Objective To evaluate the association between progression of curvature of scoliosis, and correction for functional component in patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS).
Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical data of patients prescribed custom molded foot orthosis (FO) to correct inequality of RCSPA (resting calcaneal stance position angle), and chose 52 patients (26 females, 26 males) with Cobb angle ≥10° in radiology and uneven pelvic level at iliac crest by different RCSPA (≥3°) as a factor of functional scoliosis. They had different hump angle ≥5° in forward bending test, for idiopathic scoliosis component. Their mean age and mean period of wearing FO were 79.5±10.6 months and 18.6±0.70 months.
Results Cobb angle was reduced from 22.03°±4.39° initially to 18.86°±7.53° after wearing FO. Pelvis height difference and RCSPA difference, were reduced from 1.07±0.25 cm initially to 0.60±0.36, and from 4.25°±0.71° initially to 1.71°±0.75° (p<0.01). Cobb angle improved most in 9 months. However, there was no significant improvement for those with more than 25° of Cobb angle initially. Mean Cobb angle improved in all age groups, but patients less than 6 years had clinically significant improvement of more than 5°.
Conclusion JIS can have functional components, which should be identified and managed. Foot orthosis is useful in correcting functional factors, in the case of pelvic inequality caused by different RCSPA, for patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Can Pilates Straighten the Curve? A Systematic Review of Pilates in Scoliosis Therapy Varalisa Rahmawati, Brigita Christi Petra Karina Febitasari, Silvony Chandra, Nadila Nur Pratiwi Indonesian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2026; 15(1): 63. CrossRef
IS SCOLIOSIS A COMMON DEFORMITY IN CHILDREN WITH JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS? Eylül Pınar Kısa, Ela Tarakcı, Gökçe Leblebici, Mehmet Akif Çaçan, Özgür Kasapçopur Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi.2024; 35(1): 37. CrossRef
The Role of Sole Lift in Treating Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis with Mild Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Curve Wang Zhi‐wei, Liang Cheng‐zhen, Chen Jun‐nan, Li Fang‐cai, Chen Qi‐xin, Chen Wei‐shan, Chen Gang, Zhang Ning, Li Jun, Li Hao Orthopaedic Surgery.2024; 16(11): 2654. CrossRef
Long-term Observation in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy with Early Introduction of a Standing Program Using Knee–ankle–foot Orthoses Akiko Fujimoto, Katsuhiro Mizuno, Yasuyuki Iwata, Hiroyuki Yajima, Daisuke Nishida, Hirofumi Komaki, Akihiko Ishiyama, Madoka Mori-yoshimura, Hisateru Tachimori, Yoko Kobayashi Progress in Rehabilitation Medicine.2023; 8: n/a. CrossRef
3D Stereophotogrammetric Quantitative Evaluation of Posture and Spine Proprioception in Subacute and Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain Edyta Kinel, Piero Roncoletta, Tiziana Pietrangelo, Moreno D’Amico Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(3): 546. CrossRef
The radiographic assessments of spino-pelvic compensation using IoT-based real-time ischial pressure adjustment Moon-Jun Sohn, Haenghwa Lee, Byung-Jou Lee, Hae-Won Koo, Kwang Hyeon Kim, Sang-Won Yoon Medicine.2022; 101(5): e28783. CrossRef
Indications of sole lift and foot orthoses in the management of mild idiopathic scoliosis—a review Diego Rothschild, Shu Yan Ng, Yin Ling Elaine Ng Journal of Physical Therapy Science.2020; 32(3): 251. CrossRef
Intervention versus Observation in Mild Idiopathic Scoliosis in Skeletally Immature Patients Shu Yan NG, Ying Ling NG, Ka Ping Cheng, Wing Yan Chan, Tsz Ki Ho The Open Orthopaedics Journal.2020; 14(1): 186. CrossRef
Objective To evaluate the effects of electric cortical stimulation (ECS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor and cognitive function recovery and brain plasticity in focal traumatic brain injury (TBI) of rats model.
Methods Forty rats were pre-trained to perform a single pellet reaching task (SPRT), rotarod test (RRT), and Y-maze test for 14 days, then a focal TBI was induced by a weight drop model on the motor cortex. All rats were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: anodal ECS (50 Hz and 194 μs) (ECS group), tDCS (0.1 mA, 50 Hz and 200 μs) (tDCS group), and no stimulation as a control group. Four-week stimulation, including rehabilitation, was started 3 days after the operation. SPRT, RRT, and Y-maze were measured from day 1 to day 28 after the TBI was induced. Histopathological and immunohistochemistry staining evaluations were performed at 4 weeks.
Results SPRT was improved from day 7 to day 26 in ECS, and from day 8 to day 26 in tDCS compared to the control group (p<0.05). SPRT of ECS group was significantly improved on days 3, 8, 9, and 17 compared to the tDCS group. Y-maze was improved from day 8 to day 16 in ECS, and on days 6, 12, and 16 in the tDCS group compared to the control group (p<0.05). Y-maze of the ECS group was significantly improved on day 9 to day 15 compared to the tDCS group. The c-Fos protein expression was better in the ECS group and the tDCS group compared to the control group.
Conclusion Electric stimulation in rats modified with a focal TBI is effective for motor recovery and brain plasticity. ECS induced faster behavioral and cognitive improvements compared to tDCS during the recovery period of rats with a focal TBI.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Neurophysiological Markers of Reward Processing Can Inform Preclinical Neurorehabilitation Approaches for Cognitive Impairments Following Brain Injury Miranda Francoeur Koloski, Reyana Menon, Victoria Krasnyanskiy Brain Sciences.2025; 15(5): 471. CrossRef
Exploring the Intersection of Brain–Computer Interfaces and Quantum Sensing: A Review of Research Progress and Future Trends Kun Liao, Zhaochu Yang, Dong Tao, Libo Zhao, Nuno Pires, Carlos Alberto Dorao, Bjørn Torger Stokke, Lars Eric Roseng, Wen Liu, Zhuangde Jiang Advanced Quantum Technologies.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in Neurorehabilitation: Strategies and Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery Purvi Kaurani, Ana Vitoria Moreira de Marchi Apolaro, Keerthi Kunchala, Shriya Maini, Huda A F Rges, Ashley Isaac, Mohit Lakkimsetti, Mohammed Raake, Zahra Nazir Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Neuromodulation Therapies in Pre-Clinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Translational Applications Shanan Surendrakumar, Thallita Kelly Rabelo, Ana Carolina P. Campos, Adriano Mollica, Agessandro Abrahao, Nir Lipsman, Matthew J. Burke, Clement Hamani Journal of Neurotrauma.2023; 40(5-6): 435. CrossRef
Effects of single session transcranial direct current stimulation on aerobic performance and one arm pull-down explosive force of professional rock climbers Jia Luo, Caihua Fang, Sen Huang, Jinlong Wu, Bowen Liu, Jingxuan Yu, Wen Xiao, Zhanbing Ren Frontiers in Physiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Electrical stimulation methods and protocols for the treatment of traumatic brain injury: a critical review of preclinical research D. Ziesel, M. Nowakowska, S. Scheruebel, K. Kornmueller, U. Schäfer, R. Schindl, C. Baumgartner, M. Üçal, T. Rienmüller Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Therapeutic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on loss of motor function caused by experimental mild traumatic brain injury Güven AKÇAY, Recep BAYDEMİR Cukurova Medical Journal.2023; 48(3): 972. CrossRef
Optogenetics for Understanding and Treating Brain Injury: Advances in the Field and Future Prospects Yuwen Sun, Manrui Li, Shuqiang Cao, Yang Xu, Peiyan Wu, Shuting Xu, Qian Pan, Yadong Guo, Yi Ye, Zheng Wang, Hao Dai, Xiaoqi Xie, Xiameng Chen, Weibo Liang International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(3): 1800. CrossRef
Using dual polarities of transcranial direct current stimulation in global cerebral ischemia and its following reperfusion period attenuates neuronal injury Rasoul Kaviannejad, Seyed Morteza Karimian, Esmail Riahi, Ghorbangol Ashabi Metabolic Brain Disease.2022; 37(5): 1503. CrossRef
Preliminary Study on Safety Assessment of 10 Hz Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Rat Brain Sung Suk Oh, Yoon Bum Lee, Jae Sun Jeon, Sang-Hyun An, Jong-ryul Choi Applied Sciences.2022; 12(11): 5299. CrossRef
Short-Term Cortical Electrical Stimulation during the Acute Stage of Traumatic Brain Injury Improves Functional Recovery Liang-Chao Wang, Wei-Yen Wei, Pei-Chuan Ho Biomedicines.2022; 10(8): 1965. CrossRef
Neurostimulation for Functional Recovery After Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Evidence and Future Directions for Invasive Surgical Approaches Jakov Tiefenbach, Hugh H. Chan, Andre G. Machado, Kenneth B. Baker Neurosurgery.2022; 91(6): 823. CrossRef
Rodent models used in preclinical studies of deep brain stimulation to rescue memory deficits Matthieu Faillot, Antoine Chaillet, Stéphane Palfi, Suhan Senova Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.2021; 130: 410. CrossRef
Optogenetic Modulation for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury Samantha L. Delaney, Julian L. Gendreau, Marissa D'Souza, Austin Y. Feng, Allen L. Ho Stem Cells and Development.2020; 29(4): 187. CrossRef
Cathodal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Selectively Decreases Impulsivity after Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats Kris M. Martens, Kristen M. Pechacek, Cassandra G. Modrak, Virginia J. Milleson, Binxing Zhu, Cole Vonder Haar Journal of Neurotrauma.2019; 36(19): 2827. CrossRef
Enhancing rehabilitation and functional recovery after brain and spinal cord trauma with electrical neuromodulation Anna-Sophie Hofer, Martin E. Schwab Current Opinion in Neurology.2019; 32(6): 828. CrossRef
Beyond the target area: an integrative view of tDCS-induced motor cortex modulation in patients and athletes Edgard Morya, Kátia Monte-Silva, Marom Bikson, Zeinab Esmaeilpour, Claudinei Eduardo Biazoli, Andre Fonseca, Tommaso Bocci, Faranak Farzan, Raaj Chatterjee, Jeffrey M. Hausdorff, Daniel Gomes da Silva Machado, André Russowsky Brunoni, Eva Mezger, Luciane Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
First
Prev
