Objective
To investigate the clinical usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractography in the prediction of outcomes after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess whether the predictability is different between DTI and tractography administered before and after surgery.
Methods
Sixty-one subjects with traumatic cervical SCI were randomly assigned to preop or postop groups and received DTI accordingly. Among the patients who had DTI before surgery, we assigned 10 patients who had received repeated DTI examinations at 8 weeks after injury to the follow-up group. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained from DTI, and imaginary fiber and crossing fiber numbers were calculated from the tractography. Neurological status and functional status were assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after SCI.
Results
The neurologic and functional statuses of both groups improved after 4 weeks. Out of the initial 61 patients who were enrolled in the study, the failure rate of DTI image analysis was significantly higher in the postop group (n=17, 41.5%) than in the preop group (n=6, 20%). The FA values and fiber numbers in the preop group tended to be higher than those in the postop group, whereas ADC values were lower in the preop group. When comparing the tractographic findings in the follow-up group, imaginary fiber numbers at the C6 and C7 levels and crossing fiber numbers from the C3 to C6 levels were significantly decreased after surgery. Several DTI and tractographic parameters (especially the ADC value at the C4 level and imaginary fiber numbers at the C6 level) showed significant correlations with neurologic and functional statuses in both the preop and postop groups. These findings were most prominent when DTI and physical examination were simultaneously performed.
Conclusion
Preoperative DTI and tractography demonstrated better FA and ADC values with lower interpretation failure rates than those obtained after surgery, whereas postoperative data significantly reflected the patient’s clinical state at the time of evaluation. Therefore, DTI and tractography could be useful in predicting clinical outcomes after traumatic cervical SCI and should be interpreted separately before and after spine surgery.

Citations

• Diffusion tractography outside the brain: the road less travelled
  Kurt G. Schilling, Irvin Teh, Julien Cohen-Adad, Richard Dortch, Ibrahim Ibrahim, Nian Wang, Bruce Damon, Rory L. Cochran, Alexander Leemans
  Brain Structure and Function.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
• Intravenous Infusion of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Long-Tract Reorganization That Circumvents the Lesion in a Rat Staggered Hemisection Spinal Cord Injury Model
  Hisashi Obara, Masahito Nakazaki, Takahiro Yokoyama, Hiroshi Nagahama, Ryunosuke Fukushi, Shinichi Oka, Ryo Ukai, Yuko Kataoka-Sasaki, Masanori Sasaki, Jeffery D. Kocsis, Atsushi Teramoto, Toshihiko Yamashita, Osamu Honmou
  Biomedicines.2026; 14(9): 1979.     CrossRef
• Negative Correlation Between Fractional Anisotropy on Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Neck Disability Index in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy After Percutaneous Cervical Nucleoplasty: A Cross-Sectional Study
  Ning Fan, Tusheng Li, Xuanyu Lu, Xinyu Ma, Lihui Yang, Peng Du, Lei Zang, Shuo Yuan
  Journal of Pain Research.2025; Volume 18: 3977.     CrossRef
• Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Identifies Recovery from Spinal Cord Injury after Bioactive Implants
  DIANA OSORIO-LONDOÑO, AXAYÁCATL MORALES-GUADARRAMA, ROBERTO OLAYO-GONZÁLEZ, ERNESTO ROLDAN-VALADEZ
  Archives of Medical Research.2024; 55(5): 103012.     CrossRef