To develop the Korean version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP) and to evaluate the test reliability and validity of the K-CASP in stroke patients.
Methods
The original CASP was translated into Korean, back-translated into English, then reviewed and compared with the original version. Thirty-three stroke patients were assessed independently by two examiners using the K-CASP twice, with a one-day interval, for a total of four test results. To evaluate the reliability of the K-CASP, intra-class correlation coefficients were used. Pearson correlations were calculated and simple regression analyses performed with the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) and the aphasia quotient (AQ) to assess the validity.
Results
The mean score was 24.42±9.47 (total score 36) for the K-CASP and 21.50±7.01 (total score 30) for the K-MMSE. The inter-rater correlation coefficients of the K-CASP were 0.992 on the first day and 0.995 on the second day. The intra-rater correlation coefficients of the K-CASP were 0.997 for examiner 1 and 0.996 for examiner 2. In the Pearson correlation analysis, the K-CASP score significantly correlated with the K-MMSE score (r=0.825, p<0.001). The coefficients of determination (r2) of the AQ were 0.586 for the K-MMSE and 0.513 for the K-CASP in the simple regression analysis.
Conclusion
The K-CASP is a reliable and valid instrument for cognitive dysfunction screening in post-stroke patients. It is more applicable than other cognitive assessment tools in stroke patients with aphasia.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review Francescaroberta Panuccio, Giulia Rossi, Anita Di Nuzzo, Ilaria Ruotolo, Giada Cianfriglia, Rachele Simeon, Giovanni Sellitto, Anna Berardi, Giovanni Galeoto Brain Sciences.2025; 15(3): 271. CrossRef
Cognitive assessment of post-stroke patients with and without aphasia: The Hebrew version of the Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Naama Rosenheck, Asnat Bar-Haim Erez, Michal Biran Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2024; : 1. CrossRef
The Turkish version of the cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP-TR): a reliability and validity Özlem Öge-Daşdöğen, Serkan Bengisu, Hatice Yelda Yıldız, Yakup Krespi Aphasiology.2024; : 1. CrossRef
The influence of language comprehension proficiency on assessment of global cognitive impairment following Acquired Brain Injury: A comparison between MMSE, MoCA and CASP batteries Davide Crivelli, Claudia Spinosa, Maria Teresa Angelillo, Michela Balconi Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2023; 30(5): 546. CrossRef
Reliability and validity of the Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (Chinese version) for patients with nonaphasic stroke Li-Sha Xiang, Yi Zhang, Fan Xie, Xiao Fei, Ya Wang, Yue Shi Applied Neuropsychology: Adult.2023; : 1. CrossRef
Cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP): A multicentric validation study Charles Benaim, Grégoire Wauquiez, Dominic Pérennou, Céline Piscicelli, Brigitte Lucas-Pineau, Huei-Yune Bonnin-Koang, Philippe Vuadens, Christine Binquet, Abderrahmane Bourredjem, Hervé Devilliers Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2022; 65(3): 101594. CrossRef
Home-based portable fNIRS-derived cortical laterality correlates with impairment and function in chronic stroke Christopher Lee Friesen, Michael Lawrence, Tony Gerald Joseph Ingram, Shaun Gregory Boe Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.2022;[Epub] CrossRef