis De Beaumont
    Sleep Medicine Reviews.2021; 55: 101381.     CrossRef
  • Towards the endotyping of the sleep–pain interaction: a topical review on multitarget strategies based on phenotypic vulnerabilities and putative pathways
    Alberto Herrero Babiloni, Gabrielle Beetz, Nicole K.Y. Tang, Raphael Heinzer, Jo Nijs, Marc O. Martel, Gilles J. Lavigne
    Pain.2021; 162(5): 1281.     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on experimental pain perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoyun Li, Junjie Yao, Wenyun Zhang, Shengxiong Chen, Weiwei Peng
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(9): 2163.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for provoked vestibulodynia: What roles do psychosexual factors play in treatment response?
    Mélanie Morin, Annie Morin, Véronique Gougeon, Serge Marchand, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Audrey Brassard, Justine Benoit-Piau, Guillaume Léonard
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2021; 93: 54.     CrossRef
  • Efectos de la estimulación no invasiva de la corteza motora en las pruebas sensoriales cuantitativas en sujetos sanos y con dolor crónico: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.
    Stefano Giannoni-Luza, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Piero F. Mejia-Pando, Maria A. Luna-Cuadros, Judah L. Barouh, Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros, Ludmilla Candido-Santos, Alice Barra, Wolnei Caumo, Felipe Fregni
    NeuroTarget.2021; 15(3): 45.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation methods in the treatment of chronic pain
    X. Moisset, M. Lanteri-Minet, D. Fontaine
    Journal of Neural Transmission.2020; 127(4): 673.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life and physical fitness in diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial
    Galeno Ferreira, Edson Silva-Filho, Antônio de Oliveira, Clemilda de Lucena, Johnnatas Lopes, Rodrigo Pegado
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.2020; 19(1): 327.     CrossRef
  • Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex attenuates capsaicin‐induced dynamic mechanical allodynia and mechanical pain sensitivity in humans
    Sam W. Hughes, Grace Ward, Paul H. Strutton
    European Journal of Pain.2020; 24(6): 1130.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive motor cortex stimulation effects on quantitative sensory testing in healthy and chronic pain subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stefano Giannoni-Luza, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Piero F. Mejia-Pando, Maria A. Luna-Cuadros, Judah L. Barouh, Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros, Ludmilla Candido-Santos, Alice Barra, Wolnei Caumo, Felipe Fregni
    Pain.2020; 161(9): 1955.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the editor - Transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life and physical fitness in diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial”
    Satkarjit Kaur Jhandi, Nidhi Sharma, Manu Goyal
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.2020; 19(2): 2025.     CrossRef
  • Age as a Mediator of tDCS Effects on Pain: An Integrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Júlia Schirmer Saldanha, Maxciel Zortea, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive neuromodulation effects on painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huiyan Zeng, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Ying Cao, Ying Li, Jinming Zhang, Caifeng Yang, Felipe Fregni
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Pain Processing
    Wei-Yi Ong, Christian S. Stohler, Deron R. Herr
    Molecular Neurobiology.2019; 56(2): 1137.     CrossRef
  • Primary Motor Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Temporal Summation of the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex in Healthy Subjects
    Sam Hughes, Sybil Grimsey, Paul H Strutton
    Pain Medicine.2019; 20(6): 1156.     CrossRef
  • Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC2-NIN-CP)
    Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Ana Mércia B.L. Fernandes, Katia Nunes Sá, Alexandre Hideki Okano, André Russowsky Brunoni, Argelia Lara-Solares, Aziza Jreige Iskandar, Carlos Guerrero, César Amescua-García, Durval Campos Kraychete, Egas Caparelli-Daquer, Elias
    PAIN Reports.2019; 4(1): e692.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve the Dysfunction of Descending Pain Modulatory System Related to Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An Integrative Review of Neurobiology and Meta-Analysis
    Maxciel Zortea, Leticia Ramalho, Rael Lopes Alves, Camila Fernanda da Silveira Alves, Gilberto Braulio, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain
    Neil E O'Connell, Louise Marston, Sally Spencer, Lorraine H DeSouza, Benedict M Wand
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • At-Home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) With Telehealth Support for Symptom Control in Chronically-Ill Patients With Multiple Symptoms
    Alexa Riggs, Vaishali Patel, Bhaskar Paneri, Russell K. Portenoy, Marom Bikson, Helena Knotkova
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Frequency‐dependent top‐down modulation of temporal summation by anodal transcranial direct‐current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in healthy adults
    S.W. Hughes, M. Ali, P. Sharma, N. Insan, P.H. Strutton
    European Journal of Pain.2018; 22(8): 1494.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain: A double‐blind randomized controlled trial
    G.N. Lewis, D.A. Rice, M. Kluger, P.J. McNair
    European Journal of Pain.2018; 22(7): 1312.     CrossRef
  • Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the motor cortex reduces chronic pain in Alcock canal syndrome
    Raffaella Ricci, Ada Ghiggia, Ilenia La Rosa, Azzurra Milano, Walter Troni, Mark S. George, Jeffrey J. Borckardt, Lorys Castelli, Adriana Salatino
    Brain Stimulation.2018; 11(3): 648.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain
    Neil E O'Connell, Louise Marston, Sally Spencer, Lorraine H DeSouza, Benedict M Wand
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Emerging therapies for neuropathic pain: new molecules or new indications for old treatments?
    Didier Bouhassira, Nadine Attal
    Pain.2018; 159(3): 576.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Andrea Antal, Samar S. Ayache, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Filippo Cogiamanian, Maria Cotelli, Dirk De Ridder, Roberta Ferrucci, Berthold Langguth, Paola Marangolo, Veit Mylius, Michael A. Nitsche, Frank Padberg, Ulrich Pa
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2017; 128(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in women with provoked vestibulodynia
    Annie Morin, Guillaume Léonard, Véronique Gougeon, Marie-Pierre Cyr, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Mélanie Morin
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2017; 216(6): 584.e1.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Long-Term Treatment of Chronic Pain Syndrome by Anodal tDCS of the Motor Cortex, Previously Resistant to High-Frequency rTMS and Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Hasan Hodaj, Jean-François Payen, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(4): 618.     CrossRef
  • Potential Mechanisms Supporting the Value of Motor Cortex Stimulation to Treat Chronic Pain Syndromes
    Marcos F. DosSantos, Natália Ferreira, Rebecca L. Toback, Antônio C. Carvalho, Alexandre F. DaSilva
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials
    Luana V.M. Aparício, Fabiana Guarienti, Lais Boralli Razza, André F. Carvalho, Felipe Fregni, André Russowsky Brunoni
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(5): 671.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in women with provoked vestibulodynia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Annie Morin, Guillaume Léonard, Véronique Gougeon, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Mélanie Morin
    Trials.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of left primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation on laser-evoked potentials in migraine patients and normal subjects
    Eleonora Vecchio, Katia Ricci, Anna Montemurno, Marianna Delussi, Sara Invitto, Marina de Tommaso
    Neuroscience Letters.2016; 626: 149.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.2016; 46(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • Cortical neurostimulation for neuropathic pain
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Pain.2016; 157(Supplement): S81.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation in neuropathic pain due to radiculopathy
    Nadine Attal, Samar S. Ayache, Daniel Ciampi De Andrade, Alaa Mhalla, Sophie Baudic, Frédérique Jazat, Rechdi Ahdab, Danusa O. Neves, Marc Sorel, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Didier Bouhassira
    Pain.2016; 157(6): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation as a tool in the study of sensory-perceptual processing
    Thiago L. Costa, Olivia M. Lapenta, Paulo S. Boggio, Dora F. Ventura
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.2015; 77(6): 1813.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Pain Distress Tolerance: A Preliminary Study
    Timothy Y. Mariano, Mascha van't Wout, Benjamin L. Jacobson, Sarah L. Garnaat, Jason L. Kirschner, Steven A. Rasmussen, Benjamin D. Greenberg
    Pain Medicine.2015; 16(8): 1580.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Targeting Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Task-Induced Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
    Timothy Y. Mariano, Mascha van’t Wout, Sarah L. Garnaat, Steven A. Rasmussen, Benjamin D. Greenberg
    Pain Medicine.2015; : pnv042.     CrossRef
  • Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
    Tim Hagenacker, Vera Bude, Steffen Naegel, Dagny Holle, Zaza Katsarava, Hans-Christoph Diener, Mark Obermann
    The Journal of Headache and Pain.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 7,074 View
  • 83 Download
  • 59 Crossref
Development of a Modified Naturalistic Action Test for Korean Patients With Impaired Cognition
Mi Ae Jung, Hyun Jung Kim, Youn Joo Kang, Yon Joon Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(1):57-65.   Published online February 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.1.57
Objective

To develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a modified Naturalistic Action Test (m-NAT) for Korean patients with impaired cognition. The NAT was originally designed to assess everyday action impairment associated with higher cortical dysfunction.

Methods

We developed the m-NAT by adapting the NAT for the Korean cultural background. The m-NAT was modeled as closely as possible on the original version in terms of rules and scoring. Thirty patients receiving neurorehabilitation (twenty-three stroke patients, five traumatic brain injury patients, and two dementia patients) and twenty healthy matched controls were included. Inter-rater reliability was assessed between two raters. Validity was evaluated by comparing the m-NAT score with various measures of attention, executive functions, and daily life.

Results

Performance on the m-NAT in terms of the total score was significantly different between patients and controls (p<0.01). Patients made significantly more total errors than controls (p<0.01). Omissions error was the most frequent type of error in patient group. Intraclass correlation coefficients for total m-NAT score was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 0.97; p<0.001); total error was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.92; p<0.001). Total m-NAT score showed moderate to strong correlations with Stroop test interference score & index, Trail Making Test parts A and B, Sustained Attention to Response Task commission error, Functional Independence Measure, Korean instrumental activities of daily living, Korean version of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, and Executive Behavior Scale (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The m-NAT showed very good inter-rater reliability and adequate validity. The m-NAT adjusted to Korean cultural background can be useful in performance-based assessment of naturalistic action for clinical and research purposes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Assessments of Functional Cognition Used with Patients following Traumatic Brain Injury in Acute Care: A Survey of Australian Occupational Therapists
    Katherine Goodchild, Jennifer Fleming, Jodie A. Copley
    Occupational Therapy In Health Care.2023; 37(1): 145.     CrossRef
  • Convergent and concurrent validity of a report- versus performance-based evaluation of everyday functioning in the diagnosis of cognitive disorders in a geriatric population
    Elise Cornelis, Ellen Gorus, Karen Van Weverbergh, Ingo Beyer, Patricia De Vriendt
    International Psychogeriatrics.2018; 30(12): 1837.     CrossRef
  • Ecological validity of the five digit test and the oral trails test
    Gabrielle Chequer de Castro Paiva, Mariana Braga Fialho, Danielle de Souza Costa, Jonas Jardim de Paula
    Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria.2015; 74(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • 6,173 View
  • 42 Download
  • 3 Crossref
Facilitation of Corticospinal Excitability According to Motor Imagery and Mirror Therapy in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Patients
Youn Joo Kang, Jeonghun Ku, Hyun Jung Kim, Hae Kyung Park
Ann Rehabil Med 2011;35(6):747-758.   Published online December 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.747
Objective

To delineate the changes in corticospinal excitability when individuals are asked to exercise their hand using observation, motor imagery, voluntary exercise, and exercise with a mirror.

Method

The participants consisted of 30 healthy subjects and 30 stroke patients. In healthy subjects, the amplitudes and latencies of motor evoked potential (MEP) were obtained using seven conditions: (A) rest; (B) imagery; (C) observation and imagery of the hand activity of other individuals; (D) observation and imagery of own ipsilateral hand activity; (E) observation and imagery of the hand activity of another individual with a mirror; (F) observation and imagery of own symmetric ipsilateral hand activity (thumb abduction) with a mirror; and (G) observation and imagery of own asymmetric ipsilateral hand activity (little finger abduction) with a mirror. In stroke patients, MEPs were obtained in the A, C, D, E, F conditions.

Results

In both groups, increment of the percentage MEP amplitude (at rest) and latency decrement of MEPs were significantly higher during the observation of the activity of the hand of another individual with a mirror and during symmetric ipsilateral hand activity on their own hand with a mirror than they were without a mirror. In healthy subjects, the increment of percentage MEP amplitude and latency decrement were significantly higher during the observation of the symmetric ipsilateral hand activity with a mirror compared to the observation of the activity of the asymmetric ipsilateral hand with a mirror of their own hand.

Conclusion

In both groups, corticospinal excitability was facilitated by viewing the mirror image of the activity of the ipsilateral hand. These findings provide neurophysiological evidence supporting the application of various mirror imagery programs during stroke rehabilitation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Improving motor imagery through a mirror box for BCI users
    Diana Margarita Casas Gómez, Ariel Andrés Antonio Braidot
    Journal of Neurophysiology.2024; 131(5): 832.     CrossRef
  • Shaping corticospinal pathways in virtual reality: effects of task complexity and sensory feedback during mirror therapy in neurologically intact individuals
    Trevor A. Norris, Thomas E. Augenstein, Kazandra M. Rodriguez, Edward S. Claflin, Chandramouli Krishnan
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Utilization of Mirror Visual Feedback for Upper Limb Function in Poststroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hyunjoong Kim, Eunsang Lee, Jihye Jung, Seungwon Lee
    Vision.2023; 7(4): 75.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Intensively Applied Mirror Therapy in Older Patients with Post-Stroke Hemiplegia: A Preliminary Trial
    Ana Belén Gámez Santiago, Carlos Manuel Martínez Cáceres, Juan José Hernández-Morante
    European Neurology.2022; 85(4): 291.     CrossRef
  • Event-Related Desynchronization During Mirror Visual Feedback: A Comparison of Older Adults and People After Stroke
    Kenneth N. K. Fong, K. H. Ting, Jack J. Q. Zhang, Christina S. F. Yau, Leonard S. W. Li
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the on-line effects of different motor simulation conditions on corticospinal excitability in healthy participants
    C. Pfenninger, S. Grosprêtre, A. Remontet, T. Lapole
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Task Complexity and Image Clarity Facilitate Motor and Visuo-Motor Activities in Mirror Therapy in Post-stroke Patients
    Umar Muhammad Bello, Chetwyn C. H. Chan, Stanley John Winser
    Frontiers in Neurology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modulation of Functional Connectivity in Response to Mirror Visual Feedback in Stroke Survivors: An MEG Study
    Ruei-Yi Tai, Jun-Ding Zhu, Chih-Chi Chen, Yu-Wei Hsieh, Chia-Hsiung Cheng
    Brain Sciences.2021; 11(10): 1284.     CrossRef
  • Cortical mapping of mirror visual feedback training for unilateral upper extremity: A functional near‐infrared spectroscopy study
    Zhongfei Bai, Kenneth N. K. Fong, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhishan Hu
    Brain and Behavior.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does task complexity influence motor facilitation and visuo-motor memory during mirror therapy in post-stroke patients?
    Umar Muhammad Bello, Stanley John Winser, Chetwyn C.H. Chan
    Medical Hypotheses.2020; 138: 109590.     CrossRef
  • Quantitative Analysis of EEG Power Spectrum and EMG Median Power Frequency Changes after Continuous Passive Motion Mirror Therapy System
    Taewoong Park, Mina Lee, Taejong Jeong, Yong-Il Shin, Sung-Min Park
    Sensors.2020; 20(8): 2354.     CrossRef
  • Role of kinaesthetic motor imagery in mirror-induced visual illusion as intervention in post-stroke rehabilitation
    Umar M. Bello, Stanley J. Winser, Chetwyn C.H. Chan
    Reviews in the Neurosciences.2020; 31(6): 659.     CrossRef
  • Neural Processes Underlying Mirror-Induced Visual Illusion: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis
    Umar Muhammad Bello, Georg S. Kranz, Stanley John Winser, Chetwyn C. H. Chan
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cortical neural activity evoked by bilateral and unilateral mirror therapy after stroke
    Ruei-Yi Tai, Jun-Ding Zhu, Chia-Hsiung Cheng, Yi-Jhan Tseng, Chih-Chi Chen, Yu-Wei Hsieh
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2020; 131(10): 2333.     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Combined Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Motor Imagery on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Following Stroke
    Wenxiu Pan, Pu Wang, Xiaohui Song, Xiaopei Sun, Qing Xie
    Frontiers in Neurology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Brain Computer Interface-Based Action Observation Game Enhances Mu Suppression in Patients with Stroke
    Hyoseon Choi, Hyunmi Lim, Joon Woo Kim, Youn Joo Kang, Jeonghun Ku
    Electronics.2019; 8(12): 1466.     CrossRef
  • Neurofunctional changes after a single mirror therapy intervention in chronic ischemic stroke
    Morgana M Novaes, Fernanda Palhano-Fontes, Andre Peres, Kelley Mazzetto-Betti, Maristela Pelicioni, Kátia C Andrade, Antonio Carlos dos Santos, Octavio Pontes-Neto, Draulio Araujo
    International Journal of Neuroscience.2018; 128(10): 966.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Sensorimotor Rhythm Modulation on the Human Flexor Carpi Radialis H-Reflex
    Aiko K. Thompson, Hannah Carruth, Rachel Haywood, N. Jeremy Hill, William A. Sarnacki, Lynn M. McCane, Jonathan R. Wolpaw, Dennis J. McFarland
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke
    Holm Thieme, Nadine Morkisch, Jan Mehrholz, Marcus Pohl, Johann Behrens, Bernhard Borgetto, Christian Dohle
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Motor imagery training induces changes in brain neural networks in stroke patients
    Fang Li, Tong Zhang, Bing-Jie Li, Wei Zhang, Jun Zhao, Lu-Ping Song
    Neural Regeneration Research.2018; 13(10): 1771.     CrossRef
  • The Mirror Illusion Increases Motor Cortex Excitability in Children With and Without Hemiparesis
    Sebastian Grunt, Christopher J. Newman, Stefanie Saxer, Maja Steinlin, Christian Weisstanner, Alain Kaelin-Lang
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2017; 31(3): 280.     CrossRef
  • The TMS Motor Map Does Not Change Following a Single Session of Mirror Training Either with Or without Motor Imagery
    Mark van de Ruit, Michael J. Grey
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efectos de la terapia de espejo en el ictus. Revisión sistemática
    M. Reboredo Silva, M. Soto-González
    Fisioterapia.2016; 38(2): 90.     CrossRef
  • Virtual Reality-Guided Motor Imagery Increases Corticomotor Excitability in Healthy Volunteers and Stroke Patients
    Hyungjun Im, Jeunghun Ku, Hyun Jung Kim, Youn Joo Kang
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2016; 40(3): 420.     CrossRef
  • Reflections on Mirror Therapy
    Frederik J. A. Deconinck, Ana R. P. Smorenburg, Alex Benham, Annick Ledebt, Max G. Feltham, Geert J. P. Savelsbergh
    Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair.2015; 29(4): 349.     CrossRef
  • Potential determinants of efficacy of mirror therapy in stroke patients – A pilot study
    Maddalena Brunetti, Nadine Morkisch, Claire Fritzsch, Jan Mehnert, Jens Steinbrink, Michael Niedeggen, Christian Dohle
    Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience.2015; 33(4): 421.     CrossRef
  • Mirror illusion reduces motor cortical inhibition in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex during forceful unilateral muscle contractions
    Tjerk Zult, Stuart Goodall, Kevin Thomas, Tibor Hortobágyi, Glyn Howatson
    Journal of Neurophysiology.2015; 113(7): 2262.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison of the Effect According to Type of Electromyography-triggered Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on the Upper Limb Function and Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Ji-Su Park, Jong-Bae Choi
    The Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy.2014; 22(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects
    Yeun Joon Kim, Jeonghun Ku, Sangwoo Cho, Hyun Jung Kim, Yun Kyung Cho, Teo Lim, Youn Joo Kang
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Mirror Therapy on Motor and Sensory Recovery in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ching-Yi Wu, Pai-Chuan Huang, Yu-Ting Chen, Keh-Chung Lin, Hsiu-Wen Yang
    Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2013; 94(6): 1023.     CrossRef
  • 5,624 View
  • 63 Download
  • 30 Crossref
TOP