1. Braddom RL, Chan L, Harrast MA, Kowalske KJ, Matthews DJ, Ragnarsson KT, et al. Physical medicine and rehabilitation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.
2. Fletcher DD, Andrews KL, Hallett JW Jr, Butters MA, Rowland CM, Jacobsen SJ. Trends in rehabilitation after amputation for geriatric patients with vascular disease: implications for future health resource allocation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1389-93.
3. Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE, MacKenzie EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J 2002;95:875-83.
5. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:422-9.
6. Kim SH, Beon YC, Son CK, Lee YH, Lee MK, Lee SH, et al. A survey study on prevalence and condition of the disabled in the Korea. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2011.
8. Ehara Y, Beppu M, Nomura S, Kunimi Y, Takahashi S. Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:68-72.
9. Hafner BJ, Sanders JE, Czerniecki J, Fergason J. Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002;17:325-44.
10. Zmitrewicz RJ, Neptune RR, Sasaki K. Mechanical energetic contributions from individual muscles and elastic prosthetic feet during symmetric unilateral transtibial amputee walking: a theoretical study. J Biomech 2007;40:1824-31.
11. Agrawal V, Gailey R, O’Toole C, Gaunaurd I, Finnieston A. Influence of gait training and prosthetic foot category on external work symmetry during unilateral transtibial amputee gait. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013;37:396-403.
12. Wezenberg D, Cutti AG, Bruno A, Houdijk H. Differentiation between solid-ankle cushioned heel and energy storage and return prosthetic foot based on step-tostep transition cost. J Rehabil Res Dev 2014;51:1579-90.
13. Fey NP, Klute GK, Neptune RR. The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011;26:1025-32.
14. Rigney SM, Simmons A, Kark L. Mechanical characterization and comparison of energy storage and return prostheses. Med Eng Phys 2017;41:90-6.
15. Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Cho B, Cunniffe B, Licht S, et al. The amputee mobility predictor: an instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee’s ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:613-27.
16. Fey NP, Silverman AK, Neptune RR. The influence of increasing steady-state walking speed on muscle activity in below-knee amputees. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010;20:155-61.
17. Silverman AK, Fey NP, Portillo A, Walden JG, Bosker G, Neptune RR. Compensatory mechanisms in belowknee amputee gait in response to increasing steadystate walking speeds. Gait Posture 2008;28:602-9.
18. Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Zajac FE. Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J Biomech 2001;34:1387-98.
19. Hafner BJ, Sanders JE, Czerniecki JM, Fergason J. Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. J Rehabil Res Dev 2002;39:1-11.
20. Graham LE, Datta D, Heller B, Howitt J. A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:896-901.
21. Graham LE, Datta D, Heller B, Howitt J, Pros D. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:801-6.
22. Svoboda Z, Janura M, Cabell L, Elfmark M. Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012;36:225-30.
23. Perry J, Burnfield JM. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. 2nd ed. Thorofare: Slack Inc; 2010.
24. Castro MP, Soares D, Mendes E, Machado L. Plantar pressures and ground reaction forces during walking of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation. PM R 2014;6:698-707.
25. Gitter A, Czerniecki JM, DeGroot DM. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:142-8.
26. Schneider K, Hart T, Zernicke RF, Setoguchi Y, Oppenheim W. Dynamics of below-knee child amputee gait: SACH foot versus Flex foot. J Biomech 1993;26:1191-204.
27. Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield SL. Belowknee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet : a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990;27:369-84.
28. Colborne GR, Naumann S, Longmuir PE, Berbrayer D. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees: a comparison of the SACH and Seattle feet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992;71:272-8.