To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous intradiscal monopolar pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in patients with chronic disabling discogenic back pain.
Method
Twenty-six subjects (7 males; mean age 43.2 years) with chronic back pain refractory to active rehabilitative management were recruited. All subjects underwent MRI for evaluation of Modic changes, and monopolar PRF (20 min at 60 V) at the center of target lumbar intervertebral disc confirmed by pressure-controlled provocative discography. Clinical outcomes were measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and sitting tolerance time (ST) for 12 months after treatment. Successful clinical outcome was described as a minimum of 2 point reduction in VAS compared with the baseline at each follow-up period.
Results
The mean VAS for low back pain reduced significantly from 6.4±1.1 at pre-treatment to 4.4±1.9 at 12 months (p<0.05). The mean ODI score was 47.3±15.4 points at pre-treatment and 36.7±19.5 at 12 months (p<0.001). The ST was 27.8±20.4 minutes at pre-treatment and 71.5±42.2 at 12 months (p<0.001). However, successful clinical outcome was achieved at 58%, 50%, and 42%, measured at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. There were no significant relationship between the clinical outcome and Modic changes; no adverse events were recorded.
Conclusion
The results demonstrated that the application of intradiscal monopolar PRF might be relatively effective but limited; successful intervention for chronic refractory discogenic back pain is needed. To achieve the optimal outcome through intradiscal PRF, we suggested further studies about stimulation duration, mode, and intensity of PRF.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Use of Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain: A Narrative Review Seoyon Yang, Mathieu Boudier‐Revéret, Min Cheol Chang Pain Practice.2021; 21(5): 594. CrossRef
Expert consensus of Chinese Association for the Study of Pain on the radiofrequency therapy technology in the Department of Pain Jin-Feng Liu, Wen Shen, Dong Huang, Tao Song, Wei Tao, Qing Liu, You-Qing Huang, Xiao-Mei Zhang, Ling-Jie Xia, Da-Sheng Wu, Hui Liu, Fu-Yong Chen, Tang-Hua Liu, Bao-Gan Peng, Yan-Qing Liu World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(9): 2123. CrossRef
Procedimentos minimamente invasivos na coluna vertebral Hazem Adel Ashmawi, André Marques Mansano Revista Paulista de Reumatologia.2021; (2021 abr-j): 61. CrossRef
Effect of intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency on refractory chronic discogenic neck pain So Young Kwak, Min Cheol Chang Medicine.2018; 97(16): e0509. CrossRef
Modic changes—Their associations with low back pain and activity limitation: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis Christofer Herlin, Per Kjaer, Ansgar Espeland, Jan Sture Skouen, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Jaro Karppinen, Jaakko Niinimäki, Joan Solgaard Sørensen, Kjersti Storheim, Tue Secher Jensen, Giovanni Grasso PLOS ONE.2018; 13(8): e0200677. CrossRef
A comprehensive review of pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of pain associated with different spinal conditions Giancarlo Facchini, Paolo Spinnato, Giuseppe Guglielmi, Ugo Albisinni, Alberto Bazzocchi The British Journal of Radiology.2017; 90(1073): 20150406. CrossRef
One-year follow-up results of intradiscal diode laser, radiofrequency, and pulsed radiofrequency therapies: a retrospective study Korgün Ökmen, Burcu Metin Ökmen Lasers in Medical Science.2017; 32(1): 137. CrossRef
Effect of pulsed radiofrequency in treatment of facet-joint origin back pain in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis Masoud Hashemi, Morteza Hashemian, Seyed Amir Mohajerani, Giv Sharifi European Spine Journal.2014; 23(9): 1927. CrossRef
Morphometric Analysis of Lumbal Vertebras by Multidetector Computerised Tomography Method Musa Acar, Mahinur Ulusoy, İsmail Zararsız, Serpil Acar, Elif Cantürk, Hüseyin Özbiner European Journal of Basic Medical Sciences.2013; 3(2): 34. CrossRef