To determine the effect of very high stimulation frequency (150 and 200 Hz) with wide pulse duration versus 50 Hz with wide pulse duration on stimulated force and fatigue of quadriceps femoris in healthy participants.
Methods
Thirty-four healthy participants underwent fatigue test using three stimulation frequency conditions (50, 150, and 200 Hz) with pulse duration of 0.9 ms. Normalized force values at the end of each fatigue protocol and curve fitting patterns were compared among stimulated frequencies.
Results
Very high stimulation frequency (150 and 200 Hz) conditions showed a trend of having more decline in normalized stimulated force during fatigue test compared to a low stimulation frequency at 50 Hz. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Responder group showed the same slope of a linear fitting pattern, implying the same pattern of muscle fatigue among three stimulation frequency conditions (−3.32 in 50 Hz, −2.88 in 150 Hz, and −3.14 in 200 Hz, respectively).
Conclusion
There were high inter-subject variations in the response to different frequency stimulation conditions. However, very high stimulation frequency generated the same fatigue pattern as the low stimulation frequency in the responder group. Further research is needed to explore the mechanism involved.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Hydrogels for bioinspired soft robots Chang Seo Park, Yong-Woo Kang, Hyeonuk Na, Jeong-Yun Sun Progress in Polymer Science.2024; 150: 101791. CrossRef
Electrical Impedance Myography for Evaluating Muscle Fatigue Induced by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Bin Zhou, Yuandong Zhuang, Yueming Gao, Zeljka Lucev Vasic, Ivana Culjak, Mario Cifrek, Min Du IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology.2022; 6(1): 94. CrossRef
Robust switched control design for electrically stimulated lower limbs: A linear model analysis in healthy and spinal cord injured subjects Ricardo G. Teodoro, Willian R.B.M. Nunes, Rafael A. de Araujo, Marcelo A.A. Sanches, Marcelo C.M. Teixeira, Aparecido A. de Carvalho Control Engineering Practice.2020; 102: 104530. CrossRef