• KARM
  • Contact us
  • E-Submission
ABOUT
ARTICLE TYPES
BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION

Page Path

3
results for

"Hye Sun Lee"

Filter

Article category

Keywords

Publication year

Authors

"Hye Sun Lee"

Original Articles
Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version
Seong Uk Choi, Hye Sun Lee, Joon Ho Shin, Seung Hee Ho, Mi Jung Koo, Kyoung Hae Park, Jeong Ah Yoon, Dong Min Kim, Jung Eun Oh, Se Hwa Yu, Dong A Kim
Ann Rehabil Med 2017;41(3):387-393.   Published online June 29, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.387
Objective

To establish the reliability and validity the Korean version of the Stroke Impact Scale (K-SIS) 3.0.

Methods

A total of 70 post-stroke patients were enrolled. All subjects were evaluated for general characteristics, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The SF-36 and K-SIS 3.0 assessed their health-related quality of life. Statistical analysis after evaluation, determined the reliability and validity of the K-SIS 3.0.

Results

A total of 70 patients (mean age, 54.97 years) participated in this study. Internal consistency of the SIS 3.0 (Cronbach's alpha) was obtained, and all domains had good co-efficiency, with threshold above 0.70. Test-retest reliability of SIS 3.0 required correlation (Spearman's rho) of the same domain scores obtained on the first and second assessments. Results were above 0.5, with the exception of social participation and mobility. Concurrent validity of K-SIS 3.0 was assessed using the SF-36, and other scales with the same or similar domains. Each domain of K-SIS 3.0 had a positive correlation with corresponding similar domain of SF-36 and other scales (HADS, MMSE, and NIHSS).

Conclusion

The newly developed K-SIS 3.0 showed high inter-intra reliability and test-retest reliabilities, together with high concurrent validity with the original and various other scales, for patients with stroke. K-SIS 3.0 can therefore be used for stroke patients, to assess their health-related quality of life and treatment efficacy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy of brain-computer interface training with motor imagery-contingent feedback in improving upper limb function and neuroplasticity among persons with chronic stroke: a double-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial
    Myeong Sun Kim, Hyunju Park, Ilho Kwon, Kwang-Ok An, Hayeon Kim, Gyulee Park, Wooseok Hyung, Chang-Hwan Im, Joon-Ho Shin
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Korean Version of the Confidence of Arm and Hand Movement Scale and Its Psychometric Properties
    Hanna Kim, Yeajin Ham, Joon-Ho Shin
    Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2025; 49(2): 104.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing health-related quality of life assessments for stroke survivors: a validation study of psychometric properties for the Vietnamese version of stroke impact scale 3.0
    Thao Thi Phuong Nguyen, Hai Bui Hoang, Huyen Thi Thanh Vu, Seung Won Lee
    Frontiers in Public Health.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessing Participation Among Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures
    Benyamin Hamid, Mahnaz Hejazi Shirmard, Seyedeh Maryam Shafighi Kuzani, Marzieh Pashmdarfard, Claudia Hilton
    Occupational Therapy International.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for balance and gait rehabilitation in stroke survivors: A systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Anas R Alashram
    Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification of Stroke Survivors’ Perceived Quality of Life: A Latent Profile Analysis Study
    Binnur Çetin, Orkun Tahir Aran
    The American Journal of Occupational Therapy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pragmatic multicenter randomized controlled study on early supported discharge after stroke in Korea: the KOMPACT study
    Won Kee Chang, Yun-Sun Jung, Ji-Soo Choi, Won-Seok Kim, Min Kyun Sohn, Sungju Jee, Yong-Il Shin, Sung-Hwa Ko, Minsu Ock, Hyun Joo Kim, Nam-Jong Paik
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2025; 68(8): 102025.     CrossRef
  • Outcome measures for evaluating perceived upper limb performance after stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties
    Mohammadsadegh Mojaradinloo, Sepideh Zenoozi, David Morris
    Disability and Rehabilitation.2025; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Trunk Impairment Scale and Stroke Impact Scale for Clinical Assessment of Patients in the Subacute Stage After Stroke Following Sensory Intervention
    M Gábor, D Bzdúšková, J Kimijanová, Z Hirjaková, H Šingliarová, P Valkovič
    Physiological Research.2025; 74(Suppl 2): S293.     CrossRef
  • Translation and pilot validation of the Moroccan version of Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0
    Ahmed Kharbach, Rachid Razine, Mohamed Amine Baba, Abderrahmane Achbani, Abdellatif Ait Ougjij, Radouane Belouali, Karim Sbai Idrissi, Azzedine Ibrahimi, Lahcen Belyamani, Majdouline Obtel
    Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation.2024; 31(8): 852.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of mixed reality-based rehabilitation on hands and fingers by individual finger-movement tracking in patients with stroke
    Yeajin Ham, Dong-Seok Yang, Younggeun Choi, Joon-Ho Shin
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tools for Assessing Quality of Life in People with Stroke-Induced Aphasia: A Literature Review
    Zahra Babaei, Fariba Yadegari
    Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.2024; 77(3): 300.     CrossRef
  • Linguistic and Content Validation of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 3.0 in Three Languages
    Husna Ahmad Ainuddin, Muhammad Hibatullah Romli, Mazatulfazura SF Salim, Tengku Aizan Hamid, Lynette Mackenzie
    Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences.2023; 19(3): 20.     CrossRef
  • Cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the short 12-item stroke-specific quality of life scale
    Fouad Sakr, Mariam Dabbous, Marwan Akel, Pascale Salameh, Hassan Hosseini
    Frontiers in Neurology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of a Nurse-Led Education Program for Stroke Patients on Sleep Quality and Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Zeynel Urcan, Merve Kolcu
    Clinical Nursing Research.2022; 31(2): 340.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Upper Extremity Function in People With Stroke Based on the Framework of the ICF: A Narrative Review
    Hanna Kim, Joon-Ho Shin
    Brain & Neurorehabilitation.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Construction and Validation of the 17-Item Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL-17): A Comprehensive Short Scale to Assess the Functional, Psychosocial, and Therapeutic Factors of QOL among Stroke Survivors
    Fouad Sakr, Mariam Dabbous, Marwan Akel, Pascale Salameh, Hassan Hosseini
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2022; 19(23): 15668.     CrossRef
  • Rasch Analysis of the Stroke Impact Scale–16
    Inga Wang, Yi-Ching Wang, Tzu-Yi Wu, Chia-Yeh Chou, Ching-Lin Hsieh
    The American Journal of Occupational Therapy.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Quality of life in post-stroke patients
    Lucia Dimunová, Mária Sováriová Soósová, Kinga Kardosová, Martin Červený, Mária Belovičová
    Kontakt.2021; 23(3): 157.     CrossRef
  • Characterization of muscle strength using the strength domain of the stroke impact scale: An integrative review
    Richard W. Bohannon
    Isokinetics and Exercise Science.2021; 29(3): 219.     CrossRef
  • Korean Model for Post-acute Comprehensive rehabilitation (KOMPACT): The Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study on Early Supported Discharge
    Won Kee Chang, Won-Seok Kim, Min Kyun Sohn, Sungju Jee, Yong-Il Shin, Sung-Hwa Ko, Minsu Ock, Hyun Joo Kim, Nam-Jong Paik
    Frontiers in Neurology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study
    Jin Ho Park, Gyulee Park, Ha Yeon Kim, Ji-Yeong Lee, Yeajin Ham, Donghwan Hwang, Suncheol Kwon, Joon-Ho Shin
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of a Home-Based Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management (FIRM) Program in Patients Surgically Treated for Hip Fractures
    Jun Hwan Choi, Bo Ryun Kim, Kwang Woo Nam, Sang Yoon Lee, Jaewon Beom, So Young Lee, Min Ji Suh, Jae-Young Lim
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 10(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Effects of virtual reality-based planar motion exercises on upper extremity function, range of motion, and health-related quality of life: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, controlled pilot study
    Mina Park, Myoung-Hwan Ko, Sang-Wook Oh, Ji-Yeong Lee, Yeajin Ham, Hyoseok Yi, Younggeun Choi, Dokyeong Ha, Joon-Ho Shin
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Training Using Rehabilitation Tools on the Upper-Extremity Functions and Daily Activities of Patients with Acute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
    Jong-Hoon Moon, Kyoung-Young Park, Hee-Jin Kim, Chang-Ho Na
    Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives.2018; 9(5): 225.     CrossRef
  • 11,065 View
  • 156 Download
  • 22 Web of Science
  • 25 Crossref
Utility of a Three-Dimensional Interactive Augmented Reality Program for Balance and Mobility Rehabilitation in the Elderly: A Feasibility Study
Dal Jae Im, Jeunghun Ku, Yeun Joon Kim, Sangwoo Cho, Yun Kyung Cho, Teo Lim, Hye Sun Lee, Hyun Jung Kim, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2015;39(3):462-472.   Published online June 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.3.462
Objective

To improve lower extremity function and balance in elderly persons, we developed a novel, three-dimensional interactive augmented reality system (3D ARS). In this feasibility study, we assessed clinical and kinematic improvements, user participation, and the side effects of our system.

Methods

Eighteen participants (age, 56-76 years) capable of walking independently and standing on one leg were recruited. The participants received 3D ARS training during 10 sessions (30-minute duration each) for 4 weeks. Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) scores were obtained before and after the exercises. Outcome performance variables, including response time and success rate, and kinematic variables, such as hip and knee joint angle, were evaluated after each session.

Results

Participants exhibited significant clinical improvements in lower extremity balance and mobility following the intervention, as shown by improved BBS and TUG scores (p<0.001). Consistent kinematic improvements in the maximum joint angles of the hip and knee were observed across sessions. Outcome performance variables, such as success rate and response time, improved gradually across sessions, for each exercise. The level of participant interest also increased across sessions (p<0.001). All participants completed the program without experiencing any adverse effects.

Conclusion

Substantial clinical and kinematic improvements were observed after applying a novel 3D ARS training program, suggesting that this system can enhance lower extremity function and facilitate assessments of lower extremity kinematic capacity.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of a 3D motion recognition-based virtual training system on balance and gait performance in older adults
    Dae-Joong Yang, Hyeong-Seok Lee
    Physical Activity and Nutrition.2026; 30(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • Emerging Applications of Augmented and Mixed Reality Technologies in Motor Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review
    Arman Farsi, Giacinto Luigi Cerone, Deborah Falla, Marco Gazzoni
    Sensors.2025; 25(7): 2042.     CrossRef
  • Virtual rehabilitation for patients with osteoporosis or other musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review
    Eléa Thuilier, John Carey, Mary Dempsey, John Dingliana, Bryan Whelan, Attracta Brennan
    Virtual Reality.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The evolution of augmented reality to augment physical therapy: A scoping review
    Po-Yao Hsu, Jonas Singer, Julie J Keysor
    Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lessons Learned from Older Adults Fusing of an Augmented Reality, Assisted Living and Social Interaction Platform
    Achilleas Achilleos, Christos Mettouris, Alexandros Yeratziotis, Joanna Starosta-Sztuczka, Sotiria Moza, Andria Hadjicosta, Stylianos Georgiou, Charalampos Theodorou, Constantinos Tevkros Loizou, Karol Pecyna, Kale Strahinja Lazic, Stefan Parker, George A
    SN Computer Science.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systematic Review of Augmented Reality Training Systems
    Isidro III Mendoza Butaslac, Yuichiro Fujimoto, Taishi Sawabe, Masayuki Kanbara, Hirokazu Kato
    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.2023; 29(12): 5062.     CrossRef
  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: KeepStep: Accommodating user diversity through individualized, projection-mapping based exergames for rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis
    Zahra Amiri, Yoones A. Sekhavat, Sakineh Goljaryan, Samad Roohi
    Multimedia Tools and Applications.2022; 81(19): 27991.     CrossRef
  • The efficacy of exergaming in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial
    Emel Mete, Zübeyir Sari
    Physiotherapy Research International.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effect of Augmented Reality-Based Proprioceptive Training Program on Balance, Positioning Sensation and Flexibility in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jaewon Lee, Jaeho Yu, Jiheon Hong, Dongyeop Lee, Jinseop Kim, Seonggil Kim
    Healthcare.2022; 10(7): 1202.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Augmented Reality for Lower Limb Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review
    Hongbin Chang, Yang Song, Xuanzhen Cen, Wen-Ming Chen
    Applied Bionics and Biomechanics.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Virtual and augmented reality applications to improve older adults’ quality of life: A systematic mapping review and future directions
    Reem Sulaiman Baragash, Hanan Aldowah, Samar Ghazal
    DIGITAL HEALTH.2022; 8: 205520762211320.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Exercise Using an Exoskeletal Hip-Assist Robot on Physical Function and Walking Efficiency in Older Adults
    Su-Hyun Lee, Hwang-Jae Lee, Kyungrock Kim, Byoung-Hee Lee, Yun-Hee Kim
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(12): 2077.     CrossRef
  • Using augmented reality technology for balance training in the older adults: a feasibility pilot study
    Sven Blomqvist, Stefan Seipel, Maria Engström
    BMC Geriatrics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Shaping technologies for older adults with and without dementia: Reflections on ethics and preferences
    Unai Diaz-Orueta, Louise Hopper, Evdokimos Konstantinidis
    Health Informatics Journal.2020; 26(4): 3215.     CrossRef
  • Usability Issues of Clinical and Research Applications of Virtual Reality in Older People: A Systematic Review
    Cosimo Tuena, Elisa Pedroli, Pietro Davide Trimarchi, Alessia Gallucci, Mattia Chiappini, Karine Goulene, Andrea Gaggioli, Giuseppe Riva, Fabrizia Lattanzio, Fabrizio Giunco, Marco Stramba-Badiale
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The HoloLens Augmented Reality System Provides Valid Measures of Gait Performance in Healthy Adults
    Mandy Miller Koop, Anson B. Rosenfeldt, Joshua D. Johnston, Matthew C. Streicher, Jingan Qu, Jay L. Alberts
    IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.2020; 50(6): 584.     CrossRef
  • Three-Dimensional Augmented Reality System for Balance and Mobility Rehabilitation in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jeonghun Ku, Yeun Joon Kim, Sangwoo Cho, Teo Lim, Hye Sun Lee, Youn Joo Kang
    Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.2019; 22(2): 132.     CrossRef
  • Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality Technologies to Promote Wellbeing in Older Adults
    Li Na Lee, Mi Jeong Kim, Won Ju Hwang
    Applied Sciences.2019; 9(17): 3556.     CrossRef
  • Active seniors perceived value within digital museum transformation
    Christelle Traboulsi, Moreno Frau, Francesca Cabiddu
    The TQM Journal.2018; 30(5): 530.     CrossRef
  • Myo-Art: An innovative system to monitor muscle activity in Augmented Reality
    M. Gazzoni, G.L. Cerone
    Gait & Posture.2018; 66: S16.     CrossRef
  • Using communication and visualization technologies with senior citizens to facilitate cultural access and self-improvement
    María Dolores Meneses Fernández, Juana Dolores Santana Hernández, Jorge Martín Gutiérrez, María Reyes Henríquez Escuela, Eulalia Rodríguez Fino
    Computers in Human Behavior.2017; 66: 329.     CrossRef
  • The use of step aerobics and the stability ball to improve balance and quality of life in community-dwelling older adults – a randomized exploratory study
    Ayelet Dunsky, Tal Yahalom, Michal Arnon, Ronnie Lidor
    Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics.2017; 71: 66.     CrossRef
  • First-Person Point-of-View–Augmented Reality for Central Line Insertion Training
    Lauryn R. Rochlen, Robert Levine, Alan R. Tait
    Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.2017; 12(1): 57.     CrossRef
  • 9,378 View
  • 99 Download
  • 24 Web of Science
  • 23 Crossref
Randomized, Sham Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Yon Joon Kim, Jeonghun Ku, Hyun Jung Kim, Dal Jae Im, Hye Sun Lee, Kyung Ah Han, Youn Joo Kang
Ann Rehabil Med 2013;37(6):766-776.   Published online December 23, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.766
Objective

To investigate the analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and sham tDCS in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN).

Methods

Patients with PDPN (n=60) were divided randomly into the three groups (n=20 per group). Each group received anodal tDCS with the anode centered over the left M1, DLPFC, or sham stimulation for 20 minutes at intensity of 2 mA for 5 consecutive days. A blinded physician rated the patients' pain using a visual analog scale (VAS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score, anxiety score, sleep quality, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the pain threshold (PT) to pressure.

Results

After the tDCS sessions, the M1 group showed a significantly greater reduction in VAS for pain and PT versus the sham and DLPFC groups (p<0.001). The reduction in VAS for pain was sustained after 2 and 4 weeks of follow-up in the M1 group compared with the sham group (p<0.001, p=0.007). Significant differences were observed among the three groups over time in VAS for pain (p<0.001), CGI score (p=0.01), and PT (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed among the groups in sleep quality, anxiety score, or BDI score immediately after tDCS.

Conclusion

Five daily sessions of tDCS over the M1 can produce immediate pain relief, and relief 2- and 4-week in duration in patients with PDPN. Our findings provide the first evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS on PDPN.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on neuropathic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression
    Carolina Dias de Carvalho, Gabriel Alves dos Santos, Raquel Lins de Sousa Lima, Matheus Lemos dos Santos, Bruna Gabriella Nascimento Bezerra, Danyelle Leite Furtado de Araújo, Felipe Marques da Silva, Valéria Mayaly Alves de Oliveira, Danilo Harudy Kamons
    Physiotherapy Practice and Research.2026; 47(1): 122.     CrossRef
  • Working memory ımprovement after transcranial direct current stimulation paired with working memory training ın diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Serkan Aksu, Buse Rahime Hasırcı Bayır, Ceyhun Sayman, Ahmet Zihni Soyata, Gökalp Boz, Sacit Karamürsel
    Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2025; 32(1): 231.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive brain stimulation beyond the motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring effects on quantitative sensory testing in clinical pain
    Andrew Flood, Rocco Cavaleri, We-Ju Chang, Jason Kutch, Constantino Toufexis, Simon J Summers
    Pain Medicine.2025; 26(2): 98.     CrossRef
  • The comparative evidence of efficacy of non-invasive brain and nerve stimulation in diabetic neuropathy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Ping-Tao Tseng, Bing-Yan Zeng, Chih-Wei Hsu, Chao-Ming Hung, Brendon Stubbs, Yen-Wen Chen, Tien-Yu Chen, Jiann-Jy Chen, Wei-Te Lei, Yow-Ling Shiue, Chih-Sung Liang
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Assessing Neuromodulation Therapies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
    Li Li, Xueqin Luo, Yong Liu, Yongjie Jiang, Yankun Chen, Yangmei Chen, Jinping Wang
    Neurology and Therapy.2025; 14(4): 1355.     CrossRef
  • Anti-Inflammatory Pathways Mediating tDCS’s Effects on Neuropathic Pain
    Haipeng Zhang, Xinyan Zheng, Binn Zhang
    Biology.2025; 14(7): 892.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Diabetes: A Focused and Mechanistic Review of Symptom and Function Outcomes
    James Chmiel, Donata Kurpas
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(22): 7945.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the separate and combined effects of anodal tDCS over the M1 and F3 regions on pain relief in patients with type-2 diabetes suffering from neuropathic pain
    Ahmad Alipour, Roghayeh Mohammadi
    Neuroscience Letters.2024; 818: 137554.     CrossRef
  • Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review
    Qiao Kong, Tingting Li, Sveta Reddy, Sierra Hodges, Jian Kong
    Neurotherapeutics.2024; 21(1): e00297.     CrossRef
  • Inflammation, brain connectivity, and neuromodulation in post-traumatic headache
    Fernando da Silva Fiorin, Caroline Cunha do Espírito Santo, Joyce T. Da Silva, Man-Kyo Chung
    Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health.2024; 35: 100723.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Ameliorates Stress-Induced Sleep Disruption via Activating Infralimbic-Ventrolateral Preoptic Projections
    Yu-Jie Su, Pei-Lu Yi, Fang-Chia Chang
    Brain Sciences.2024; 14(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • Analgesia of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiqi Wu, Xiaoyun Li, Yinhua Zhang, Shengxiong Chen, Richu Jin, Weiwei Peng
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research.2024; 185: 111868.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Strategies for Brain Doping in an Animal Model via Quantitative Analysis of Neurochemicals
    Yoeseph Cho, Seongeun Jeon, Yejin Lee, Hana Park, Yinglan Xu, Mijin Jeon, Sunmi Jung, Minyoung Kim, Ahlim Chin, Sang Sun Yoon, Junghyun Son
    Separations.2023; 10(7): 413.     CrossRef
  • Stimulation corticale pour le traitement de la douleur
    L. Garcia-Larrea, N. André-Obadia, S. Rostaing, C. Colomb
    Douleur et Analgésie.2023; 36(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Brain stimulation for chronic pain management: a narrative review of analgesic mechanisms and clinical evidence
    Michał Szymoniuk, Jia-Hsuan Chin, Łukasz Domagalski, Mateusz Biszewski, Katarzyna Jóźwik, Piotr Kamieniak
    Neurosurgical Review.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive cortical stimulation for drug-resistant pain
    Luis Garcia-Larrea
    Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care.2023; 17(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • Long-term analgesic effect of trans-spinal direct current stimulation compared to non-invasive motor cortex stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome
    Hasan Hodaj, Jean-Francois Payen, Enkelejda Hodaj, Marc Sorel, Anne Dumolard, Laurent Vercueil, Chantal Delon-Martin, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Brain Communications.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of massage, passive neural mobilization and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (MR-DTI) of the tibial nerve in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus induced neuropathy: a case report
    Goyal Manu, Mittal Amit, Samuel Asir John
    Physiotherapy Theory and Practice.2022; 38(13): 3273.     CrossRef
  • Effects of rTMS and tDCS on neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot study
    Erickson Duarte Bonifácio de Assis, Wanessa Kallyne Nascimento Martins, Carolina Dias de Carvalho, Clarice Martins Ferreira, Ruth Gomes, Evelyn Thais de Almeida Rodrigues, Ussânio Mororó Meira, Ledycnarf Januário de Holanda, Ana Raquel Lindquist, Edgard M
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Relieving Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Older Adults Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Effects on Pain Intensity, Quality, and Pain-Related Outcomes
    Marie-Philippe Harvey, Marylie Martel, Francis Houde, Inès Daguet, Eléonor Riesco, Guillaume Léonard
    Frontiers in Pain Research.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Treatment of Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD)
    Jooyeon Jamie Im, Seunghee Na, Sanghoon Kang, Hyeonseok Jeong, Eek-Sung Lee, Tae-Kyeong Lee, Woo-Young Ahn, Yong-An Chung, In-Uk Song
    Frontiers in Neurology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cortical stimulation for chronic pain: from anecdote to evidence
    Luis GARCIA-LARREA, Charles QUESADA
    European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is transcranial direct current stimulation beneficial for treating pain, depression, and anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu-Rong Wen, Jian Shi, Zheng-Yu Hu, Yang-Yang Lin, You-Tian Lin, Xue Jiang, Rui Wang, Xue-Qiang Wang, Yu-Ling Wang
    Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Sleep Disturbances
    Young-Ji Lee, Bong-Jo Kim, Cheol-Soon Lee, Boseok Cha, So-Jin Lee, Jae-Won Choi, Eunji Lim, Nuree Kang, Dongyun Lee
    Chronobiology in Medicine.2022; 4(4): 141.     CrossRef
  • Can a tDCS treatment enhance subjective and objective sleep among student-athletes?
    Jonathan Charest, Alexandre Marois, Celyne H. Bastien
    Journal of American College Health.2021; 69(4): 378.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Visual Illusion Effect According to Sensory Phenotypes in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury and Neuropathic Pain
    Dolors Soler, David Moriña, Hatice Kumru, Joan Vidal, Xavier Navarro
    The Journal of Pain.2021; 22(1): 86.     CrossRef
  • The effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on sleep disturbances among different neurological and neuropsychiatric conditions: A systematic review
    Alberto Herrero Babiloni, Audrey Bellemare, Gabrielle Beetz, Sophie-A. Vinet, Marc O. Martel, Gilles J. Lavigne, Louis De Beaumont
    Sleep Medicine Reviews.2021; 55: 101381.     CrossRef
  • Towards the endotyping of the sleep–pain interaction: a topical review on multitarget strategies based on phenotypic vulnerabilities and putative pathways
    Alberto Herrero Babiloni, Gabrielle Beetz, Nicole K.Y. Tang, Raphael Heinzer, Jo Nijs, Marc O. Martel, Gilles J. Lavigne
    Pain.2021; 162(5): 1281.     CrossRef
  • Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on experimental pain perception: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoyun Li, Junjie Yao, Wenyun Zhang, Shengxiong Chen, Weiwei Peng
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2021; 132(9): 2163.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for provoked vestibulodynia: What roles do psychosexual factors play in treatment response?
    Mélanie Morin, Annie Morin, Véronique Gougeon, Serge Marchand, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Audrey Brassard, Justine Benoit-Piau, Guillaume Léonard
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.2021; 93: 54.     CrossRef
  • Efectos de la estimulación no invasiva de la corteza motora en las pruebas sensoriales cuantitativas en sujetos sanos y con dolor crónico: una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis.
    Stefano Giannoni-Luza, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Piero F. Mejia-Pando, Maria A. Luna-Cuadros, Judah L. Barouh, Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros, Ludmilla Candido-Santos, Alice Barra, Wolnei Caumo, Felipe Fregni
    NeuroTarget.2021; 15(3): 45.     CrossRef
  • Neurostimulation methods in the treatment of chronic pain
    X. Moisset, M. Lanteri-Minet, D. Fontaine
    Journal of Neural Transmission.2020; 127(4): 673.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life and physical fitness in diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial
    Galeno Ferreira, Edson Silva-Filho, Antônio de Oliveira, Clemilda de Lucena, Johnnatas Lopes, Rodrigo Pegado
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.2020; 19(1): 327.     CrossRef
  • Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex attenuates capsaicin‐induced dynamic mechanical allodynia and mechanical pain sensitivity in humans
    Sam W. Hughes, Grace Ward, Paul H. Strutton
    European Journal of Pain.2020; 24(6): 1130.     CrossRef
  • Noninvasive motor cortex stimulation effects on quantitative sensory testing in healthy and chronic pain subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stefano Giannoni-Luza, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Piero F. Mejia-Pando, Maria A. Luna-Cuadros, Judah L. Barouh, Marina Gnoatto-Medeiros, Ludmilla Candido-Santos, Alice Barra, Wolnei Caumo, Felipe Fregni
    Pain.2020; 161(9): 1955.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the editor - Transcranial direct current stimulation improves quality of life and physical fitness in diabetic polyneuropathy: a pilot double blind randomized controlled trial”
    Satkarjit Kaur Jhandi, Nidhi Sharma, Manu Goyal
    Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.2020; 19(2): 2025.     CrossRef
  • Age as a Mediator of tDCS Effects on Pain: An Integrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Júlia Schirmer Saldanha, Maxciel Zortea, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive neuromodulation effects on painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huiyan Zeng, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Ying Cao, Ying Li, Jinming Zhang, Caifeng Yang, Felipe Fregni
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Pain Processing
    Wei-Yi Ong, Christian S. Stohler, Deron R. Herr
    Molecular Neurobiology.2019; 56(2): 1137.     CrossRef
  • Primary Motor Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Temporal Summation of the Nociceptive Withdrawal Reflex in Healthy Subjects
    Sam Hughes, Sybil Grimsey, Paul H Strutton
    Pain Medicine.2019; 20(6): 1156.     CrossRef
  • Latin American and Caribbean consensus on noninvasive central nervous system neuromodulation for chronic pain management (LAC2-NIN-CP)
    Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Ana Mércia B.L. Fernandes, Katia Nunes Sá, Alexandre Hideki Okano, André Russowsky Brunoni, Argelia Lara-Solares, Aziza Jreige Iskandar, Carlos Guerrero, César Amescua-García, Durval Campos Kraychete, Egas Caparelli-Daquer, Elias
    PAIN Reports.2019; 4(1): e692.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve the Dysfunction of Descending Pain Modulatory System Related to Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An Integrative Review of Neurobiology and Meta-Analysis
    Maxciel Zortea, Leticia Ramalho, Rael Lopes Alves, Camila Fernanda da Silveira Alves, Gilberto Braulio, Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres, Felipe Fregni, Wolnei Caumo
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain
    Neil E O'Connell, Louise Marston, Sally Spencer, Lorraine H DeSouza, Benedict M Wand
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • At-Home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) With Telehealth Support for Symptom Control in Chronically-Ill Patients With Multiple Symptoms
    Alexa Riggs, Vaishali Patel, Bhaskar Paneri, Russell K. Portenoy, Marom Bikson, Helena Knotkova
    Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Frequency‐dependent top‐down modulation of temporal summation by anodal transcranial direct‐current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in healthy adults
    S.W. Hughes, M. Ali, P. Sharma, N. Insan, P.H. Strutton
    European Journal of Pain.2018; 22(8): 1494.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb neuropathic pain: A double‐blind randomized controlled trial
    G.N. Lewis, D.A. Rice, M. Kluger, P.J. McNair
    European Journal of Pain.2018; 22(7): 1312.     CrossRef
  • Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the motor cortex reduces chronic pain in Alcock canal syndrome
    Raffaella Ricci, Ada Ghiggia, Ilenia La Rosa, Azzurra Milano, Walter Troni, Mark S. George, Jeffrey J. Borckardt, Lorys Castelli, Adriana Salatino
    Brain Stimulation.2018; 11(3): 648.     CrossRef
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques for chronic pain
    Neil E O'Connell, Louise Marston, Sally Spencer, Lorraine H DeSouza, Benedict M Wand
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Emerging therapies for neuropathic pain: new molecules or new indications for old treatments?
    Didier Bouhassira, Nadine Attal
    Pain.2018; 159(3): 576.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Andrea Antal, Samar S. Ayache, David H. Benninger, Jérôme Brunelin, Filippo Cogiamanian, Maria Cotelli, Dirk De Ridder, Roberta Ferrucci, Berthold Langguth, Paola Marangolo, Veit Mylius, Michael A. Nitsche, Frank Padberg, Ulrich Pa
    Clinical Neurophysiology.2017; 128(1): 56.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in women with provoked vestibulodynia
    Annie Morin, Guillaume Léonard, Véronique Gougeon, Marie-Pierre Cyr, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Mélanie Morin
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2017; 216(6): 584.e1.     CrossRef
  • A Case of Long-Term Treatment of Chronic Pain Syndrome by Anodal tDCS of the Motor Cortex, Previously Resistant to High-Frequency rTMS and Implanted Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Hasan Hodaj, Jean-François Payen, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(4): 618.     CrossRef
  • Potential Mechanisms Supporting the Value of Motor Cortex Stimulation to Treat Chronic Pain Syndromes
    Marcos F. DosSantos, Natália Ferreira, Rebecca L. Toback, Antônio C. Carvalho, Alexandre F. DaSilva
    Frontiers in Neuroscience.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials
    Luana V.M. Aparício, Fabiana Guarienti, Lais Boralli Razza, André F. Carvalho, Felipe Fregni, André Russowsky Brunoni
    Brain Stimulation.2016; 9(5): 671.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in women with provoked vestibulodynia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Annie Morin, Guillaume Léonard, Véronique Gougeon, Guy Waddell, Yves-André Bureau, Isabelle Girard, Mélanie Morin
    Trials.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of left primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation on laser-evoked potentials in migraine patients and normal subjects
    Eleonora Vecchio, Katia Ricci, Anna Montemurno, Marianna Delussi, Sara Invitto, Marina de Tommaso
    Neuroscience Letters.2016; 626: 149.     CrossRef
  • A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005–2016)
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.2016; 46(6): 319.     CrossRef
  • Cortical neurostimulation for neuropathic pain
    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
    Pain.2016; 157(Supplement): S81.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Targeting Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Task-Induced Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
    Timothy Y. Mariano, Mascha van’t Wout, Sarah L. Garnaat, Steven A. Rasmussen, Benjamin D. Greenberg
    Pain Medicine.2016; 17(4): 737.     CrossRef
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation in neuropathic pain due to radiculopathy
    Nadine Attal, Samar S. Ayache, Daniel Ciampi De Andrade, Alaa Mhalla, Sophie Baudic, Frédérique Jazat, Rechdi Ahdab, Danusa O. Neves, Marc Sorel, Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur, Didier Bouhassira
    Pain.2016; 157(6): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation as a tool in the study of sensory-perceptual processing
    Thiago L. Costa, Olivia M. Lapenta, Paulo S. Boggio, Dora F. Ventura
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.2015; 77(6): 1813.     CrossRef
  • Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Pain Distress Tolerance: A Preliminary Study
    Timothy Y. Mariano, Mascha van't Wout, Benjamin L. Jacobson, Sarah L. Garnaat, Jason L. Kirschner, Steven A. Rasmussen, Benjamin D. Greenberg
    Pain Medicine.2015; 16(8): 1580.     CrossRef
  • Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
    Tim Hagenacker, Vera Bude, Steffen Naegel, Dagny Holle, Zaza Katsarava, Hans-Christoph Diener, Mark Obermann
    The Journal of Headache and Pain.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • 11,376 View
  • 99 Download
  • 63 Crossref
TOP